This paper aims to describe the training preparation for health visitors who took part in the intervention arm of a cluster randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of training for health visitors – the POstNatal Depression Economic evaluation and Randomised (the PoNDER) trial. A secondary aim is to make available, by electronic links, the training manuals developed for and used for the cognitive behavioural approach (CBA) and the person-centred approach (PCA) training for the health visitors. The paper is of relevance to health visitors, general practitioners, nurse practitioners, midwives, clinical psychologists, mental health nurses, community psychiatric nurses, counsellors, and service commissioners.

The trial clinical outcomes have been published, indicating the pragmatic effectiveness of the package of training for health visitors to identify depressive symptoms and provide a psychologically informed intervention. The training was associated with a reduction in depressive symptoms at six months postnatally among intervention group women and some evidence of a benefit for the intervention group for some of the secondary outcomes at 18 months follow-up.

The two experimental interventions examined in the PoNDER trial built upon promising work on the potential for psychological interventions to help women recover from postnatal depression as an alternative to pharmaceutical interventions and to address the limitations of previous research in the area.

The package of health visitor training comprised the development of clinical skills in assessing postnatal women and identifying depressive symptoms, and the delivery of a CBA or a PCA for eligible women. This was the largest trial a health visitor intervention and of postnatal depression ever conducted. We are aware of no other rigorously performed trial that has published details of an extensively tested training programme for the benefit of health-care professionals and clients.

This study aimed to compare the prevalence of stroke risk factors among people with a parental history of stroke to those in a control group of individuals, of similar age, gender and social class, with no parental stroke history.

Parental stroke increases an individual’s risk of stroke, but little is known of the potential value of using this information in targeted screening for primary prevention in general practice.

We sent questionnaires to 300 randomly selected individuals aged 40–65 years, in each of 11 different general practices in Northern Ireland. Among 1061 responses received within six weeks, 332 reported a parental history of stroke (31.3%). We matched respondents with (cases) and without (controls) a parental history of stroke on characteristics of age, gender and socioeconomic status. Matched pairs were invited to attend a consultation at which their diet and exercise habits were assessed using validated questionnaires and height, weight, blood pressure and serum lipids and glucose were measured.

Matched data were available for 199 case–control pairs (398 individuals). Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly higher in cases than in paired controls (systolic 146.3 versus 140.6 mmHg (P < 0.01); diastolic 87.7 versus 85.0 mmHg (P = 0.014)). Cases consumed more alcohol than their paired controls (13.8 versus 10.1 U/week (P < 0.01)), but their measures of body mass index, lipids, diabetes, diet and exercise did not differ significantly. The results of this study suggest that screening offspring of patients with stroke in respect of blood pressure has potential value in identifying people likely to benefit from primary prevention, but do not support the adoption of a targeted screening strategy for other commonly cited stroke risk factors.

To explore the experiences of healthcare assistants (HCAs) working in general practice (GP).

HCAs increasingly play an important role in UK GP teams. The role is relatively new and little is known about how HCAs feel about their work in GP, and the challenges that they face.

Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 14 HCAs from two Primary Care Trusts in the West Midlands, United Kingdom. Transcriptions were analysed using the framework analysis approach.

Overall, HCAs reported that they enjoyed their work, and particularly appreciated the patient contact and positive feedback gained. Attitudes to the role were affected by previous position, experience, and length of time working within the practice. The HCAs felt accepted and supported by GP team members and valued the support they were receiving. Key sources of frustration included the poor salary, the lack of initial clarity with regard to role definition, and the constraints of their scope of practice. Role boundaries between HCAs and practice nurses were experienced as well defined, and no perceptions of role ambiguity were reported. HCAs considered their work to be of relatively low status, with its main purpose being to ease the practice nurse’s workload. Although many had the desire to train as nurses, few saw it as a realistic possibility.

Although HCAs appear to be satisfied overall, the elements of dissatisfaction relate to status, pay, and career progression, which may limit the retention of individuals in this role. Practices should consider the importance of recognising and valuing the work of HCAs and of providing protected time and resources for mentorship and career progression.

Maintaining the principles of asepsis when performing wound care and other invasive procedures is one of the fundamental approaches of preventing healthcare-acquired infection. Such an approach has been advocated for community practitioners.

The performance of an aseptic technique is an under-researched area. The few studies that have been conducted have identified how strict adherence to the technique is difficult and contamination of hands/gloves is common and that community nurses often have a fatalistic view about whether asepsis is possible in a community setting.

The overall aim of this research project was to examine how experienced practitioners have adapted the aseptic technique within a community setting and to what extent the changed procedure still adhered to the principles of asepsis.

This study used a mixture of non-participant observation and individual semi-structured interviews to examine adherence to the principles of the aseptic technique among the district nurses. Data were collected from one Trust in England with a total of 10 district nurses taking part and 30 aseptic procedures been observed.

The results show that almost all of the staff understood the principles of asepsis and had adapted the standard procedure for use in a patient’s home. Common challenges included wound cleaning using a single nurse procedure, the contents of the pack and the home environment. The research also identified misconceptions about clean versus aseptic procedures and a lack of training for staff.

This study highlights the challenges of maintaining the principles of asepsis in a home environment and the fact that district nurses are often relied upon to find creative solutions to such challenges. The study also highlights issues around the implementation of evidence-based practice and the need for clearer guidance about how evidence should be used alongside existing procedures.

To explore how irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) impacts on patients’ lives in order to explain the reported reduction in quality of life (QOL).

IBS affects 10–20% of the population and over half of the people with the condition consult in primary care, with many consultations ending unsatisfactorily. IBS is known to have a detrimental effect on the QOL, though the mechanisms through which this is affected are poorly understood. A greater understanding of the patient experience of IBS would facilitate better healthcare provision.

Eighteen semi-structured, in-depth interviews were undertaken in the West Midlands, United Kingdom from August 2006 to March 2008. Interviews were carried out until data saturation was achieved. All interviewees had previously taken part in one of the two recent primary care-based IBS studies and were long-term sufferers of IBS. Participants were purposively sampled to capture a range of experiences and included both genders, a range of ages, symptom severity scores and IBS sub-types.

In contrast to the previously reported ‘worried well’ label, participants reported integration of the disease into their lives to the extent that it became a part of their identity. Even so, IBS did at times prevent their participation in everyday activities. Strategies used by participants to manage symptoms were an integral part of daily living and events which threatened routine coping strategies caused stress and exacerbated symptoms. Both adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies were identified. These were in part patient created, but for many incorporated advice or medication provided by their doctor. The findings not only confirm the extensive impact of IBS on daily living but also expose the additional impacts of IBS on emotional well-being and self-identity. The reduced QOL reported in previous studies may be an underestimate of the impact of IBS on patients’ lives as patients integrate coping mechanisms completely into daily living.

To examine whether different methods of administration of a patient questionnaire (PQ) assessing a doctor’s professional performance can influence the quality of data collected.

Patient surveys are important information sources regarding a doctor’s professional performance. Previous research across a range of patient outcomes suggests that the method of administration can influence response rates and ratings, although no data that explore how this might influence patients’ assessments of a doctor’s professional performance are available.

A volunteer sample of 13 UK doctors from primary care settings undertook a cross-sectional patient survey. Seven doctors distributed patient surveys using exit and touch-tone telephone administration, and six doctors used exit and postal administration. A consecutive sample of up to 40 patients per doctor completed each method of administration; postal and touch-tone surveys were administered retrospectively, whereas the exit surveys were administered prospectively. The GMC (General Medical Council) PQ included nine performance evaluation questions. We examined the response rates, item completion rates and response profiles of exit survey responses with those obtained from either postal or touch-tone telephone methods.

The administration methods influence the quality and comparability of data obtained. The exit survey response rate was higher than touch-tone (82.1% versus 37.5%; P < 0.0001) or postal survey (no reminder) (76.7% versus 60.8%; P < 0.0001) administration, but comparable to the postal survey after one reminder (78.3% versus 75.0%; P = 0.39). Item completion rates were comparable for exit and touch-tone surveys (highest rates of missing data 4.1% and 4.6%, respectively), but exit surveys resulted in more missing values than postal surveys (10.3 to 11.7% versus 1.1 to 3.9%). Response profiles varied. Both touch-tone and postal surveys yielded significantly more critical ratings than the exit survey (three of nine items).

Mixing administration methods requires caution when the data are used to create benchmarks against which a doctor’s performance is assessed.