Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-w79xw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-27T20:24:37.071Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EFFECTS OF EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL ATTENTIONAL MANIPULATIONS ON SECOND LANGUAGE GRAMMAR DEVELOPMENT

AN EYE-TRACKING STUDY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2018

Bernard I. Issa  and
Kara Morgan-Short
Bernard I. Issa*
Affiliation:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Kara Morgan-Short
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Chicago
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be directed to Bernard I. Issa II, Department of Modern Foreign Language and Literatures, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, TN 37996. E-mail: bissa@utk.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The role of attention has been central to theoretical and empirical inquiries in second language (L2) acquisition. The current eye-tracking study examined how external and internal attentional manipulations (Chun, Golomb, &Turk-Browne, 2011) promote L2 grammatical development. Participants (n = 55) were exposed to Spanish direct-object pronouns under external or internal attentional manipulations, which were implemented through textual input enhancement or structured input practice, respectively. Results for both manipulations indicated that (a) learner attentional allocation to the form was affected; (b) L2 gains were evidenced, although only the internal manipulation led to above-chance performance; and (c) L2 gains were related to attention allocated to the form under the external manipulation and to a lesser extent the internal manipulation. Overall, findings may inform theoretical perspectives on attention and elucidate cognitive processes related to L2 instruction.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , May 2019 , pp. 389 - 417
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The research was supported by a National Science Foundation Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grant (1348964) and a Language Learning Dissertation Grant. We would like to thank Gary Raney, Kay González-Vilbazo, Jessica Williams, and Aline Godfroid for their contributions to this work as members of Issa’s dissertation committee. We would like to acknowledge audiences at the Second Language Research Forum (2015) and EuroSLA (2014) as well as members of the Cognition of Second Language Acquisition laboratory for their comments on previous iterations of this project. We also thank Briana Villegas and Nidhi Kadakia for their help with data collection. Lastly, we would like to thank Sharisse and Dustin Manning for their work as models in the photos used in the experiment. All errors are our own.

References

REFERENCES

Alanen, R. (1995). Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition. In Schmidt, R. W. (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 259–302). Honolulu, HI: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
Braver, T. S., Reynolds, J. R., & Donaldson, D. I. (2003). Neural mechanisms of transient and sustained cognitive control during task switching. Neuron, 39, 713–726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, S. (2017). Processing and learning of enhanced English collocations: An eye movement study. Language Teaching Research, 21, 403–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chun, M. M., Golomb, J. D., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2011). A taxonomy of external and internal attention. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 73–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cintrón-Valentín, M., & Ellis, N. C. (2015). Exploring the interface: Explicit focus-on-form instruction and learned attentional biases in L2 Latin. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 197–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifton, C., Staub, A., & Rayner, K. (2007). Eye movements in reading words and sentences. In Van Gompel, R. P. G., Fisher, M. H., Murray, W. S., & Hill, R. L. (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 341–372). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumming, G., & Finch, S. (2005). Inference by eye: Confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data. American Psychologist, 60, 170–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C. (2003). Instructed SLA. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256–310). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egeth, H. E., & Yantis, S. (1997). Visual attention: Control, representation, and time course. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 269–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernandez, C. (2008). Reexamining the role of explicit information in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 277–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S., Svetics, I., & Lemelin, S. (2003). Differential effects of attention. Language Learning, 53, 497–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfroid, A., Boers, F., & Housen, A. (2013). An eye for words. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 483–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfroid, A., Ahn, J., Choi, I., Ballard, L., Cui, Y., Johnston, S., Lee, S., Sarkar, A., & Yoon, H. J. (2018). Incidental vocabulary learning in a natural reading context: an eye-tracking study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(3), 563–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Z., Park, E. S., & Combs, C. (2008). Textual enhancement of input: Issues and possibilities. Applied Linguistics, 29, 597–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Indrarathne, H. D. B. N., & Kormos, J. (2016). Attentional processing of input in explicit and implicit learning conditions: An eye-tracking study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 401–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Indrarathne, H. D. B. N., Ratajczak, M. and Kormos, J. (2018). Modelling changes in the cognitive processing of grammar in implicit and explicit learning conditions: Insights from an eye–tracking study. Language Learning, 68, 669–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Issa, B., Morgan-Short, K., Villegas, B., & Raney, G. (2015). An eye-tracking study on the role of attention and its relationship with motivation. EUROSLA Yearbook, 15, 114–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, G. D. (2014). Eye-tracking with text. In Jegerski, J. & VanPatten, B. (Eds.), Research methods in second language psycholinguistics (pp. 69–92). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lavie, N., Hirst, A., de Fockert, J. W., & Viding, E. (2004). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 339–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leber, A. B. (2010). Neural predictors of within-subject fluctuations in attentional control. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 11458–11465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, S. (2007). Effects of textual enhancement and topic familiarity on Korean EFL students’ reading comprehension and learning of passive form. Language Learning, 57, 87–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leow, R. P. (1998). Toward operationalizing the process of attention in SLA: Evidence for Tomlin and Villa’s (1994) fine-grained analysis of attention. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 133–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leow, R. P. (2000). A study of the role of awareness in foreign language behavior: Aware versus unaware learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 557–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leow, R. P. (2015). Toward a model of the L2 learning process in instructed SLA. In Leow, R. P. (Ed.), Explicit learning in the L2 classroom: A student-centered approach (pp. 236–250) New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leow, R. P., & Martin, A. (2017). Enhancing the input to promote salience of the L2: A critical overview. In Gass, S. M., Spinner, P., & Beheney, J. (Eds.), Salience in second language acquisition (pp. 167–186). New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewen, S., & Inceoglu, S. (2016). The effectiveness of visual input enhancement on the noticing and L2 development of the Spanish past tense. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6, 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan-Short, K., & Bowden, H. W. (2006). Processing instruction and meaningful output-based instruction: Effects on second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 31–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, E. S. (2005). Constraints of implicit focus on form: Insights from a study of input enhancement. Teachers College, Columbia University Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 4, 1–30.Google Scholar
Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2016). Incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition from and while reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 97–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L. (2015). Statistical power, p values, descriptive statistics, and effect sizes: A “back-to-basics” approach to advancing quantitative methods in L2 research. In Plonsky, L. (Ed.), Advancing quantitative methods in second language research (pp. 23–45). New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Derrick, D. J. (2016). A meta-analysis of reliability coefficients in second language research. The Modern Language Journal, 100, 538–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457–1506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
R Core Team (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: https://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2003). Attention and memory during SLA. In Doughty, C. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 631–678). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanz, C., & Morgan-Short, K. (2004). Positive evidence versus explicit rule presentation and explicit negative feedback: A computer-assisted study. Language Learning, 54, 35–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 206–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simard, D., & Foucambert, D. (2013). Observing noticing while reading in L2. In Bergsleithner, J. M., Frota, S. N., & Yoshioka, J. K. (Eds.), Noticing: L2 studies and essays in honor of Richard Schmidt (pp. 207–226). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i at Manoa: National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. N., & Perfetti, C. A. (2016). Eye movements reveal readers’ lexical quality and reading experience. Reading and Writing, 29, 1069–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlin, R. S., & Villa, V. (1994). Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B. (2005). Processing instruction. In Sanz, C. (Ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition: Methods, theory, and practice (pp. 267–281). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Oikkenon, S. (1996). Explanation versus structured input in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 495–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R., & Morris, R. (2004). Eye movements, word familiarity, and vocabulary acquisition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 312–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winke, P. M. (2013). The effects of input enhancement on grammar learning and comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Issa and Morgan-Short supplementary material

Tables S1-S3

Download Issa and Morgan-Short supplementary material(File)
File 22.7 KB