Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:59:30.603Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Glyphosate-resistant soybean response to various salts of glyphosate and glyphosate accumulation in soybean nodules

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Krishna N. Reddy  and
Robert M. Zablotowicz
Robert M. Zablotowicz
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Southern Weed Science Research Unit, P.O. Box 350, Stoneville, MS 38776
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A field study was conducted during 2000 and 2001 at Stoneville, MS, to determine the effects of isopropylamine, trimethylsulfonium (Tms), diammonium, and aminomethanamide dihydrogen tetraoxosulfate (Adt) salt formulations of glyphosate on weed control, growth, chlorophyll content, nodulation, nitrogen content, and grain yield in glyphosate-resistant soybean and to assess potential glyphosate accumulation in soybean nodules. Glyphosate-Tms and glyphosate-Adt injured soybean, and visible injury ranged from 29 to 38% 2 d after late postemergence (LPOST) application; however, soybean recovered by 14 d. Glyphosate formulations had no effect on chlorophyll content, root and shoot dry weight, or nodule number but reduced nodule biomass by 21 to 28% 14 d LPOST. Glyphosate levels in nodules from treated plants ranged from 39 to 147 ng g−1 (dry weight), and leghemoglobin content was reduced by as much as 10%. Control of five predominant weed species 14 d after LPOST was > 83% with one application and > 96% with two applications regardless of the glyphosate salts used. Soybean yields were generally higher with two applications than with one application regardless of glyphosate formulation. These results indicate that soybean injury and inhibition of nodule development with certain glyphosate formulations can occur, but soybean has the potential to recover from glyphosate stress.

