Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T02:39:52.951Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ELICITED IMITATION TASKS AS A MEASURE OF L2 PROFICIENCY

A META-ANALYSIS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2021

Maria Kostromitina  and
Luke Plonsky Open the ORCID record for Luke Plonsky [Opens in a new window]
Maria Kostromitina
Affiliation:
Northern Arizona University
Luke Plonsky*
Affiliation:
Northern Arizona University
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Luke Plonsky. E-mail: luke.plonsky@nau.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Elicited imitation tasks (EITs) have been proposed and examined as a practical measure of second language (L2) proficiency. This study aimed to provide an updated and comprehensive view of the relationship between EITs and other proficiency measures. Toward that end, 46 reports were retrieved contributing 60 independent effect sizes (Pearson’s r) that were weighted and averaged. Several EIT features were also examined as potential moderators. The results portray EIT as a generally consistent measure of L2 proficiency (r = .66). Among other moderators, EIT stimuli length was positively associated with stronger correlations. Overall, the findings provide support for the use of EITs as a means to greater consistency and practicality in measuring L2 proficiency. In our Discussion section, we highlight the need for more transparent reporting and provide empirically grounded recommendations for EIT design and for further research into EIT development.

Type
Methods Forum
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , July 2022 , pp. 886 - 911
Check for updates
Open Practices
Open materials
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The experiment in this article earned an Open Materials badge for transparent practices. The materials are available at https://www.iris-database.org/iris/app/home/detail?id=york%3a939338&ref=search

References

ARTICLES INCLUDED IN THE META-ANALYSIS

Akakura, M. (2012). Evaluating the effectiveness of explicit instruction on implicit and explicit L2 knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 16, 9–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baten, K., & Cornillie, F. (2019). Elicited imitation as a window into developmental stages. Journal of the European Second Language Association, 3, 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowden, H. W. (2016). Assessing second-language oral proficiency for research: The Spanish elicited imitation task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 647–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, S., & Chrétien, M. (2001). The development of oral production in content-based second language courses at the University of Ottawa. Canadian Modern Language Review, 58, 84–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campfield, D. E., & Murphy, V. A. (2014). Elicited imitation in search of the influence of linguistic rhythm on child L2 acquisition. System, 42, 207–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, C., Hendrickson, R., & Lonsdale, D. (2010). Principled construction of elicited imitation tests. In Calzolari, N., Choukri, K., Maegaard, B., Mariani, J., Odijk, J., Piperidis, S., Rosner, M., & Tapias, D. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th conference on international language resources and evaluation (LREC). European Language Resources Association.Google Scholar
Cox, T., Bown, J., & Burdis, J. (2016). Constructing a Russian Elicited Imitation Exam. Russian Language Journal, 66, 51–88.Google Scholar
Culbertson, G., Andersen, E., & Christiansen, M. H. (2020). Using utterance recall to access second language proficiency. Language Learning, 70, 104–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daugherity, F. L. (2008). A correlative study of the International English Language Testing System listening test and a new repetition test (Publication no. 3297511) [Doctoral dissertation, Capella University]. ProQuest Dissertation Publishing.Google Scholar
Deygers, B. (2020). Elicited imitation: A test for all learners? Examining the EI performance of learners with diverging educational backgrounds. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42, 933–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erlam, R. (2006). Elicited imitation as a measure of L2 implicit knowledge: An empirical validation study. Applied Linguistics, 27, 464–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ettlinger, M., Morgan-Short, K., Faretta-Stutenberg, M., & Wong, P. C. (2016). The relationship between artificial and second language learning. Cognitive Science, 40, 822–847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faretta-Stutenberg, M., Issa, B., Bowden, H. W., & Morgan-Short, K. (2020, October). Two versions of the Ortega et al. Spanish Elicited Imitation Task: Utility for longitudinal research. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum (SLRF). Nashville, Tennessee.Google Scholar
Finestrat Martinez, I. (2021, March). Exploring the effect of L1 grammatical skills in L2 development in two learning contexts. Paper presented at the AAAL 2021 Virtual Conference, Houston, TX.Google Scholar
Gaillard, S. (2014). The Elicited Imitation Task as a method for French proficiency assessment in institutional and research settings (Publication no. 3680531) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign]. ProQuest Dissertation Publishing.Google Scholar
Gaillard, S., & Tremblay, A. (2016). Linguistic proficiency assessment in second language acquisition research: The elicited imitation task. Language Learning, 66, 419–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallimore, R., & Tharp, R. (1981). The interpretation of elicited imitation in a standardized context. Language Learning, 31, 369–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, C. R., Lonsdale, D., Kennington, C., Johnson, A., & McGhee, J. (2008). Elicited imitation as an oral proficiency measure with ASR scoring. In Calzolari, N., Choukri, K., Maegaard, B., Mariani, J., Odijk, J., & Piperidis, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th international conference on language resources and evaluation (pp. 1604–1610). http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2008 Google Scholar
Gray, J. W. (2017). Explicit and implicit second language knowledge measurement: Effects of an extended focus-on-form tasked-based pedagogy. OSAKA JALT, 4, 34–61.Google Scholar
Henning, G. (1983). Oral proficiency testing: Comparative validities of interview, imitation, and completion methods. Language Learning, 33, 315–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahng, J., & Otonya, M. (2021). What elicited imitation can show us: Quantitative and qualitative analyses of longitudinal changes. TESOL Quarterly, 55, 284–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, C., & Lust, B. (2019). Code-switching does not predict executive function performance in proficient bilingual children: Bilingualism does. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22, 366–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y., Tracy-Ventura, N., & Jung, Y. (2016). A measure of proficiency or short-term memory? Validation of an elicited imitation test for SLA research. Modern Language Journal, 100, 655–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. E. (1975). The acquisition of grammatical morphemes by adult ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 409–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, S., & Qian, J. (2021). Exploring syntactic priming as a measure of implicit language aptitude. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263120000698 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lonsdale, D., & Lever, J. (2015). Elicited imitation for Brazilian Portuguese. Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal, 6, 142–161.Google Scholar
