The present study further explored the phenomenon of “diagnosis
threat” (Suhr & Gunstad, 2002), by
examining the potential explanatory roles of anxiety, effort, and
depression. Individuals with mild head injury history were randomly
assigned to receive either neutral instructions (controls, N =
25) or to have attention called to their head injury history as a
reason for invitation into the study (diagnosis threat, N =
28). Depression was measured at baseline. Following the
neuropsychological battery, ratings of effort, test pressure, and state
anxiety were completed. The diagnosis threat group performed worse than
controls on attention/working memory, psychomotor speed, and memory
tasks, but not on measures of executive functioning, post-test anxiety,
or effort. Effort, anxiety and depression were not related to cognitive
performance, nor did depression interact with expectations in
explaining group differences in performance. Results provide further
support for the “diagnosis threat” effect, but offer no
support for effort, anxiety, or depression explanations for diminished
performance. (JINS, 2005, 11, 23–29.)