Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T02:46:46.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Individual Differences and Universals in Language Learning Aptitude. Karl C. Diller (ed.), Rowley, Ma.: Newbury House, 1981. Pp. 218.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Thomas Scovel
Thomas Scovel
Affiliation:
San Francisco State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , Fall 1982 , pp. 120 - 125
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, R. (ed.) 1981. New dimensions in second language acquisition research. Rowley: Newbury House Publishers.Google Scholar
Bogen, J. and Bogen, G.. 1976. Wernicke's region—where is it? Annals of the New York Academy of Science 280:834–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodmann, K. 1909. Lokalisationslehre der Grosshirnrinde. Leipzig: J.A. Barth.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. and Sapon, S.. 1959. Modern language aptitude test, Form A. New York: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Diller, K. and Walsh, T.. 1981. “Living” and “dead” languages—a neurolinguistic distinction. Proceedings of the Fifth Congress of the International Association of Applied Linguistics. Quebec: Laval University Press.Google Scholar
Genesee, F. 1982. Experimental neuropsychological research on second language processing. TESOL Quarterly 16. 315–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, J. 1982. Current limitations to neurobiologically based theories of language learning. Paper presented at the 16th Annual TESOL Convention,Honolulu.Google Scholar
Neufeld, G. 1978. A theoretical perspective on the nature of linguistic aptitude. International Review of Applied Linguistics 16:15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scovel, T. 1982. Questions concerning the application of neurolinguistic research to second language learning/teaching. TESOL Quarterly 16.322–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seliger, H. 1982. On the possible role of the right hemisphere in second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly 16. 307–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, T. and Diller, K.. 1978. Neurolinguistic foundations to methods of teaching a second language. International Review of Applied Linguistics 41:1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar