Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T17:13:32.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Symposium 6: Young people, artificial nutrition and transitional care Transition in young people on home parenteral nutrition

Conference on ‘Malnutrition matters’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2009

Susan Protheroe*
Affiliation:
Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Steelhouse Lane, Birmingham B4 6NH, UK
*
Corresponding author: Dr Susan Protheroe, fax +44 121 333 8701, email sue.protheroe@bhc.nhs.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pharmacological, surgical and technological advances have resulted in children now surviving through adolescence into adulthood with conditions that were previously unseen by adult services. Arranging transition for young people on home parenteral nutrition (HPN) to the adult sector is one of greatest challenges for health services that care for young people. Transition is not only a key quality issue for health services, but is a multidimensional process covering psychosocial, educational and vocational aspects. Poorly-planned transition may result in difficulties when young people access adult specialist services. As a consequence, there may be increased risk of non-adherence or lack of follow-up, which carries dangers of morbidity and mortality as well as poor social and educational outcomes. Transition does not end at the exit from the paediatric clinic, but continues into the adult sector, which needs to provide developmentally-appropriate clinical care. Recent Department of Health initiatives are aimed at ensuring that young people do not miss out on healthcare during the transfer between paediatric and adult services. Transfer can be a major, often daunting, event for young people. Parents may also fear transfer and need to learn to ‘let go’ of some control, which may be particularly difficult with a young person on HPN.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2009

Abbreviations:
HPN

home parenteral nutrition

PN

parenteral nutrition

During the last three to four decades use of parenteral nutrition (PN) has been successful in supporting survival and normal growth in paediatric patients with severe intestinal failure. Short-bowel syndrome, acquired as a result of extensive bowel resection, usually in the neonatal period, is the most common reason for intestinal failure(Reference Puntis1). Children receiving PN for primary digestive disorders, e.g. short-bowel syndrome and Crohn's disease, may have a better probability of survival (89% after 5 years)(Reference Colomb, Dabbas-Tyan and Taupin2, Reference Guarino and De Marco3) than adults (60% survival in adults)(Reference Scolapio, Fleming and Kelly4, Reference Messing, Lemann and Landais5).

Permanent intestinal failure also results from inherited conditions diagnosed in the neonatal period, which include severe motility disorders, such as chronic intestinal pseudo obstruction or long-segment Hirschsprung's disease, and congenital enteropathies, such as microvillus inclusion disease and tufting enteropathy. Although these conditions carry a worse probability of survival than intestinal failure as a result of short-bowel syndrome(Reference Colomb, Dabbas-Tyan and Taupin2, Reference Guarino and De Marco3), and patients are less likely to rehabilitate and stop home PN (HPN), children can now survive to adulthood(Reference Colomb, Dabbas-Tyan and Taupin2, Reference Guarino and De Marco3, Reference Goulet, Ruemmele and Lacaille6).

Paediatric v. adult home parenteral nutrition

The prevalence of paediatric HPN is estimated to be 2·2 per million of the general population(7). While children with short-bowel syndrome have a better chance of weaning off PN than an adult with a comparable diagnosis(Reference Guarino and De Marco3), it is estimated that in the UK up to thirty adolescents are poised to transfer to adult services over the next 5 years(7). Many of these adolescents will have been dependent on PN since early infancy (PN for ⩽6000 d). Of this cohort 40% have short-bowel syndrome secondary to neonatal causes, 30% have congenital enteropathies and a smaller number (15%) have severe motility problems(7).

Linear growth may not always be completed by age 16–18 years when a patient might be poised to transfer to adult services, particularly if puberty is delayed. Adequate energy intake to allow a normal pubertal growth spurt is essential(Reference Johnson and Sexton8). Requirements are assessed on an individual basis according to age and stage of growth, and a higher intake of intravenous fat than that required by an adult may be necessary to achieve adequate energy intake(Reference Koletzko, Goulet and Hunt9). Flexibility in timing of transfer will ensure that the needs of individual young people are met. Children who miss out on development of oral feeding skills in the first year of life may have persistent eating problems that continue as young adults. Enteral intake may be reliant on gastrostomies or feeding tubes.

Intestinal failure-associated liver disease is more common in children (23% of patients receiving HPN)(Reference Colomb, Dabbas-Tyan and Taupin2) than in adults on PN and carries a high mortality(Reference Colomb, Dabbas-Tyan and Taupin2). Key risk factors are preterm birth(Reference Kelly10, Reference Merrit11) and sepsis(Reference Sondheimer, Asturias and Cadnapaphornchai12). Difficulties placing catheters for venous access cannot be underestimated and require experts familiar with placing catheters in unconventional sites(Reference Rodrigues, Van Mourik and Sharif13). Intestinal transplantation has developed for those patients with complications of liver damage or loss of venous access, and children currently represent two-thirds of all candidates for intestinal transplantation(Reference Gupte, Beath and Protheroe14, Reference Beath, Booth and Murphy15).

Transition

Preparing patients for transition involves more than simply describing future events and raising awareness of transfer(Reference Viner16). Paediatric care is family centred, focusing as much on the parents as on the children. This approach provides poor preparation for moving to the adult sector. Adult health services assume that patients have an extent of autonomy and have the capacity to negotiate the healthcare system. Shift from parent-managed to self-managed care is required(Reference Sawyer and Aroni17, Reference McDonagh and Viner18).

The standard definition of transition is ‘a purposeful, planned process that addresses the medical, psycho social and educational/vocational needs of adolescents and young adults with chronic physical and medical conditions as they move from child-centred to adult-orientated health care systems’(Reference Rosen, Blum and Britto19). Key features of the transition are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Key features of transition (based on Viner(Reference Viner16) and McDonagh et al.(Reference McDonagh, Shaw and Southwood40))Footnote *

* WHO defines ages 10–20 years as adolescence and the Department of Health recognises that health services for young people cover those individuals aged 16–19 years(20).

Adolescent medicine

Young people (the WHO defines ages 10–20 years as adolescence and the Department of Health recognises that health services for young people cover those individuals aged 16–19 years(20)) are new independent users of health services. Provision of confidential healthcare that allows engagement with young people and promotes disease self-management behaviour (e.g. central line care) and engagement with the new HPN team is pivotal(Reference Kennedy and Sawyer21). Screening for health risk behaviours (mental health, diet, exercise, cardiovascular risk, smoking) is as important in adolescents on HPN as in other young people in the population(Reference Goldenring and Rosen22). Opportunities exist for promoting health, disease knowledge and prevention (e.g. osteoporosis). There is growing evidence that skills training for young people with chronic illness can be associated with positive outcomes (e.g. improved information seeking, social competence and behaviour), which can maximise functioning and potential(Reference McDonagh, Southwood and Shaw23, Reference Last, Stam and Onland-van Nieuwenhuizen24). There have been several reports of increased unemployment in young adults that is not always related to their disability or educational achievement(Reference McDonagh25).

Benefits of transition

Why is the transfer of healthcare so important? At worst, if it is not handled well, failure to engage with adult tertiary services makes routine clinic attendance less likely and quality of care may decline(Reference Dobbels, Van Damme-Lonbaert and Vanhaecke26). Young people who have experienced skills training in transition programmes and secure a strong relationship with the new healthcare team have better adherence to follow-up, improved disease control and quality of life(Reference Watson27).

Challenges: young people

While the young person with a chronic medical condition may have outgrown the paediatric healthcare environment, they may have delayed psychosocial milestones, reduced independence, social isolation and increased educational and vocational difficulties(Reference Stam, Hartman and Deurloo28). Management tasks may present greater obstacles and be more problematic in young people. Skill acquisition, e.g. setting up their own HPN, is variable and can be delayed in the context of chronic illness and be more problematic in young people as psychosocial milestones such as cognitive maturity and autonomy have not yet been achieved(Reference Sawyer, Drew and Yeo29).

Medical care might be rejected by adolescents as part of separation from parental control. They may be more prone to risk taking(Reference Sawyer, Drew and Yeo29, Reference Bolton-Maggs30) or overwhelmed by the burden of healthcare issues and inappropriate expectations of clinicians.

Depression and anxiety are common problems in the daily life of adults on HPN and may arise as a result of lack of freedom, limitations in social life and being dependent. Somatic problems, fatigue and sleep disturbance impact on economic dependency(Reference Huisman-de Waal, Schoonhoven and Janeen31). Quality of life is reduced in the presence of depression and narcotic dependency(Reference Winkler32). HPN teams should be familiar with these problems and facilitate psychosocial support and/or cognitive training.

Challenges: parents

Families of young people on HPN may be overprotective and have difficulties with transition(Reference Shaw, Southwood and McDonagh33), particularly if care appears discontinuous or they feel excluded. Demonstration that young people have developed independence in healthcare as well as other aspects of their lives allows parents (and their doctors) to ‘let go’.

Having a child on HPN is associated with physical and social stresses. Feelings of social isolation, loneliness and depression are reported in parents(Reference Huisman-de Waal, Schoonhoven and Janeen31, Reference Sexton, Holden and Coad34). Young people and their families may be concerned about a reduction in services following transfer and a lack of preparation for such differences. Home-care services may be negotiated to support children and their families with nursing support(Reference Winkler32), and families may face a change of services with a change of provider as well as a new adult nutritional care team.

Transition: how to do it

There have been a number of recent publications on how to provide quality services for adolescents during transition, including the National Service Framework for Children, Young People and Maternity Services (35) and the guidelines from the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health(36) and the Royal College of Nursing(37). They have been reviewed in the Department of Health's recent guidance in Transition: Getting it Right for Young People. Improving the Transition of Young People with Long Term Conditions from Children's to Adult Health Services (38). Focus groups of adolescents have been helpful in developing models of care in rheumatology(Reference Shaw, Southwood and McDonagh39), with common themes emerging, e.g. need for multidisciplinary team, continuity and good coordination between professionals, clear sources of information, care that minimises the impact of the medical condition on their life and a less-formal environment. There is a need for information, and web sites devoted to health issues for adolescents are popular sources(Reference Bolton-Maggs30).

Planning

Health transitions are one part of the wider set of educational, family and social transitions that young people make. These transitions are outlined in Table 2.

Table 2. Transitions undergone by the young personFootnote *

PN, parenteral nutrition.

* The Department of Health recognises that health services for young people cover those individuals aged 16–19 years(20).

Conclusion

Transition is a key quality issue for the National Health Service(Reference Gupte, Beath and Protheroe14). It is vital that both paediatric and adult centres address the challenge to ensure transition is a well-managed active process that starts early and proceeds in a planned and purposeful way. Securing relationships for the young person with a new healthcare team can enhance his/her self reliance while at the same time continuing good medical care.

Effective transition is important not only in terms of the potential benefits to patients from increased satisfaction and decreased morbidity, but in terms of the cost savings to enhance participation in society when the transition team ‘get it right’(Reference Viner16, Reference Kennedy and Sawyer21, Reference McDonagh, Shaw and Southwood40). Young adult clinics or wards covering ages 18–24 years may help an adolescent's complete transition, are associated with improved quality of care and may cost no more to implement than an ad hoc approach(Reference Towns, Sawyer and Stephens41, Reference Viner42).

Despite initiatives and evidence, progress in developing transition programmes in some medical specialities has been slow. A concerted effort is required to put recommendations into practice and for commissioning bodies to consider the resource implications for development of transition policies(Reference Bolton-Maggs30). Knowledge and skills in adolescent medicine and transition should become more firmly incorporated into training programmes for healthcare professionals(Reference McDonagh, Minnaar and Kelly43).

Acknowledgements

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

1.Puntis, JWL (1995) Home parenteral nutrition. Arch Dis Child 72, 186190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Colomb, V, Dabbas-Tyan, M, Taupin, P et al. (2007) Long term outcome of children receiving home parenteral nutrition: a 20 year single-center experience in 302 patients. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 44, 347353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Guarino, A & De Marco, G (2003) Natural history of intestinal failure investigated through a national network-based approach. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 37, 136141.Google ScholarPubMed
4.Scolapio, JS, Fleming, CR, Kelly, DG et al. (1999) Survival of home parenteral nutrition-treated patients; 20 years of experience at the Mayo Clinic. Mayo Clinic Proc 74, 217222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Messing, B, Lemann, M, Landais, P et al. (1995) Prognosis of patients with non malignant chronic intestinal failure receiving long term home parenteral nutrition. Gastroenterol 108, 10051010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Goulet, O, Ruemmele, F & Lacaille, F (2004) Irreversible intestinal failure. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 38, 250269.Google ScholarPubMed
7.British Artificial Nutrition Survey Committee (2007) Annual BANS Report, 2007. Artificial Nutrition Support in the UK 2000–2006. Redditch, Worcs.: BAPEN; available at http://www.bapen.org.uk/pdfs/bans_reports/bans_report_07.pdfGoogle Scholar
8.Johnson, T & Sexton, E (2006) Managing children and adolescents on parenteral nutrition: challenges for the nutritional support team. Proc Nutr Soc 65, 217221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Koletzko, B, Goulet, O, Hunt, J et al. (2005) Guidelines on paediatric parenteral nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 41, Suppl. 2, 8184.Google ScholarPubMed
10.Kelly, DA (1998) Liver complications of parenteral nutrition. Nutrition 14, 153157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Merrit, RJ (1986) Cholestasis associated with total parenteral nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 5, 9–22.Google Scholar
12.Sondheimer, JM, Asturias, E & Cadnapaphornchai, M (1988) Infection and cholesatis in neonates with intestinal resection and long term parenteral nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 27, 131137.Google Scholar
13.Rodrigues, AF, Van Mourik, ID, Sharif, K et al. (2006) Management of end-stage central venous access in children referred for possible small bowel transplantation. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 42, 427433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Gupte, GL, Beath, SV, Protheroe, S et al. (2007) Improved outcome of referrals for intestinal transplantation in the UK. Arch Dis Child 92, 147152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Beath, SV, Booth, IW & Murphy, MS (1995) Nutritional care and candidates for small bowel transplantation. Arch Dis Child 73, 348350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Viner, R (2008) Transition of care from paediatric to adult services; one part of improved health services for adolescents. Arch Dis Child 93, 160163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Sawyer, S & Aroni, R (2005) Self management in adolescents with chronic illness. What does it mean and how can it be achieved? Med J Aust 183, 405409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.McDonagh, J & Viner, R (2006) Lost in transition? Between paediatric and adult services. Br Med J 332, 435436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Rosen, DS, Blum, RW, Britto, M et al. (2003) Transition to adult health care for adolescents and young adults with chronic conditions: position paper for the Society for Adolescent Medicine. J Adolesc Health 33, 309311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Department of Health (2009) Health Lives, Brighter Futures – The Strategy for Children and Young People's Health. London: Department of Health; available at http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_094400Google Scholar
21.Kennedy, A & Sawyer, S (2008) Transition from pediatric to adult services: are we getting it right? Curr Opinion in Pediatrics 20, 403409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Goldenring, JM & Rosen, DS (2004) Getting into adolescent heads: an essential update. Contemp Pediatr 21, 6490.Google Scholar
23.McDonagh, JE, Southwood, TR & Shaw, KL (2005) Growing up and moving on in rheumatology: disease knowledge in a multicentre cohort of adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arch Dis Child 90, G123.Google Scholar
24.Last, BF, Stam, H, Onland-van Nieuwenhuizen, AM et al. (2007) Positive effects of a psycho-educational group intervention for children with a chronic disease: first results. Patient Educ Couns 65, 101112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.McDonagh, JE (2007) Transition of care from paediatric to adult rheumatology Arch Dis Child 92, 802807.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Dobbels, F, Van Damme-Lonbaert, R, Vanhaecke, J et al. (2005) Growing pains: non-adherence with the immunosuppressive regime in adolescent transplant recipients. Pediatr Transplant 9, 381390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Watson, AR (2000) Non-compliance and transfer from paediatric to adult transplant unit. Pediatr Nephrol 14, 469472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Stam, H, Hartman, E, Deurloo, J et al. (2006) Young adult patients with a history of paediatric disease: impact on course of life and transition in adulthood. J Adolesc Health 39, 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Sawyer, S, Drew, S, Yeo, M et al. (2007) Adolescents with a chronic condition: challenges living, challenges treating. Lancet 369, 14811489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30.Bolton-Maggs, HB (2007) Transition of care from paediatric services in haematology. Arch Dis Child 92, 797801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.Huisman-de Waal, G, Schoonhoven, L, Janeen, J et al. (2007) The impact of home parenteral nutrition on daily life – a review. Clin Nutr 26, 275288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32.Winkler, MF (2005) Quality of life in adult home parenteral nutrition patients. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 29, 162170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33.Shaw, KL, Southwood, TR & McDonagh, JE (2004) Transitional care for adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: results of a postal survey. Rheumatology 43, 211219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.Sexton, E, Holden, C & Coad, J (2005) A review of homecare packages developed for home parenteral nutiriton patients and their families. Br J Nursing 14, 10281032.Google Scholar
35.Department of Health (2004) National Service Framework for Children, Young People and Maternity Services. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
36.Intercollegiate Working Party on Adolescent Health (2003) Bridging the Gap: Healthcare for Adolescents. Report of the Joint Working Party on Adolescent Health of the Royal Medical and Nursing Colleges of the UK. London: Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.Google Scholar
37.Royal College of Nursing (2004) Adolescent Transition Care: Guidance for Nursing Staff. London. RCN.Google Scholar
38.Department of Health, Child Health and Maternity Services Branch (2006) Transition: Getting it Right for Young People. Improving the Transition of Young People with Long Term Conditions from Children's to Adult Health Services. London: Department of Health; available at http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/Browsable/DH_4132944Google Scholar
39.Shaw, KLSouthwood, TR & McDonagh, JE (2004) User perspectives of transitional care for adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 43, 770778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40.McDonagh, JE, Shaw, KL & Southwood, TR (2006) Growing up and moving on in rheumatology: development and preliminary evaluation of a transitional care programme for a multicentre cohort of adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Child Health 10, 2242.Google ScholarPubMed
41.Towns, SJ, Sawyer, SM, Stephens, L et al. (2007) Hospital based care of young people in Australia. In J Adolesc Med Health 19, 317323.Google ScholarPubMed
42.Viner, R (2007) Do adolescent inpatient wards make a difference? Findings from a national young patient survey. Pediatrics 120, 749755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43.McDonagh, J, Minnaar, G, Kelly, K et al. (2006) Unmet education and training needs in adolescent health of health professionals in a UK children's hospital. Acta Paediatr 95, 715719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44.Telfair, J, Alexander, LR, Loosier, PS et al. (2004) Providers perspectives and beliefs regarding transition to adult care for adolescents with sickle cell disease. J Health Care Poor Underserved 15, 443461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Key features of transition (based on Viner(16) and McDonagh et al.(40))*

Figure 1

Table 2. Transitions undergone by the young person*