Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T02:44:38.603Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

INCIDENTAL VOCABULARY LEARNING IN SLA

EFFECTS OF FREQUENCY, AURAL ENHANCEMENT, AND WORKING MEMORY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

Jonathan Malone Open the ORCID record for Jonathan Malone [Opens in a new window]
Jonathan Malone*
Affiliation:
University of Maryland
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Jonathan Malone, School of Languages, Literatures, and Cultures, 3215 Jiménez Hall, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742. E-mail: jemalone@umd.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study explored the roles of exposure frequency, aural enhancement (AE) of input, and individual differences in working memory (WM) during L2 incidental vocabulary learning while reading. Eighty intermediate-level English learners were divided into four treatment groups, and given reading tasks with target words embedded two or four times. Listening while reading was controlled, as well as duration of exposure to new words through timed reading tasks, and comprehension questions helped to ensure a focus on meaning. Surprise posttests assessed initial form recognition and form-meaning connections. Proficiency and WM measures were administered, with English proficiency used as a covariate. Results indicated that measurable learning occurred at the two-exposure level for new words, both in form recognition and form-meaning connections. Frequency effects held from two to four exposures across AE and non-AE conditions, but were influenced by AE on the form-meaning outcome. This indicated support for simultaneous input modalities facilitating deeper processing and better learning outcomes. WM outcomes correlated with vocabulary outcomes for form recognition, and an aptitude by treatment interaction was found for form recognition.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , September 2018 , pp. 651 - 675
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This study was supported by the PhD program of Second Language Acquisition at the University of Maryland. I would like to thank Drs. Michael Long, Robert DeKeyser, and Steve Ross for their helpful suggestions for the project. I would also like to thank Dr. Michael Dougherty for sharing the Shapebuilder memory task, Dr. J. D. Brown for sharing the cloze reading ability task, and the Center for the Advanced Study of Language for sharing the nonword span memory task. I would also like to thank Donna DeLuca and Cory Northern for their help during the project.

References

REFERENCES

Atkins, S. M., Sprenger, A. M., Colflesh, G. J. H., Briner, T. L., Buchanan, J. B., Chavis, S. E., … Dougherty, M. R. (2013). Measuring working memory is all fun and games: A four-dimensional spatial game predicts cognitive task performance. Experimental Psychology, 61, 417–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. D. (1998). Working memory. Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences, Serie III, Sciences de la vie, 321, 167–173.Google ScholarPubMed
Barcroft, J. (2009). Effects of synonym generation on incidental and intentional L2 vocabulary learning during reading. TESOL Quarterly, 43, 79–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisson, M.-J., van Heuven, W. J. B., Conklin, K., & Tunney, R. J. (2013). Incidental acquisition of foreign language vocabulary through brief multi-modal exposure. PLoS ONE, 8, 609–612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bisson, M.-J., van Heuven, W. J. B., Conklin, K., & Tunney, R. J. (2014). The role of repeated exposure to multimodal input in incidental acquisition of foreign language vocabulary. Language Learning, 64, 855–877.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2012). Experimental and intervention studies on formulaic sequences in a second language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 83–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, T., & Fox, C. (2012). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brown, J. D. (1980). Relative merits of four methods for scoring cloze tests. The Modern Language Journal, 64, 311–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R., Waring, B., & Donkaewbua, S. (2008). Incidental vocabulary acquisition from reading, reading-while-listening, and listening to stories. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20, 136–163.Google Scholar
Bruton, A., García López, M., & Esquiliche Mesa, R. (2011). Incidental vocabulary learning: An impracticable term? TESOL Quarterly, 45, 759–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, A. (2009). Gains to L2 listeners from reading while listening vs. listening only in comprehending short stories. System, 37, 652–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudron, C. (1985). Intake: On models and methods for discovering learners’ processing of input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, C., & Truscott, J. (2010). The effects of repetition and L1 lexicalization on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 31, 693–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chrabaszcz, A., & Jiang, N. (2014). The role of the native language in the use of the English definite article by L2 learners: A cross-linguistic comparison. Second Language Research, 30, 351–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, T. (2016). Numbers or numerology? A response to Nation (2014) and McQuillan (2016). Reading in a Foreign Language 28, 299–304.Google Scholar
D’Anna, C. A., Zechmeister, E. B., & Hall, J. W. (1991). Toward a meaningful definition of vocabulary size. Journal of Reading Behavior, 23, 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M. (2008). The corpus of contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990–present. Retrieved from http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Durrant, P., & Schmitt, N. (2010). Adult learners’ retention of collocations from exposure. Second Language Research, 26, 163–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. (1994). Implicit and explicit language learning—An overview. In Ellis, N. (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 1–31). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2007). Confirming the operational definitions of explicit and implicit knowledge in Ellis (2005): Responding to Isemonger. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 119–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engle, R. W., Cantor, J., & Carullo, J. J. (1992). Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: A test of four hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 972–992.Google ScholarPubMed
Escudero, P., Hayes-Harb, R., & Mitterer, H. (2008). Novel second-language words and asymmetric lexical access. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 345–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35, 116–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foster, J. L., Shipstead, Z., Harrison, T. L., Hicks, K. L., Redick, T. S., & Engle, R. W. (2015). Shortened complex span tasks can reliably measure working memory capacity. Memory and Cognition, 43, 226–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gathercole, S., Pickering, S., Hall, M., & Peaker, S. (2001). Dissociable lexical and phonological influences on serial recognition and serial recall. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 54, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Godfroid, A., Boers, F., & Housen, A. (2013). An eye for words: Gauging the role of attention in L2 vocabulary acquisition by means of eye-tracking. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 483–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulden, R., Nation, I. S. P., & Read, J. (1990). How large can a receptive vocabulary be? Applied Linguistics, 11, 341–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, P., & Tisdale, J. (2009). Does phonological short-term memory causally determine vocabulary learning? Toward a computational resolution of the debate. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 481–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes-Harb, R., Nicol, J., & Barker, J. (2010). Learning the phonological forms of new words: Effects of orthographic and auditory input. Language and Speech, 53, 367–381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hazenberg, S., & Hulstijn, J. H. (1996). Defining a minimal receptive second-language vocabulary for non-native university students: An empirical investigation. Applied Linguistics, 17, 145–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoijtink, H. (2012). Informative hypotheses: Theory and practice for behavioral and social scientists. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
Horst, M., Cobb, T., & Meara, P. (1998). Beyond a clockwork orange: Acquiring second language vocabulary through reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 11, 207–223.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2003). Incidental and intentional learning. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 349–381). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J., Hollander, M., & Greidanus, T. (1996). Incidental vocabulary learning by advanced foreign students: The influence of marginal glosses, dictionary use, and reoccurrence of unknown words. The Modern Language Journal, 80, 327–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J. R., Stein, M. L., & Wysocki, K. (1984). Learning vocabulary through reading. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 767–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaushanskaya, M. (2012). Cognitive mechanisms of word learning in bilingual and monolingual adults: The role of phonological memory. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 470–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, P. (1992). Does the ear assist the eye in long-term retention of lexis? IRAL, 30, 137–145.Google Scholar
