Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-5mhkq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-20T09:22:10.449Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Common Ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) Control in Soybean (Glycine max) with Bentazon as Influenced by Imazethapyr or Thifensulfuron Tank-mixes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Aaron Hager  and
Karen Renner
Aaron Hager
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop and Soil Sci., Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824
Karen Renner
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop and Soil Sci., Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Several herbicides control common ragweed postemergence in soybean. However, weed response may be altered if herbicides are tank-mixed and the choice of additive may also influence the degree of weed control. Imazethapyr and thifensulfuron could be tank-mixed with bentazon for broadleaf weed control and visual crop injury reduced compared to a bentazon plus acifluorfen tank-mix. Experiments determined common ragweed control with these herbicides and herbicide combinations when applied with various additives. In the greenhouse, bentazon at 560 g ai/ha reduced common ragweed dry weight 95 to 97%. Common ragweed control with imazethapyr at 35 g/ha increased by 13 and 7% when 28% urea ammonium nitrate was applied with nonionic surfactant or petroleum oil adjuvant, respectively. Tank-mixing imazethapyr with bentazon did not change dry weight of common ragweed compared with bentazon. Bentazon plus thifensulfuron plus nonionic surfactant required the addition of 28% urea ammonium nitrate to reduce dry weight of common ragweed comparable to that with bentazon. In field research, bentazon at 1120 g/ha reduced common ragweed dry weight 78 to 81%. Tank-mixing bentazon with thifensulfuron at 4.5 g/ha or imazethapyr at 71 or 35 g/ha reduced common ragweed dry weight at 14 d after treatment by 89 to 91%, thus enhancing control compared to each herbicide applied alone. Adding 28% urea ammonium nitrate to bentazon plus imazethapyr or bentazon plus thifensulfuron tank-mixes did not increase control compared to these treatments applied with either nonionic surfactant or petroleum oil adjuvant. By 28 d after treatment only imazethapyr at 35 or 71 g/ha plus 28% urea ammonium nitrate plus nonionic surfactant or petroleum oil adjuvant and bentazon plus imazethapyr tank-mixes provided 85% or more control of common ragweed in 1991, and only imazethapyr at 71 g/ha plus 28% urea ammonium nitrate plus petroleum oil adjuvant or imazethapyr at 71 g/ha plus bentazon provided greater than 78% common ragweed control in 1992. Soybean yield was not different from the handweeded control only where bentazon plus 71 g/ha of imazethapyr or acifluorfen at 560 g/ha was applied.

Keywords

Acifluorfen, 5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoic acidbentazon, 3-(1-methylethyl)-(1H)-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxideimazethapyr, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-ethyl-3-pyridinecarboxylic acidthifensulfuron, 3-[[[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-2-thiophenecarboxylic acidcommon ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. ♯ AMBELsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Elgin 87.’AdditiveadjuvantpostemergenceAMBEL
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , December 1994 , pp. 766 - 771
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Amuti, K. S., Drake, D. C., and Leek, G. L. 1985. DPX-M6316: Postemergence broadleaf weed control in corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Cont. Conf. 40:47.Google Scholar
2. Anonymous. 1992. Basagran Product Label. BASF Corporation, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.Google Scholar
3. Beckett, T. H. and Stoller, E. W. 1991. Effects of methylammonium and urea ammonium nitrate on foliar uptake of thifensulfuron in velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 39:333–338.Google Scholar
4. Brown, H. M., Joshi, M. M., and Van, A. 1987. Rapid soil degradation of DPX-M6316. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 27:75.Google Scholar
5. Cantwell, J. R., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Imazethapyr for weed control in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 3:596–601.Google Scholar
6. Coble, H. D., Williams, F. M., and Ritter, R. L. 1981. Common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 29:339–342.Google Scholar
7. Forney, D. R., Amuti, K. S., Claus, J. S., Long, J. D., Green, J. M., Saari, L. L., Brown, H. M., and Sebastian, S. 1988. DPX-M6316, A new postemergence soybean herbicide: activity, selectivity, and soil residual considerations. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 28:17.Google Scholar
8. Fielding, R. J. and Stoller, E. W. 1990. Effects of additives on the efficacy, uptake, and translocation of the methyl ester of thifensulfuron. Weed Sci. 39:412–416.Google Scholar
9. Goetz, A. J., Lavey, T. L., and Gbur, E. E. Jr. 1990. Degradation and field persistence of imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 38:421–428.Google Scholar
10. Hatzios, K. K. and Penner, D. 1985. Interactions of herbicides with other agrochemicals in higher plants. Rev. Weed Sci. 1:1–63.Google Scholar
11. Irons, S. M. and Bumside, O. C. 1982. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of bentazon in sunflower (Helianthus annuus). Weed Sci. 30:255–259.Google Scholar
12. Johnson, W. O., Kollman, G. E., Swithenbank, C., and Yih, R. Y. 1977. RH-6201 (Blazer): A new broadspectrum herbicide for postemergence use in soybeans. J. Agric. Food Chem. 26:285–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Kent, L. M., Wills, G. D., and Shaw, D. R. 1991. Influence of ammonium sulfate, imazapyr, temperature, and relative humidity on the absorption and translocation of imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 39:412–416.Google Scholar
14. Lee, S. D. and Oliver, L. R. 1982. Efficacy of acifluorfen on broadleaf weeds. Times and methods for application. Weed Sci. 30:520–526.Google Scholar
15. Leuschen, W. E. and Hoverstad, T. R. 1991. Imazethapyr for weed control in no-till soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 5:845–851.Google Scholar
16. Malefyt, T., Marc, P. A., Umeda, K., Los, M., and Orwick, P. L. 1984. AC 263,499—A new broad spectrum herbicide for soybeans and other leguminous crops. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 24:18.Google Scholar
17. Nalewaja, J. D. and Adamczewski, K. A. 1977. Uptake and translocation of bentazon with additives. Weed Sci. 25:309–315.Google Scholar
18. Quakenbush, L. S. and Andersen, R. N. 1985. Susceptibility of five species of the Solanum nigrum complex to herbicides. Weed Sci. 33:386–390.Google Scholar
19. Ritter, R. L. and Coble, H. D. 1981. Influence of temperature and relative humidity on the activity of acifluorfen. Weed Sci. 29:480–485.Google Scholar
20. Shurtleff, J. L. and Coble, H. D. 1985. Interference of certain broadleaf weed species in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 33:654–657.Google Scholar
21. Sorensen, V. M., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1987. The interaction of acifluorfen and bentazon in herbicidal combinations. Weed Sci. 35:449–456.Google Scholar
22. Zhao, C. C., Teasdale, J. R., and Coffman, C. B. 1990. Factors affecting the activity of thifensulfuron. Weed Sci. 38:553–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar