Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T06:58:07.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

We need more precise, quantitative models of sentiments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2017

Mirta Galesic
Mirta Galesic*
Affiliation:
Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501. galesic@santafe.eduhttp://www.santafe.edu/about/people/profile/Mirta%20Galesic
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The constructs of attitudes, emotions, and sentiments are often only verbally defined and therefore somewhat vague. The sentiment construct might be fruitfully modeled as a result of sampling processes, complementing the Attitude–Scenario–Emotion model in explaining similarities and differences in sentiments across different cultures.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 40 , 2017 , e236
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bohner, G. & Dickel, N. (2011) Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology 62:391–417.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. (2016) What scientists who study emotion agree about. Perspectives on Psychological Science 11:31–34.Google Scholar
Galesic, M., Olsson, H. & Rieskamp, J. (2012) Social sampling explains apparent biases in judgments of social environments. Psychological Science 23:1515–23.Google Scholar
Pang, B. & Lee, L. (2008) Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 2(1–2):1–135. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1500000011.Google Scholar
Schwarz, N. (2007) Attitude construction: Evaluation in context. Social Cognition 25(5):638–56. [Special Issue: What is an Attitude?].Google Scholar
Schwarz, N. & Bless, H. (1992) Constructing reality and its alternatives: Assimilation and contrast effects in social judgment. In: The construction of social judgment, ed. Martin, L. L. & Tesser, A., pp. 217–45. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Stets, J. E. (2003) Emotions and sentiments. In: Handbook of social psychology, ed. Delamater, J., pp. 309–35. Kluwer Academic/Plenum.Google Scholar
Tourangeau, R. & Rasinski, K. A. (1988) Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement. Psychological Bulletin 103:299–314.Google Scholar
Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J. & Rasinski, K. (2000) The psychology of survey response. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Volz, K. G. & Hertwig, R. (2016) Emotions and decisions beyond conceptual vagueness and the rationality muddle. Perspectives on Psychological Science 11:101–16.Google Scholar