Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T12:32:36.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE USE OF NATIVE SPEAKER NORMS IN CRITICAL PERIOD HYPOTHESIS RESEARCH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2014

Sible Andringa
Sible Andringa*
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Sible Andringa, Center for Language and Communication, University of Amsterdam, Spuistraat 134, 1012 VB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. E-mail: S.J.Andringa@uva.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In critical period hypothesis (CPH) research, native speaker (NS) norm groups have often been used to determine whether nonnative speakers (NNSs) were able to score within the NS range of scores. One goal of this article is to investigate what NS samples were used in previous CPH research. The literature review shows that NS control groups tend to be small and highly educated and that detailed background information is usually not provided. Another goal of this article is to investigate how the NS norm group may affect the incidence of nativelike performance by NNSs. To this end, 124 NSs and 118 NNSs of Dutch completed five comprehension tasks and a vocabulary task. On the basis of mean scores and standard deviations, norms were determined for a representative and a nonrepresentative (highly educated) subsample of NSs. Also, separate norms were constructed for the high- and low-frequency items within a task. Exact McNemar tests were used to establish that the incidence of nativelike performance by NNSs was significantly higher if a representative sample norm was used. The results also showed that, insofar as there were effects of frequency, norms based on low-frequency test items tended to be more inclusive. The results imply that the selection of NSs in CPH research deserves more consideration than it has received in the past; they also suggest that NS ceiling performance is potentially useful in determining nativelike performance.

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , September 2014 , pp. 565 - 596
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2009). Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59, 249–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andringa, S. J., Olsthoorn, N. M., Van Beuningen, C. G., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2012). Determinants of success in native and nonnative listening comprehension: An individual differences approach. Language Learning, 62(s2), 28–48.Google Scholar
Asher, J., & García, G. (1969). The optimal age to learn a foreign language. Modern Language Journal, 38, 334–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. (2005). Consequences of bilingualism for cognitive development. In Kroll, J. F. & De Groot, A. M. B. (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 417–432). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., & Miller, B. (1999). The problem of age in second language acquisition: Influences from language, structure, and task. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2, 127–145.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D. (1992). Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition. Language, 68, 706–756.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D. (2005). Nativelikeness and nonnativelikeness in L2A research. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 43, 319–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, D. (2007). Nativelike pronunciation among late learners of French as a second language. In Bohn, O. & Munro, M. J. (Eds.), Second language speech learning: The role of language experience in speech perception and production (pp. 99–116). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, D., & Molis, M. (2001). On the evidence for maturational constraints in second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 235–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. (1989). What is the logical problem of foreign language learning? In Gass, S. M. & Schachter, J. (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 41–68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bongaerts, T. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 pronunciation: The case of very advanced late L2 learners. In Birdsong, D. (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 133–159). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bongaerts, T., Mennen, S., & Van der Slik, F. (2000). Authenticity of pronunciation in naturalistic second language acquisition: The case of very advanced late learners of Dutch as a second language. Studia Linguistica, 54, 298–308.Google Scholar
Bongaerts, T., Planken, B., & Schils, E. (1995). Can late learners attain a native accent in a foreign language? A test of the critical period hypothesis. In Singleton, D. & Lengyel, Z. (Eds.), The age factor in second language acquisition (pp. 30–50). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bongaerts, T., Van Summeren, C., Planken, B., & Schils, E. (1997). Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 447–465.Google Scholar
Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. (2011). Statline databank [Online database]. Retrieved fromhttp://www.cbs.nlGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of theory and syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Colantoni, L., & Steele, J. (2006). Native-like attainment in the L2 acquisition of Spanish stop-liquid clusters. In Klee, C. A. & Face, T. L. (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 7th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages (pp. 59–73). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J. (2002). Background to the L2 user. In Cook, V. J. (Ed.), Portraits of the L2 user (pp. 1–28). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppieters, R. (1987). Competence differences between native and near-native speakers. Language, 63, 544–573.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coussé, E., Gillis, S., & Kloots, H. (2007). Verkort, verdoft, verdwenen: Vocaalreductie in het Corpus Gesproken Nederlands [Shortened, reduced, disappeared: Vocal reduction in the Corpus of Spoken Dutch]. Nederlandse Taalkunde, 12, 109–138.Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, E. (1997). The LAD goes to school: A cautionary tale for nativists. Linguistics, 35, 735–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dąbrowska, E. (2008). The later development of an early-emerging system: The curious case of the Polish genitive. Linguistics, 46, 629–650.Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, E. (2012). Different speakers, different grammars: Individual differences in native language attainment. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2, 219–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dąbrowska, E., & Street, J. (2006). Individual differences in language attainment: Comprehension of passive sentences by native and non-native English speakers. Language Sciences, 28, 604–615.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2012). Age effects in second language learning. In Gass, S. M. & Mackey, A. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 442–460). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2013). Age effects in second language learning: Stepping stones toward better understanding. Language Learning, 63(s1), 52–67.Google Scholar
Ernestus, M. T. C. (2000). Voice assimilation and segment reduction in casual Dutch: A corpus-based study of the phonology-phonetics interface (Doctoral dissertation). Utrecht, the Netherlands: LOT.Google Scholar
Eubank, L., & Gregg, K. R. (1999). Critical periods and (second) language acquisition: Divide et impera. In Birdsong, D. (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 65–99). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ferreira, F. (2003). The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 164–203.Google Scholar
Ferreira, F., Henderson, J. M., Anes, M. D., Weeks, P. A., & McFarlane, D. K. (1996). Effects of lexical frequency and syntactic complexity in spoken-language processing: Evidence from the auditory moving-window technique. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 324–335.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Birdsong, D., Bialystok, E., Mack, M., Sung, H., & Tsukada, K. (2006). Degree of foreign accent in English sentences produced by Korean children and adults. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 153–175.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Liu, S. (2001). The effect of experience on adults’ acquisition of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 527–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & MacKay, I. R. A. (1995). Factors affecting degree of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3125–3134.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Yeni-Komshian, G. H., & Liu, S. (1999). Age constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 78–104.Google Scholar
Granena, G., & Long, M. H. (2013). Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research, 23, 311–343.Google Scholar
Gregg, K. R. (1996). The logical and developmental problems of second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. C. & Bhatia, T. K. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 49–81). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (1998). Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 131–149.Google Scholar
Guion, S. (2003). The vowel systems of Quichua-Spanish bilinguals: Age of acquisition effects on the mutual influence of the first and second languages. Phonetica, 60, 98–128.Google Scholar
Guion, S., Harada, T., & Clark, J. J. (2004). Early and late Spanish-English bilinguals’ acquisition of English word stress patterns. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 207–226.Google Scholar
Hazenberg, S., & Hulstijn, J. H. (1996). Defining a minimal receptive second-language vocabulary for nonnative university students: An empirical investigation. Applied Linguistics, 17, 145–163.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2011). Language proficiency in native and nonnative speakers: An agenda for research and suggestions for second-language assessment. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8, 229–249.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2012). The construct of language proficiency in the study of bilingualism from a cognitive perspective. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 422–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2003). Maturational constraints in SLA. In Doughty, C. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 539–588). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ioup, G., Boustagui, E., El Tigi, M., & Moselle, M. (1994). Reexamining the critical period hypothesis: A case study in a naturalistic environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 73–98.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60–99.Google Scholar
Kloots, H., De Schutter, G., Gillis, S., & Swerts, M. (2003). Vocaalreductie in spontaan gesproken Standaardnederlands: Een verkennende studie [Vocal reduction in spontaneously spoken standard Dutch: An exploratory study]. In Koole, T., Nortier, J., & Tahitu, B. (Eds.), Artikelen van de vierde sociolinguistische conferentie (pp. 224–233). Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar
Lee, B., Guion, S., & Harada, T. (2006). Acoustic analysis of the production of unstressed English vowels by early and late Korean and Japanese bilinguals. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 487–513.Google Scholar
Lee, D., & Schachter, J. (1997). Sensitive period effects in binding theory. Language Acquisition, 6, 333–362.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1990). Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 251–285.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2005). Problems with supposed counter-evidence to the critical period hypothesis. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43, 287–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 16–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, J. L. (2000). Grammaticality judgments in a second language: Influences of age of acquisition and native language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 395–423.Google Scholar
McDonald, J. L. (2006). Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanation for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 381–401.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. A. (2008). Incomplete acquisition in bilingualism. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. A., & Slabakova, R. (2003). Competence similarities between native and near-native speakers: An investigation of the preterite-imperfect contrast in Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 351–398.Google Scholar
Moyer, A. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 phonology: The critical factors of age, motivation and instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 81–108.Google Scholar
Muñoz, C. (2008). Symmetries and asymmetries of age effects in naturalistic and instructed L2 learning. Applied Linguistics, 29, 578–596.Google Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Mann, V. (2005). Age of immersion as a predictor of foreign accent. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 311–341.Google Scholar
Neufeld, G. (1988). Phonological asymmetry in second-language learning and performance. Language Learning, 4, 531–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neufeld, G. (2001). Non-foreign-accented speech in adult second language learners: Does it exist and what does it signify? ITL International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 133–134, 185–206.Google Scholar
Olsthoorn, N. M., Andringa, S. J., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2012). Visual and auditory digit-span performance in native and nonnative speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1367006912466314Google Scholar
Oyama, S. (1976). A sensitive period for the acquisition of a nonnative phonological system. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5, 261–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patkowski, M. S. (1980). The sensitive period for the acquisition of syntax in a second language. Language Learning, 30, 449–472.Google Scholar
Penfield, W., & Roberts, L. (1959). Speech and brain mechanisms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime reference guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools Inc.Google Scholar
Street, J., & Dąbrowska, E. (2010). More individual differences in language attainment: How much do adult native speakers of English know about passives and quantifiers? Lingua, 120, 2080–2094.Google Scholar
Tsukada, K., Birdsong, D., Bialystok, E., Mack, M., Sung, H., & Flege, J. E. (2005). A developmental study of English vowel production and perception by native Korean adults and children. Journal of Phonetics, 33, 263–290.Google Scholar
Van Boxtel, S., Bongaerts, T., & Coppen, P. (2005). Native-like attainment of dummy subjects in Dutch and the role of the L1. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43, 355–380.Google Scholar
White, L., & Genesee, F. (1996). How native is near-native? The issue of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 12, 238–265.Google Scholar