Shaver, S. (1988) ‘Universality or selectivity in income
support to
older people? A comparative assessment of the issues’, Journal
of
Social Policy, 27 (2), 231–254.
Reynaud, E. (1998) ‘Pensions in the European Union: adapting to
economic and social changes’. International Social Security Review,
51
(1), 31–47.
These two articles are highlighted as both offer the reader some insights
into
the ongoing debate on the level of income in later life from a cross-national
and
comparative perspective. Recently the focus of this attention, particularly
within the European Union (EU), relates to one of the myths of modern times,
the devastation that will result because of the demographic time-bomb.
I was
pleased to see another refutation of this in Reynaud's article (p.
34). Thus the
framework for this European-wide discussion has been as much about
ideological and political issues as about economic ones, such as level
of public
provision of support in old age.
These two articles approach the issue of income in later life from different
angles. The Reynaud article is essentially a review of the current debate
on
public pensions within the EU. It focuses upon the manner in which pension
policy has adapted to social and economic change in recent years. No
statistical or quantitative analysis is presented and this limits the analysis
somewhat. Shaver on the other hand adopts a classic quantitative approach,
using a well-established dataset, the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS), to
revisit the longstanding debate about the merits of universalism and selectivism
within the context of income in later life.