Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
2000.
The Acquisition of Lexical and Grammatical Aspect.
Howard, Martin
2002.
Les interrelations entre les facteurs contextuels et l'emploi des temps du passé.
Revue française de linguistique appliquée,
Vol. Vol. VII,
Issue. 2,
p.
39.
Slabakova, Roumyana
2002.
Recent research on the acquisition of aspect: an embarrassment of riches?.
Second Language Research,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 2,
p.
172.
Geeslin, Kimberly L.
2003.
A Comparison of Copula Choice: Native Spanish Speakers and Advanced Learners.
Language Learning,
Vol. 53,
Issue. 4,
p.
703.
Lardiere, Donna
2003.
Revisiting the comparative fallacy: a reply to Lakshmanan and Selinker, 2001.
Second Language Research,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
129.
Collins, Laura
2004.
The Particulars on Universals: A Comparison of the Acquisition of Tense-Aspect Morphology among Japanese- and French-Speaking Learners of English.
The Canadian Modern Language Review,
Vol. 61,
Issue. 2,
p.
251.
Squartini, Mario
and
Marello, Carla
2004.
Plurilinguisme et didactique des langues : quelques applications de l'Aspect Hypothesis.
Revue française de linguistique appliquée,
Vol. Vol. IX,
Issue. 2,
p.
95.
Ishida, Midori
2004.
Effects of Recasts on the Acquisition of the Aspectual Form ‐te i‐(ru) by Learners of Japanese as a Foreign Language.
Language Learning,
Vol. 54,
Issue. 2,
p.
311.
Collins, Laura
2005.
Accessing Second Language Learners’ Understanding of Temporal Morphology.
Language Awareness,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 4,
p.
207.
Gündüz, Marie-Pierre
2005.
Articulation problématique des descriptions grammaticales et des pseudo-competences chez les apprenants de FLE.
Acquisition et interaction en langue étrangère,
p.
43.
Clachar, Arlene
2005.
Creole English Speakers’ Treatment of Tense‐Aspect Morphology in English Interlanguage Written Discourse.
Language Learning,
Vol. 55,
Issue. 2,
p.
275.
DeKeyser, Robert M.
2005.
What Makes Learning Second‐Language Grammar Difficult? A Review of Issues.
Language Learning,
Vol. 55,
Issue. S1,
p.
1.
Comajoan, Llorenç
2006.
The Aspect Hypothesis: Development of Morphology and Appropriateness of Use.
Language Learning,
Vol. 56,
Issue. 2,
p.
201.
Folli, Raffaella
and
Harley, Heidi
2006.
What language says about the psychology of events.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 3,
p.
91.
Haznedar, Belma
2007.
The acquisition of tense—aspect in child second language English.
Second Language Research,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 4,
p.
383.
Shirai, Yasuhiro
2007.
The Aspect Hypothesis, the comparative fallacy and the validity of obligatory context analysis: a reply to Lardiere, 2003.
Second Language Research,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 1,
p.
51.
IZQUIERDO, JESÚS
and
COLLINS, LAURA
2008.
The Facilitative Role of L1 Influence in Tense–Aspect Marking: A Comparison of Hispanophone and Anglophone Learners of French.
The Modern Language Journal,
Vol. 92,
Issue. 3,
p.
350.
González, Paz
2008.
Towards effective instruction on aspect in L2 Spanish.
IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching,
Vol. 46,
Issue. 2,
Ayoun, Dalila
and
Salaberry, M. Rafael
2008.
Acquisition of English Tense‐Aspect Morphology by Advanced French Instructed Learners.
Language Learning,
Vol. 58,
Issue. 3,
p.
555.
Gyeonghee No
2008.
Time Talk by Korean Young Learners of English.
English Teaching,
Vol. 63,
Issue. 2,
p.
95.