Numerical coefficients are incorrect at the end of § 8 and in two places in the summary in § 9 of Catto (Reference Catto2018). The material before (8.39) is unaffected. To evaluate the pitch angle integral in (8.39), $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}\sqrt{2k\ell n(\sqrt{2k})}$ with $\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}=(1-\unicode[STIX]{x1D705})/8$ should have been used. And on the right-hand side of (8.40) there is a $4\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}$ missing in the denominator. The overall effect is to increase the size of the coefficients of the fluxes and diffusivities by $16/\unicode[STIX]{x03C0}$ and to remove the 64 from all $\ell n(\sqrt{2k\ell n(\sqrt{2k})})$ and $\ell n(\sqrt{2k_{0}\ell n(\sqrt{2k_{0}})})$ terms. Correcting these errors (8.39), (8.40), (8.42) and (8.43) become as follows:
In addition, the erroneous $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}_{s}$ has been removed from the numerator of (8.42). These errors in numerical coefficients alter (9.3) and (9.4) which become
and
Acknowledgement
Work supported by the US Department of Energy grants DE-FG02-91ER-54109 at MIT.