Summary

Background and objective: An evaluation of post-craniotomy analgesia within the University Hospital of Wales Neurosurgical Unit, Cardiff, found that many patients were experiencing moderate to severe pain post-craniotomy. It was therefore decided to undertake a nationwide survey of analgesic practices in order to establish best practice guidelines and benchmark with other units.

Method: A postal questionnaire was sent to the senior nurse of every Neurosurgical Directorate within the UK inquiring about the current, standard analgesic practices for post-craniotomy patients in their unit.

Results: Completed replies were received from 23 of the 33 centres (70%). Intramuscular (i.m.) codeine phosphate was found to be the principal first-line analgesic used post-craniotomy. Only three centres used morphine as the first-line analgesic and only one centre used patient controlled analgesia routinely. The majority of centres (82%) used balanced analgesia. Pain assessments were only carried out in 57% of centres and no centre used a validated pain assessment tool specifically for dysphasic patients.

Conclusions: Codeine phosphate continues to be the mainstay of post-craniotomy analgesia, however, it is proposed that patient controlled analgesia with morphine is an efficacious and safe alternative.

Summary

Background and objective: High doses of opioid associated with low doses of hypnotic is a popular anaesthetic technique since the use of remifentanil has become widespread. This type of anaesthesia could result in a higher incidence of implicit memory.

Methods: Ten patients were anaesthetised with a target-controlled infusion of remifentanil (target concentration of 8 ng mL−1) combined with a target-controlled infusion of propofol with progressive stepwise increases until loss of consciousness was reached. A tape containing 20 words was then played to the patients. Bispectral index (BIS, Aspect Medical Systems, Newton, MA, USA) was continuously monitored during the whole study period. Implicit and explicit memories were tested between 2 and 4 h after recovery.

Results: Loss of consciousness was obtained with a mean calculated propofol plasma concentration of 1.3 ± 0.4 μg mL−1. At this low hypnotic concentration no implicit or explicit memory was found in the three postoperative memory tests. Median (range) BIS value during word presentation was 93 (80–98).

Conclusions: In our group of young American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I/II patients, no explicit or implicit memory was found when the calculated concentration of propofol combined with a high concentration of remifentanil was maintained at the level associated with loss of consciousness with high BIS values.

Summary

Objective: To assess the ability of medical students to learn and retain skills of airway manipulation for insertion of the endotracheal tube, the laryngeal mask airway (Laryngeal Mask Company, Henley-on-Thames, UK) and the oesophageal–tracheal Combitube® (Kendall-Sheridan Catheter Corp., Argyle, NY, USA).

Methods: A 6-month prospective study was conducted among fifth-year medical students attending a 3-week clerkship in the Division of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine in the Soroka Medical Center. All the students viewed a demonstration of insertion technique for the endotracheal tube, the laryngeal mask airway and the Combitube®, followed by formal teaching in a mannikin. At the end of the program, the insertion skills were demonstrated in the mannikin, the success rate on the first attempt was registered and the students were requested to assess (by questionnaire) their ability to execute airway manipulation (phase 1). Six months later, the students were requested to repeat the insertion technique, and a similar re-evaluation applied (phase 2).

Results: The success rate, during the first phase, at first attempts was 100% for the laryngeal mask airway and the Combitube®, compared to 57.4% for the endotracheal tube (P < 0.02), and 92.6%, 96.2% and 62.9% (P < 0.02) respectively for the second phase of the study.

Conclusion: Learning and retention skills of medical students, in a mannikin, are more accentuated with the laryngeal mask airway and the Combitube® than seen with an endotracheal tube.

Summary

Background and objective: This study was performed to compare three supraglottic airway devices: the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA), the laryngeal tube S (LTS) and the oesophageal–tracheal combitube (OTC) during routine surgical procedures.

Methods: Ninety American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I–III patients scheduled for routine minor obstetric surgery were randomly allocated to the PLMA (n = 30), the LTS (n = 30) or the OTC (n = 30) group, respectively. The overall success rate, insertion time, cuff pressures and resulting airway leak pressures were determined as well as a subjective assessment of handling and the incidence of sore throat, dysphagia and hoarseness were performed.

Results: Insertion time until the first adequate ventilation was significantly (P < 0.0001) shorter in the PLMA (median 29 s; 25–75th percentile 25–48 s; range 10–161 s; success rate 100%) and in the LTS group (38 s; 30–44 s; 13–180 s; 100%) compared to the OTC group (75 s; 48–98 s; 35–180 s; 90%). In vivo cuff pressures and airway leak pressures increased with the inflating cuff volume in all devices and were highest in the OTC group. Postoperatively, patients in the PLMA and the LTS group complained significantly less about sore throat (P < 0.001 and 0.05) and dysphagia (P < 0.001 and 0.02) compared to the OTC group, while there was no difference regarding the incidence of hoarseness. Subjective assessment of handling was comparable with the PLMA and the LTS, but inferior with the OTC.

Conclusions: In conclusion, both PLMA and LTS proved to be suitable for routine surgical procedures and proved to be superior to the OTC which cannot be recommended for routine use.

Summary

Background and objective: Neurological dysfunction is a common problem after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Cerebral ischaemia associated with the use of CPB may result in a release of neuronal–ischaemic markers and a subsequent cerebral inflammatory response which may additionally release inflammatory cytokines. In order to locate the origin and to quantify the release of neuronal–ischaemic markers and cytokines we investigated arterial–cerebral venous concentration gradients during and after CPB in a clinical setting.

Methods: In twenty-five patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting surgery we measured the plasma concentration of neuron-specific enolase, S-100β protein as well as interleukins (IL) IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10 from arterial and cerebral venous blood samples prior to surgery (baseline), during hypothermic CPB at 32°C, after termination of bypass, as well as 2, 4 and 6 h after admission to the intensive care unit.

Results: Arterial–cerebral venous concentration gradients of neuron-specific enolase, S-100β, IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10 were neither detectable during nor after CPB. Compared to the baseline period, S-100β and neuron-specific enolase significantly increased during hypothermic CPB. After termination of CPB, neuronal–ischaemic markers as well as cytokines were increased and remained elevated during the investigated time course without reaching baseline values.

Conclusions: Although we found an overall increase in plasma concentrations of neuronal–ischaemic markers, IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10 during and after CPB, arterial–cerebral venous gradients were not detectable for any of these parameters. Our results suggest that the increase of investigated parameters associated with the use of CPB are not primarily caused by a cerebral inflammatory response but rather reflect a release from other sources in the systemic circulation.

Summary

Background and objective: Xenon may have favourable applications in the setting of cardiac surgery. Its advantages include a desirable haemodynamic profile as well as potential cardiac and neuroprotective properties. However, its low solubility may lead to enhanced diffusion into enclosed gas spaces. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of xenon (Xe), nitrous oxide (N2O) and nitrogen (N2) on gas bubble size during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

Methods: Rats were randomized to receive 70% Xe, 26% oxygen (O2), 4% carbon dioxide (CO2) (xenon group); 70% N2O, 26% O2, 4% CO2 (nitrous oxide group) or 70% N2, 26% O2, 4% CO2 (nitrogen group) during 90 min of normothermic CPB. Small gas bubbles (300–500 μL; n = 12 per group) were injected into a bubble chamber on the venous side of the bypass circuit. After 10 min of equilibration, they were removed for volumetric analysis.

Results: The increase in bubble size was 2 ± 2% with nitrogen, 17 ± 6% with xenon (P = 0.0192 vs. nitrogen) and 63 ± 23% with nitrous oxide (P = 0.0001 vs. nitrogen). The nitrous oxide group had significantly increased bubble size compared to the xenon group (P = 0.0001).

Conclusions: During CPB, xenon anaesthesia produced a small increase in gas bubble size compared to nitrogen. Nitrous oxide resulted in significantly larger bubbles compared to both nitrogen and xenon.

Summary

Background and objective: Epidural and spinal anaesthesia are the preferred mode of anaesthesia for Caesarean section. Volume preloading is recommended to prevent maternal hypotension and a reduction in uteroplacental blood flow, although positive effects of volume preloading on maternal cardiac output and arterial pressure are debatable. Doppler measurements of the umbilical artery beyond deriving pulsatility indices are not routinely performed.

Methods: After Institutional Review Board approval and written informed consent, 14 consecutive women with epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean section received either hydroxyethyl starch 500 mL or gelatine 500 mL. Haemodynamic variables monitored were maternal arterial pressure, maximal blood flow velocity and pulsatility indices of the uterine artery derived from Doppler measurements.

Conclusions: Maternal arterial pressure and pulsatility indices in both groups did not change from baseline after intravenous colloid infusion. However, uterine blood flow increased significantly in both groups. The effectiveness of volume preloading may therefore be better described by changes in maximum uterine blood flow velocity than by pulsatility indices or maternal arterial pressure.

Summary

Background and objectives: The aim of this prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study was to evaluate the effects of thoracic epidural anaesthesia combined with isoflurane/nitrous oxide anaesthesia on intraoperative oxygenation during one-lung ventilation for lung resections.

Methods: Forty patients were randomly allocated to receive general anaesthesia maintained with isoflurane/nitrous oxide (group General, n = 20) or the same anaesthetic combined with thoracic epidural anaesthesia (group Integrated, n = 20). All patients were mechanically ventilated with the same settings (FiO2 = 0.5; VT = 9 mL kg−1; inspiratory : expiratory time = 1 : 1; inspiratory pause = 10%). Effects on oxygenation were evaluated by determining the changes in PaO2/FiO2 ratio at 10, 30, 45 and 60 min of one-lung ventilation as compared to values obtained after induction of anaesthesia (supine, two-lung ventilation).

Results: The PaO2/FiO2 ratio was decreased in both groups during one-lung ventilation until the end of surgery. No differences were found at any observation time between the groups. Ventilation with 100% oxygen because of SPO2 decrease <92% was required in nine patients of group General (45%) and in eight patients of group Integrated (40%) (P = 0.64). Manual re-inflation of the operated lung was required in one patient of group General only (P = 0.99). Heart rate was lower in group Integrated than in group General throughout the study. No differences between the two groups in mean arterial pressure were observed.

Conclusions: Adding a thoracic epidural block to isoflurane/nitrous oxide anaesthesia during one-lung ventilation for lung resections does not result in clinically relevant detrimental effects on intraoperative oxygenation.

Summary

Background and objective: Transfusion of blood components can trigger immunological reactions which may result in a transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI). The reported incidence is low; however, there is increasing evidence that the true incidence of this complication may be much higher. One reason for underdiagnosing TRALI could be a deficiency of knowledge about this complication. Therefore, we studied the level of knowledge concerning TRALI among clinicians working on intensive care units (ICU) of an university teaching hospital.

Methods: A total of 65 clinicians were asked to complete a confidential questionnaire designed to evaluate their knowledge about incidence, pathophysiology, clinical symptoms, therapy and outcome of TRALI. This questionnaire consisted of 13 questions which could be assessed by ‘yes’, ‘no’ or ‘do not know’.

Results: Only 42 ± 18% (mean ± SD) of all answers were correct, while 33 ± 17% were wrong and 25 ± 8% unanswered (‘do not know’). The 95% confidence interval for the correct answers was 30.8–53.8% implying that there was no significant difference compared to the probability of arbitrary guessing (33.3%).

Conclusions: Our survey uncovered a marked deficit of knowledge about TRALI suggesting that the low reported incidence of this complication may be in part due to a lack of awareness for TRALI. We conclude that training programmes for clinicians should alert them to the symptoms, diagnosis and treatment options of TRALI.

Summary

Background and objective: The combination of non-opioid analgesic drugs, though widely used, has been rarely evaluated. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of propacetamol and the non-steroidal analgesic drug ketoprofen, alone or in combination, on pain relief after thyroid surgery performed using remifentanil.

Methods: Ninety-seven patients were randomly allocated to one of the three groups: propacetamol 2 g (32), ketoprofen 100 mg (33) and propacetamol 2 g + ketoprofen 100 mg (32). Each regimen was administered intravenously (i.v.) 30 min before the end of surgery and then every 6 h. If pain was not relieved, patients received an i.v. bolus of tramadol 100 mg. Tramadol consumption and pain intensity using a visual analogue scale was recorded at 1, 2, 8 and 14 h after the end of surgery.

Results: Pain scores were significantly higher with propacetamol compared with ketoprofen 2 h after surgery (35 ± 3.7, 21 ± 2.6, respectively; P < 0.01). The number of patients receiving tramadol was higher with propacetamol alone compared with the two other groups, 1 h (14/32, 4/33, 2/32, respectively; P > 0.01) and 2 h (24/32, 6/33, 8/32, respectively; P < 0.01) after surgery. There was no difference between ketoprofen alone and ketoprofen plus propacetamol, and there was no difference between the three groups from the 8th hour onward.

Conclusions: In the immediate postoperative period after thyroid surgery performed using remifentanil, the concomitant use of propacetamol and ketoprofen does not improve analgesia compared with ketoprofen alone.

Summary

Background and objective: This randomized, double-blinded clinical study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of remifentanil and morphine administered using intravenous (i.v.) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for postoperative analgesia after major abdominal surgery during the first 24 postoperative hours.

Methods: Sixty-nine patients were randomly allocated into two groups, each receiving remifentanil or morphine. The first group received i.v. remifentanil PCA with a loading dose of 45 μg, a maintenance dose of 1 μg min−1, a bolus dose of 15 μg and a lockout interval of 10 min during the first 24 postoperative hours. The second group received i.v. morphine PCA with a loading dose of 5 mg, a maintenance dose of 0.3 mg h−1, a bolus dose of 1 mg and a lockout interval of 15 min. Age, weight, sex, history of general anaesthesia, duration of surgery and time spent in the post-anaesthesia care unit were recorded. Preoperative pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressures (BP), respiration rate and arterial blood gases were collected. Pulmonary function was tested before induction of anaesthesia, as well as at 4 and 26 h after operation. Pulse rate, systolic and diastolic BP, respiration rate, arterial blood gases, sedation and visual analogue scores, and presence of side-effects in the recovery room and on the ward for 24 h were recorded at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 h after operation. Total drug use, number of boluses delivered, number of boluses demanded and delivery/demand ratio were collected.

Results: Sixty patients were evaluated. The groups did not differ in age, weight, sex, history of general anaesthesia, duration of surgery or time spent in the recovery unit. There were also no clinically relevant differences between the groups with regard to haemodynamic and respiratory parameters as well as sedation and visual analogue scores (P > 0.05). More bolus doses were demanded and delivered and the delivery/demand ratio was significantly higher in the remifentanil group (P < 0.05). There was no finding suggesting acute opioid tolerance during remifentanil or morphine PCA.

Conclusion: The i.v. remifentanil PCA with the chosen dosage regimen after abdominal surgery produces postoperative analgesia and has cardiovascular side-effects similar to those achieved with i.v. morphine. Special attention must be given to respiratory depression during establishment of PCA with remifentanil.

Summary

Background and objective: This prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study was designed to test the effect of pre-anaesthetic administration of dexmedetomidine, given as a single intravenous (i.v.) dose, on postoperative pain scores and morphine consumption in patients receiving patient-controlled morphine after abdominal surgery.

Methods: Sixty patients were randomly allocated to receive dexmedetomidine (1 μg kg−1) or saline 10 min before induction of anaesthesia. Twenty minutes before the end of surgery, all patients received a standardized (0.1 mg kg−1) loading dose of morphine. They were then allowed to use a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device giving bolus doses of morphine (0.02 mg kg−1). Pain, discomfort and sedation scores; cumulative morphine consumption; time to extubation; time to recovery; and any side-effects were recorded after recovery and at 1, 2, 6, 12 and 24 h after the start of PCA.

Results: The mean time to extubation at the end of anaesthesia and recovery time were similar in both groups. There were no significant differences between groups with regard to mean pain, discomfort, sedation and nausea scores. Cumulative morphine consumption was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group at 6, 12 and 24 h (P < 0.05). The incidence of side-effects did not differ between the groups.

Conclusions: A single i.v. dose of dexmedetomidine (1 μg kg−1) given 10 min before induction of anaesthesia significantly reduced postoperative morphine consumption at identical pain scores compared to control, but had no effect on postoperative recovery time.