Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T22:03:44.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Systematic review comparing the effectiveness of self help v. group weight management programme in weight loss

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2011

N. Khasteganan  and
A. Tsiami
N. Khasteganan
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health and Human Science, TVU, Boston Manor Road, Brentford TE8 9GA, UK
A. Tsiami
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health and Human Science, TVU, Boston Manor Road, Brentford TE8 9GA, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Abstract
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 70 , Issue OCE4: Summer Meeting, 4–6 July 2011, 70th Anniversary: From plough through practice to policy , 2011 , E203
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2011

The research is a systematically review of literature comparing the effectiveness of group weight loss programme (GWLP) and self-help weight loss programmes (SHWLP). Research method was systematically searching databases Cochrane library, PUBMED and MEDLINE from 2000 until June 2010. Selection criteria were randomised controlled trials include either GWL or SHWLP or both. Obese or overweight adults aged between 18 and 65, BMI between 25 and 40. For data collection and analysis, the reviewer used standardised tools to extract data and rate every study's methodological quality. Thirteen articles were included, six were in the SHWLP and nine were in GWLP. The mean methodological quality score was 19.5 in both groups (the minimum score was 6, while the maximum score was 26, see Table 1). The mean weight loss (kg) for SHWLP was 1.19, while GWLP had 7.08. The GWL intervention had a mean follow up months of 11.6, while the SHWLP had 13.5 (see Table 2). Higher weight loss was noticed in the GWLP as compared with the SHWLP (see graph 1). The final results should be used with care because of lack of Meta analysis in the review as the data were inhomogeneous.

Table. 1. Randomised controlled trials reporting the self and group weight management programme in weight loss.

Table 2. Comparison between mean weight loss and duration of follow up among self-helping and weight management group

Graph 1. Systematic review results' graph.

References

1.Welsh, EM, Sherwood, NE, VanWormer, JJ et al. (2009) Is frequent self-weighing associated with poorer body satisfaction? Findings from a phone-based weight loss trial. J nutr educ behav 41 (6), 425–428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Corbalán, MD, Morales, EM, Canteras, M et al. (2009) Effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy based on the Mediterranean diet for the treatment of obesity. Nutrition 25 (7–8), 861–869.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Helsel, DL, Jakicic, JM & Otto, AD (2007) Comparison of techniques for self-monitoring eating and exercise behaviors on weight loss in a correspondence-based intervention. J Am Diet Assoc 107 (10), 1807–1810.Google Scholar
4.Truby, H, Hiscutt, R, Herriot, AM et al. (2008) Commercial weight loss diets meet nutrient requirements in free living adults over 8 weeks: A randomised controlled weight loss trial. Nutr J 7, No. 25.Google Scholar
5.Byrne, NM, Meerkin, JD, Laukkanen, R et al. (2006) Weight loss strategies for obese adults: Personalized weight management program vs. standard care. Obes J 14 (10), 1777–1788.Google Scholar
6.Teixeira, PJ, Going, SB, Houtkooper, LB et al. (2004) Pretreatment predictors of attrition and successful weight management in women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 28 (9), 1124–1133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Womble, LG, Wadden, TA, McGuckin, BG et al. (2004) A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Commercial Internet Weight Loss Program. Obes Res J 12, 1011–1018.Google Scholar
8.Latner, JD, Wilson, GT, Stunkard, B, AJ, et al. (2002) Self-help and long-term behavior therapy for obesity. Behav Res Ther 40 (7), 805–812.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Heshka, S, Anderson, JW, Atkinson, RL et al. (2003) Weight loss with self helps compared with a structured commercial program, pub J Am Med Assoc 289 (14), 1792–1798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Harvey-Berino, J, Pintauro, S, Buzzell, P et al. (2002) Does using the Internet facilitate the maintenance of weight loss? Int J Obes 26, 1254–1260.Google Scholar
11.Heshka, S, Anderson, JW, Atkinson, RL et al. (2000) Weight loss with self-help compared with a Structured Commercial Program a Randomized Trial. Am J Med 109 (4), 282–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Truby, H, Baic, S, deLooy, A et al. (2006) Randomised controlled trial of four commercial weight loss programmes in the UK: initial findings from the BBC diet Cite this article as: BMJ, doi:10.1136/bmj.38833.411204.80. Available at http://www.ajcn.org. (accessed 17 February, 2010).Google Scholar
13.Waleekhachonloet, OA, Limwattananon, CH, Limwattananon, S et al. (2007) Group behavior therapy versus individual behavior therapy for healthy dieting and weight control management in overweight and obese women living in rural community. Obes Res Clin Pract 1 (4), 223–232.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table. 1. Randomised controlled trials reporting the self and group weight management programme in weight loss.

Figure 1

Table 2. Comparison between mean weight loss and duration of follow up among self-helping and weight management group

Figure 2

Graph 1. Systematic review results' graph.