Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T22:05:58.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impact of apo E genotype on postprandial TAG-rich lipoprotein in healthy men

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2011

V. Calabuig-Navarro
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, RG6 6AP, UK
C. M. Walden
Affiliation:
Unilever Discover, Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook, MK44 1LQ, UK
J. A. Lovegrove
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, RG6 6AP, UK
A. M. Minhane
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, RG6 6AP, UK Department of Nutrition, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, NR4 7TJ, UK
K. G. Jackson
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, RG6 6AP, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2011

The concentration of plasma fasting and postprandial TAG and TAG-rich lipoproteins (TRLs) composition and particle size, are recognised as being important determinants of atherogenesis and CVD risk(Reference Nordestgaard, Benn and Schnohr1). apoE is a protein found associated with TRLs and apoE genotype in part determines responsiveness to dietary fat change with the greatest reduction in LDL cholesterol levels evident in apoE4 carriers following the switch to a low fat/low cholesterol diet. However, the responsiveness to acute changes in dietary fat composition is less clear.

Our aim was to examine the impact of the apoE genotype on the response of postprandial plasma TAGs, the composition of TRL with Svedberg flotation rates (S f)>400, S f 60–400 and S f 20–60 and lipoprotein particle size, to meals of varying fatty acid composition. Twenty-one healthy men (mean (sd), age 48 (16) years and BMI 26 (3) kg/m2), were recruited according to apoE genotype (10 apoE3/3, 11 apoE3/E4). They consumed in random order a mixed meal containing 50 g of fat rich in either SFA, unsaturated fatty acids (UNSAT) or SFA with fish oils (FO, 5.75 g DHA and 0.83 g EPA) on three separate occasions. Fasting and frequent postprandial blood samples were collected until 480 min after the meal.

Units for AUC are mmol/l×480 min.

There was no significant impact of apoE genotype on AUC for the total postprandial TAG responses or any of the TRL fractions after the three meals. A significant genotype (P=0.015), time×genotype (P=0.008) and meal×time×genotype (P=0.003) effect was observed in the particle size of the S f>400 fraction. A significant genotype effect in the time to reach peak TAG concentration in the S f 20–60 fraction (P=0.032), with later peak times in the apoE3/E4 group following any meal compared with apoE3/E3 (unpublished results).

Overall, our data indicate that the apoE genotype has little impact on the postprandial TAG response following test meals of varying fat composition.

References

1.Nordestgaard, BG, Benn, M, Schnohr, P et al. (2007) Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association. 298, 299308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0