Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:10:48.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Session 3: Joint Nutrition Society and Irish Nutrition and Dietetic Institute Symposium on ‘Nutrition and autoimmune disease’ Nutrition in Crohn's disease

Symposium on ‘The challenge of translating nutrition research into public health nutrition’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Maria O'Sullivan*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Medicine, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Adelaide & Meath Hospital, Dublin 24, Republic of Ireland
*
Corresponding author: Dr Maria O'Sullivan, fax +353 1 896 2988, email maria.osullivan@tcd.ie
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The exact aetiology of Crohn's disease remains unknown. The consensus is that the disease results from a complex interaction between genes, immunity and environmental factors. Diet is attractive, in theory, as an environmental risk factor in the aetiology of the disease. The epidemiological data, often impeded by methodological issues, have failed to confirm a direct link between pre-diet illness and the development of Crohn's disease. Once diagnosed, however, nutrition has an important role in disease management. Among the nutritional issues are malnutrition, weight loss and suboptimal nutritional status; these outcomes may be present at any stage of the disease but are likely to be overt during acute illness and hospitalisation. Malnutrition has been identified in approximately 40% of hospital admissions with Crohn's disease and is associated with higher mortality, longer hospital stays and higher healthcare costs. Patients in remission may indeed be overweight and appear to be influenced by the general population trends toward overweight and obesity. Irrespective of BMI, patients are at risk of micronutrient deficiencies. Vitamin D deficiency, for example, is common in Crohn's disease and has important implications for bone health. Moreover, newer evidence suggests that vitamin D has potential anti-inflammatory effects. Dietary approaches, in the form of enteral nutrition, have previously been shown to reduce inflammation and treat the active disease. Current guidelines now recommend that corticosteroids are more effective than enteral nutrition for treating adults. Enteral nutrition has important growth and developmental benefits and continues to be a recommended therapy for children with Crohn's disease.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2009

Abbreviation:
CD

Crohn's disease

Crohn's disease: background

Crohn's disease (CD) and a related condition, ulcerative colitis, are collectively referred to as inflammatory bowel disease. CD is a lifelong chronic relapsing and remitting inflammatory condition of the gastrointestinal tract. Symptoms include diarrhoea, abdominal pain, fever and fatigue. The disease is named after Dr Burrill B Crohn, who in 1932, along with his colleagues, published a landmark paper describing ‘regional ileitis’, which is now known as CD(Reference Crohn, Ginzburg and Oppenheimer1).

The incidence of CD is estimated at 6·7 cases per 100 000 annually, with a prevalence of 140 cases per 100 000 in the Western world(Reference Loftus2). CD may be diagnosed at any age, including childhood, but typically presents in late adolescence and early adulthood (15–30 years of age). The disease therefore affects individuals during their most active years and is associated with increased morbidity, hospitalisation, surgery, medical and nutritional complications and high healthcare costs. For individuals with this condition it can be debilitating, resulting in poor quality of life, reduced daily functioning and the potential to cause lifelong ill health.

Given the symptoms and nature of this condition, nutritional issues are important. The present review sets out to address three key questions relating to nutrition in CD: (1) is diet a risk factor for the development of the disease; (2) what are the main nutrition-related issues in disease management; (3) are dietary approaches effective for treating active disease.

Is diet a risk factor for the development of Crohn's disease?

The exact aetiology of CD remains unknown. The consensus is that the disease results from a complex interaction between genes, immunity and environmental factors(Reference Hanauer3). There is a known genetic component to CD; the disease runs in families and 20–25% of patients have a first-degree relative with either CD or ulcerative colitis. More recent advances in genetics show that mutations in the NOD2/CADD15 gene, located on chromosome 16, are associated with increased susceptibility to the disease(Reference Ogura, Bonen and Inohara4, Reference Hugot, Chamaillard and Zouali5). Cigarette smoking is one of the best-described environmental risk factors(Reference Loftus2, Reference Birrenbach and Bocker6), with smokers twice as likely to develop CD as non-smokers. Several other risk factors have been proposed, including diet, socio-economic factors and childhood infections(Reference Loftus2).

Diet is attractive, in theory, as an environmental risk factor in the aetiology of the disease. Westernised diets, typically characterised by high fat, high sugar and low fibre intakes, have been proposed as a risk factor for the development of CD(Reference Mahmud and Weir7). The increasing incidence of the disease in countries such as Japan coincides with changes to more Westernised diets(Reference Shoda, Matsueda and Yamato8). A number of case–control studies conducted in the 1970s and 1980s have identified refined sugars as a potential risk factor(Reference Mayberry, Rhodes and Allan9, Reference Martini and Brandes10); however, this finding has yet to be confirmed by large prospective studies. A larger case–control study has implicated consumption of chocolate and cola drinks as possible risk factors for the disease(Reference Russel, Engels and Muris11). Overall, the data showing a relationship between sugar intake and onset of CD are inconsistent(Reference Riordan, Ruxton and Hunter12) and there is limited convincing evidence that high sugar intakes relate to disease onset. Similarly for fats, some studies have implicated monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats in the development of the disease(Reference Shoda, Matsueda and Yamato8, Reference MacLean, Mojica and Newberry13). A hospital-based case–control study from Japan has shown that the consumption of sugars, sweeteners and confectionery as well as fats and oils (intakes of total fat, MUFA, PUFA and n-3 and n-6 fatty acids) are positively associated with CD risk(Reference Sakamoto, Kono and Wakai14). Overall, the putative role of fats and sugar in the development of the disease remains inconclusive.

More recently, a Canadian study has revisited this issue of diet as a risk factor(Reference Amre, D'Souza and Morgan15). In a case–control study the dietary habits were assessed 1 year before disease onset in 130 children with CD compared with 202 controls. The findings suggested that intakes of fruit and vegetables, fish and nuts were associated with a lower risk of developing the disease in children. Data for fat intake were also reported, showing a negative association between consumption of long-chain n-3 fatty acids and CD, with a higher long-chain n-3:n-6 fatty acids associated with lower risks for the disease(Reference Amre, D'Souza and Morgan15). These findings, however, need to be confirmed in larger rigorously-conducted prospective studies.

There are several methodological challenges in providing supporting evidence that diet is a truly causative agent in CD. In retrospective studies it may be difficult to determine whether dietary patterns have occurred because of the disease symptoms rather than contributing to the development of the disease, bearing in mind that the onset of the disease may precede the diagnosis by a considerable time. Several methodological issues, particularly in relation to recalled dietary intakes, have been highlighted(Reference Riordan, Ruxton and Hunter12). The relatively low incidence of the disease is also a challenge to studying the role of dietary factors in disease onset in large cohorts. Moreover, dietary habits may be markers for aspects of lifestyle other than diet, such as socio-economic factors, childhood factors, educational status and access to health care. For an individual with CD eating in general or eating specific foods may aggravate gastrointestinal symptoms without having a causative role in the disease.

In summary, to date, there is no conclusive evidence that pre-illness diet directly contributes to the pathogenesis of CD. There is currently no recommended diet-specific approach to reducing the risk of developing CD, over and above general healthy eating and lifestyle advice aimed at the general population. Once CD is diagnosed, however, nutrition does have an important role in the management of this chronic digestive condition.

What are the nutritional issues and challenges in CD?

There are many nutritional challenges in managing patients with CD throughout the course of their disease. These challenges include malnutrition in hospitalised patients, malabsorption, short bowel syndrome, micronutrient status(Reference Filippi, Al-Jaouni and Wiroth16, Reference Johtatsu, Andoh and Kurihara17), Fe-deficiency anaemia(Reference Gasche, Berstad and Befrits18) and osteoporosis(Reference Scott, Gaywood and Scott19, Reference Bernstein and Leslie20). For the purposes of the present review the focus is on the contrasting nutritional issues of malnutrition and overweight in CD and on the growing problem of vitamin D insufficiency.

Malnutrition in Crohn's disease

The causes of malnutrition in CD are multiple and include poor dietary intake, impaired nutrient digestion and absorption and increased nutrient requirements (Fig. 1). Malnutrition, weight loss and suboptimal nutritional status may be present at any stage of the disease but are often overt during acute illness and hospitalisation.

Fig. 1. Causes of malnutrition in Crohn's disease (CD).

A study of hospital admissions (n 502) has identified malnutrition in 40% of patients with inflammatory bowel disease(Reference Pirlich, Schutz and Kemps21); the highest prevalence of malnutrition among patients with benign diseases. Furthermore, patients with malnutrition spend 40% longer in hospital(Reference Pirlich, Schutz and Kemps21). Recently, a large study comprising >75 000 patients has highlighted a higher prevalence of protein–energy malnutrition among admissions for inflammatory bowel disease than admissions not for inflammatory bowel disease (6·1% compared with 1·8% respectively)(Reference Nguyen, Munsell and Harris22). The prevalence rates of malnutrition in this study are unusually low and are possibly underestimated because malnutrition was identified from information contained in national databases of hospital discharges rather than being measured specifically for the study. This approach is in contrast to hospital-based studies (for example, see Pirlich et al.(Reference Pirlich, Schutz and Kemps21)) in which malnutrition was measured by anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance. Nevertheless, it was found that when malnutrition is present patients have a higher mortality, longer hospital stays and higher healthcare costs(Reference Nguyen, Munsell and Harris22). In acutely-ill hospitalised patients malnutrition may be a marker of disease severity and poor prognosis. Hospitalised patients may often be malnourished on admission, which worsens while in hospital(Reference McWhirter and Pennington23). Thus, appropriate nutritional screening and intervention as part of the multidisciplinary management of CD is important.

While malnutrition during active disease or hospitalisation may be expected, the nutritional status of patients with inactive disease is less clear. Changes in lean body mass, muscle function and bone stores have been documented during remission(Reference Geerling, Badart-Smook and Stockbrugger24Reference Valentini, Schaper and Buning26). Reduced hand-grip strength has been identified in patients with quiescent CD in the absence of other signs of malnutrition(Reference Nic Suibhne, O'Morain and O'Sullivan27). Also, reduced body cell mass and reduced hand-grip strength have been reported in CD in remission compared with controls(Reference Valentini, Schaper and Buning26). Reductions in muscle function and body cell mass have, therefore, been identified in patients considered well nourished according to routine measures such as BMI, serum albumin and screening tools such as the subjective global assessment and the malnutrition universal screening tool. It would appear, however, that the emerging findings in CD among outpatients and patients in clinical remission are an increase in BMI and the presence of overweight.

Overweight: the changing shape of Crohn's disease

CD is traditionally considered to be a disease associated with weight loss and low BMI. This perception, however, appears to be changing. In a study of children with newly-diagnosed CD most of the subjects (68%) were found to have a BMI in the normal range, with 10% classed as overweight or at risk for overweight(Reference Kugathasan, Nebel and Skelton28). Low BMI was documented in <25% of all children at diagnosis. These findings are illustrated in Fig. 2, which compares BMI data from two cohorts of American children with inflammatory bowel disease with data from normal healthy children(Reference Kugathasan, Nebel and Skelton28); they suggest that overweight or obesity should not preclude a diagnosis of CD in children(Reference Kugathasan, Nebel and Skelton28, Reference Sokol29). In adults the predominant form of malnutrition in patients in disease remission appears to be an excess of body fat(Reference Sousa Guerreiro, Cravo and Costa30). In a preliminary study the majority of patients, even those with signs of reduced muscle function, have been found to have a BMI that is normal or above normal, with 40% classed as overweight or obese(Reference Nic Suibhne, O'Morain and O'Sullivan27).

Fig. 2. Classification of BMI in 2748 US children in years 2001 and 2002, as determined by National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) data (controls) and in children with newly-diagnosed Crohn's disease (CD) from the North American CD cohort (n 456) and the Wisconsin CD cohort (n 142). (), BMI≥85th percentile (at risk of overweight or overweight); (□), BMI 5th–84th percentile (normal reference range); (▪), BMI<5th percentile (low). (Reproduced, with permission from Elsevier, from Kugathasan et al.(Reference Kugathasan, Nebel and Skelton28).)

Taken together, these findings suggest that individuals with CD, at least when in remission and not hospitalised, are similar to those for the general population and are influenced by the background population trends towards overweight and obesity. There are added concerns for this phenomenon in CD. Overweight may mask other aspects of poor nutritional status such as loss of lean body mass, bone loss or micronutrient deficiencies. It has been reported that macronutrient needs of patients in disease remission are met in ⩽70% of patients; micronutrient deficiencies, however, may be common and require specific screening(Reference Filippi, Al-Jaouni and Wiroth16). The consequences of overweight and excess body fat in the context of CD are not clear. It has been suggested that obese patients with CD are more prone to develop an active disease than matched non-obese patients with CD(Reference Blain, Cattan and Beaugerie31). Furthermore, obese patients with CD require surgery sooner than non-obese patients with CD(Reference Hass, Brensinger and Lewis32).

In the short term overweight among individuals with CD may reflect wellness and disease control. How overweight and excess adipose tissue interacts with a background of inflammation and contributes to relapse, comorbidity, long-term complications or disease course in CD remains to be seen. Adipose tissue, once considered to be an inert entity, is now known to produce several bioactive molecules including TNFα, which is a key pro-inflammatory cytokine in CD. Furthermore, a build up of intra-abdominal adipose tissue is a recognised feature of CD, which may contribute to intestinal inflammation(Reference Schaffler, Scholmerich and Buchler33).

Vitamin D insufficiency in Crohn's disease

Vitamin D deficiency is common in individuals with CD(Reference Siffledeen, Siminoski and Steinhart34, Reference Tajika, Matsuura and Nakamura35), with known implications for the risk of bone disease. Vitamin D stimulates bone matrix formation and maturation and promotes Ca absorption from the gut and kidney (for review, see Lanham-New(Reference Lanham-New36)). The relative risk of fractures is 40% greater in patients with inflammatory bowel disease than in the general population. The prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis is estimated at 50% and 15% respectively(Reference Bernstein, Leslie and Leboff37). Corticosteroid therapy, malabsorption, malnutrition, inflammation and hormonal and genetic factors as well as vitamin D and Ca status contribute to this increased risk of bone disease. As far back as 2000 the British Society of Gastroenterology highlighted the importance of recognising and treating vitamin D deficiency in individuals with CD and have recommended daily vitamin D supplements of 20 μg for patients taking systemic corticosteroids(Reference Scott, Gaywood and Scott19).

Individuals with CD are at most risk of vitamin D deficiency in winter(Reference McCarthy, Duggan and O'Brien38), especially in countries of northern latitudes, because the lack of sunlight during winter months results in poor stimulation of vitamin D production in the skin. Diet alone is unlikely to maintain adequate serum vitamin D status, as few foods, apart from oily fish and fortified foods, are good sources of this vitamin. Dietary vitamin D may be further compromised for individuals with CD by poor dietary intakes and malabsorption.

Defining optimal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level in Crohn's disease

Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D is the biomarker most commonly used to assess vitamin D status. The most appropriate thresholds for determining vitamin D status are an issue of debate(Reference Lips39Reference Vieth and Carter41). The focus of this argument is on determining the optimal level for health as opposed to the minimum level to prevent deficiency and severe bone disease such as osteomalacia and rickets. Broadly speaking, a level of 40 or 50 nmol/l(Reference Lips39, Reference Vieth and Carter41, Reference Hypponen and Power42) is used to define insufficient or inadequate vitamin D status. Other researchers propose higher cut-off levels of the order of 75–80 nmol/l(Reference Heaney40, Reference Hypponen and Power42). The debate about 25-hydroxyvitamin D is pertinent to CD because higher disease-specific levels may well be required to prevent bone disease in this at-risk group. Moreover, 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels that promote anti-inflammatory effects, if any, in CD have yet to be determined.

Vitamin D: possible anti-inflammatory role of vitamin D in Crohn's disease

There is growing evidence to suggest a role for vitamin D beyond its role in bone health in CD. Deficiency of vitamin D has been reported to accelerate the development of symptoms of inflammatory bowel disease in IL-10-knock-out mice(Reference Cantorna, Munsick and Bemiss43), while dietary vitamin D and Ca have been reported to suppress experimental colitis by inhibition of the TNFα pathway(Reference Zhu, Mahon, Froicu and Cantorna44). Recently, anti-inflammatory effects of vitamin D on T-cells derived from patients with CD have been described(Reference Bartels, Jorgensen and Agnholt45); in this study 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol was found to increase IL-10 and reduce interferon-γ production.

Vitamin D insufficiency in Crohn's disease: spectrum of a wider public health problem

The identification of vitamin D insufficiency is, of course, not isolated to CD. Indeed, numerous studies now suggest that hypovitaminosis D is widespread in adult normal populations(Reference Hypponen and Power42, Reference McCarthy, Collins and O'Brien46Reference Chapuy, Preziosi and Maamer48). A large cohort study of British adults has documented hypovitaminosis D in 47% of participants in winter and spring and 15% during summer and autumn. Similarly, a high prevalence (51%) of vitamin D insufficiency has been reported among healthy Irish adults, with half (51%) classed as vitamin D insufficient, rising to 58% in winter(Reference O'Sullivan, Nic Suibhne and Cox49). Substantial work now shows that vitamin D deficiency is common in the general population, suggesting that the high prevalence of deficiency in CD is part of a spectrum of a wider public health issue. The deficiency, however, may be more common and more severe among individuals with CD and the consequences of poor vitamin D status are likely to be considerable in terms of the added risk of bone disease and the potential role in suppressing inflammation.

Is nutrition effective in the treatment of Crohn's disease?

Adults

In the early 1970s enteral nutrition, in the form of an elemental diet, was shown to have a primary therapeutic effect in CD(Reference Voitk, Echave and Feller50, Reference Fisher, Foster and Abel51). An elemental diet provides nutrients in their simplest form, i.e. protein as free amino acids, carbohydrate as glucose or short-chain maltodextrins and fat as short-chain TAG. Elemental diets were used initially to nourish patients before surgery and some of these patients with CD were found to inadvertently improve symptomatically, which suggested that the diet may have had a primary therapeutic effect(Reference Voitk, Echave and Feller50, Reference Fisher, Foster and Abel51). In the 1980s the first controlled trial confirmed that an elemental diet is as effective as corticosteroids in inducing clinical remission in active CD(Reference O'Morain, Segal and Levi52). Several subsequent studies have supported this therapeutic effect and have also shown that the less-expensive and more-palatable polymeric (whole-protein) enteral formulas are equally as effective as an elemental diet(Reference Sanderson, Udeen and Davies53Reference Giaffer, North and Holdsworth55).

The therapeutic approach of enteral nutrition is based on administering the feed as the only source of nutrition either orally or by nasogastric tube for 1–2 weeks. The practicalities of this regimen for adult patients, who may have other therapeutic options, should be considered. Poor compliance typically results in poor outcome irrespective of the therapeutic agent; suggestions on overcoming the practical challenges for the use of enteral nutrition in adults with CD are detailed elsewhere(Reference O'Sullivan and O'Morain56Reference Teahon, Pearson and Levi58).

More recent evaluation, based on meta-analyses(Reference Fernandez-Banares, Cabre and Esteve-Comas59, Reference Messori, Trallori and D'Albasio60) and a Cochrane review(Reference Zachos, Tondeur and Griffiths61), now show that corticosteroids are more effective than enteral nutrition therapy in adults. Current guidelines mirror this finding, recommending that enteral nutrition is less effective than corticosteroids in the treatment of active CD, but that it may be considered as therapy for adults in special circumstances, e.g. where other primary therapy may not be feasible(Reference Carter, Lobo and Travis62). As adjunctive therapy, nutritional support is recommended for any malnourished patient with CD or for patients with difficulty maintaining normal nutritional status (Table 1). The role of nutritional therapy in the management of adult CD in the future remains uncertain(Reference O'Sullivan and O'Morain57, Reference Gassull63, Reference Matsui, Sakurai and Yao64), particularly in the era of newer therapeutic approaches such as biologic therapy that have changed the management of this disease(Reference Rutgeerts, Van Assche and Vermeire65). Moreover, in adults guidelines recommend using enteral nutrition in special circumstances rather than as a generic therapy. Clearly, its role in managing malnourished patients or those at risk of malnutrition is undisputed (Table 1).

Table 1. Summary of guidelines for enteral nutrition as primary therapy in Crohn's disease

EN, enteral nutrition (oral nutritional supplements or tube feeding); CD, Crohn's disease; n/a, not applicable.

Children

In children with CD the rationale for using enteral nutrition as the primary therapy is stronger. In addition to the therapeutic effect(Reference Dziechciarz, Horvath and Shamir66), nutritional therapy has positive effects on growth and development(Reference Day, Whitten and Sidler67, Reference Newby, Sawczenko and Thomas68) and may reduce the use of corticosteroids(Reference Knight, El-Matary and Spray69). A recent meta-analysis has concluded that enteral nutrition has similar efficacy to corticosteroids in children, but has cautioned that this outcome is based on limited data(Reference Dziechciarz, Horvath and Shamir66). A Cochrane review of strategies for growth failure in children with CD has highlighted the positive effect of enteral nutrition therapy in promoting growth(Reference Newby, Sawczenko and Thomas68). In children enteral nutrition is recommended as first-line therapy for active disease, especially for those with growth failure (Table 1). As a maintenance therapy to prolong remission, enteral nutrition, in addition to normal diet, has been shown to prolong remission and improve linear growth in children who have achieved remission by exclusive enteral nutrition(Reference Wilschanski, Sherman and Pencharz70).

Mode of action

The mechanisms underlying the therapeutic response to enteral nutrition remain unclear. There is evidence that enteral nutrition therapy promotes mucosal healing and down regulates mucosal pro-inflammatory cytokines(Reference Fell, Paintin and Arnaud-Battandier71, Reference Yamamoto, Nakahigashi and Saniabadi72). Low antigenic load (absence of whole protein) was initially proposed to contribute to the therapeutic effect, but it is now known, however, that whole-protein enteral feeds are as effective as the amino acid-based elemental diets(Reference Verma, Brown and Kirkwood73). Other theories(Reference O'Sullivan and O'Morain74) relate to the provision of fatty acids(Reference Gassull, Fernandez-Banares and Cabre75), changes in gut flora and changes in intestinal permeability. Better understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying a therapeutic response, as well as the phenotypic and genotypic factors that predict this response, may allow more innovative approaches to diet therapy in the future.

In summary, enteral nutrition arguably offers a safe mode of delivery of potentially immune-modifying substrates directly to the gastrointestinal mucosa. Its role, however, as primary therapy for CD in adults remains uncertain in the light of pharmacological advances, such as biologic therapy, that have changed the management of this disease. Judged in the context of the best evidence and consensus guidelines, enteral nutrition is shown to be less effective than corticosteroids in adults but is an effective and important first-line therapy for children.

Conclusion

Diet is attractive, in theory, as an environmental risk factor in the aetiology of CD. Currently, there is no conclusive evidence, however, that pre-illness diet is a risk factor for development of this disease. How Westernised diets and environmental factors contribute to the pathogenesis of this disease remain active areas of research interest. Once CD is diagnosed, nutrition has an important role in disease management; in particular, the prevention and treatment of malnutrition is a key clinical priority throughout all stages of this disease. While individuals with CD have disease-specific nutritional needs, they appear to be influenced also by the wider-population health issues such as vitamin D deficiency and overweight. Vitamin D deficiency is common in CD and has important implications for bone health. While CD is traditionally associated with weight loss, the emerging picture suggests that overweight may be common, particularly in patients in clinical remission.