Kinchla, R. A. (1974). Detecting target elements in multielement arrays: A confusability model. Perception and Psychophysics, 15, 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koda, K. (1998). The role of phonemic awareness in second language reading. Second Language Research, 14, 194–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J., & Sáfár, A. (2008). Phonological short-term memory, working memory and foreign language performance in intensive language learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuiper, R., Klugkist, I., & Hoijtink, H. (2010). A Fortran 90 program for confirmatory analysis of variance. Journal of Statistical Software, 34, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B. (2017). From word parts to full texts: Searching for effective methods of vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 21, 5–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B., & Nation, I. S. P. (2012). Vocabulary. In Gass, S. M. & Mackey, A. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 163–176). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lewandowski, L., & Kobus, D. (1993). The effects of redundancy in bimodal word processing. Human Performance, 6, 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linck, J., Hughes, M., Campbell, S., Silbert, N., Tare, M., Jackson, S., … Doughty, C. (2013). Hi-LAB: A new measure of aptitude for high-level language proficiency. Language Learning, 63, 530–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, K., & Ellis, N. C. (2012). The roles of phonological short-term memory and working memory in L2 grammar and vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 379–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McQuillan, J. (2016). Time, texts, and teaching in vocabulary acquisition: A rebuttal to Cobb (2016). Reading in a Foreign Language, 28, 307–318.Google Scholar
Montali, J., & Lewandowski, L. (1996). Bimodal reading: Benefits of a talking computer for average and less-skilled readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 271–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagy, W. E., Herman, P. A., & Anderson, R. C. (1985). Learning words from context. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 233–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63, 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2014). How much input do you need to learn the most frequent 9,000 words? Reading in a Foreign Language 26, 1–16.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P., & Chung, M. (2009). Teaching and testing vocabulary. In Long, M. H. & Doughty, C. J. (Eds.), Handbook of language teaching (pp. 543–559). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ota, M., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Haywood, S. L. (2009). The KEY to the ROCK: Near-homophony in nonnative visual word recognition. Cognition, 111, 263–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paivio, A., & Csapo, K. (1973). Picture superiority in free recall: Imagery or dual coding? Cognitive Psychology, 5, 176–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papagno, C., & Vallar, M. D. (1995). Verbal short-term memory and vocabulary learning in polyglots. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 48, 98–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pawlas, A. A., Ramig, L. O., & Countryman, S. (1996). Perceptual voice and speech characteristics in patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. NCVS Status Report #10, 79–87. Retrieved from http://www.ncvs.org/ProgressReports/NCVS%20Status%20&%20Progress%20Report%20Vol.%2010,%20Nov%201996%20copy.pdf.Google Scholar
Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2016). Incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition from and while reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 97–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasinski, T. (1990). Effects of repeated reading and listening-while-reading on reading fluency. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 147–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, B. L., & Wible, D. (2014). Frequency in incidental vocabulary acquisition research: An undefined concept and some consequences. TESOL Quarterly, 48, 843–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roehr, K. (2012). Aptitude-treatment interaction (ATI) research. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), The Routledge encyclopedia of second language acquisition (pp. 31–35).Google Scholar
Rott, S. (1999). The effect of exposure frequency on intermediate language learners’ incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 589–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (2012). A reassessment of frequency and vocabulary size in L2 vocabulary teaching. Language Teaching, 47, 1–20.Google Scholar
Shefelbine, J. L. (1990). Student factors related to variability in learning word meanings from context. Journal of Literacy Research, 22, 71–97.Google Scholar
Sonbul, S., & Schmitt, N. (2010). Direct teaching of vocabulary after reading: Is it worth it? ELT Journal, 64, 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speciale, G., Ellis, N. C., & Bywater, T. (2004). Phonological sequence learning and short-term store capacity determine second language vocabulary acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 293–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tekmen, E. A., & Daloğlu, A. (2006). An investigation of incidental vocabulary acquisition in relation to learner proficiency level and word frequency. Foreign Language Annals, 39, 220–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waring, R., & Takaki, M. (2003). At what rate do learners learn and retain new vocabulary from reading a graded reader? Reading in a Foreign Language, 15, 130–163.Google Scholar
Watanabe, Y. (1997). Input, intake, and retention: Effects of increased processing on incidental learning of foreign language vocabulary. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 287–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, S. (2007). The effects of repetition on vocabulary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 28, 46–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, S., & Chang, A. (2015). Second language vocabulary learning through extensive reading with audio support: How does frequency and distribution of occurrence affect learning? Language Teaching Research, 19, 667–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesche, M., & Paribakht, S. (1996). Assessing second language vocabulary knowledge: Depth versus breadth. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 13–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahar, R., Cobb, T., & Spada, N, (2001). Acquiring vocabulary through reading: Effects of frequency and contextual richness. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 57, 541–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar