Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:34:13.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of L1 orthography on L2 word recognition: A study of American and Chinese learners of Japanese

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Nobuko Chikamatsu
Nobuko Chikamatsu
Affiliation:
DePaul University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper examines the effects of a first language (L1 ) orthographic system on second language (L2) word recognition strategies. Lexical judgment tests using Japanese kana (a syllabic script consisting of hiragana and katakana) were given to native English and native Chinese learners of Japanese. The visual familiarity and length in test words were controlled to examine the involvement of phonological or visual coding in word recognition strategies. The responses of the English and Chinese subjects were compared on the basis of observed reaction time. The results indicated that (a) Chinese subjects relied more on the visual information in L2 Japanese kana words than did English subjects and (b) English subjects utilized the phonological information in Japanese kana words more than did Chinese subjects. Accordingly, these findings demonstrate that native speakers of English and Chinese utilize different word recognition strategies due to L1 orthographic characteristics, and such L1 word recognition strategies are transferred into L2 Japanese kana word recognition.

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , December 1996 , pp. 403 - 432
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baluch, B., & Besner, D. (1973). Visual word recognition: Evidence for the strategic control of lexical and nonlexical routines in oral reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 644–652.Google Scholar
Baron, J. (1973). Phonemic stage not necessary for reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 241–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, J., & Strawson, C. (1973). Orthographic and word-specific mechanisms in children's reading of words. Child Development, 50, 60–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besner, D., & Coltheart, M. (1973). Ideographic and alphabetic processing in skilled reading of English. Neuropsychologia, 17, 467–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besner, D., & Hildebrandt, N. (1973). Orthographic and phonological codes in the oral reading of Japanese kana. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 335–343.Google Scholar
Besner, D., & Smith, M. C. (1992). Basic processes in reading: Is the orthographic depth hypothesis sinking? In Frost, R. & Katz, L. (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 45–66). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biederman, I., & Tsao, I. C. (1979). On processing Chinese ideographs and English words: Some implications from Stroop-test results. Cognitive Psychology, 2, 125–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, P., & Goryo, K. (1973). Biscriptal interference: A study of English and Japanese. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 515–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P., Lupker, S., & Colombo, L. (1973). Interacting sources of information in word naming: A study of individual differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 537–554.Google Scholar
Chen, H. C., & Tsoi, K. C. (1990). Symbol-word interference in Chinese and English. Acta Psychologica, 75, 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, M. J., Yung, Y. F., & Ng, T. W. (1988). The effect of context on perception of Chinese characters. In Liu, I. M., Chen, H. C., & Chen, M. J. (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of the Chinese language (pp. 27–39). Hong Kong: Asian Research Service.Google Scholar
Cheng, C. M. (1992). Lexical access in Chinese: Evidence from automatic activation of phonological information. In Chen, H. C. & Tzeng, O. J. L. (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (pp. 67–92). Amsterdam: North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, C. M., & Shih, S. (1973). The nature of lexical access in Chinese: Evidence from experiments on visual and phonological priming in lexical judgment. In Liu, I. M., Chen, H. C., & Chen, M. J. (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of the Chinese language (pp. 1–14). Hong Kong: Asian Research Service.Google Scholar
Chikamatsu, N. (1994, 10). The gap between high schools and colleges in Japanese language instruction (2): Survey results. Paper presented at the Illinois Council of Teaching of Foreign Languages Conference, Rockford.Google Scholar
Coltheart, M. (1973). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In Underwood, G. (Ed.), Strategies of information processing (pp. 151–216). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cunningham, A. E., Stanovich, K. E., & Wilson, M. R. (1990). Cognitive variation in adult college students deferring in reading ability. In Carr, T. H. & Levy, B. A. (Eds.), Reading and its development: Component skills approaches (pp. 129–160). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cunningham, P. M., & Cunningham, J. W. (1978). Investigating the “print to meaning” hypothesis. In Pearson, P. D. & Hansen, J. (Eds.), Reading: Disciplined inquiry in process and practice: 27th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 116–120). Clemson, SC: The National Reading Conference.Google Scholar
Fang, S. P., Tzeng, O. J. L., & Alva, L. (1973). Intralanguage vs. interlanguage Stroop effects in two types of writing systems. Memory and Cognition, 9, 609–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, R. (1973). Prelexical and postlexical strategies in reading: Evidence from a deep and a shallow orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 116–129.Google Scholar
Frost, R. (1973). Phonological computation and missing vowels: Mapping lexical involvement in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 398–401.Google Scholar
Frost, R., Katz, L., & Benlin, S. (1973). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 104–115.Google Scholar
Goryo, K. (1973). Yomuto lukoto [Psychology of Reading]. Tokyo: Tokyo University Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, L. (1973). Orthography and word recognition in reading. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hirose, T. (1973). Recognition of Japanese kana words in printing tasks. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75, 907–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoosain, R. (1991). Psycholinguistic implications for linguistic relativity: A case study of Chinese. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hsieh, L. T. (1994, 03). The effects of writing system on decoding processes in Chinese (LI) and English(FL). Paper presented at the American Association of Applied Linguistics Annual Conference, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Hung, D. L., Tzeng, O. J. L., & Tzeng, A. K. Y. (1992). Automatic activation of linguistic information in Chinese character recognition. In Frost, R. & Katz, L. (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 119–130). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jared, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1991). Does word identification proceed from spelling to sound to meaning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 358–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, L., & Feldman, L. B. (1983). Relation between pronunciation and recognition of printed words in deep and shallow orthographies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 157–166.Google ScholarPubMed
Keppel, G. (1973). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kirk, R. E. (1982). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Koda, K. (1987). Cognitive strategy transfer in second language reading. In Devine, J., Carrell, P. L., & Esky, D. E. (Eds.), Research in reading in English as a second language (pp. 127–144). Washington, DC: TESOL.Google Scholar
Koda, K. (1973). Cognitive process in second language reading: Transfer of L1 reading skills and strategies. Second Language Research, 4, 133–156.Google Scholar
Koda, K. (1973). The use of L1 reading strategies in L2 reading: Effects of L1 orthographic structures of L2 phonological receding strategies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 393–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koda, K. (1973). The effects of lower-level processing skills on FL reading performance: Implications for instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 76, 502–512.Google Scholar
Koda, K. (1973). Second language reading research: Problems and possibilities. Applied Psycholinguistics, 15, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesch, M. F., & Pollatsek, A. (1973). Automatic access of semantic information by phonological codes in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 285–294.Google Scholar
Liu, I. M., Zhu, Y., & Wu, J. (1973). The long-term modality effect: In search of differences in processing logographs and alphabetic words. Cognition, 43, 31–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, V. A. (1985). A cross-linguistic perspective on the relation between temporary memory skills and early reading ability. Remedial and Special Education, 6, 37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, D. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., & Ruddy, M. G. (1974). Functions of graphemic codes in visual word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 2, 309–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monsell, S., Patterson, K. E., Graham, A., Hughes, C. H., & Milroy, R. (1973). Lexical and sublexical translation of spelling to sound: Strategic anticipation of lexical status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 452–467.Google Scholar
Morikawa, Y. (1973). Stroop phenomena in the Japanese language (a): Effects of character-usage frequency and number of strokes. In Kao, H. S. R. & Hoosain, R. (Eds.), Linguistics, psychology, and the Chinese language (pp. 73–80). Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong Centre of Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Paradis, M., Higiwara, H., & Hildebrandt, N. (1973). Neurolinguistic aspects of the Japanese writing system. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Zhang, S. (1973). Phonological processes in reading Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 633–643.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Zhang, S. (1973). Very early phonological activation in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 24–33.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., Zhang, S., & Berent, I. (1973). Reading in English and Chinese: Evidence for a “universal” phonological principle. In Frost, R. & Katz, L. (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 227–248). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Rusted, J. (1973). Orthographic effects of Chinese-English bilinguals in a picture-word interference task. Current Psychology: Research & Reviews, 7, 207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems. Cognition, 19, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shimamura, A. (1973). Word comprehension and naming: An analysis of English and Japanese orthographies. American Journal of Psychology, 100, 15–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, F. (1973). Reading without nonsense. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. (1982). Word recognition skill and reading ability. In Singer, M. H. (Ed.), Competent reader, disabled reader: Research and application (pp. 81–102). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. (1991). Changing models of reading and reading acquisition. In Rieben, L. & Perfetti, C. H. (Eds.), Learning to read: Basic research and its implications (pp. 19–32). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabossi, P., & Laghi, L. (1973). Semantic priming in the pronunciation of words in two writing systems: Italian and English. Memory and Cognition, 20, 303–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, L. H., Hoosain, R., & Peng, D. (1973). Role of early presemantic phonological code in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 43–54.Google Scholar
Taylor, I., & Taylor, M. M. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Toma, C., & Toshima, T. (1973). Developmental change in cognitive organization underlying Stroop tasks of Japanese orthographies. International Journal of Psychology, 24, 547–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnage, T. W., & McGinnies, E. (1973). A cross-cultural comparison of the effects of presentation mode and meaningfulness on short-term memory. American Journal of Psychology, 86, 369–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tzeng, O. J. L., & Wang, W. S. Y. (1983). The first two R's. American Scientist, 71, 238–243.Google ScholarPubMed
Van Orden, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound and reading. Memory and Cognition, 15, 181–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, J. (1973). Do phonological and semantic processing of kanji finish at the same time? The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 59, 252–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wydell, T. N., Patterson, K. E., & Humphreys, G. W. (1993). Phonologically mediated access to meaning for kanji: Is a rows still a rose in Japanese kanji? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 19, 491–514.Google Scholar
Yamada, J., Imai, H., & Ikebe, Y. (1973). The use of the orthographic lexicon in reading kana words. The Journal of General Psychology, 117, 311–323.Google Scholar
Zhou, Y. G. (1978). To what degree are the “phonetics” of present-day Chinese characters still phonetic? Zhonggou Yuwen, 146, 172–177.Google Scholar