Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-npwhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T16:21:24.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analyzing Language Sequence in the Sequence of Language Acquisition: Some Comments on Major and Ioup

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Nick C. Ellis
Nick C. Ellis
Affiliation:
University of Wales, Bangor
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Rebuttal
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , September 1996 , pp. 361 - 368
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Bates, E. (1984). Bioprograms and the innateness hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 188–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1981). Second language acquisition from a functionalist perspective. In Winitz, H. (Ed.), Native language and foreign language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379, 190–214.Google Scholar
Cairns, P., Shillcock, R., Chater, N., & Levy, J. P. (1995). Bottom-up connectionist modeling of speech. In Levy, J. P., Bairaktaris, D., Bullinaria, J. A., & Cairns, P. (Eds.), Connectionist models of memory and language (pp. 289–310). London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1993). A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In Hale, K. & Keyser, S. J. (Eds.), The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvian Bromberger (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J., & Newson, M. (1996). Chomsky's Universal Grammar: An introduction, 2nd ed.Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (Ed.). (1994). Implicit and explicit learning of languages. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (1996). Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking, and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 91–126.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Laporte, N. (in press). Contexts of acquisition: Effects of formal instruction and naturalistic exposure on SLA. In de Groot, A. & Kroll, J. (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Schmidt, R. (1996). Rules or associations in the acquisition of second language morphology? Human learning of regular and irregular morphosyntax and connectionist simulations of the frequency by regularity interaction. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
Finch, S., & Chater, N. (1994). Learning syntactic categories: A statistical approach. In Oaksford, M. & Brown, G. D. A. (Eds.), Neurodynamics and psychology (pp. 295–321). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, L. G. (1969). Twenty-five centuries of language teaching. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Lachter, J., & Bever, T. (1988). The relation between linguistic structure and associative theories of language learning: A constructive critique of some connectionist learning models. Cognition, 28, 195–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, J. P., Bairaktaris, D., Bullinaria, J. A., & Cairns, P. (1995). Connectionist models of memory and language. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (Ed.). (1987). Mechanisms of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B., & Leinbach, J. (1991). Implementations are not conceptualisations: Revising the verb learning model. Cognition, 40, 121–157.Google Scholar
Marchman, V. A., & Bates, E. (1994). Continuity in lexical and morphological development: A test of the critical mass hypothesis. Journal of Child Language, 21, 339–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). Interactive processes in speech perception: The Trace Model. In McClelland, J. L., Rumelhart, D. E., & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol. 2. Psychological and biological models (pp. 58–121). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A., & Nicely, P. E. (1955). An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 27, 338–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Pinker, S., & Prince, A. (1988). On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition, 29, 195–247.Google Scholar
Plunkett, K., & Marchmann, V. (1993). From rote learning to system building: Acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets. Cognition, 48, 73–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). On learning the past tense of English verbs. In McClelland, J. L., Rumelhart, D. E., & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Vol. 2. Psychological and biological models (pp. 216–271). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1987). Learning the past tense of English verbs: Implicit rules or parallel distributed processes? In MacWhinney, B. (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 195–248). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1969). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (Eds.), Studies of child language development (pp. 175–208). New York: Holt Rinehart Winston.Google Scholar
Stern, H. H. (1983). Fundamental concepts of language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1991). Language development from an evolutionary perspective. In Krasnegor, N. A., Rumbaugh, D. M., Schiefelbusch, R. L., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (Eds.), Biological and behavioral determinants of language development (pp. 5–28). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Velleman, S. L. (1988). The role of linguistic perception in later phonological development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 221–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vihman, M. M. (1996). Phonological development: The origins of language in the child. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar