Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:56:42.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Touch me if you can: The intangible but grounded nature of abstract concepts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2020

Anna M. Borghi Open the ORCID record for Anna M. Borghi [Opens in a new window]  and
Luca Tummolini Open the ORCID record for Luca Tummolini [Opens in a new window]
Anna M. Borghi
Affiliation:
Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Via degli Apuli 1, 00185Rome, Italy anna.borghi@uniroma1.it Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, Italian National Research Council, Via San Martino della Battaglia 44, 00185Rome, Italy. luca.tummolini@istc.cnr.it
Luca Tummolini
Affiliation:
Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, Italian National Research Council, Via San Martino della Battaglia 44, 00185Rome, Italy. luca.tummolini@istc.cnr.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Thinking about what the senses cannot grasp is one of the hallmarks of human cognition. We argue that “intangible abstracta” are represented differently from other products of abstraction, that goal-derived categorization supports their learning, and that they are grounded also in internalized linguistic and social interaction. We conclude by suggesting different ways in which abstractness contributes to cement group cohesion.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 43 , 2020 , e123
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barca, L., Mazzuca, C. & Borghi, A. M. (2017) Pacifier overuse and conceptual relations of abstract and emotional concepts. Frontiers in Psychology 8:2014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barca, L., Mazzuca, C. & Borghi, A. M. (in press) Overusing the pacifier during infancy sets a footprint on abstract words processing. Journal of Child Language.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (1983) Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition 11(3):211–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, L. W. (1985) Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 11(4):629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borghi, A. M., Barca, L., Binkofski, F., Castelfranchi, C., Pezzulo, G. & Tummolini, L. (2019a) Words as social tools: Language, sociality and inner grounding in abstract concepts. Physics of Life Reviews 29:120–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borghi, A. M., Barca, L., Binkofski, F., Castelfranchi, C., Pezzulo, G. & Tummolini, L. (2019b) Words as social tools: Flexibility, situatedness, language and sociality in abstract concepts: Reply to comments on “Words as social tools: Language, sociality and inner grounding in abstract concepts.” Physics of Life Reviews 29:178–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borghi, A. M., Barca, L., Binkofski, F. & Tummolini, L. (2018a) Abstract concepts, language and sociality: From acquisition to inner speech. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 373(1752):20170134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borghi, A. M., Barca, L., Binkofski, F. & Tummolini, L. (2018b) Varieties of abstract concepts: Development, use and representation in the brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 373(1752):20170121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borghi, A. M. & Binkofski, F. (2014) Words as social tools: An embodied view on abstract concepts. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borghi, A. M., Binkofski, F., Castelfranchi, C., Cimatti, F., Scorolli, C. & Tummolini, L. (2017) The challenge of abstract concepts. Psychological Bulletin 143(3):263–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borghi, A. M., Caramelli, N. & Setti, A. (2005) Conceptual information on objects’ locations. Brain and Language 93(2):140–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borghi, A. M. & Zarcone, E. (2016) Grounding abstractness: Abstract concepts and the activation of the mouth. Frontiers in Psychology 7:1498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desai, R. H., Reilly, M. & van Dam, W. (2018) The multifaceted abstract brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 373(1752):20170122. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dove, G. (2018) Language as a disruptive technology: Abstract concepts, embodiment and the flexible mind. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 373(1752):20170135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dreyer, F. R. & Pulvermüller, F. (2018) Abstract semantics in the motor system? – An event-related fMRI study on passive reading of semantic word categories carrying abstract emotional and mental meaning. Cortex 100:52–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fini, C. & Borghi, A. M. (2019) Sociality to reach objects and to catch meaning. Frontiers in Psychology 10:838.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghio, M., Vaghi, M. M. S. & Tettamanti, M. (2013) Fine-grained semantic categorization across the abstract and concrete domains. PLOS ONE 8(6):e67090.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Granito, C., Scorolli, C. & Borghi, A. M. (2015) Naming a Lego world. The role of language in the acquisition of abstract concepts. PLOS ONE 10(1):e0114615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heit, E. & Barsalou, L. W. (1996) The instantiation principle in natural categories. Memory (Hove, England) 4:413–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lai, V. T. & Desai, R. H. (2016) The grounding of temporal metaphors. Cortex 76:43–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mazzuca, C., Lugli, L., Benassi, M., Nicoletti, R. & Borghi, A. M. (2018) Abstract, emotional and concrete concepts and the activation of mouth-hand effectors. PeerJ 6:e5987.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, G. L. & Wisniewski, E. J. (1989) Categorizing objects in isolation and in scenes: What a superordinate is good for. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15(4):572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, L. (2018) Statistical and methodological problems with concreteness and other semantic variables: A list memory experiment case study. Behavior Research Methods 50(3):1198–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prinz, J. J. (2012b) Beyond human nature. How culture and experience shape our lives. Penguin; Norton.Google Scholar
Sakreida, K., Scorolli, C., Menz, M. M., Heim, S., Borghi, A. M. & Binkofski, F. (2013) Are abstract action words embodied? An fMRI investigation at the interface between language and motor cognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7:125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shallice, T. & Cooper, R. P. (2013) Is there a semantic system for abstract words? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7:175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shea, N. (2018) Metacognition and abstract concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 373(1752):20170133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villani, C., Lugli, L., Liuzza, M. T. & Borghi, A. M. (2019) Varieties of abstract concepts and their multiple dimensions. Language and Cognition 11(3):403–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar