Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Iton, Anthony
Ross, Robert K.
and
Tamber, Pritpal S.
2022.
Building Community Power To Dismantle Policy-Based Structural Inequity In Population Health.
Health Affairs,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 12,
p.
1763.
House, Julian
Lacetera, Nicola
Macis, Mario
and
Mazar, Nina
2022.
Nudging the Nudger: A Field Experiment on the Effect of Performance Feedback to Service Agents on Increasing Organ Donor Registrations.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Dubova, Marina
Galesic, Mirta
and
Goldstone, Robert L.
2022.
Cognitive Science of Augmented Intelligence.
Cognitive Science,
Vol. 46,
Issue. 12,
Wu, James Shyan-Tau
Kremen, Claire
Zhao, Jiaying
and
Coelho, Denis Alves
2023.
How does framing influence preference for multiple solutions to societal problems?.
PLOS ONE,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 5,
p.
e0285793.
Hallsworth, Michael
2023.
A manifesto for applying behavioural science.
Nature Human Behaviour,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 3,
p.
310.
Cislak, Aleksandra
Wójcik, Adrian D.
Borkowska, Julia
Milfont, Taciano L.
and
Fairbrother, Malcolm
2023.
Secure and defensive forms of national identity and public support for climate policies.
PLOS Climate,
Vol. 2,
Issue. 6,
p.
e0000146.
Roozenbeek, Jon
Culloty, Eileen
and
Suiter, Jane
2023.
Countering Misinformation.
European Psychologist,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 3,
p.
189.
Hyder, Adnan A
Rylance, Sarah
Al Saegh, Abeer
Feigin, Valery L
Kataria, Ishu
Laatikainen, Tiina
Lee, Liming
Mahendradhata, Yodi
Marten, Robert
Mikkelsen, Bente
Miranda, J Jaime
Nugent, Rachel
Owolabi, Mayowa
Sullivan, Richard
Virani, Salim S
and
Reddy, K Srinath
2023.
Strengthening evidence to inform health systems: opportunities for the WHO and partners to accelerate progress on non-communicable diseases.
BMJ Global Health,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 11,
p.
e013994.
Nettle, Daniel
Frankenhuis, Willem E.
and
Panchanathan, Karthik
2023.
Biology, Society, or Choice: How Do Non-Experts Interpret Explanations of Behaviour?.
Open Mind,
Vol. 7,
Issue. ,
p.
625.
Judge, Madeline
Kashima, Yoshihisa
Steg, Linda
and
Dietz, Thomas
2023.
Environmental Decision-Making in Times of Polarization.
Annual Review of Environment and Resources,
Vol. 48,
Issue. 1,
p.
477.
Zengilowski, Allison
Maqbool, Irum
Deka, Surya Pratap
Niebaum, Jesse C.
Placido, Diego
Katz, Benjamin
Shah, Priti
and
Munakata, Yuko
2023.
Overemphasizing individual differences and overlooking systemic factors reinforces educational inequality.
npj Science of Learning,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 1,
Basso, Frederic
and
Krpan, Dario
2023.
The WISER framework of behavioural change interventions for mindful human flourishing.
The Lancet Planetary Health,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 2,
p.
e106.
Díaz, Juan-José
Sánchez, Alan
Diez-Canseco, Francisco
Jaime Miranda, J.
and
Popkin, Barry M.
2023.
Employment and wage effects of sugar-sweetened beverage taxes and front-of-package warning label regulations on the food and beverage industry: Evidence from Peru.
Food Policy,
Vol. 115,
Issue. ,
p.
102412.
Anzelone, Caitlin
2023.
Behavioral Public Policy in a Global Context.
p.
81.
Hofmann, Wilhelm
2023.
Going beyond the individual level in self-control research.
Nature Reviews Psychology,
Vol. 3,
Issue. 1,
p.
56.
Smith, Rory
Chen, Kung
Winner, Daisy
Friedhoff, Stefanie
and
Wardle, Claire
2023.
A Systematic Review Of COVID-19 Misinformation Interventions: Lessons Learned.
Health Affairs,
Vol. 42,
Issue. 12,
p.
1738.
Banerjee, Sanchayan
and
John, Peter
2023.
Encyclopedia of Public Policy.
p.
1.
Ispoglou, Theocharis
Wilson, Oliver
McCullough, Deaglan
Aldrich, Luke
Ferentinos, Panagiotis
Lyall, Gemma
Stavropoulos-Kalinoglou, Antonios
Duckworth, Lauren
Brown, Meghan A.
Sutton, Louise
Potts, Alexandra J.
Archbold, Victoria
Hargreaves, Jackie
and
McKenna, Jim
2023.
A Narrative Review of Non-Pharmacological Strategies for Managing Sarcopenia in Older Adults with Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases.
Biology,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 7,
p.
892.
Esmark, Anders
2023.
Is there a behavioral revolution in policy design? A new agenda and inventory of the behavioral toolbox.
Policy and Society,
Vol. 42,
Issue. 4,
p.
441.
Mills, S.
Costa, S.
and
Sunstein, C. R.
2023.
AI, Behavioural Science, and Consumer Welfare.
Journal of Consumer Policy,
Vol. 46,
Issue. 3,
p.
387.
Target article
The i-frame and the s-frame: How focusing on individual-level solutions has led behavioral public policy astray
Related commentaries (33)
An inconvenient truth: Difficult problems rarely have easy solutions
Behavioral market design
Behavioral mechanism design
Behavioral public policy in practice: Misconceptions and opportunities
Behavioral winter: Disillusionment with applied behavioral science and a path to spring forward
Community-engaged research is best positioned to catalyze systemic change
Conspiracy theory
Don't throw the individual perspective out while waiting for systemic change
Expectations, opportunities, and awareness: A case for combining i- and s-frame interventions
i-Frame interventions enhance s-frame interventions
Individual-level solutions may support system-level change â if they are internalized as part of one's social identity
It's always both: Changing individuals requires changing systems and changing systems requires changing individuals
Misdiagnosing the problem of why behavioural change interventions fail
Moral psychology biases toward individual, not systemic, representations
Moving from i-frame to s-frame focus in equity, diversity, and inclusion research, practice, and policy
Nudges, regulations, and behavioral public choice
Nudging is being framed
On Skinner's pendulum: A framework for assessing s-frame hope
Optimizing behavior change through integration of individual- and system-level intervention approaches
Real systemic solutions to humanity's problems require a radical reshaping of the global political system
Structural problems require structural solutions
The influence of private interests on research in behavioural public policy: A system-level problem
The psychology and policy of overcoming economic inequality
The real cause of our complicity: The preoccupation with human weakness
The social sciences are increasingly ill-equipped to design system-level reforms
The “hearts-and-minds frame”: Not all i-frame interventions are ineffective, but education-based interventions can be particularly bad
Unpacking the nudge muddle
Use behavioral research to improve the feasibility and effectiveness of system-level policy
Using effective psychological techniques to subvert a US sociopolitical context
When nudges have societal-level impact
Why a group-level analysis is essential for effective public policy: The case for a g-frame
Wise interventions consider the person and the situation together
“More effective” is not necessarily “better”: Some ethical considerations when influencing individual behaviour
Author response
Where next for behavioral public policy?