No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Can multiple bootstrapping provide means of very early conceptual development?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 May 2011
Abstract
Carey focuses her theory on initial knowledge and Quinian bootstrapping. We reflect on developmental mechanisms, which can operate in between. Whereas most of the research aims at delimitating early cognitive mechanisms, we point at the need for studying their integration and mutual bootstrapping. We illustrate this call by referring to a current debate on infants' use of featural representations.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011
References
Csibra, G. & Gergely, G. (2009) Natural pedagogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences
13(4):148–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denison, S. & Xu, F. (2010) Integrating physical constraints in statistical inference by 11-month-old infants. Cognitive Science
34:885–908.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Futo, J., Teglas, E, Csibra, G. & Gergely, G. (2010) Communicative function demonstration induces kind-based artifact representation in preverbal infants. Cognition
117:1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K. & Bloom, P. (2007) Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature
450:557–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K. & Bloom, P. (2010) Three-month-olds show a negativity bias in their social evaluations. Developmental Science
13(6):923–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hernik, M. & Haman, M. (2010) Fourteen-month-olds transfer sequences of features derived from internally-driven object transformation. Cognitive Development Center Opening Conference, Central European University, Budapest.
Google Scholar
Leslie, A. M. (1982) The perception of causality in infants. Perception
11:173–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luo, Y. (2010) Three-month-old infants attribute goals to a non-human agent. Developmental Science
14:453–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Y. & Beck, W. (2010) Do you see what I see? Infants' reasoning about others' incomplete perceptions. Developmental Science
13:124–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCurry, S., Wilcox, T. & Woods, R. (2008) Beyond the search barrier: A new task for assessing object individuation in young infants. Infant Behavior & Development
32:429–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlottmann, A. & Ray, E. (2010) Goal attribution to schematic animals: Do 6-month-olds perceive biological motion as animate?
Developmental Science
13:1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Surian, L. & Caldi, S. (2010) Infants' individuation of agents and inert objects. Developmental Science
13:143–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, S. & Baillargeon, R. (2009) Detecting impossible changes in infancy: A three-system account. Trends in Cognitive Sciences
13:17–23.Google Scholar
Wang, S. (2011) Priming 4.5-month-old infants to use height information by enhancing retrieval. Developmental Psychology
47:26–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, T., Woods, R. & Chapa, C. (2009) Color-function categories that prime infants to use color information in an object individuation task. Cognitive Psychology
57:220–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, T., Woods, R., Toggy, L. & Napoli, R. (2006) Shake, rattle, and … one or two objects? Young infants' use of auditory information to individuate objects. Infancy
9:97–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, F. (2007a) Language acquisition and concept formation: Count nouns and object kinds. In: Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics, ed. Gaskell, G., pp. 627–34. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Xu, F. (2007b) Sortal concepts, object individuation, and language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences
11:400–406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, F. & Carey, S. (1996) Infants' metaphysics: The case of numerical identity. Cognitive Psychology
30:111–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Target article
Can multiple bootstrapping provide means of very early conceptual development?
Related commentaries (1)
Précis of The Origin of Concepts