Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-14T20:36:44.802Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Where not to look for targets of social reforms and interventions, according to behavioral genetics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2023

Nikolai Haahjem Eftedal  and
Lotte Thomsen Open the ORCID record for Lotte Thomsen [Opens in a new window]
Nikolai Haahjem Eftedal
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Forskningsveien 3A, Oslo, Norway n.h.eftedal@psykologi.uio.no lotte.thomsen@psykologi.uio.no PROMENTA Research Center, University of Oslo, Forskningsveien 3A, Oslo, Norway
Lotte Thomsen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Forskningsveien 3A, Oslo, Norway n.h.eftedal@psykologi.uio.no lotte.thomsen@psykologi.uio.no Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 7, Aarhus, Denmark Center for the Experimental Philosophical Investigation of Discrimination, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 7, Aarhus, Denmark
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Behavioral genetics typically finds that the so-called shared environment contributes little or nothing to explaining within-population variation on most traits. If true, this has important implications for where not to look for good targets of interventions: Namely all things that are within the normal range of variation from one rearing environment to the next in that population.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e190
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Eftedal, N. H., Kleppesto, T. H., Czajkowski, N. O., Eilertsen, E. M., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Vassend, O., … Thomsen, L. (2020). Causality and confounding between right wing authoritarianism, education, and socio-economic status; a twin study. PsyArxiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vws83Google Scholar
Eftedal, N. H., Kleppestø, T. H., Czajkowski, N. O., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Røysamb, E., Vassend, O., … Thomsen, L. (2022). Justice sensitivity is undergirded by separate heritable motivations to be morally principled and opportunistic. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flynn, J. R. (2009). Requiem for nutrition as the cause of IQ gains: Raven's gains in Britain 1938–2008. Economics & Human Biology, 7(1), 18–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franić, S., Dolan, C. V., Borsboom, D., Hudziak, J. J., van Beijsterveldt, C. E., & Boomsma, D. I. (2013). Can genetics help psychometrics? Improving dimensionality assessment through genetic factor modeling. Psychological Methods, 18(3), 406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kleppestø, T. H., Czajkowski, N. O., Vassend, O., Røysamb, E., Eftedal, N. H., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., … Thomsen, L. (2019). Correlations between social dominance orientation and political attitudes reflect common genetic underpinnings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(36), 17741–17746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kunst, J. R., Fischer, R., Sidanius, J., & Thomsen, L. (2017). Preferences for group dominance track and mediate the effects of macro-level social inequality and violence across societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(21), 5407–5412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., Knopik, V. S., & Neiderhiser, J. M. (2016). Top 10 replicated findings from behavioral genetics. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(1), 3–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turkheimer, E. (2000). Three laws of behavior genetics and what they mean. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(5), 160–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willoughby, E. A., Giannelis, A., Ludeke, S., Klemmensen, R., Nørgaard, A. S., Iacono, W. G., … McGue, M. (2021). Parent contributions to the development of political attitudes in adoptive and biological families. Psychological Science, 32(12), 2023–2034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar