Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T04:06:17.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Psychoactive drug use: Expand the scope of outcome assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2011

Alfonso Troisi
Affiliation:
Department of Neuroscience, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy. alfonso.troisi@uniroma2.ithttp://web.uniroma2.it/medicinait.php

Abstract

The “hijacking” and “drug instrumentalization” models of psychoactive drug use predict opposite outcomes in terms of adaptive behavior and fitness benefits. Which is the range of applicability of each model? To answer this question, we need more data than those reported by studies focusing on medical, psychiatric, and legal problems in addicted users. An evolutionary analysis requires a much wider focus.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Harmer, C. J. (2010) Antidepressant drug action: A neuropsychological perspective. Depression & Anxiety 27:231–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, M. T. & Troisi, A. (1998) Darwinian psychiatry. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellman, T. A., Bustanmante, V., David, D. & Fins, A. (2002) Hypnotic medication in the aftermath of trauma. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 63:1183–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nesse, R. M. (1990) Evolutionary explanations of emotions. Human Nature 1:261–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nesse, R. M. & Berridge, K. C. (1997) Psychoactive drug use in evolutionary perspective. Science 278:6366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Panksepp, J. (1998) Affective neuroscience. The foundations of human and animal emotions. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troisi, A. (2001) Harmful effects of substance abuse: A Darwinian perspective. Functional Neurology 16:237–43.Google ScholarPubMed