No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Food seeking and food sharing under uncertainty
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 March 2019
Abstract
We propose an elaboration of Anselme and Güntürkün's research that considers individuals’ foraging behavior as part of group efforts to cope with uncertainty. We discuss different possibilities for the interaction between individual and group mechanisms for risk reduction in uncertain environments, and we raise some open questions for future research.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019
References
Bird, D. W. (1997) Delayed reciprocity and tolerated theft: The behavioral ecology of food-sharing strategies. Current Anthropology 38(1):49–78. https://doi.org/10.1086/204581.Google Scholar
Bleige Bird, R., Smith, E. A., & SBird, D.W. (2001) The hunting handicap: Costly signaling in human foraging strategies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 50(1):9–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650100338.Google Scholar
Blurton Jones, N.G. (1987) Tolerated theft, suggestions about the ecology and evolution of sharing, hoarding and scrounging. Social Science Information 26(1):31–54.Google Scholar
Bone, J., Hey, J. & Suckling, J. (2004) A simple risk-sharing experiment. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 28(1):23–28.Google Scholar
Charness, G. & Genicot, G. (2009) Informal risk sharing in an infinite-horizon experiment. The Economic Journal 119(537):796–825. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20485344.Google Scholar
De Dreu, C. K. W., Greer, L. L., Handgraaf, M. J. J., Shalvi, S., Kleef, G. A. Van, Baas, M., Ten Velden, F.S., Van Dijk, E. & Feith, S. W. W. (2010) The neuropeptide oxytocin regulates parochial altruism in intergroup conflict among humans. Science 328(5984):1408–11. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1189047.Google Scholar
de Waal, F. B. M. (1989) Food sharing and reciprocal obligations among chimpanzees. Journal of Human Evolution 18(5):433–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2484(89)90074-2.Google Scholar
Gurven, M. (2004) To give and to give not: The behavioral ecology of human food transfers. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27:543–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X04000123.Google Scholar
Gurven, M., Hill, K., Kaplan, H., Hurtado, A. & Lyles, R. (2000) Food transfers among Hiwi foragers of Venezuela: Tests of reciprocity. Human Ecology 28(2):171–218. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007067919982.Google Scholar
Hawkes, K., O'Connell, J. F. & Blurton Jones, N. G. (2001) Hadza meat sharing. Evolution and Human Behavior 22(2):113–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00066-0.Google Scholar
Jimenez, S. & Pietras, C. (2018) An investigation of the probability of reciprocation in a risk-reduction model of sharing. Behavioural Processes 157:583–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.04.012.Google Scholar
Kaplan, H., Hill, K., Cadeliña, R. V, Hayden, B., Hyndman, D. C., Preston, R. J., Alden Smith, E., Stuart, D.E. & Yesner, D. R. (1985) Food sharing among ache foragers: Tests of explanatory hypotheses [and Comments and Reply]. Current Anthropology 26(2):223–46.Google Scholar
Kaplan, H., Schniter, E., Smith, V. L. & Wilson, B. J. (2012) Risk and the evolution of human exchange. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 279(1740):2930–35. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.2614.Google Scholar
Kosfeld, M., Heinrichs, M., Zak, P. J., Fischbacher, U. & Fehr, E. (2005) Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature 435(7042):673–76. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03701.Google Scholar
Madden, J. R. & Clutton-Brock, T. H. (2011) Experimental peripheral administration of oxytocin elevates a suite of cooperative behaviours in a wild social mammal. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278(1709):1189–94. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.1675.Google Scholar
Suleiman, R., Aharonov-Majar, E. & Luzon, P. (2015) The sharing dilemma: Joining cooperative groups and sharing resources as a means of coping with environmental risk. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 28(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1831.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, G. S. (1990) Food sharing in vampire bats. Scientific American 262(2):76–83.Google Scholar
Winterhalder, B. (1986) Diet choice, risk, and food sharing in a stochastic environment. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 5(4):369–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4165(86)90017-6.Google Scholar
Wittig, R. M., Crockford, C., Deschner, T., Langergraber, K. E., Ziegler, T. E. & Zuberbuhler, K. (2014) Food sharing is linked to urinary oxytocin levels and bonding in related and unrelated wild chimpanzees. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281(1778):20133096. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.3096.Google Scholar
Target article
How foraging works: Uncertainty magnifies food-seeking motivation
Related commentaries (22)
A neural basis for food foraging in obesity
Beyond uncertainty: A broader scope for “incentive hope” mechanisms and its implications
Beyond “incentive hope”: Information sampling and learning under reward uncertainty
Complex social ecology needs complex machineries of foraging
Considerations for the study of “incentive hope” and sign-tracking behaviors in humans
Does the “incentive hope” hypothesis explain food-wasting behavior among humans? Yes and no
Extending models of “How Foraging Works”: Uncertainty, controllability, and survivability
Food security and obesity: Can passerine foraging behavior inform explanations for human weight gain?
Food seeking and food sharing under uncertainty
Food-seeking behavior has complex evolutionary pressures in songbirds: Linking parental foraging to offspring sexual selection
Foraging extends beyond food: Hoarding of mental energy and information seeking in response to uncertainty
Hoarding all of the chips: Slot machine gambling and the foraging for coins
Hope, exploration, and equilibrated action schemes
How uncertainty begets hope: A model of adaptive and maladaptive seeking behavior
Mechanistic models must link the field and the lab
Overlapping neural systems underlying “incentive hope” and apprehension
Random isn't real: How the patchy distribution of ecological rewards may generate “incentive hope”
Simulating exploration versus exploitation in agent foraging under different environment uncertainties
The value of uncertainty: An active inference perspective
Unpredictable homeodynamic and ambient constraints on irrational decision making of aneural and neural foragers
“How Foraging Works”: Let's not forget the physiological mechanisms of energy balance
“Incentive hope” and the nature of impulsivity in low-socioeconomic-status individuals
Author response
Incentive hope: A default psychological response to multiple forms of uncertainty