Keywords

Glyphosatesoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘DP 5806 RR’Chlorophyllformulationinjuryleghemoglobinnodulesweed controltransgenic soybean
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 51 , Issue 4 , August 2003 , pp. 496 - 502
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Arnon, D. I. 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts: polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris . Plant Physiol. 24:1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, W. H. and Thompson, T. L. 1992. Determination of total nitrogen in plant samples by Kjeldahl. Pages 13–16 In Plank, C. O., ed. Plant Analysis Reference Procedures for the Southern Region of the United States. Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin 368. Athens: The Georgia Agricultural Experiment Stations, University of Georgia.Google Scholar
Baldwin, F. L. 2000. Transgenic crops: a view from the US extension service. Pest Manag. Sci. 56:584–585.3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, R. L. 2000. Why the American Soybean Association supports transgenic soybeans. Pest Manag. Sci. 56:580–583.Google Scholar
Berg, R. K., Loynachan, T. E., Zablotowicz, R. M., and Lieberman, M. T. 1988. Nodule occupancy of introduced Bradyrhizobium japonicum in Iowa soils. Agron. J. 80:876–881.Google Scholar
Delannay, X., Bauman, T. T., Beighley, D. H., et al. 1995. Yield evaluation of a glyphosate-tolerant soybean line after treatment with glyphosate. Crop Sci. 35:1461–1467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duke, S. O. 1988. Glyphosate. Pages 1–70 In Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation, and Mode of Action. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Duke, S. O., Rimando, A. M., Pace, P. F., Reddy, K. N., and Smeda, R. J. 2003. Isoflavone, glyphosate, and aminomethylphosphonic acid levels in seeds of glyphosate-treated, glyphosate-resistant soybean. J. Agric. Food Chem. 51:340–344.Google Scholar
Elmore, R. W., Roeth, F. W., Klein, R. N., Knezevic, S. Z., Martin, A., Nelson, L. A., and Shapiro, C. A. 2001a. Glyphosate-resistant soybean cultivar response to glyphosate. Agron. J. 93:404–407.Google Scholar
Elmore, R. W., Roeth, F. W., Nelson, L. A., Shapiro, C. A., Klein, R. N., Knezevic, S. Z., and Martin, A. 2001b. Glyphosate-resistant soybean cultivar yields compared with sister lines. Agron. J. 93:408–412.Google Scholar
Etheridge, R. E., Hayes, R. M., Mueller, T. C., Rhodes, G. N., and Smith, J. D. 2000. Influence of basagran on soybean response to touchdown five and roundup ultra. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 53:43–44.Google Scholar
Hernandez, A., Garcia-Plazaola, J. I., and Becerril, J. M. 1999. Glyphosate effects on phenolic metabolism of nodulated soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 47:2920–2925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hiscox, J. D. and Israelstam, G. F. 1979. A method for the extraction of chlorophyll from leaf tissues without maceration. Can. J. Bot. 57:1332–1334.Google Scholar
Hoagland, R. E. 1980. Effects of glyphosate on metabolism of phenolic compounds: VI. Effects of glyphosine and glyphosate metabolites on phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activity, growth, and protein, chlorophyll, and anthocyanin levels in soybean (Glycine max) seedlings. Weed Sci. 28:393–400.Google Scholar
King, C. A., Purcell, L. C., and Vories, E. D. 2001. Plant growth and nitrogenase activity of glyphosate-tolerant soybean in response to foliar glyphosate applications. Agron. J. 93:179–186.Google Scholar
Klubeck, B. P., Hendrickson, L. L., Zablotowicz, R. M., et al. 1988. Competitiveness of Bradyrhizobium japonicum strains in midwestern soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 52:662–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krausz, R. F. and Young, B. G. 2001. Response of glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max) to trimethylsulfonium and isopropylamine salts of glyphosate. Weed Technol. 15:745–749.Google Scholar
Moorman, T. B. 1986. Effects of herbicides on the survival of Rhizobium japonicum strains. Weed Sci. 34:628–633.Google Scholar
Moorman, T. B., Becerril, J. M., Lydon, J., and Duke, S. O. 1992. Production of hydroxybenzoic acids by Bradyrhizobium japonicum strains after treatment with glyphosate. J. Agric. Food Chem. 40:289–293.Google Scholar
Mulkey, J. L., Griffin, J. L., Miller, D. K., Clay, P. A., and Ellis, J. M. 1999. Weed control with glyphosate formulations and ammonium sulfate. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 52:212.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. A. and Renner, K. A. 1999. Weed management in wide- and narrow-row glyphosate resistant soybean. J. Prod. Agric. 12:460–465.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. A. and Renner, K. A. 2001. Soybean growth and development as affected by glyphosate and postemergence herbicide tank mixtures. Agron. J. 93:428–434.Google Scholar
Norris, J. L., Shaw, D. R., and Snipes, C. E. 2001. Weed control from herbicide combinations with three formulations of glyphosate. Weed Technol. 15:552–558.Google Scholar
Padgette, S. R., Kolacz, K. H., Delannay, X., et al. 1995. Development, identification, and characterization of a glyphosate-tolerant soybean line. Crop Sci. 35:1451–1461.Google Scholar
Pline, W. A., Wu, J., and Hatzios, K. K. 1999. Effects of temperature and chemical additives on the response of transgenic herbicide-resistant soybeans to glufosinate and glyphosate applications. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 65:119–131.Google Scholar
Reddy, K. N. 2001. Glyphosate-resistant soybean as a weed management tool: opportunities and challenges. Weed Biol. Manag. 1:193–202.Google Scholar
Reddy, K. N., Hoagland, R. E., and Zablotowicz, R. M. 2000. Effect of glyphosate on growth, chlorophyll, and nodulation in glyphosate-resistant and susceptible soybean (Glycine max) varieties. J. New Seeds 2:37–52.Google Scholar
Reddy, K. N. and Whiting, K. 2000. Weed control and economic comparisons of glyphosate-resistant, sulfonylurea-tolerant, and conventional soybean (Glycine max) systems. Weed Technol. 14:204–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1998. Software Version 7. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Sprent, J. I. 1976. Nitrogen fixation by legumes subjected to water and light stress. Pages 405–420 In Nutman, P. S., ed. Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation in Plants. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. O. and Reisenauer, H. M. 1963. Determination of leghemoglobin in legume nodules. Ann. Biochem. 6:27–30.Google Scholar