Introduction

Albert Valdman

doi:10.1017/S0272263100007269

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

References

REFERENCE

Byrnes, H. (1987). Features of pragmatic and sociolinguistic competence in the Oral Proficiency Interview. In Valdman, A. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Symposium on the Evaluation of Foreign Language Proficiency (pp. 167–178). Bloomington: Indiana University, CREDLI.Google Scholar

Crossref Citations

This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Richard Tucker, G. 1989. Summary. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 10, Issue. , p. 243.

SWAFFAR, JANET K. 1989. Competing Paradigms in Adult Language Acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, Vol. 73, Issue. 3, p. 301.

HERSCHENSOHN, JULIA 1990. Toward a Theoretical Basis for Current Language Pedagogy. The Modern Language Journal, Vol. 74, Issue. 4, p. 451.

Lennon, Paul 1990. Investigating Fluency in EFL: A Quantitative Approach*. Language Learning, Vol. 40, Issue. 3, p. 387.

Ross, Steven and Berwick, Richard 1992. The Discourse of Accommodation in Oral Proficiency Interviews. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, Vol. 14, Issue. 2, p. 159.

Halleck, Gene B. 1992. The Oral Proficiency Interview: Discrete Point Test or a Measure of Communicative Language Ability?. Foreign Language Annals, Vol. 25, Issue. 3, p. 227.

DAVIDSON, FRED 1994. The interlanguage metaphor and language assessment. World Englishes, Vol. 13, Issue. 3, p. 377.

Haggstrom, Margaret 1994. Using a Videocamera and Task‐Based Activities to Make Classroom Oral Testing a More Realistic Communicative Experience. Foreign Language Annals, Vol. 27, Issue. 2, p. 161.

Ke, Chuanren and Reed, Daniel J. 1995. An Analysis of Results from the ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview and the Chinese Proficiency Test Before and After Intensive Instruction in Chinese as a Foreign Language. Foreign Language Annals, Vol. 28, Issue. 2, p. 208.

HALLECK, GENE B. 1995. Assessing Oral Proficiency: A Comparison of Holistic and Objective Measures. The Modern Language Journal, Vol. 79, Issue. 2, p. 223.

West, Michaell and Donato, Richard 1995. Stories and Stances: Cross‐Cultured Encounters with African Folktales. Foreign Language Annals, Vol. 28, Issue. 3, p. 392.

Fulcher, Glenn 1996. Invalidating validity claims for the ACTFL oral rating scale. System, Vol. 24, Issue. 2, p. 163.

DAVIS, JAMES N. 1997. Educational Reform and the Babel (Babble) of Culture: Prospects for the Standards for Foreign Language Learning. The Modern Language Journal, Vol. 81, Issue. 2, p. 151.

Fulcher, Glenn 1997. Encyclopedia of Language and Education. p. 75.

Salaberry, Rafael 2000. Revising the revised format of the ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview. Language Testing, Vol. 17, Issue. 3, p. 289.

Chaudron, Craig 2003. The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. p. 762.

Johnson, Marysia 2022. Interaction in the oral proficiency interview. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), p. 215.

Article contents

Introduction

Abstract

Access options

References

REFERENCE

This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Article contents

Introduction

Abstract

Access options

References

REFERENCE

Save article to Kindle

Save article to Dropbox

Save article to Google Drive

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests