Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:31:19.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cracking the Nest Egg: Comparing Pension Politics in Post-Communist Russia and Hungary – ERRATUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2023

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Erratum
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

The Publisher apologises for errors in the layout of Table 4. The correct Table 4 is given below.

Table 4 Comparing Russia and Hungary on cost-cutting pension reforms, 2009-2021

* Regime type is based on the current Freedom House ranking (Freedom House, 2021). Freedom House rankings are calculated on a weighted scale based on a country’s civil liberties and political rights which are numerically coded and then used to group countries into free, partly free, and not free. The Freedom House scores are highly correlated with another standard measure of democracy, the Polity score, which ranges from -10 to 10 with 10 being the most democratic (Marshall et al., 2019). On Polity, Hungary received a “10” through 2018. Russia received a “3” from 1993-1999, a “6” from 2000-2006, and a “4” from 2007-2018.

In addition, the authors wish to make the following amendment to their acknowledgements: We would like to thank Professor Linda Cook and Professor Michael Titterton for organising this themed section and for their invaluable comments and suggestions on the article. Daria Prisiazhniuk acknowledges that the article was prepared within the framework of the Basic Research Program at HSE University.

References

Prisiazhniuk, D. and Wilson Sokhey, S. (2023) ‘Cracking the Nest Egg: Comparing Pension Politics in Post-Communist Russia and Hungary’, Social Policy and Society, Published by Cambridge University Press, 30 January 2023, DOI: 10.1017/S1474746422000653.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 4 Comparing Russia and Hungary on cost-cutting pension reforms, 2009-2021