Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:45:11.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE BOUNDS OF ADULT LANGUAGE ACQUISITION

Blocking and Learned Attention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2011

Nick C. Ellis  and
Nuria Sagarra
Nick C. Ellis*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Nuria Sagarra
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
*
*Address correspondence to: Nick C. Ellis, University of Michigan, 500 E. Washington Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48104; e-mail: ncellis@umich.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The current study investigates the limited attainment of adult language acquisition in terms of an associative learning phenomenon whereby earlier learned cues attentionally block those that are experienced later. Short- and long-term blocking are demonstrated in experimental investigations of learned attention in the acquisition of temporal reference in a small set of Latin phrases. In Experiment 1, previous experience with adverbial cues blocks the acquisition of verbal tense morphology, and, in contrast, early experience with tense blocks later learning of adverbs. Experiment 2 demonstrates long-term transfer effects: Native speakers of Chinese languages, which do not exhibit verb tense morphology, fail to acquire inflectional cues when adverbial and verbal cues are equally available.

Type
Research Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , December 2010 , pp. 553 - 580
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baddeley, A. D. (1976). The psychology of memory. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1992). The use of adverbials and natural order in the development of temporal expression. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 30, 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2000). Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning, and use. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Barlow, M., & Kemmer, S. (Eds.). (2000). Usage based models of language. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information Publications.Google Scholar
Bates, E., & Goodman, J. C. (1997). On the inseparability of grammar and the lexicon: Evidence from acquisition, aphasia and real-time processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 507–586.Google Scholar
Cheng, P. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (1995). Adaptive systems as intuitive statisticians: Causality, contingency, and prediction. In Meyer, J.-A. & Roitblat, H. (Eds.), Comparative approaches to cognition (pp. 271–302). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, L., & Ellis, N. C. (Eds.). (2009). Input and second language construction learning: Frequency, form, and function [Special issue]. Modern Language Journal, 93(3).Google Scholar
Dale, P. S., & Fenson, L. (1996). Lexical development norms for young children. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 28, 125–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R., & Larson-Hall, J. (2005). What does the critical period really mean? In Kroll, J. F. & De Groot, A. M. B. (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 88–108). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dienes, Z. (2004). Assumptions of subjective measures of unconscious mental states: Higher order thoughts and bias. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 11, 25–45.Google Scholar
Dienes, Z. (2008). Subjective measures of unconscious knowledge. Progress in Brain Research, 168, 49–64.Google Scholar
Dienes, Z., & Scott, R. (2005). Measuring unconscious knowledge: Distinguishing structural knowledge and judgment knowledge. Psychological Research, 69, 338–351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doughty, C. J., & Long, M. H. (Eds.). (2003). The handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (1998). Emergentism, connectionism and language learning. Language Learning, 48, 631–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2002a). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2002b). Reflections on frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 297–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2003). Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 33–68). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 305–352.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2006a). The associative-cognitive CREED. In VanPatten, B. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 77–96). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2006b). Cognitive perspectives on SLA: The associative cognitive CREED. AILA Review, 19, 100–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2006c). Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2006d). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in SLA: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2007). Blocking and learned attention in language acquisition. In McNamara, D. S. & Trafton, J. G. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th annual Cognitive Science Society (pp. 965–970). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2008a). The dynamics of language use, language change, and first and second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 41, 232–249.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2008b). Usage-based and form-focused language acquisition: The associative learning of constructions, learned-attention, and the limited L2 endstate. In Robinson, P. & Ellis, N. C. (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 372–405). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Cadierno, T. (2009). Constructing a second language [Special section]. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 111–290.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Sagarra, N. (2010). Learned attention and blocking in the acquisition of second language tense. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, V. (2003). The structure of time: Language, meaning and temporal cognition. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Felser, C., & Clahsen, H. (2009). Grammatical processing of spoken language in child and adult language learners. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 38, 305–319.Google Scholar
Gass, S. M., Svetics, I., & Lemelin, S. (2003). Differential effects of attention. Language Learning, 53, 495–543.Google Scholar
Goldschneider, J. M., & DeKeyser, R. (2001). Explaining the “natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition” in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 51, 1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granfeldt, J. (2005). The development of gender attribution and gender concord in French: A comparison of bilingual first and second language learners. In Dewaele, J. (Ed.), Focus on French as a foreign language: Multidisciplinary approaches (pp. 164–190). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, M., Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (2002). An fMRI study of bilingual sentence comprehension and workload. Neuroimage, 15, 647–660.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R., & Franceschina, F. (2004). Explaining the acquisition and non-acquisition of determiner-noun gender concord in French and Spanish. In Prévost, P. & Paradis, J. (Eds.), The acquisition of French in different contexts (pp. 175–206). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hopp, H. (2007). Ultimate attainment at the interfaces in second language acquisition: Grammar and processing. Groningen, The Netherlands: Grodil Press.Google Scholar
Jiang, N. (2004). Morphological insensitivity in second language processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 603–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of working memory: Individual differences in comprehension. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149.Google Scholar
Kamin, L. J. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning. In Campbell, B. A. & Church, R. M. (Eds.), Punishment and aversive behavior (pp. 276–296). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Klein, W. (1986). Second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, W. (1998). The contribution of second language acquisition research. Language Learning, 48, 527–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. D. (1994). The input hypothesis and its rivals. In Ellis, N. C. (Ed.), Implicit and explicit language learning (pp. 45–78). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., & De Groot, A. M. B. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kruschke, J. K. (2006, June). Learned attention. Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Development and Learning, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
Kruschke, J. K., & Blair, N. J. (2000). Blocking and backward blocking involve learned inattention. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 636–645.Google Scholar
Kruschke, J. K., Kappenman, E. S., & Hetrick, W. P. (2005). Eye gaze and individual differences consistent with learned attention in associative blocking and highlighting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 830–845.Google ScholarPubMed
Lardiere, D. (2007). Feature assembly in second language acquisition. In Liceras, J., Zobl, H., & Goodluck, H. (Eds.), The role of formal features in second language acquisition (pp. 106–140). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lee, J. F. (1999). On levels of processing and levels of comprehension. In Gutiérrez-Rexach, J. & Martínez-Gil, F. (Eds.), Advances in Hispanic linguistics (pp. 42–59). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Lee, J. F. (2002). The incidental acquisition of Spanish future morphology through reading in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. F., Cadierno, T., Glass, W. R., & VanPatten, B. (1997). The effects of lexical and grammatical cues on processing past temporal reference in second language input. Applied Language Learning, 8, 1–23.Google Scholar
Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A. (2007). How first and second language learners use predictive cues in online sentence interpretation in Spanish and English. In Caunt-Nulton, H., Kulatilake, S., & Woo, I. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Boston University conference on language development (pp. 382–393). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Lin, J.-W. (2006). Time in a language without tense: The case of Chinese. Journal of Semantics, 23, 1–53.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In de Bot, K., Ginsberg, R., & Kramsch, C. (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (1987). The competition model. In MacWhinney, B. (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 249–308). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (1997). Second language acquisition and the competition model. In De Groot, A. M. B. & Kroll, J. F. (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 113–142). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2001). The competition model: The input, the context, and the brain. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 69–90). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B., & Bates, E. (1989). The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B., Bates, E., & Kliegl, R. (1984). Cue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German, and Italian. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 127–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangubhai, F. (1991). The processing behaviors of adult second language learners and their relationship to second language proficiency. Applied Linguistics, 12, 268–297.Google Scholar
Matessa, M., & Anderson, J. R. (2000). Modeling focused learning in role assignment. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 263–292.Google Scholar
McDonald, J. L. (1986). The development of sentence comprehension strategies in English and Dutch. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 317–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J. (1987). Reference to past events and actions in the development of natural second language acquisition. In Pfaff, C. (Ed.), First and second language acquisition (pp. 206–224). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Musumeci, D. (1989). The ability of second language learners to assign tense at the sentence level: A cross-linguistic study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1991). The matter of time: Interdependencies between language and thought in development. In Gelman, S. A. & Byrnes, J. P. (Eds.), Perspectives on language and thought: Interrelations in development (pp. 278–318). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1996). Language in cognitive development. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noyau, C., Klein, W., & Dietrich, R. (1995). Acquisition of temporality in a second language. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawlak, A., Oehlrich, J., & Weist, R. (2006). Reference time in child English and Polish. First Language, 26, 281–297.Google Scholar
Perdue, C. (Ed.). (1993). Adult language acquisition: Crosslinguistic perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pica, T. (1983). Adult acquisition of English as a second language under different conditions of exposure. Language Learning, 33, 465–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In Black, A. H. & Prokasy, W. F. (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current theory and research (pp. 64–99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. C. (Eds.). (2008). A handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossomondo, A. E. (2007). The role of lexical temporal indicators and tense interaction format in the incidental acquisition of the Spanish future tense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 39–66.Google Scholar
Sagarra, N. (2001, October). Attention allocation to morphological cues during L2 sentence processing: Evidence from eye-movement. Paper presented at the IV Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages, Urbana-Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
Sagarra, N. (2007). Working memory and L2 processing of redundant grammatical forms. In Han, Z. (Ed.), Second language processing and instruction: Broadening the scope of inquiry (pp. 142–159). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Sagarra, N., & Ellis, N. C. (2010). Learned attention and blocking in the acquisition of L2 tense. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Sato, M., & Felser, C. (2008). Sensitivity to morphosyntactic violations in English as a second language. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Language and Linguistics, University of Essex.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1984). The strengths and limitations of acquisition: A case study of an untutored language learner. Language, Learning, and Communication, 3, 1–16.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 206–226.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools, Inc.Google Scholar
Schumann, J. H. (1978). The pidginization process: A model for second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Schumann, J. H. (1987). The expression of temporality in basilang speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 21–41.Google Scholar
Shanks, D. R. (1995). The psychology of associative learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man: Social and rational. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In Hinkel, E. (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471–484). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Terrell, T. (1991). The role of grammar instruction in a communicative approach. Modern Language Journal, 75, 52–63.Google Scholar
Valian, V. (2006). Young children’s understanding of present and past tense. Language Learning and Development, 2, 251–276.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction in second language acquisition. Westport, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B. (2006). Input processing. In VanPatten, B. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 115–136). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Weist, R., Atanassova, M., Wysocka, H., & Pawlak, A. (1999). Spatial and temporal systems in child language and thought: A cross-linguistic study. First Language, 19, 267–312.Google Scholar
White, L. (2003). Second language acquisition and Universal Grammar. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wills, A. J. (2005). New directions in human associative learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Xiao, R., & McEnery, T. (2004). Aspect in Mandarin Chinese. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behaviour and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human ecology. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Zobl, H., & Liceras, J. M. (1994). Functional categories and acquisition orders. Language Learning, 44, 159–180.Google Scholar