Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-jtdwj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T12:16:44.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EPILOGUE

A Framework for Investigating Oral and Written Corrective Feedback

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2010

Rod Ellis
Rod Ellis*
Affiliation:
University of Auckland, Shanghai International Studies University
*
*Address correspondence to: Rod Ellis, Department of Applied Language Studies and Linguistics, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand; e-mail: r.ellis@auckland.ac.nz.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Research Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 32 , Special Issue 2: The Role of Oral and Written Corrective Feedback in SLA , June 2010 , pp. 335 - 349
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. Modern Language Journal, 78, 465–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allwright, R. (1975). Problems in the study of language teacher’s treatment of error. In Burt, M. & Dulay, H. (Eds.), On TESOL ‘75: New directions in second-language learning, teaching and bilingual education (pp. 96–109). Washington, DC: TESOL.Google Scholar
Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 102–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2008). The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research, 12, 409–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudron, C. (1977). A descriptive model of discourse in the corrective treatment of learners’ errors. Language Learning, 27, 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. D. (1991). Feedback on writing: The use of verbal reports. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 133–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craik, F., & Lockhart, R. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In Doughty, C. J. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42–63). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Doughty, C. J. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206–257). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egi, T. (2007). Interpreting recasts as linguistic evidence: The role of linguistic target, length, and degree of change. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 511–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2006). Researching the effects of form-focused instruction on L2 acquisition. In Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Dörnyei, Z. (Eds.), Themes in SLA research (pp. 18–41). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. English Language Teaching Journal, 63, 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., & Sheen, Y. (2006). Re-examining the role of recasts in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 575–600.Google Scholar
Fathman, A., & Whalley, E. (1990). Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content. In Kroll, B. F. (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 178–190). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, D. R. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, L. (2001). For Kyla: What does research say about responding to ESL writers. In Silva, T. & Matsuda, P. K. (Eds.), On second language writing (pp. 73–90). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goldstein, L. (2006). Feedback and revision in second language writing: Helping learners become independent writers. In Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 185–205). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, F. (1998). The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 255–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, F. (2000). ESL writers and feedback: Giving more autonomy to students. Language Teaching Research, 4, 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Loewen, S., & Philp, J. (2006). Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness. Modern Language Journal, 90, 536–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. & Bhatia, T. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2007). Recasts in SLA: The story so far. In Long, M. H. (Ed.), Problems in SLA (pp. 75–116). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lyster, R. (1998). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48, 183–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R., & Mori, H. (2006). Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 269–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A. (2006). Feedback, noticing and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 405–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82, 338–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K., & Mackey, A. (2006). Responses to recasts: Repetitions, primed production, and linguistic development. Language Learning, 56, 693–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nystrom, N. (1983). Teacher-student interaction in bilingual classrooms: Four approaches to error feedback. In Seliger, H. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), Classroom-oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 169–189). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Oliver, R., & Mackey, A. (2003). Interactional context and feedback in child ESL classrooms. Modern Language Journal, 87, 519–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. (2003). Attention and memory during SLA. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 631–678). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolin-Ianziti, J. (in press). The organization of delayed second language correction. Language Teaching Research.Google Scholar
Sachs, R., & Polio, C. (2007). Learners’ use of two types of written feedback on a L2 writing task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 67–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1994). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review, 11, 11–26.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case‑study of an adult learner. In Day, R. (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237–322). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Schulz, R. (2001). Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction. Modern Language Journal, 85, 244–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. D. (1993). On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seedhouse, P. (1997). The case of the missing “no”: The relationship between pedagogy and interaction. Language Learning, 47, 547–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sheen, Y. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research, 8, 263–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheen, Y. (2006). Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research, 10, 361–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheen, Y. (2007a). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 255–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheen, Y. (2007b). The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In Mackey, A. (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 301–322). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sheen, Y. (2008). Recasts, language anxiety, modified output, and L2 learning. Language Learning, 58, 835–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truscott, J. (1999). The case for “the case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes”: A response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Lier, L. (1988). The classroom and the language learner. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Zamel, V. (1985). Responding to student writing. TESOL Quarterly, 10, 79–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar