Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:47:29.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of AE F130060 03 in wheat, barley, and Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) with or without dicamba

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Steven R. King ,
Edward S. Hagood Jr. ,
Kevin W. Bradley  and
Kriton K. Hatzios
Edward S. Hagood Jr.
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology, and Weed Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061
Kevin W. Bradley
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology, and Weed Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061
Kriton K. Hatzios
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology, and Weed Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Laboratory experiments were conducted to evaluate absorption, translocation, and metabolism of AE F130060 03 in wheat, barley, and Italian ryegrass. An additional objective was to evaluate how combinations of AE F130060 03 with dicamba affect absorption, translocation, and metabolism in wheat, barley, and Italian ryegrass. Experiments were conducted in a completely randomized design, and data were subjected to a factorial analysis. The factors included for analysis were plant type, time, and presence or absence of dicamba. Italian ryegrass absorbed 2.5, 2.0, and 1.5 times the amount of applied radioactivity 24, 48, and 96 h after treatment (HAT), respectively, compared with wheat or barley. Translocation of radiolabeled AE F130060 03 from the treated leaf blade was low and did not differ among wheat, barley, or Italian ryegrass. The rates of AE F130060 03 metabolism by the two cereal crops and Italian ryegrass were different. Ninety-six HAT, the total absorbed radioactivity metabolized by wheat, barley, and Italian ryegrass was 67, 51, and 34%, respectively. Conversely, 96 HAT, the levels of nonmetabolized AE F130060 03 were highest in Italian ryegrass, intermediate in barley, and lowest in wheat. The lower absorption of herbicide and a more rapid rate of metabolism by wheat and barley in comparison with Italian ryegrass most likely account for differential selectivity among the three plant species. Dicamba did not influence translocation or metabolism in wheat, barley, or Italian ryegrass.

Keywords

Dicambadiclofop-methylAE F115008 00 (methyl 4-iodo-2-[3-(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-ureidosulfonyl]benzoate, sodium salt)AE F107892 (diethyl 1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-5-methyl-2-pyrazoline-3, 5-dicarboxylate)AE F130060 00 (methyl-2-[3-(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)ureidosulfonyl]-4-methane-sulfonamidomethylbenzoate)Italian ryegrass, Lolium multiflorum Lam. LOLMUbarley, Hordeum vulgare L. ‘Nomini’wheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘Jackson’Crop tolerancediclofop-methyl resistancesulfonylurea
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 51 , Issue 4 , August 2003 , pp. 509 - 514
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ackley, J. A., Hatzios, K. K., and Wilson, H. P. 1999. Absorption, translocation and metabolism of rimsulfuron in black nightshade (Solanum nigrum), eastern blacknightshade (Solanum ptycanthum), and hairy nightshade (Solanum sarrachoides). Weed Technol. 13:151–156.Google Scholar
Anderson, M., Bertges, W., Hicks, C., Luff, K., Hoobler, M., Maruska, D., Paulsgrove, M., and Thorsness, K. 2002. The use of AEF-130060 herbicide for grass control in wheat. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 42:76.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2002a. AE F115008 00 Technical Bulletin. Aventis CropScience S. A., Lyon, France, p. 32.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2002b. Mesomaxx Technical Bulletin. Aventis CropScience S. A. Lyon, France, p. 28.Google Scholar
Askew, S. D. and Wilcut, J. W. 2002. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of foliar-applied CGA 362622 in cotton, peanut, and selected weeds. Weed Sci. 50:293–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, J. B., Penner, D., and Kells, J. J. 1997. Physiological basis for nicosulfuron and primisulfuron selectivity in five plant species. Weed Sci. 45:22–30.Google Scholar
Durgan, B. R., Yenish, L. P., Daml, R. J., and Miller, D. W. 1997. Broadleaf weed control in hard red spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) with F8426. Weed Technol. 11:489–495.Google Scholar
Eberlein, C. V., Roscow, K. M., Geadelmann, J. L., and Openshaw, S. J. 1989. Differential tolerance of corn genotypes to DPX-M6316. Weed Sci. 37:651–657.Google Scholar
Hart, S. E. and Wax, L. M. 1996. Dicamba antagonizes grass weed control with imazethapyr by reducing foliar absorption. Weed Technol. 10:828–834.Google Scholar
Hatzios, K. K. 1997. Regulation of xenobiotics degrading enzymes with herbicide safeners. Pages 275–288 In Hatzios, K. K., ed. Regulation of Enzymatic Systems Detoxifying Xenobiotics in Plants. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Heap, I. 2002. International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. Available at: www.weedscience.org/in.asp. Accessed: June 15, 2002.Google Scholar
King, S. R. and Hagood, E. S. 2002. Italian ryegrass control in small grains in Virginia. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 56:101.Google Scholar
Ma, G., Coble, H. D., Corbin, F. T., and Burton, J. D. 1997. Physiological mechanisms for differential responses of three weed species to prosulfuron. Weed Sci. 45:642–647.Google Scholar
Morozov, I. V., Hagood, E. S., and Hipkins, P. L. 1999. Response of Virginia collections of diclofop-resistant Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) to preemergence and postemergence herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 52:40.Google Scholar
Saari, L. L., Cotterman, J. C., and Thill, D. C. 1994. Resistance to acetolactate synthase inhibiting herbicides. Pages 83–139 In Powles, S. B. and Holtum, J.A.M., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants: Biology and Biochemistry. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.Google Scholar
Stanger, C. E. and Appleby, A. P. 1989. Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) accessions tolerant to diclofop. Weed Sci. 37:350–352.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M. 2000. Weed survey—southern states grass crop subsection. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 53:247–274.Google Scholar