Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:38:34.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hepatic phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase promoter methylation is contingent on pre- and post-natal diet in female rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2011

S. P. Hoile
Affiliation:
University of Southampton, School of Medicine, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
E. S. Garratt
Affiliation:
University of Southampton, School of Medicine, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
K. A. Lillycrop
Affiliation:
Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
N. A. Thomas
Affiliation:
University of Southampton, School of Medicine, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
M. A. Hanson
Affiliation:
University of Southampton, School of Medicine, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
G. C. Burdge
Affiliation:
University of Southampton, School of Medicine, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2011

The quality of nutrition during development acting via developmental plasticity and altered methylation of gene promoters is an important determinant of future disease risk(Reference Gluckman, Hanson and Cooper1). Little is known about the relative impact of pre- and post-natal nutrition on such epigenetic effects. Induced changes to the homeostatic capacity of females may affect their ability to provide an optimal developmental environment. We investigated the effect of variation in maternal dietary protein and post-weaning folic acid (FA) intake on the methylation of individual CpG dinucleotides in the hepatic phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) promoter in adult female rats.

The study was carried out in accordance with the Home Office Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act (1986). Virgin female Wistar rats (n 9 per dietary group) were fed either protein-sufficient (S, 18% (w/w) casein) or protein-restricted (R, 9% (w/w) casein) diets during pregnancy and AIN93G during lactation(Reference Burdge, Lillycrop and Phillips2). Offspring were weaned on PN day 28 onto folic acid adequate (FA, 1 mg/kg feed) or FA-supplemented (FS, 5 mg/kg) diets for 28 d, and then an FA diet containing 18%(w/w) fat until day 84(Reference Gluckman, Hanson and Cooper1). Offspring (n 8 females per group) were fasted for 12 h prior to sample collection. Hepatic PEPCK mRNA expression was measured by real-time RTPCR(Reference Burdge, Lillycrop and Phillips2). PEPCK promoter methylation was determined by pyrosequencing(Reference Lillycrop, Phillips and Torrens3). Statistical analysis was by a general linear model (GLM) with maternal (M) and post-weaning (P) diets as fixed factors. The numerical designation of CpGs refers to their location (bp) from the transcription start site.

Different superscripts indicate significantly different values (P<0.05) by Bonferroni's post-hoc test; NS, not significant.

Post-weaning FA supplementation induced differential changes in PEPCK mRNA expression and on the methylation of individual CpGs contingent on maternal protein intake. The FS diet altered the methylation of CpGs in offspring of S dams, but not R dams. The changes induced in DNA methylation by FS diets were directionally opposite for CpGs-606, -129 and -90 compared to CpGs-508, -440 and -81. CpGs-606 (r=−0.509, P=0.003), located proximal to a heat shock factor response element and -90 (r=−0.524, P=0.002), located within a cAMP response element, were correlated negatively with PEPCK expression. These results show that maternal protein intake and post-weaning FA intake interact to induce persistent changes in hepatic PEPCK mRNA expression, which reflect altered methylation of specific CpG dinucleotides. These findings suggest that nutrition throughout early life may have long-term effects on the metabolism of females, which may affect their ability to nourish their offspring.

This work was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council. MAH receives salary support from the British Heart Foundation.

References

1.Gluckman, PD, Hanson, MA, Cooper, C et al. (2008) New Engl J Med 359, 6173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Burdge, GC, Lillycrop, KA, Phillips, ES et al. (2009) J Nutr 139, 10541060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Lillycrop, KA, Phillips, ES, Torrens, C et al. (2008) Br J Nutr 100, 278282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar