Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:41:03.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Automatic processes, emotions, and the causal field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2014

Robin M. Hogarth
Robin M. Hogarth*
Affiliation:
Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Department of Economics & Business, 08005 Barcelona, Spain. robin.hogarth@upf.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Newell & Shanks (N&S) provide a welcome examination of many claims about unconscious influences on decision making. I emphasize two issues that they do not consider fully: the roles of automatic processes and emotions. I further raise an important conceptual problem in assigning causes to potential unconscious influences. Which “causal field” is relevant: that of the investigator or the experimental participants?

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , February 2014 , pp. 31 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrade, E. B. & Ariely, D. (2009) The enduring effect of transient emotions on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 109:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danziger, S., Levav, J. & Avnaim-Pesso, L. (2011a) Extraneous factors in judicial decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 108(17):6889–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Einhorn, H. J. & Hogarth, R. M. (1986) Judging probable cause. Psychological Bulletin 99:3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogarth, R. M., Portell, M., Cuxart, A. & Kolev, G. I. (2011) Emotion and reason in everyday risk perception. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 24:202–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, J. L. (1965) Causes and conditions. American Philosophical Quarterly 2:245–64.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L. (1974) The cement of the universe: A study of causation. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Slovic, P. & Peters, E. (2006) Risk perception and affect. Current Directions in Psychological Science 15:322–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar