Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:11:04.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Subjective cognitive functioning in relation to changes in levels of depression and anxiety in youth over three months of treatment – CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2020

Kelly Allott ,
Caroline Gao ,
Sarah E. Hetrick ,
Kate M. Filia ,
Jana M. Menssink ,
Caroline Fisher ,
Ian B. Hickie ,
Helen E. Herrman ,
Debra J. Rickwood  and
Alexandra G. Parker
...Show all authors
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Keywords

Subjective cognitive functioningdepressionanxietyyouthlongitudinalcorrigendum
Type
Corrigendum
Information
BJPsych Open , Volume 6 , Issue 5 , September 2020 , e110
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

It has come to our attention that two of the items for the NSSR were incorrectly labelled in Table 3 and Figure 2 (and in the online supplementary materials).

  1. 1. Item 1 should be ‘Ability to stay awake during the day’ instead of ‘The speed of completing activities’.

  2. 2. Item 4 should be ‘Memory’ instead of ‘Ability to remember verbal instructions and conversations’.

On page 4 we state that “The percentage of participants who reported improvement in their ability to remember verbal instructions and conversations was slightly lower (17.2%)”. This should say “The percentage of participants who reported improvement in their memory was slightly lower (17.2%)”. Also on page 4 we state that “Increase in GAD7 scores from baseline to follow-up was associated with deterioration of most aspects of subjective cognitive functioning except for ‘ability to plan ahead and organise things’ and ‘the speed of completing activities’. ‘The speed of completing activities’ should be replaced with ‘ability to stay awake during the day’.

These errors have no bearing on the study results or data reported, or on the interpretation of the findings.

We sincerely apologise for the error.

References

Allott, K, Gao, C, Hetrick, SE, Filia, KM, Menssink, JM, Fisher, C, Hickie, IB, et al. Subjective cognitive functioning in relation to changes in levels of depression and anxiety in youth over 3 months of treatment. BJPsych Open 2020; 6(5), e84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.