Luque, A., & Morgan-Short, K. (2021). The relationship between cognitive control and second language proficiency. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 57, 100956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, K. & Liu, Y. (2020). Using elicited imitation to measure global oral proficiency in SLA research. A close replication study. .Language Teaching Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144482000021X Google Scholar
Meir, N., Walters, J., & Armon-Lotem, S. (2016). Disentangling SLI and bilingualism using sentence repetition tasks: The impact of L1 and L2 properties. International Journal of Bilingualism, 20, 421–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaud, G., & Ammar, A. (2021, March). Timing of form-focused instruction within a task. Paper presented at the AAAL 2021 Virtual Conference, Houston, TX.Google Scholar
Millard, B. J. (2011). Oral proficiency assessment of French using an elicited imitation test and automatic speech recognition (Publication no. 2690) [Masters thesis, Brigham Young University]. Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/2690.Google Scholar
Ortega, L. (2000). Understanding syntactic complexity: The measurement of change in the syntax of instructed L2 Spanish learners (Publication no. 9977566) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Hawai’i at Manoa]. ProQuest Dissertation Publishing.Google Scholar
Ortega, L., Iwashita, N., Norris, J., & Rabie, S. (2002, October). An investigation of elicited imitation tasks in crosslinguistic SLA research. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum, Toronto.Google Scholar
Park, H. I., Solon, M., Henderson, C., & Dehghan-Chaleshtori, M. (2020). The roles of working memory and oral language abilities in elicited imitation performance. Modern Language Journal, 104, 133–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risdiani, R. (2016). Placement testing in computer-assisted language testing: Validating elicited imitation as a measure of language proficiency (Unpublished master’s thesis, Radboud University, Netherlands).Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Silva, L. H., & Roehr-Brackin, K. (2016). Perceived learning difficulty and actual performance: Explicit and implicit knowledge of L2 English grammar points among instructed adult learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 317–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarandi, H. (2015). Reexamining elicited imitation as a measure of implicit grammatical knowledge and beyond…? Language Testing, 32, 485–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serafini, E. J. (2013). Cognitive and psychosocial factors in the long-term development of implicit and explicit second language knowledge in adult learners of Spanish at increasing proficiency (Publication no. 3590064) [Doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.Google Scholar
Solon, M., Park, H. I., Henderson, C., & Dehghan-Chaleshtori, M. (2019). Revisiting the Spanish elicited imitation task: A tool for assessing advanced language learners? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 1027–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Son, Y. A. (2018). Measuring heritage language learners’ proficiency for research purposes: An argument-based validity study of the Korean C-test. [Doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University]. DigitalGeorgetown.Google Scholar
Spada, N., Shiu, J. L. J., & Tomita, Y. (2015). Validating an elicited imitation task as a measure of implicit knowledge: Comparisons with other validation studies. Language Learning, 65, 723–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracy-Ventura, N., McManus, K., Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2014). “Repeat as much as you can”: Elicited imitation as a measure of oral proficiency in L2 French. In Leclercq, P., Edmonds, A., & Hilton, H. (Eds.), Measuring L2 proficiency: Perspectives from SLA (pp. 143–166). Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, W. W. (1998). Age-related effects in adult second language acquisition, a study of Mandarin-speaking learners of English (Publication no. NQ35362) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto]. ProQuest Dissertation Publishing.Google Scholar
Wu, S. L., & Ortega, L. (2013). Measuring global oral proficiency in SLA research: A new elicited imitation test of L2 Chinese. Foreign Language Annals, 46, 680–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, S.L., Tio, W. P., & Ortega, L. (2021). Elicited imitation as a measure of L2 proficiency: New insights from a comparison of two L2 English parallel forms. Studies of Second Language Acquisition. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000103 Google Scholar

REFERENCES

Alderson, J. C. (2007). The CEFR and the need for more research. Modern Language Journal, 91, 659–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andringa, S., & Godfroid, A. (2020). Sampling bias and the problem of generalizability in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 40, 134–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bairstow, D., Lavaur, J. M., Laxén, J., & Aparicio, X. (2014). Evaluating the workings of bilingual memory with a translation recognition task. In Leclercq, P. & Edmonds, A. (Eds.), Measuring L2 proficiency: Perspectives from SLA (pp. 122–140). Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R., & Chaudron, C. (1994). Elicited imitation as a measure of second-language competence. In Tarone, E. E., Gass, S. M., & Cohen, A. D. (Eds.), Research methodology in second-language acquisition (pp. 245–261). Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010). A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1, 97–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowles, M. A. (2011). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge: What can heritage learners contribute? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 247–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. V., Plonsky, L., & Teimouri, Y. (2018). The use of course grades as metrics in L2 Research: A systematic review. Foreign Language Annals, 51, 763–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsen, C. (2012). Proficiency level—A fuzzy variable in computer learner corpora. Applied Linguistics, 33, 161–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1968). The psychology of language testing. In Davies, A. (Ed.), Language Testing Symposium: A Psycholinguistic Approach (pp. 46–69). Oxford University.Google Scholar
Chaudron, C., Ngyuen, H., & Prior, M. (2005). Manual for the Vietnamese elicited imitation test (NFLRC Research Note #41, pp. 1–33). National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawai’i.Google Scholar
Derrick, D. J. (2016). Instrument reporting practices in second language research. TESOL Quarterly, 50, 132–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, C. J., & Brannick, M. T. (2012). Publication bias in psychological science: Prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses. Psychological Methods, 17, 120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraser, C., Bellugi, U., & Brown, R. (1963). Control of grammar in imitation, comprehension, and production. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2, 121–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T. (2017). Exploring learner language through corpora: Comparing and interpreting corpus frequency information. Language Learning, 67, 130–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. M., Behney, J., & Plonsky, L. (2020). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (5th ed.). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginther, A., & Yan, X. (2018). Interpreting the relationships between TOEFL iBT scores and GPA: Language proficiency, policy, and profiles. Language Testing, 35, 271–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, C. R., McGhee, J., & Millard, B. (2010). The role of lexical choice in elicited imitation item difficulty. In Prior, M. T., Watanabe, Y., & Lee, S.-K. (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2008 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 57–72). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Hamayan, E., Saegert, J., & Laraudee, P. (1977). Elicited imitation in second language learners. Language and Speech, 20, 86–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hameyer, K. (1980). Testing oral proficiency via elicited imitation. Revue de Phonétique Appliquée Mons, 53, 11–24.Google Scholar
Han, Y., & Ellis, R (1998). Implicit knowledge, explicit knowledge and general language proficiency. Language Teaching Research, 2, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsch, C., & Malone, M. E. (2021). Language proficiency frameworks and scales. In Winke, P. & Brunfaut, T. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and language testing (pp. 33–44). Routledge.Google Scholar
Hendrickson, R., Aitken, M., McGhee, J., & Johnson, A. (2010). What makes an item difficult? A syntactic, lexical, and morphological study of elicited imitation test items. In Prior, M. T., Watanabe, Y., & Lee, S. (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2008 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 48–56). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Housen, A., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (Eds.). (2012). Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (Vol. 32). John Benjamins Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2007). The shaky ground beneath the CEFR: Quantitative and qualitative dimensions of language proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 91, 663–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2011). Language proficiency in native and nonnative speakers: An agenda for research and suggestions for second-language assessment. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8, 229–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2012). The construct of language proficiency in the study of bilingualism from a cognitive perspective. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 422–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, Y., & Plonsky, L. (2021). Statistical assumptions in L2 research: A systematic review. Second Language Research, 37, 171–184.Google Scholar
In’nami, Y., & Koizumi, R. (2009). A meta-analysis of test format effects on reading and listening test performance: Focus on multiple-choice and open-ended formats. Language Testing, 26, 219–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isbell, D. R., & Son, Y.-A. (2021). Measurement properties of a standardized elicited imitation test: An integrated data analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000383 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, T. I. (1994) Elicited imitation tasks in L2 acquisition research. Unpublished manuscript, University of Iowa.Google Scholar
Kokhan, K. (2013). An argument against using standardized test scores for placement of international undergraduate students in English as a Second Language (ESL) courses. Language Testing, 30, 467–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lado, R. (1961). Language testing: The construction and use of foreign language tests. A teacher’s book. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Larson-Hall, J., & Plonsky, L. (2015). Reporting and interpreting quantitative research findings: What gets reported and recommendations for the field. Language Learning, 65, 127–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leclercq, P., Edmonds, A., & Hilton, H. (Eds.). (2014). Measuring L2 proficiency: Perspectives from SLA (Vol. 78). Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, M., & Zhang, X. (2021). A meta-analysis of self-assessment and language performance in language testing and assessment. Language Testing, 28, 189–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H., Gor, K., & Jackson, S. (2012). Linguistic correlates of second language proficiency: Proof of concept with ILR 2–3 in Russian. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 99–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lonsdale, D., & Christensen, C. (2011, June). Automating the scoring of elicited imitation tests . Paper presented at the Symposium on Machine Learning in Speech and Language Processing, Bellevue, WA.Google Scholar
Markman, B. R., Spilka, I. V., & Tucker, G. R. (1975). The use of elicited imitation in search of an interim French. Language Learning, 25, 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, E., Mackey, A., & Plonsky, L. D. (2016). The IRIS Repository: Advancing research practice and methodology. In Mackey, A. & Marsden, E. (Eds.), Advancing methodology and practice: The IRIS repository of instruments for research into second languages (pp. 1–21). Routledge.Google Scholar
Marsden, E., Morgan-Short, K., Thompson, S., & Abugaber, D. (2018). Replication in second language research: Narrative and systematic reviews and recommendations for the field. Language Learning, 68, 321–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, E., Thompson, S., & Plonsky, L. (2018). A methodological synthesis of self-paced reading in second language research. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39, 861–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDade, H. L., Simpson, M. A., & Lamb, D. E. (1982). The use of elicited imitation as a measure of expressive grammar: A question of validity. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 19–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKay, T., & Plonsky, L. (2021). Reliability analyses: Estimating error in L2 research. In Winke, P. & Brunfaut, T. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and language testing (pp. 468–482). Routledge.Google Scholar
McKay, T. H., Teimouri, Y., Sağdiç, A., Salen, B., Reagan, D., & Malone, M. (2021). The cagey C-test construct: Some evidence from a meta-analysis of correlation coefficients. System, 99, 102526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mozgalina, A. (2015). Applying an argument-based approach for validating language proficiency assessments in second language acquisition research: The elicited imitation test for Russian. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Naiman, N. (1974). The use of elicited imitation in second language acquisition research. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 2, 1–37.Google Scholar
Norris, J. M. (2005). Using developmental sequences to estimate ability with English grammar: Preliminary design and investigation of a web-based test. Second Language Studies, 24, 24–108.Google Scholar
Norris, J. M. (Ed.) (2018). Developing C-tests for estimating proficiency in foreign language research. Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2012). Assessing learner knowledge. In Gass, S. M. & Mackey, A. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 573–589). Routledge.Google Scholar
Ortega, L., Iwashita, N., Rabie, S., & Norris, J. M. (1999). A multilanguage comparison of measures of syntactic complexity [Funded project]. University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Pallotti, G. (2021). Measuring complexity, accuracy, and fluency (CAF). In Winke, P. & Brunfaut, T. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and language testing (pp. 201–210). Routledge.Google Scholar
Papadopoulou, D., & Clahsen, H. (2003). Parsing strategies in L1 and L2 sentence processing: A study of relative clause attachment in Greek. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 501–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, K., Brutten, S. R., & Angelis, P. J. (1986). Derivational complexity and item difficulty in a sentence repetition task. Language Learning, 36, 125–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phakiti, A. (2014). Experimental research methods in language learning. Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M., Johnston, M., & Brindley, G. (1988). Constructing an acquisition-based procedure for second language assessment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10, 217–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L. (2013). Study quality in SLA: An assessment of designs, analyses, and reporting practices in quantitative L2 research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 655–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L. (2017). Quantitative research methods. In Loewen, S. & Sato, M. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 505–521). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Brown, D. (2015). Domain definition and search techniques in meta-analyses of L2 research (or why 18 meta-analyses of feedback have different results). Second Language Research, 31, 267–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L. & Derrick, D. (2016). A meta-analysis of reliability coefficients in second language research. The Modern Language Journal, 100, 538–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L., Marsden, E., Crowther, D., Gass, S. M., & Spinner, P. (2020). A methodological synthesis and meta-analysis of judgment tasks in second language research. Second Language Research, 0267658319828413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2017). Multiple regression as a flexible alternative to ANOVA in L2 research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 579–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Révész, A., & Brunfaut, T. (2021). Validating assessments for research purposes. In Winke, P. & Brunfaut, T. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and language testing (pp. 21–32). Routledge.Google Scholar
Saito, K., & Plonsky, L. (2019). Measuring the effects of second language pronunciation teaching: A proposed framework and meta-analysis. Language Learning, 69, 652–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savignon, S.J. (1982) Dictation as a measure of communicative competence in French as a second language. Language Learning, 32, 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (1989). Language testing part II. Language Teaching, 22, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suurmond, R., van Rhee, H., & Hak, T. (2017). Introduction, comparison, and validation of Meta-Essentials: A free and simple tool for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 8, 537–553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. (2015). Comparing elicited imitation and word monitoring as measures of implicit knowledge. Language Learning, 65, 860–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, M. (2006). Research synthesis and historiography: The case of assessment of second language proficiency. In Norris, J. and Ortega, L. (Eds.), Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching (pp. 179–198). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Tigchelaar, M., Bowles, R. P., Winke, P., & Gass, S. (2017) Assessing the validity of ACTFL can-do statements for spoken proficiency: A Rasch analysis. Foreign Language Annals, 50, 584–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, A. (2011). Proficiency assessment standards in second language acquisition research: “Clozing” the gap. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 339–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinther, T. (2002). Elicited imitation: A brief review. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12, 54–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, X., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Ginther, A. (2016). Elicited imitation as a measure of second language proficiency: A narrative review and meta-analysis. Language Testing, 33, 497–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y. (2012). Willingness to communicate in learning Mandarin as a foreign and heritage language (Publication no. AAI350671) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Hawai’i in Manoa]. ProQuest Dissertation Publishing.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Kostromitina and Plonsky supplementary material

Appendix A

Download Kostromitina and Plonsky supplementary material(File)
File 23.5 KB