Acknowledgements

The author declares no conflict of interest. This work was supported by The Meath Foundation Dublin.

References

1. Crohn, B, Ginzburg, L & Oppenheimer, G (1932) Regional ileitis, a pathologic and clinical entity. JAMA 99, 13231329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Loftus, EV Jr (2004) Clinical epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease: Incidence, prevalence, and environmental influences. Gastroenterology 126, 15041517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Hanauer, SB (2006) Inflammatory bowel disease: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and therapeutic opportunities. Inflamm Bowel Dis 12, Suppl. 1, S3S9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Ogura, Y, Bonen, DK, Inohara, N et al. (2001) A frameshift mutation in NOD2 associated with susceptibility to Crohn's disease. Nature 411, 603606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Hugot, J-P, Chamaillard, M, Zouali, H et al. (2001) Association of NOD2 leucine-rich repeat variants with susceptibility to Crohn's disease. Nature 411, 599603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Birrenbach, T & Bocker, U (2004) Inflammatory bowel disease and smoking: a review of epidemiology, pathophysiology, and therapeutic implications. Inflamm Bowel Dis 10, 848859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Mahmud, N & Weir, DG (2001) The urban diet and Crohn's disease: is there a relationship? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 13, 9395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Shoda, R, Matsueda, K, Yamato, S et al. (1996) Epidemiologic analysis of Crohn disease in Japan: increased dietary intake of n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids and animal protein relates to the increased incidence of Crohn disease in Japan. Am J Clin Nutr 63, 741745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Mayberry, JF, Rhodes, J, Allan, R et al. (1981) Diet in Crohn's disease. Two studies of current and previous habits in newly diagnosed patients. Dig Dis Sci 26, 444448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Martini, GA & Brandes, JW (1976) Increased consumption of refined carbohydrates in patients with Crohn's disease. Klin Wochenschr 54, 367371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Russel, M, Engels, L, Muris, J et al. (1998) Modern life in the epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease: a case-control study with special emphasis on nutritional factors. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 10, 235237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Riordan, AM, Ruxton, CH & Hunter, JO (1998) A review of associations between Crohn's disease and consumption of sugars. Eur J Clin Nutr 52, 229238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. MacLean, CH, Mojica, WA, Newberry, SJ et al. (2005) Systematic review of the effects of n-3 fatty acids in inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Clin Nutr 82, 611619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Sakamoto, N, Kono, S, Wakai, K et al. (2005) Dietary risk factors for inflammatory bowel disease: a multicenter case-control study in Japan. Inflamm Bowel Dis 11, 154163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Amre, DK, D'Souza, S, Morgan, K et al. (2007) Imbalances in dietary consumption of fatty acids, vegetables, and fruits are associated with risk for Crohn's disease in children. Am J Gastroenterol 102, 20162025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Filippi, J, Al-Jaouni, R, Wiroth, J et al. (2006) Nutritional deficiencies in patients with Crohn's disease in remission. Inflamm Bowel Dis 12, 185191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Johtatsu, T, Andoh, A, Kurihara, M et al. (2007) Serum concentrations of trace elements in patients with Crohn's disease receiving enteral nutrition. J Clin Biochem Nutr 41, 197201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Gasche, C, Berstad, A, Befrits, R et al. (2007) Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of iron deficiency and anemia in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 13, 15451553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Scott, E, Gaywood, I & Scott, B (2000) Guidelines for osteoporosis in coeliac disease and inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 46, 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Bernstein, C & Leslie, W (2004) Osteoporosis and inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 19, 941952.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Pirlich, M, Schutz, T, Kemps, M et al. (2003) Prevalence of malnutrition in hospitalized medical patients: impact of underlying disease. Dig Dis 21, 245251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Nguyen, GC, Munsell, M & Harris, ML (2008) Nationwide prevalence and prognostic significance of clinically diagnosable protein-calorie malnutrition in hospitalized inflammatory bowel disease patients. Inflamm Bowel Dis 14, 11051111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. McWhirter, J & Pennington, C (1994) Incidence and recognition of malnutrition in hospital. Br Med J 308, 945948.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Geerling, BJ, Badart-Smook, A, Stockbrugger, RW et al. (1998) Comprehensive nutritional status in patients with long-standing Crohn disease currently in remission. Am J Clin Nutr 67, 919926.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Jahnsen, J, Falch, J, Mowinckel, P et al. (2003) Body composition in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol 98, 15561562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Valentini, L, Schaper, L, Buning, C et al. (2008) Malnutrition and impaired muscle strength in patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis in remission. Nutrition 24, 694702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27. Nic Suibhne, T, O'Morain, C & O'Sullivan, M (2006) Reduced muscle function and muscle stores are common in quiescent Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 130, Suppl. 2, A-611.Google Scholar
28. Kugathasan, S, Nebel, J, Skelton, JA et al. (2007) Body mass index in children with newly diagnosed inflammatory bowel disease: observations from two multicenter North American inception cohorts. J Pediatr 151, 523527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29. Sokol, J (2007) A new larger look to inflammatory bowel disease J Pediatr 51, 2A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Sousa Guerreiro, C, Cravo, M, Costa, AR et al. (2007) A comprehensive approach to evaluate nutritional status in Crohn's patients in the era of biologic therapy: a case-control study. Am J Gastroenterol 102, 25512556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. Blain, A, Cattan, S, Beaugerie, L et al. (2002) Crohn's disease clinical course and severity in obese patients. Clin Nutr 21, 5157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32. Hass, DJ, Brensinger, CM, Lewis, JD et al. (2006) The impact of increased body mass index on the clinical course of Crohn's disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4, 482488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33. Schaffler, A, Scholmerich, J & Buchler, C (2005) Mechanisms of disease: adipocytokines and visceral adipose tissue – emerging role in intestinal and mesenteric diseases. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 2, 103111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34. Siffledeen, J, Siminoski, K, Steinhart, H et al. (2003) The frequency of vitamin D deficiency in adults with Crohn's disease. Can J Gastroenterol 17, 473478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35. Tajika, M, Matsuura, A, Nakamura, T et al. (2004) Risk factors for vitamin D deficiency in patients with Crohn's disease. J Gastroenterol 39, 527533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36. Lanham-New, SA (2008) Importance of calcium, vitamin D and vitamin K for osteoporosis prevention and treatment. Proc Nutr Soc 67, 163176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37. Bernstein, CN, Leslie, WD & Leboff, MS (2003) American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement: guidelines on osteoporosis in gastrointestinal diseases. Gastroenterology 124, 791794.Google Scholar
38. McCarthy, D, Duggan, P, O'Brien, M et al. (2005) Seasonality of vitamin D status and bone turnover in patients with Crohn's disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 21, 10731083.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39. Lips, P (2004) Which circulating level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D is appropriate? J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 89–90, 611614.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40. Heaney, R (2004) Functional indices of vitamin D status and ramifications of vitamin D deficiency. Am J Clin Nutr 80, 1706S1709S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41. Vieth, R & Carter, G (2001) Difficulties with vitamin D nutrition research: objective targets of adequacy, and assays for 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Eur J Clin Nutr 55, 221222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42. Hypponen, E & Power, C (2007) Hypovitaminosis D in British adults at age 45 y: nationwide cohort study of dietary and lifestyle predictors. Am J Clin Nutr 85, 860868.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43. Cantorna, MT, Munsick, C, Bemiss, C et al. (2000) 1,25-Dihydroxycholecalciferol prevents and ameliorates symptoms of experimental murine inflammatory bowel disease. J Nutr 130, 26482652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44. Zhu, Y, Mahon, BD, Froicu, M & Cantorna, MT (2005) Calcium and 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 target the TNF-α pathway to suppress experimental inflammatory bowel disease. Eur J Immunol 35, 217224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45. Bartels, LE, Jorgensen, SP, Agnholt, J et al. (2007) 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and dexamethasone increase interleukin-10 production in CD4+ T cells from patients with Crohn's disease. Int Immunopharmacol 7, 17551764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46. McCarthy, D, Collins, A, O'Brien, M et al. (2006) Vitamin D intake and status in Irish elderly women and adolescent girls. Ir J Med Sci 175, 1420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47. Hill, T, O'Brien, M, Lamberg-Allardt, C et al. (2006) Vitamin D status of 51–75-year-old Irish women: its determinants and impact on biochemical indices of bone turnover. Public Health Nutr 9, 225233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48. Chapuy, MC, Preziosi, P, Maamer, M et al. (1997) Prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency in an adult normal population. Osteoporos Int 7, 439443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49. O'Sullivan, M, Nic Suibhne, T, Cox, G et al. (2008) High prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency in healthy Irish adults. Ir J Med Sci 177, 131134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50. Voitk, AJ, Echave, V, Feller, JH et al. (1973) Experience with elemental diet in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Is this primary therapy? Arch Surg 107, 329333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
51. Fisher, J, Foster, G, Abel, R et al. (1973) Hyperalimentation as primary therapy for inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Surg 125, 165175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52. O'Morain, C, Segal, A & Levi, A (1984) Elemental diet as primary treatment of acute Crohn's disease: a controlled trial. Br Med J 288, 18591862.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
53. Sanderson, IR, Udeen, S, Davies, PSW et al. (1987) Remission induced by an elemental diet in small bowel Crohn's disease. Arch Dis Child 61, 123127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54. Royall, D, Jeejeebhoy, KN, Baker, J et al. (1994) Comparison of amino acid v peptide based enteral diets in active Crohn's disease: clinical and nutritional outcome. Gut 35, 783787.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
55. Giaffer, MH, North, G & Holdsworth, CD (1990) Controlled trial of polymeric versus elemental diet in treatment of active Crohn's disease. Lancet 335, 816819.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
56. O'Sullivan, M & O'Morain, C (2001) Nutritional treatments in inflammatory bowel disease. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 4, 207213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
57. O'Sullivan, M & O'Morain, C (2004) Nutritional therapy in inflammatory bowel disease. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 7, 191198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
58. Teahon, K, Pearson, M, Levi, AJ et al. (1995) Practical aspects of enteral nutrition in the management of Crohn's disease. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 19, 365368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
59. Fernandez-Banares, F, Cabre, E, Esteve-Comas, M et al. (1995) How effective is enteral nutrition in inducing clinical remission in active Crohn's disease? A meta-analysis of the randomized clinical trials. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 19, 356364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
60. Messori, A, Trallori, G, D'Albasio, G et al. (1996) Defined-formula diets versus steroids in the treatment of active Crohn's disease: a meta-analysis. Scand J Gastroenterol 31, 267272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
61. Zachos, M, Tondeur, M & Griffiths, AM (2001) Enteral nutritional therapy for inducing remission of Crohn's disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001, issue 3, CD000542. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
62. Carter, MJ, Lobo, AJ & Travis, SPL (2004) Guidelines for the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults. Gut 53, Suppl. V, v1v16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
63. Gassull, MA (2004) Review article: the role of nutrition in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 20, 7983.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
64. Matsui, T, Sakurai, T & Yao, T (2005) Nutritional therapy for Crohn's disease in Japan. J Gastroenterol 40, 2531.Google ScholarPubMed
65. Rutgeerts, P, Van Assche, G & Vermeire, S (2006) Infliximab therapy for inflammatory bowel disease – seven years on. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 23, 451463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
66. Dziechciarz, P, Horvath, A, Shamir, R et al. (2007) Meta-analysis: enteral nutrition in active Crohn's disease in children. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 26, 795806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
67. Day, AS, Whitten, KE, Sidler, M et al. (2008) Systematic review: nutritional therapy in paediatric Crohn's disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 27, 293307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
68. Newby, E, Sawczenko, A, Thomas, A et al. (2005) Interventions for growth failure in childhood Crohn's disease. Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews 2005, issue 3, CD003873. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
69. Knight, C, El-Matary, W, Spray, C et al. (2005) Long-term outcome of nutritional therapy in paediatric Crohn's disease. Clin Nutr 24, 775779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
70. Wilschanski, M, Sherman, P, Pencharz, P et al. (1996) Supplementary enteral nutrition maintains remission in paediatric Crohn's disease. Gut 38, 543548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
71. Fell, J, Paintin, M, Arnaud-Battandier, F et al. (2000) Mucosal healing and a fall in mucosal pro-inflammatory cytokine mRNA induced by a specific oral polymeric diet in paediatric Crohn's disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 14, 281289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
72. Yamamoto, T, Nakahigashi, M, Saniabadi, AR et al. (2007) Impacts of long-term enteral nutrition on clinical and endoscopic disease activities and mucosal cytokines during remission in patients with Crohn's disease: a prospective study. Inflamm Bowel Dis 13, 14931501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
73. Verma, S, Brown, S, Kirkwood, B et al. (2000) Polymeric versus elemental diet as primary treatment in active Crohn's disease: a randomized, double-blind trial. Am J Gastroenterol 95, 735739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
74. O'Sullivan, M & O'Morain, C (1998) Nutritional therapy in Crohn's disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 4, 4553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
75. Gassull, MA, Fernandez-Banares, F, Cabre, E et al. (2002) Fat composition may be a clue to explain the primary therapeutic effect of enteral nutrition in Crohn's disease: results of a double blind randomised multicentre European trial. Gut 51, 164168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
76. Lochs, H, Dejong, C, Hammarqvist, F et al. (2006) ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition: Gastroenterology. Clin Nutr 25, 260274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
77. Konno, M, Kobayashi, A, Tomomasa, T et al. (2006) Guidelines for the treatment of Crohn's disease in children. Pediatr Int 48, 349352.Google ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Causes of malnutrition in Crohn's disease (CD).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Classification of BMI in 2748 US children in years 2001 and 2002, as determined by National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) data (controls) and in children with newly-diagnosed Crohn's disease (CD) from the North American CD cohort (n 456) and the Wisconsin CD cohort (n 142). (), BMI≥85th percentile (at risk of overweight or overweight); (□), BMI 5th–84th percentile (normal reference range); (▪), BMI<5th percentile (low). (Reproduced, with permission from Elsevier, from Kugathasan et al.(28).)

Figure 2

Table 1. Summary of guidelines for enteral nutrition as primary therapy in Crohn's disease