Article contents
SOURCES OF VARIATION IN SECOND AND NATIVE LANGUAGE SPEAKING PROFICIENCY AMONG COLLEGE-AGED SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 June 2021
Abstract
We evaluated external and internal sources of variation in second language (L2) and native language (L1) proficiency among college students. One hundred and twelve native-English L2 learners completed measures of L1 and L2 speaking proficiency, working memory, and cognitive control and provided self-ratings of language exposure and use. When considering learner-external variation, we found that more frequent L2 exposure predicted higher L2 and L1 proficiency, while earlier L2 exposure predicted higher L2 proficiency, but poorer L1 maintenance. L1–L2 distance limited crosslinguistic transfer of print-to-sound mappings. When considering learner-internal variation, we found that L1 and L2 proficiency were highly correlated and that better working memory, but not cognitive control, accounted for additional variance in L2 and L1 proficiency. More frequent L2 exposure was associated with better cognitive control.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
Footnotes
This research was supported by a Catalyst Award and a Richard Wallace Faculty Incentive Grant from the University of Missouri and an Advancing Academic-Research Careers Award from the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association to MRB, as well as by grant 31871097 from the National Natural Science Foundation of China to TG. We would like to thank Kathleen Acord, Madison Backes, Ashley Bramer, Jennifer Calvin, Sierra Cheung, Sierra Clemetson, Sarah D’Amico, Ryley Ewy, Laura Fry, Madison Hinmon, Jaclyn Johnson, Zeping Liu, Hanna Lowther, Sarah Marx, Carlos Martinez Villar, Allie Mitan, Xi Ren, Istvan Romhany, Morgan Trachsel, Jason Wong, No-Ya Yu, and Qiming Yuan for help with data collection and coding.
References
REFERENCES
- 6
- Cited by