Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T07:31:17.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Including pride and its group-based, relational, and contextual features in theories of contempt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2017

Gavin Brent Sullivan
Gavin Brent Sullivan*
Affiliation:
Centre for Trust, Peace and Social Relations, IV5, Innovation Village, Cheetah Road, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 2TL, United Kingdom. gavin.sullivan@coventry.ac.ukhttp://www.coventry.ac.uk/research/research-directories/researchers/gavin-sullivan/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sentiment includes emotional and enduring attitudinal features of contempt, but explaining contempt as a mixture of basic emotion system affects does not adequately address the family resemblance structure of the concept. Adding forms of individual, group-based, and widely shared arrogance and contempt is necessary to capture the complex mixed feelings of proud superiority when “looking down upon” and acting harshly towards others.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 40 , 2017 , e248
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bar-Tal, D., Halperin, E. & de Rivera, J. (2007) Collective emotions in conflict situations: Societal implications. Journal of Social Issues 63(2):441–60.Google Scholar
Becker, J. C., Tausch, N. & Wagner, U. (2011) Emotional consequences of collective action participation: Differentiating self-directed and outgroup-directed emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 37(12):1587–98. doi: 10.1177/0146167211414145.Google Scholar
Fischer, A. & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2016) Contempt: Derogating others while keeping calm. Emotion Review 8(4):346–57. doi:10.1177/1754073915610439. Available at: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1754073915610439.Google Scholar
Holbrook, C., Piazza, J. R. & Fessler, D. M. (2014b) Further challenges to the “authentic”/“hubristic” model of pride: Conceptual clarifications and new evidence. Emotion 14(1):38–42.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1739/2001) A treatise of human nature, ed. Norton, D. F. & Norton, E. F.. Oxford University Press. (Original work published in 1739).Google Scholar
Norton, D. F. (2001) Editor's introduction. In: Hume, D., A treatise of human nature, ed. Norton, D. F. & Norton, E. F., pp. 9–99. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, G. B., ed. (2014) Understanding collective pride and group identity: New directions in emotion theory, research and practice. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracy, J. L. & Robins, R. W. (2007) The psychological structure of pride: A tale of two facets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92(3):506–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Löwe, I. & Parkinson, B. (2014) Relational emotions and social networks. In: Collective emotions: Perspectives from psychology, philosophy and sociology, ed. von Scheve, C. & Salmela, M., pp. 125–30. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1953/2001) Philosophical investigations, 3rd edition, trans. Anscombe, G. E. M.. Prentice-Hall. (Original work published in 1935.)Google Scholar