Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-2pp2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T14:51:44.799Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EFFECTS OF AGE AND SPEAKING RATE ON VOICE ONSET TIME

The Production of Voiceless Stops by Near-Native L2 Speakers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2014

Katrin Stölten ,
Niclas Abrahamsson  and
Kenneth Hyltenstam
Katrin Stölten*
Affiliation:
Stockholm University
Niclas Abrahamsson
Affiliation:
Stockholm University
Kenneth Hyltenstam
Affiliation:
Stockholm University
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Katrin Stölten, Centre for Research on Bilingualism, Stockholm University, SE—106 91 Stockholm, Sweden. E-mail: katrin.stoelten@biling.su.se
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As part of a research project on the investigation of second language (L2) ultimate attainment in 41 Spanish early and late near-native speakers of L2 Swedish, the present study reports on voice onset time (VOT) analyses of the production of Swedish word-initial voiceless stops, /p t k/. Voice onset time is analyzed in milliseconds as well as in percentages of word duration, thereby accounting for speaking rate effects. The results revealed an overall age effect on VOT production; however, this age effect became salient and statistically significant for all three stops only when speaking rate was taken into consideration. Similarly, when speaking rate was accounted for, only a small minority of the late learners exhibited actual nativelike L2 behavior, and most (but far from all) early learners performed within native-speaker range. The results are taken as an indication for relative VOT, as opposed to absolute VOT, constituting a reliable measure of nativelike L2 stop production, which has important implications for future research on age effects and maturational constraints in L2 acquisition.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , March 2015 , pp. 71 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Abrahamsson, N. (2012). Age of onset and nativelike L2 ultimate attainment of morphosyntactic and phonetic intuition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 187–214.Google Scholar
Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2008). The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 481–509.Google Scholar
Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2009). Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59, 249–306.Google Scholar
Abramson, A. S. (1977). Laryngeal timing in consonant distinctions. Phonetica, 34, 295–303.Google Scholar
Asher, J., & García, G. (1969). The optimal age to learn a foreign language. Modern Language Journal, 38, 334–341.Google Scholar
Beckman, J., Helgason, P., McMurray, B., & Ringen, C. (2011). Rate effects on Swedish VOT: Evidence for phonological overspecification. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 39–49.Google Scholar
Best, C. T. (1993). Emergence of language-specific constraints in perception of non-native speech: A window on early phonological development. In de Boysson-Bardies, B., de Schonen, S., Jusczyk, P., McNeilage, P., & Morton, J. (Eds.), Developmental neurocognition: Speech and face processing in the first year of life (pp. 289–304). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D. (1992). Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition. Language, 68, 706–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, D. (1999). Introduction: Whys and why nots of the critical period hypothesis for second language acquisition. In Birdsong, D. (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 1–22). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D. (2005). Nativelikeness and non-nativelikeness in L2A research. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43, 319–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, D. (2007). Nativelike pronunciation among late learners of French as a second language. In Bohn, O.-S. & Munro, M. J. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege. Language Learning and Language Teaching (Vol. 17, pp. 99–116). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D., & Molis, M. (2001). On the evidence for maturational constraints in second language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 235–249.Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. (1989). What is the logical problem of foreign language learning? In Gass, S. & Schachter, J. (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives and second language acquisition (pp. 41–68). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bongaerts, T., Mennen, S., & van der Slik, F. (2000). Authenticity of pronunciation in naturalistic second language acquisition: The case of very advanced late learners of Dutch as a second language. Studia Linguistica, 54, 298–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bongaerts, T., Planken, B., & Schils, E. (1995). Can late learners attain a native accent in a foreign language? A test of the critical period hypothesis. In Singleton, D. & Lengyel, Z. (Eds.), The age factor in second language acquisition (pp. 30–50). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Bongaerts, T., van Summeren, C., Planken, B., & Schils, E. (1997). Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 447–465.Google Scholar
Bylund, E., Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2012). Does first language maintenance hamper nativelikeness in a second language? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 215–241.Google Scholar
Caramazza, A., Yeni-Komshian, G. H., Zurif, E. B., & Carbone, E. (1973). The acquisition of a new phonological contrast: The case of stop consonants in French-English bilinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54, 421–428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeKeyser, R. M. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499–533.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M., & Larson-Hall, J. (2005). What does the critical period really mean? In Kroll, J. F. & de Groot, A. M. B. (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 88–108). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deuchar, M., & Clark, A. (1996). Early bilingual acquisition of the voicing contrast in English and Spanish. Journal of Phonetics, 24, 351–365.Google Scholar
Deuchar, M., & Quay, S. (2000). Bilingual acquisition: Theoretical implications of a case study. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eimas, P. D., Siqueland, E. R., Jusczyk, P., & Vigorito, J. (1971). Speech perception in infants. Science, 171, 303–306.Google Scholar
Ekberg, L. (1998). Regeltillämpning kontra lexikonkunskap i svenskan hos invandrarbarn i Malmö [Rule application versus lexical knowledge in the Swedish of immigrant children in Malmö]. In Møller, J., Quist, P., Holmen, A., & Jørgensen, J. N. (Eds.), Nordiske sprog som andetsprog: Københavnerstudier i tosprogethed, 30 (pp. 247–263). Copenhagen, Denmark: Institut for humanistiske fag, Danmarks Lærerhøjskole.Google Scholar
Fant, G. (1969). Stops in CV-syllables. Speech Transmission Laboratory-Quarterly Progress and Status Report (STL-QPSR), 10(4), 1–25.Google Scholar
Fant, G. (1973). Speech sounds and features. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1984). The detection of French accent by American listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 692–707.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1987). The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1991). Age of learning affects the authenticity of voice-onset time (VOT) in stop consonant produced in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 395–411.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1992). Speech learning in a second language. In Ferguson, C., Menn, L., & Stoel-Gammon, C. (Eds.), Phonological development: Models, research, and implications (pp. 565–604). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1999). Age of learning and second language speech. In Birdsong, D. (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 101–132). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Birdsong, D., Bialystok, E., Mack, M., Sung, H., & Tsukada, K. (2006). Degree of foreign accent in English sentences produced by Korean children and adults. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 153–175.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Eefting, W. (1986). Linguistic and developmental effects on the production and perception of stop consonants. Phonetica, 43, 155–171.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Eefting, W. (1987). Production and perception of English stops by native Spanish speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 67–83.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Frieda, E. M., Walley, A. C., & Randazza, L. A. (1998). Lexical factors and segmental accuracy in second language speech production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 155–187.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Hillenbrand, J. (1984). Limits on phonetic accuracy in foreign language speech production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 708–721.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & MacKay, I. R. A. (1996). Factors affecting the production of word-initial consonants in a second language. In Bayley, R. & Preston, D. R. (Eds.), Second language acquisition and linguistic variation (pp. 47–73). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Yeni-Komshian, G. H., & Liu, S. (1999). Age constraints on second language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 78–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F. (2001). The bilingual’s language modes. In Nicol, J. (Ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing (pp. 1–22). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Helgason, P., & Ringen, C. (2008). Voicing and aspiration in Swedish stops. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 607–628.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. (1992). Non-native features of near-native speakers: On the ultimate attainment of childhood L2 learners. In Harris, R. J. (Ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals (pp. 351–368). Amsterdam, TheNetherlands: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2003a). Age of onset and ultimate attainment in near-native speakers of Swedish as a second language. In Fraurud, K. & Hyltenstam, K. (Eds.), Multilingualism in global and local perspectives: Selected papers from the 8th Nordic Conference on Bilingualism, November 1–3, 2001, Stockholm-Rinkeby (pp. 319–340). Stockholm, Sweden: Centre for Research on Bilingualism and Rinkeby Institute of Multilingual Research.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2003b). Maturational constraints in SLA. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 539–588). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ioup, G., Boustagui, E., El Tigi, M., & Moselle, M. (1994). Reexamining the critical period hypothesis: A case study in a naturalistic environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 73–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. E., & Wilson, I. L. (2002). Phonetic evidence for early language differentiation: Research issues and some preliminary data. International Journal of Bilingualism, 6, 271–289.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60–99.Google Scholar
Kent, R. D., & Read, C. (1992). The acoustic analysis of speech. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Kessinger, R. H., & Blumstein, S. E. (1997). Effects of speaking rate on voice-onset time in Thai, French, and English. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 143–168.Google Scholar
Kessinger, R. H., & Blumstein, S. E. (1998). Effects of speaking rate on voice-onset and vowel production: Some implications for perception studies. Journal of Phonetics, 26, 117–128.Google Scholar
Klatt, D. H. (1975). Voice onset time, frication, and aspiration in word-initial consonant clusters. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 18, 686–706.Google Scholar
Krull, D. (1991). VOT in spontaneous speech and in citation form words. Phonetic Experimental Research at the Institute of Linguistics, University of Stockholm (PERILUS), XII, 101–107.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. K., Williams, K. A., Lacerda, F., Stevens, K. N., & Lindblom, B. (1992). Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science, 255, 606–608.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20, 384–422.Google Scholar
Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. S. (1967). Some effects of context on voice onset time in English stops. Language and Speech, 10, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, M. H. (1990). Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 251–285.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1993). Second language acquisition as a function of age: Research findings and methodological issues. In Hyltenstam, K. & Viberg, Å. (Eds.), Progression and regression in language (pp. 196–221). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Löfqvist, A. (1976). Closure duration and aspiration for Swedish stops. Working Papers (Phonetics Laboratory, Dept. of General Linguistics, Lund University), 13, 1–39.Google Scholar
Mack, M., Bott, S., & Boronat, C. (1995). Mother, I’d rather do it myself, maybe: An analysis of voice-onset time produced by early French-English bilinguals. Ideal, 8, 23–55.Google Scholar
MacLeod, A. A. N., & Stoel-Gammon, C. (2010). What is the impact of age of second language acquisition on the production of consonants and vowels among childhood bilinguals? International Journal of Bilingualism, 14, 400–421.Google Scholar
Magloire, J., & Green, K. P. (1999). A cross-language comparison of speaking rate effects on the production of voice onset time in English and Spanish. Phonetica, 56, 158–185.Google Scholar
Major, R. C. (1987). English stop production by speakers of Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 197–202.Google Scholar
Miller, J. L., Green, K. P., & Reeves, A. (1986). Speaking rate and segments: A look at the relation between speech production and speech perception for the voicing contrast. Phonetica, 43, 106–115.Google Scholar
Moyer, A. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 phonology: The critical factors of age, motivation, and instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 81–108.Google Scholar
Munro, M., & Mann, V. (2005). Age of immersion as a predictor of foreign accent. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 311–341.Google Scholar
Neufeld, G. (2001). Non-foreign-accented speech in adult second language learners: Does it exist and what does it signify? ITL Review of Applied Linguistics, 133–134, 185–206.Google Scholar
Nielsen, K. Y. (2006). Specificity and generalizability of spontaneous phonetic imitation. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (Interspeech) (paper 1326; pp. 1–4), Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
Obler, L. K. (1982). The parsimonious bilingual. In Obler, L. K. & Menn, L. (Eds.), Exceptional language and linguistics (pp. 339–346). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Oyama, S. (1976). A sensitive period for the acquisition of a nonnative phonological system. Psycholinguistic Research, 5, 261–285.Google Scholar
Patkowski, M. S. (1990). Age and accent in a second language: A reply to James Emil Flege. Applied Linguistics, 11, 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piller, I. (2002). Passing for a native speaker: Identity and success in second language learning. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6, 179–206.Google Scholar
Piske, T., MacKay, I. R. A., & Flege, J. E. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 191–215.Google Scholar
Rosner, B. S., López-Bascuas, L. E., García-Albea, J. E., & Fahey, R. P. (2000). Voice-onset times for Castilian Spanish initial stops. Journal of Phonetics, 28, 217–224.Google Scholar
Ruben, R. J. (1997). A time frame of critical/sensitive periods of language development. Acta Otolaryngologica, 117, 202–205.Google Scholar
Schmidt, A. M., & Flege, J. E. (1995). Effects of speaking rate changes on native and nonnative speech production. Phonetica, 52, 41–54.Google Scholar
Schmidt, A. M., & Flege, J. E. (1996). Speaking rate effects on stops produced by Spanish and English monolinguals and Spanish/English bilinguals. Phonetica, 53, 162–179.Google Scholar
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002a). E-Prime Reference Guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.Google Scholar
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002b). E-Prime User’s Guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.Google Scholar
Scovel, T. (1969). Foreign accent, language acquisition, and cerebral dominance. Language Learning, 19, 245–253.Google Scholar
Seliger, H. W. (1978). Implications of a multiple critical periods hypothesis for second language learning. In Ritchie, W. C. (Ed.), Second language acquisition research: Issues and implications (pp. 11–19). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Seliger, H., Krashen, S., & Ladefoged, P. (1975). Maturational constraints in the acquisition of second language accent. Language Sciences, 36, 20–22.Google Scholar
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10, 209–231.Google Scholar
Stölten, K. (2006). Effects of age on VOT: Categorical perception of Swedish stops by near-native L2 speakers. In Ambrazaitis, G. & Schötz, S. (Eds.), Proceedings FONETIK 2006: The XVIIIIth Swedish Phonetics Conference, June 7–9, 2006. Working Papers 52 (pp. 125–128). Lund, Sweden: Centre for Language & Literature, Department of Linguistics and Phonetics, Lund University.Google Scholar
Stölten, K., Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2013). Effects of age of learning on voice onset time: Categorical perception of Swedish stops by near-native L2 speakers. Language and Speech. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0023830913508760.Google Scholar
Sundberg, U., & Lacerda, F. (1999). Voice onset time in speech to infants and adults. Phonetica, 56, 186–199.Google Scholar
Thornburgh, D. F., & Ryalls, J. H. (1998). Voice onset time in Spanish-English bilinguals: Early versus late learners of English. Journal of Communication Disorders, 31, 215–229.Google Scholar
Volaitis, L. E., & Miller, J. L. (1992). Phonetic prototypes: Influence of place of articulation and speaking rate on the internal structure of voicing categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 723–735.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., & Behne, D. (2007). Temporal remnants from Mandarin in nonnative English speech. In Bohn, O.-S. & Munro, M. J. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege. Language Learning and Language Teaching (Vol. 17, pp. 167–184). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Werker, J. F., Gilbert, J. H. V., Humphrey, K., & Tees, R. C. (1981). Developmental aspects of cross-language speech perception. Child Development, 52, 349–353.Google Scholar
Werker, J. F., & Lalonde, C. E. (1988). Cross-language speech perception: Initial capabilities and developmental change. Developmental Psychology, 24, 672–683.Google Scholar
Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 49–63.Google Scholar
White, L., & Genesee, F. (1996). How native is near-native? The issue of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 12, 233–265.Google Scholar
Williams, L. (1977a). The perception of stop consonant voicing by Spanish-English bilinguals. Perception and Psychophysics, 21, 289–297.Google Scholar
Williams, L. (1977b). The voicing contrast in Spanish. Journal of Phonetics, 5, 169–184.Google Scholar
Williams, L. (1980). Phonetic variation as a function of second-language learning. In Yeni-Komshian, G. H., Kavanagh, J. F., & Ferguson, C. A. (Eds.), Child phonology: Vol. 2. Perception (pp. 185–215). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Yavaş, M. (1996). Differences in voice onset time in early and later Spanish-English bilinguals. In Roca, A. & Jensen, J. B. (Eds.), Spanish in contact: Issues in bilingualism (pp. 131–141). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Yavaş, M., & Wildermuth, R. (2006). The effects of place of articulation and vowel height in the acquisition of English aspirated stops by Spanish speakers. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 44, 251–263.Google Scholar
Zampini, M. L. (2008). L2 speech production research: Findings, issues, and advances. In Hansen Edwards, J. G. & Zampini, M. L. (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 219–249). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Zampini, M. L., & Green, K. P. (2001). The voicing contrast in English and Spanish: The relationship between perception and production. In Nicol, J. L. (Ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing (pp. 23–48). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar