Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:48:22.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Competing goals draw attention to effort, which then enters cost-benefit computations as input

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2013

Marie Hennecke  and
Alexandra M. Freund
Marie Hennecke
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904. marie.hennecke@gmail.comhttp://www.psychologie.uzh.ch/fachrichtungen/motivation/team2-1/mariehennecke_en.html
Alexandra M. Freund
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, 8050 Zurich, Switzerland. freund@psychologie.uzh.chhttp://www.psychologie.uzh.ch/fachrichtungen/angpsy/angpsy-team/freund_en.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Different to Kurzban et al., we conceptualize the experience of mental effort as the subjective costs of goal pursuit (i.e., the amount of invested resources relative to the amount of available resources). Rather than being an output of computations that compare costs and benefits of the target and competing goals, effort enters these computations as an input.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 6 , December 2013 , pp. 690 - 691
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bloom, P. (2010) How pleasure works: The new science of why we like what we like. W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Boksem, M. A. S. & Tops, M. (2008) Mental fatigue: Costs and benefits. Brain Research Reviews 59(1):125–39. doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.07.001.Google Scholar
Buehler, R., Griffin, D. & Ross, M. (1994) Exploring the “planning fallacy”: Why people underestimate their task completion times. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology 67:366–81. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.366.Google Scholar
Ebner, N. C., Freund, A. M. & Baltes, P. B. (2006) Developmental changes in personal goal orientation from young to late adulthood: From striving for gains to maintenance and prevention of losses. Psychology and Aging 21:664–78. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.4.664.Google Scholar
Freund, A. M., Hennecke, M. & Mustafic, M. (2012) On gains and losses, means and ends: Goal orientation and goal focus across adulthood. In: The Oxford handbook of human motivation, ed. Ryan, R. M., pp. 280–300. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hennecke, M. & Freund, A. M. (in press) Identifying success on the process level reduces negative effects of prior weight loss on subsequent weight loss during a low-calorie diet. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (1973) Attention and effort. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kool, W., McGuire, J. T., Rosen, Z. B. & Botvinick, M. M. (2010) Decision making and the avoidance of cognitive demand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 139(4):665–82. doi:10.1037/a0020198.Google Scholar
Kruglanski, A. W., Shah, J. Y., Fishbach, A., Friedman, R., Chun, W. Y. & Sleeth-Keppler, D. (2002) A theory of goal systems. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 34:331–78. doi: 10.1177/1088868307303029.Google Scholar
Thornhill, R. (1998) Darwinian aesthetics. In: Handbook of evolutionary psychology: Ideas, issues, and applications, ed. Crawford, C. & Krebs, D. L., pp. 543–72. Erlbaum.Google Scholar