Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:44:42.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Identification of genes induced in emerging tillers of wild oat (Avena fatua) using Arabidopsis microarrays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

David P. Horvath ,
Robert Schaffer  and
Ellen Wisman
Robert Schaffer
Affiliation:
HortResearch, 120 Mt. Albert Road, Auckland, New Zealand
Ellen Wisman
Affiliation:
MSU-DOE Plant Research Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1312
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Arabidopsis complementary DNA (cDNA) microarrays were hybridized with labeled cDNA from mature leaves and emerging tillers of wild oat to determine if they could identify gene expression profiles in distantly related species. More than 23% of the > 11,000 cDNAs on the array hybridized to the wild oat probe. Transcription patterns detected by hybridization to the arrays are indicators for physiological processes in the tissues tested. Coordinated expression patterns for these genes in Arabidopsis indicate common signals involved in their regulation. The results demonstrate that probing cDNA-based arrays from well-characterized species can provide valuable insight into the signal transduction processes regulating growth and development of poorly characterized species.

Keywords

Gibberellic acidN-1-naphthylphthalamic acidwild oat, Avena fatua L. AVEFAMicroarraytiller growthgene regulation
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 51 , Issue 4 , August 2003 , pp. 503 - 508
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Chang, S., Puryear, J., and Cairney, J. 1993. A simple and efficient method for isolating RNA from pine trees. Plant Mol. Biol. Reporter 11:113–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisen, M. B., Spellman, P. T., Brown, P. O., and Botstein, D. 1998. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:14 863–14 868.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frishman, D., Albermann, K., Hani, J., Heumann, K., Metanomski, A., Zollner, A., and Mewes, H.- W. 2001. Functional and structural genomics using PEDANT. Bioinformatics 17:44–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horvath, D. P. and Olson, P. A. 1998. Cloning and characterization of cold-regulated glycine-rich RNA-binding protein genes from leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.) and comparison to heterologous genomic clones. Plant Mol. Biol. 38:531–538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horvath, D. P., Schaffer, R., and Wisman, E. 2003. Arabidopsis microarrays identify conserved and differentially-expressed genes involved in shoot growth and development from distantly related plant species. Plant J. 33:1–10.Google Scholar
Jones, H. D., Kurup, S., Peters, N.C.B., and Holdsworth, M. J. 2000. Identification and analysis of proteins that interact with the Avena fatua homologue of the maize transcription factor VIVIPAROUS1 . Plant J. 21:133–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, H. D., Peters, N. C.B., and Holdsworth, M. J. 1997. Genotype and environment interact to control dormancy and differential expression of the VIVIPAROUS1 homologue in embryos of Avena fatua. Plant J. 12:911–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koornneef, M., Leon Kloosterziel, K. M., Scwartz, S. H., and Zeevaart, J.A.D. 1998. The genetic and molecular dissection of abscisic acid biosynthesis and signal transduction in Arabidopsis . Plant Physiol. Biochem. 36:83–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreps, J., Nero, P., Zhu, T., Wu, Y., Chang, H.-S., and Harper, J. 2002. Using genomics to study the plant's response to abiotic stress. Boom of Abstracts, Keystone Symposia on Specificity and Crosstalk in Plant Signal Transduction. p. 57. [Abstract 211]Google Scholar
Li, B. L. and Foley, M. E. 1995. Cloning and characterization of differentially expressed genes in imbibed dormant and after-ripened Avena fatua embryos. Plant Mol. Biol. 29:823–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, J.A.H., Freman, D., Greenwood, J., et al. 1998. Plant D cyclins and retinoblastoma protein homologues. Pages 99–127 In Francis, D., Dudits, D., and Inze, D., eds. Plant Cell Division. London: Portland Press.Google Scholar
Rohde, A., Prinsen, E., De Rycke, R., Engler, G., Van Montegue, M., and Boerjan, W. 2002. PtABI3 impinges on the growth and differentiation of embryonic leaves during bud set in poplar. Plant Cell 14:1885–1901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaffer, R., Landgraf, J., Accerbi, M., Simon, V. V., Larson, M., and Wisman, E. 2001. Microarray analysis of diurnal and circadian-regulated genes in Arabidopsis . Plant Cell 13:113–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, L. G., Greene, B., Veit, B., and Hake, S. 1992. A dominant mutation in the maize homeobox gene, Knotted-1, causes its ectopic expression in leaf cells with altered fates. Development 16:21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockinger, E. J., Gilmour, S. J., and Thomashow, M. F. 1994. Arabidopsis thaliana CBF1 encodes an AP2 domain-containing activator that binds to the C-repeat/DRE, a cis-acting DNA regulatory element stimulates transcription in response to low temperature and water deficit. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:1035–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomashow, M. F. 1999. Plant cold acclimation: freezing tolerance genes and regulatory mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 50:571–599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. and Shinozaki, K. 1993. Characterization of the expression of a desiccation-responsive RD29gene of Arabidopsis thaliana and analysis of its promoter in transgenic plants. Mol. Gen. Genet. 236:331–340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, Y. H., Dudoit, S., Luu, P., Lin, D. M., Peng, V., Ngai, J., and Speed, T. P. 2002. Normalization for cDNA microarray data: a robust composite method addressing single and multiple slide systematic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:e15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar