Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T04:01:15.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optimal vitamin D levels in Crohn's disease: a review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2014

Tara Raftery
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Trinity Centre for Health Science, St. James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
Maria O'Sullivan*
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Trinity Centre for Health Science, St. James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
*
*Corresponding author: Professor M. O'Sullivan, fax +353 1 896 2988, email maria.osullivan@tcd.ie
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Vitamin D deficiency is common among patients with Crohn's disease. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) is the best measure of an individual's vitamin D status and current cut-off ranges for sufficiency are debatable. Several factors contribute to vitamin D deficiency in Crohn's disease. These include inadequate exposure to sunlight, inadequate dietary intake, impaired conversion of vitamin D to its active metabolite, increased catabolism, increased excretion and genetic variants in vitamin D hydroxylation and transport. The effects of low 25(OH)D on outcomes other than bone health are understudied in Crohn's disease. The aim of the present review is to discuss the potential roles of vitamin D and the possible levels required to achieve them. Emerging evidence suggests that vitamin D may have roles in innate and adaptive immunity, in the immune-pathogenesis of Crohn's disease, prevention of Crohn's disease-related hospitalisations and surgery, in reducing disease severity and in colon cancer prevention. The present literature appears to suggest that 25(OH)D concentrations of ≥75 nmol/l may be required for non-skeletal effects; however, further research on optimal levels is required.

Type
Irish postgraduate winners
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2014 

Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are immune-mediated idiopathic diseases of the gastrointestinal tract. Crohn's disease can involve the entire gastrointestinal tract, while ulcerative colitis is isolated to the colon and rectum, both conditions are collectively referred to as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)( Reference Xavier and Podolsky 1 ). The key pathological mechanism in both cases is thought to be a dysregulated host immune response to commensal intestinal flora in genetically susceptible individuals( Reference Abraham and Cho 2 , Reference Khor, Gardet and Xavier 3 ). Almost 100 genetic loci are currently associated with IBD, yet they incompletely explain the variance in disease incidence, suggesting a strong role for environmental factors, as supported by epidemiological data( Reference Khor, Gardet and Xavier 3 Reference Ananthakrishnan 5 ).

Vitamin D has long been recognised as a major regulator of calcium and phosphorus metabolism and thus has key roles in bone formation and resorption( Reference Holick 6 Reference Rosen 8 ). Low bone mineral density is a common manifestation in Crohn's disease( Reference Leslie, Miller and Rogala 9 , Reference Laakso, Valta and Verkasalo 10 ) and guidelines regarding supplementation are well established( Reference Mowat, Cole and Windsor 11 ). Despite this vitamin D insufficiency remains common. With the discovery of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) in numerous tissues throughout the body beyond bone, including immune cells, a strong interest in understanding the role of vitamin D in disease pathogenesis and as a possible therapy in Crohn's disease has emerged( Reference Ananthakrishnan, Khalili and Higuchi 12 Reference Jørgensen, Agnholt and Glerup 15 ). The aim of the present review is to discuss vitamin D insufficiency in Crohn's disease, the potential benefits of supplementation and possible serum levels required to achieve the same.

Vitamin D physiology

Vitamin D metabolism

Vitamin D is a precursor of the active hormone calcitrol (1,25(OH)2D) and is present in two forms; vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol), which is the physiological form, and the synthetic analogue of vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol). In human subjects, vitamin D can be obtained from two sources; diet and UVB exposure. Dietary sources of vitamin D2 include irradiated yeast, plants and fungi, whereas vitamin D3 is found in fish liver oils, oily fish, meat, eggs and some fortified produce. Sunlight is the major source of vitamin D3 for human subjects. In the skin, UVB rays promote cleavage of 7-dehydrocholesterol (provitamin D3) into previtamin D3, which, in turn, is converted by a thermal process to vitamin D3. Regardless of the source, vitamin D is hydroxylated twice, first in the liver, followed by the kidney. The latter hydroxylation generates 1,25(OH)2D that exerts its actions by binding to a VDR( Reference Raftery, O'Morain and O'Sullivan 16 ). VDR are present on at least thirty different tissues throughout the body, including the intestinal and colonic tissues, circulating immune cells (such as activated lymphocyte T and B cells), monocytes, macrophages and muscle cells( Reference Holick 7 ). Importantly, many of these non-skeletal tissues also express vitamin D-activating enzymes, thereby permitting local production of 1,25(OH)2D. Investigations into the role of the VDR and 1,25(OH)2D in these extra-skeletal tissues has uncovered novel anti-proliferative, anti-inflammatory and immune-modulating effects, which may be relevant to Crohn's disease.

Optimal vitamin D status

The best measure of an individual's vitamin D status is serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D)( Reference Holick 6 , Reference Rosen 8 ) which reflects both sunlight exposure and dietary vitamin D intake. The definition of vitamin D deficiency remains controversial. At present there is no target level set for people with Crohn's disease beyond recommendations for the general, healthy population. The US Institute of Medicine define deficiency as <30 nmol/l, and use 40 and 50 nmol/l to define the estimated average requirement and recommended daily allowance respectively with intakes of 15μg (600 IU) vitamin D3/d recommended for adults and children, a tolerable upper intake level of 100μg (4000 IU)/d and a no observed adverse effect level of 250μg (10 000 IU) vitamin D3/d( 17 ). The US Endocrine Society's Clinical Practice Guideline suggests 75 nmol/l as a cut-off for adequacy and intakes of 37·5–50μg (1500–2000 IU) vitamin D3/d to achieve this concentration. Irrespective of the cut-off applied (30, 50 or 75 nmol/l), several studies have reported a high prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency in established IBD cases (Table 1) and in 80 % of new Crohn's disease diagnoses( Reference Leslie, Miller and Rogala 9 ). In paediatric cases, 25 % of patients have severe deficient levels( Reference Alkhouri, Hashmi and Baker 18 ) (Table 1).

Table 1. Prevalence of suboptimal vitamin D status in inflammatory bowel disease in patients with active and quiescent disease

CD, Crohn's disease; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; UC, ulcerative colitis; 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D.

* Paediatric studies.

Vitamin D toxicity

Vitamin D toxicity is a rare clinical syndrome of both hypervitaminosis D and hypercalcaemia. Clinical symptoms of vitamin D toxicity include nausea, vomiting, dehydration, muscle weakness, lethargy and confusion( Reference Blank, Scanlon and Sinks 19 ). An upper toxic level of 250 nmol/l is frequently cited in the literature;( Reference Souberbielle, Body and Lappe 20 , Reference Vieth 21 ) however, toxicity may not occur until 25(OH)D levels exceed 500 nmol/l( Reference Vieth 22 ) or even 750 nmol/l( Reference Jones 23 ). Data on vitamin D toxicity derives mainly from studies involving healthy cohorts. A study in 340 healthy school children( Reference Maalouf, Nabulsi and Vieth 24 ) showed that administration of 350μg (14 000 IU) vitamin D3/week for 1 year was safe and brought the mean 25(OH)D concentrations to 90 (sd 55) nmol/l. Measurements conducted in adults with a constant sun exposure (Puerto-Rican farmers) revealed serum 25(OH)D levels which were often between 100 and 200 nmol/l, while their calcium status was normal( Reference Haddock, Corcino and Vazques 25 ). In Crohn's disease, Jorgensen et al. ( Reference Jørgensen, Agnholt and Glerup 15 ) supplemented forty-six patients with 30μg (1200 IU) vitamin D3/d and levels increased to 96 (sd 27) nmol/l without any side-effects such as hypercalcaemia after 12 months of treatment. In a smaller study (n 18), 125μg (5000 IU) vitamin D3/d increased 25(OH)D concentrations to 112·5 (sd 47·5) nmol/l without safety concerns( Reference Yang, Weaver and Smith 26 ). Currently 50μg (2000 IU) vitamin D3/d is regarded as acceptable and can be taken without medical supervision( Reference Hanley, Cranney and Jones 27 ), although most clinical trials in Crohn's disease do monitor patients tolerance to supplementation regardless of the dose used as part of the study protocol.

Factors influencing vitamin D levels in Crohn's disease

Several factors predict vitamin D deficiency in Crohn's disease including; longer disease duration, higher Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) scores, C-reactive protein levels, poor nutrition status, smoking( Reference Siffledeen, Siminoski and Steinhart 28 Reference Gilman, Shanahan and Cashman 31 ), small bowel involvement( Reference Gilman, Shanahan and Cashman 31 ) and resection( Reference Driscoll, Meredith and Sitrin 32 ), non-Caucasian ethnicity( Reference de Bruyn, van Heeckeren and Ponsioen 33 ), sunlight exposure, impaired conversion of vitamin D to its active metabolite, increased catabolism and increased excretion due to steatorrhoea.

In Crohn's disease dietary intakes and supplemental intakes appear inadequate for achieving sufficient 25(OH)D status. Less than half (43 %) of the patients are consumers of a vitamin D supplement, with multivitamin preparations being the most common form reported providing on average 5.6μg (5–10μg); 225 IU (200–400 IU) vitamin D daily. Moreover, for bone health, present guidelines suggest intakes of 20μg (800 IU)/d( Reference Mowat, Cole and Windsor 11 ) which may or may not result in 25(OH)D concentrations ≥75 nmol/l. Studies have indicated intakes of 30, 50 or 125μg (1200, 2000 or 5000 IU)/d may be required to achieve levels ≥75 nmol/l, depending on baseline levels( Reference Jørgensen, Agnholt and Glerup 15 , Reference Yang, Weaver and Smith 26 , Reference Raftery, Lee and Cox 34 ).

Diet in Crohn's disease provides approximately 1·0 μg/d (95 % CI 0·6, 1·9)( Reference Suibhne, Cox and Healy 35 , Reference Vogelsang, Klamert and Resch 36 ) with the main food sources being oily fish (38 %), followed by eggs (27 %)( Reference Suibhne, Cox and Healy 35 ). Despite being low, dietary intakes in Crohn's disease are comparable with population intakes( Reference McCarthy, Duggan and O'Brien 29 , Reference Filippi, Al-Jaouni and Wiroth 37 , Reference Bin, Flores and Alvares-da-Silva 38 ). Poor dietary intakes may also be hindered by reduced absorption. Vitamin D is absorbed in the proximal small intestine, particularly in the jejunum( Reference Hollander and Truscott 39 ). The effect on vitamin D status due to small bowel involvement is uncertain. In a small study of twelve Crohn's disease patients with a terminal ileum resection a decline in vitamin D absorption correlating with the length of the resection was observed( Reference Leichtmann, Bengoa and Bolt 40 ). Conversely Ulitsky et al.( Reference Ulitsky, Ananthakrishnan and Naik 41 ) reported no difference in vitamin D levels between those with a resection v. no resection.

Whereas most of the predictors of low serum 25(OH)D in Crohn's disease are consistent throughout the literature, the effect of Crohn's disease activity on the vitamin D status is not confirmed. Some studies have reported no difference in 25(OH)D-based disease activity,( Reference Gilman, Shanahan and Cashman 31 , Reference Hassan, Hassan and Seyed-Javad 42 ) whereas Jorgensen et al. reported low levels were associated with active disease( Reference Jørgensen, Hvas and Agnholt 43 ). A clear trend of decreasing 25(OH)D from remission (64 nmol/l) to mild disease (49 nmol/l) and moderately active disease (21 nmol/l) (P < 0·01) was reported( Reference Jørgensen, Hvas and Agnholt 43 ). A recent study confirmed these findings insofar as patients with active Crohn's disease had lower 25(OH)D levels than those in clinical remission; this measurement was independent of season or reported supplement use( Reference Ham, Longhi and Lahiff 44 ). There also appears to be wide variation in the absorption of vitamin D in Crohn's disease; for example, Farraye et al.( Reference Farraye, Nimitphong and Stucchi 45 ) reported that even in quiescent disease ability to absorb vitamin D is reduced by an average of 30 % in comparison with normal subjects after supplementation with 1250μg (50 000 IU) vitamin D2. Whether or not the outcome would have been similar had vitamin D3 been used remains to be seen.

In symptomatic/active disease cholestryamine may also be prescribed to reduce post-resectional diarrhoea. It also reduces bile acids, which are required for vitamin D absorption and may induce vitamin D malabsorption. Protein loosing enteropathy is a condition which can arise in severe disease and can result in the loss of vitamin D-binding protein along with the vitamin D bound to it( Reference Mouli and Ananthakrishnan 46 ). Moreover, genetic variants in vitamin D hydroxylation and transport may also contribute substantially to both the development of vitamin D insufficiency and poor response to supplementation( Reference Wang, Zhang and Richards 47 ).

Beyond diet, sunlight and casual UVB exposure is the main source of vitamin D for most of the population. However, in Crohn's disease immunosuppressive therapy, such as azathioprine and adalimumab, can increase the risk of skin cancer. For this reason patients prescribed such medications are counselled regarding the careful use of sunscreen, which also prevents UVB synthesis of vitamin D. Sun exposure may also have a link to Crohn's disease pre-diagnosis. UVB exposure is often reduced at higher latitudes and coincides with a higher prevalence of autoimmune diseases and colorectal cancer in these regions compared with those more southerly( Reference Simpson, Blizzard and Otahal 48 , Reference Peyrin-Biroulet, Oussalah and Bigard 49 ) suggesting a possible relationship between latitude and Crohn's disease.

Epidemiological evidence: low vitamin D status and Crohn's disease

Environmental triggers for IBD have been difficult to identify( Reference Frolkis, Dieleman and Barkema 50 ). A German twin cohort study confirmed the strong genetic element to IBD, yet concordance rates between monozygotic twins are nonetheless low (35 % for Crohn's disease and 16 % for ulcerative colitis). This suggests important environmental interactions with disease-inducing genes( Reference Spehlmann, Begun and Burghardt 51 ). One potential environmental risk factor is the UVB exposure. Recently a link between latitude and incidence rates of Crohn's disease has been identified in a large prospective study( Reference Khalili, Huang and Ananthakrishnan 52 ). By tracking the location and lifestyle information of approximately 175 000 female American nurses biennially over 20 years, the authors detected a greater increase in the incidence rates of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis the farther subjects lived from the equator. At age 30 years, living in southern latitudes was associated with a roughly halved risk of developing Crohn's disease and approximately a 40 % reduced risk of developing ulcerative colitis. Similarly Ananthakrishnan et al.( Reference Ananthakrishnan, Khalili and Higuchi 12 ) found that women with a higher serum vitamin D level had a significantly reduced risk of Crohn's disease (hazard ratio: 0·38) suggesting a protective effect of vitamin D sufficiency.

In Europe an evident north–south gradient of incidence and prevalence also exists( Reference Shivananda, Lennard-Jones and Logan 53 Reference Schultz and Butt 55 ). For example, low sunlight exposure was associated with an increased incidence of Crohn's disease in France and no association with ulcerative colitis( Reference Burisch, Pedersen and Cukovic-Cavka 56 ). Migration of populations who live near the equator to countries of greater latitude also increases the rate of Crohn's disease( Reference Pinsk, Lemberg and Grewal 57 , Reference Sewell, Yee and Inadomi 58 ). More recently, Limketkai et al.( Reference Limketkai, Bayless and Brant 59 ) reported that lower UV exposure is associated with greater rates of hospitalisation, prolonged hospitalisation and the need for bowel surgery in IBD. Further studies are needed to determine if this association is causal and also the role of other environmental factors that might explain these findings such as pollutants, diet and commensal or pathogenic microorganisms.

Vitamin D and immune function in Crohn's disease: experimental data

Vitamin D appears to have an important role in innate immunity( Reference Cantorna, Zhu and Froicu 14 , Reference Cantorna and Mahon 60 ). For example, human cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide and beta defensins are antimicrobial peptides of the innate immune system, which are expressed by the gastrointestinal epithelium( Reference Jäger, Stange and Wehkamp 61 ). Antimicrobial peptides protect against bacterial invasion( Reference Tollin, Bergman and Svenberg 62 ) and human cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide is important in maintaining and re-establishing intestinal barrier integrity( Reference Otte, Zdebik and Brand 63 ) and in the healing of human intestinal epithelial cells( Reference Otte, Zdebik and Brand 63 ). Moreover in vitro studies have shown that 1,25(OH)2D can induce the expression of the gene encoding human cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide( Reference Gombart, Borregaard and Koeffler 64 ). However, the largest body of experimental evidence for an immunoregulatory role for vitamin D in IBD concerns the adaptive T-cell response. Several types of T-cells are important for the regulation of homeostasis in the gastrointestinal tract and either induce or suppress IBD. The VDR and 1,25(OH)2D inhibit Th1 and Th17 functions by suppressing the production of particular cytokines( Reference Cantorna and Mahon 13 , Reference Daniel, Sartory and Zahn 65 , Reference Tang, Zhou and Luger 66 ) which restores gastrointestinal homeostasis post infection or chemical injury. In addition, 1,25(OH)2D stimulates dendritic cell production of IL-10, and T-cell levels of CTLA-4 (an inhibitory co-stimulatory signal), which further enhances its anti-inflammatory effect( Reference Jeffery, Burke and Mura 67 ).

Vitamin D and intestinal permeability in Crohn's disease: experimental data

Animal studies have shown that vitamin D may be linked to Crohn's disease severity and the function of the epithelial barrier. Vitamin D deficiency increased symptoms of several experimental models of IBD( Reference Cantorna 68 ) and VDR deficiency increased susceptibility of mice to colitis( Reference Froicu and Cantorna 69 , Reference Froicu, Weaver and Wynn 70 ). Conversely treatment with 1,25(OH)2D improves IBD symptoms and blocks the progression of colitis in mice( Reference Daniel, Sartory and Zahn 65 , Reference Froicu, Weaver and Wynn 70 , Reference Cantorna, Munsick and Bemiss 71 )

Vitamin D may also function on the epithelial barrier. Epithelial cells are connected by intercellular junctions, comprising tight junctions and adherens junctions( Reference Henderson and van Limbergen 72 ). Patients with Crohn's disease have increased small intestine permeability( Reference Marchiando, Graham and Turner 73 ) resulting in part from defects in these junctions. Compromised barrier function in Crohn's disease has been associated with inflammation, dysbiosis( Reference Cantorna, McDaniel and Bora 74 ), disease pathogenesis and as a predictor of clinical relapse( Reference D'Incà, Di Leo and Corrao 75 , Reference Wyatt, Vogelsang and Hübl 76 ). Evidence suggests that vitamin D increases tight junction proteins and enhances gut mucosal healing post-injury( Reference Kong, Zhang and Musch 77 ). For example, following exposure to dextran sulphate sodium, a chemical which induces colitis, the VDR knock out mice were unable to maintain the integrity of the epithelial barrier( Reference Froicu and Cantorna 69 , Reference Ooi, Li and Rogers 78 ) and had lower expression of tight junction proteins than in wild-type mice( Reference Kong, Zhang and Musch 77 Reference Zhang, Leung and Richers 79 ). As a result of reduced tight junction proteins, vitamin D-deficient and VDR knock out mice had increased gut permeability compared with vitamin D-sufficient wild-type mice( Reference Ooi, Li and Rogers 78 ). Whilst the basic science supports a role for vitamin D in Crohn's disease as reviewed elsewhere( Reference Hewison 80 ), further work is required to establish if this translates to human studies.

Observational studies: association between vitamin D levels, disease activity and surgery in Crohn's disease

Whilst epidemiological, animal and experimental data are promising the full possible range of effects of vitamin D in Crohn's disease are unknown, as are the optimal level(s) for inducing them. Observational studies which have focused on vitamin D and its effect on clinical markers such as CDAI (a research tool used to quantify the symptoms of patients with Crohn's disease) and inflammatory markers have been inconclusive. In cross-sectional IBD cohort studies El-Matary et al.( Reference El-Matary, Sikora and Spady 81 ) and Hassan et al.( Reference Hassan, Hassan and Seyed-Javad 42 ) reported no association between 25(OH)D and CDAI. CDAI levels <150 are indicative of remission, whereas levels above that suggest active disease. The mean 25(OH)D in these two studies were 66·7 (sd 27·3) nmol/l and 32·7 (sd 28·3) nmol/l, respectively. The cohorts included both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis patients and the sample sizes were small. Another cross-sectional study exclusive to Crohn's disease (n 34) reported a significant inverse association between 25(OH)D and CDAI with mean concentrations of 53·5 (sd 27) nmol/l( Reference Joseph, George and Pulimood 82 ). Similar findings were reported by Ulitsky et al.( Reference Ulitsky, Ananthakrishnan and Naik 41 ) who observed greater disease activity in those with lower 25(OH)D levels (Table 2).

Table 2. Observational studies of the association between 25-hyroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) status and disease related outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)

CD, Crohn's disease; UC, ulcerative colitis; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; HBI, Harvey Bradshaw index; CDAI, Crohn's disease activity index; CDI, Clostridium difficile infection; CRP, C-reactive protein; UCAI, ulcerative colitis activity index.

Almost two-thirds of patients with Crohn's disease will eventually require surgery as part of their clinical course. Ananthakrishnan et al.( Reference Ananthakrishnan, Cagan and Gainer 83 ) reported that 25(OH)D levels >50 nmol/l in Crohn's disease were associated with fewer surgeries and hospitalisations compared with those with levels below this threshold. A more aggressive disease course and need for surgery among those with vitamin D deficiency was also seen in a South Asian cohort( Reference Boyd and Limdi 84 ). Overall, despite limitations inherent in cross-sectional studies, such as mixed cohorts of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, a reduced spread of vitamin D levels, different methods of data analysis, role of causality and various primary outcome measures, most of these studies suggest positive correlations between vitamin D and Crohn's disease-related outcomes (Table 2).

Clinical studies; association between 25-hyroxyvitamin D levels, disease activity and relapse in Crohn's disease

Only a small number of intervention studies have examined the effects of vitamin D supplementation in a clinical trial setting in IBD (Table 3). Two studies have reported positive associations with disease activity. The first, a prospective open label study compared supplementation with active vitamin D (alfacalcidiol) to 25μg (1000 IU) vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) in Crohn's disease( Reference Miheller, Muzes and Hritz 85 ). After 6 weeks alfacalcidiol treatment resulted in a significant decrease in CDAI scores and C-reactive protein levels, as well as improvement in quality of life (QoL) scores. In spite of this at 12 months there were no significant differences between the groups with respect to these variables( Reference Miheller, Muzes and Hritz 85 ). The primary aim of the present study was to examine the effects on bone metabolism and not disease activity; moreover, the paper did not report the 25(OH)D levels obtained by the groups, which may have not been in the therapeutic range at 12 months. Yang et al.( Reference Yang, Weaver and Smith 26 ) titrated vitamin D3 intake until such a point serum levels were ≥100 nmol/l (commonly requiring 125μg (5000 IU)/d) and reported significant improvements in CDAI with a mean reduction in CDAI from 230 (sd 74) to 118 (sd 66; P < 0·0001). This may suggest a minimum level of 100 nmol/l is required to exert a significant effect on disease severity but further research is warranted. Whilst promising these studies were open label trials and therefore have their inherent limitations. A double-blind randomised placebo-controlled study assessed the effectiveness of vitamin D3 supplementation in preventing clinical relapse. In comparison with the placebo group, oral vitamin D3 supplementation of 30μg (1200 IU)/d for 12 months reduced the risk of relapse from 29 to 13 % at 1 year (P = 0·056)( Reference Jørgensen, Agnholt and Glerup 15 ). This difference in relapse was not statistically significant and merits further work (Table 3).

Table 3. Intervention studies; relationship between 25-hyroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) and outcomes in Crohn's disease

CD, Crohn's disease, CDAI, Crohn's disease activity index; QoL, quality of life.

The current authors previously examined the effects of vitamin D supplementation on intestinal permeability as measured by the lactulose : mannitol ratio and sucrose excretion which indicates small bowel permeability( Reference Raftery, Martineau and Greiller 86 ). In a double-blind placebo-controlled study 27 Crohn's disease patients were randomised to 50μg (2000 IU)/d vitamin D3 or placebo. At follow-up (3 months) mean (95 % CI) 25(OH)D levels were as expected significantly higher in the vitamin D group 91·6 (75·5–107·6) nmol/l than in the placebo group 40·4 (30·4–50·4) nmol/l (P < 0·001). At 3 months, there was a significant increase in lactulose : mannitol ratio (P = 0·010) and sucrose excretion (P = 0·030) in the controls, but these parameters were unchanged in the vitamin D group, suggesting that 25(OH)D levels ≥75 nmol/l may preserve intestinal integrity.

Clinical studies; association between 25-hyroxyvitamin D levels and muscle function

Compared with healthy controls in Crohn's disease skeletal muscle mass and strength are reduced( Reference Schneider, Al-Jaouni and Filippi 87 Reference Geerling, Badart-Smook and Stockbrügger 89 ) and muscle fatigue is increased( Reference van Langenberg, Della Gatta and Warmington 90 ). Fatigue is a major concern in Crohn's disease( Reference Jelsness-Jorgensen, Bernklev and Henriksen 91 Reference Maunder, de Rooy and Toner 94 ) with two of five patients reporting that it negatively impacts their QoL, even in remission( Reference Minderhoud, Oldenburg and van Dam 95 ). Reasons for this may include elevated pro-inflammatory factors such as TNFα and IL-6( Reference Reimund, Wittersheim and Dumont 96 , Reference Cominelli 97 ) which are associated with lower muscle mass and strength in elderly populations( Reference Visser, Pahor and Taaffe 98 , Reference Schaap, Pluijm and Deeg 99 ), poor nutrition, physical inactivity and prolonged corticosteroid therapy( Reference Geerling, Badart-Smook and Stockbrügger 89 ). The underlying mechanisms of how vitamin D might improve muscle are poorly understood; however, several lines of evidence support a role of vitamin D in muscle health. First, proximal muscle weakness is a prominent feature of vitamin D deficiency( Reference Al-Shoha, Qiu and Palnitkar 100 ) in addition to diffuse muscle pain and gait impairments such as a waddling way of walking( Reference Schott and Wills 101 ). Secondly, skeletal muscle is a major reservoir of 25(OH)D( Reference Mawer, Backhouse and Holman 102 ); however, whilst it was previously thought that VDR were abundantly expressed in muscle cells with roles myogenesis and contractility this is currently under debate( Reference Boillon, Gielen and Vanderschueren 103 ). Although vitamin D supplementation increases muscle strength and balance in some populations for example in the elderly( Reference Pfeifer, Begerow and Minne 104 ) data in Crohn's disease are not as widely available. In a cross-sectional study, van Landenberg et al. ( Reference van Langenberg, Gatta and Hill 105 ) reported that high 25(OH)D and physical activity may protect against reduced muscle mass( Reference van Langenberg, Della Gatta and Warmington 90 ). Conversely Salacinski et al.( Reference Salacinski, Regueiro and Broeder 106 ) were unable to show a relationship between 25(OH)D levels and muscle strength in Crohn's disease. Although they did show that those with higher 25(OH)D levels (≥100 nmol/l) exhibited greater muscle strength (normalised to body weight) than those with lower levels (≤80 nmol/l) suggesting perhaps optimal effects on muscle function with levels ≥100 nmol/l; however, this is tentative data.

The current authors previously reported the results of a 3-month randomised, double-blind intervention study in quiescent Crohn's disease (n 27)( Reference Raftery, Lee and Cox 34 ). Patients were randomised to either 50μg (2000 IU)/d vitamin D3 or placebo and the primary outcome measures included changes in hand-grip strength, a proxy measure for muscle strength. Post-intervention, both dominant and non-dominant hand-grip strength were significantly higher in the vitamin D-treated group compared with the controls. In the same study group, we also assessed changes in fatigue and QoL( Reference Raftery, Lee and Cox 34 ). At 3 months, patients who achieved 25(OH)D levels ≥75 nmol/l had significantly higher QoL compared with patients below this cut-off (P = <0·0001)]. In line with this, significantly less fatigue was experienced in those with 25(OH)D levels ≥75 nmol/l compared with those below this cut-off, as assessed by question 2 of the IBD questionnaire.

In a cross-sectional study of 504 IBD patients (403 Crohn's disease patients and 101 ulcerative colitis patients) vitamin D deficiency (<50 nmol/l) was associated with lower QoL in Crohn's disease but not ulcerative colitis;( Reference Ulitsky, Ananthakrishnan and Naik 41 ) however, muscle function and fatigue were not measured in the present study. Another intervention study( Reference Yang, Weaver and Smith 26 ) also showed improved QoL scores following vitamin D supplementation (P < 0·0004), particularly when serum concentrations were ≥100 nmol/l( Reference Yang, Weaver and Smith 26 ). This was paralleled with significant improvements in CDAI scores; however, muscle strength was not measured in this study.

Vitamin D and cancer in Crohn's disease

More recently, associations between vitamin D status and cancer have been examined. Epidemiological studies suggest an increased risk of and mortality from cancer in northern latitudes with reduced UVB exposure, an association possibly mediated by vitamin D( Reference Wacker and Holick 107 ). Furthermore, prospective cohorts have demonstrated an inverse association between 25(OH)D and cancers of the colon, breast and prostate( Reference Feskanich, Ma and Fuchs 108 Reference Giovannucci, Liu and Rimm 111 ) with one intervention study reporting a reduced risk of cancer by 60 %( Reference Lappe, Travers-Gustafson and Davies 112 ) with levels >80 nmol/l. Ananthakrishnan et al. ( Reference Ananthakrishnan, Khalili and Higuchi 12 ) looked at data from 2809 patients with IBD and a median plasma 25(OH)D level of 65 nmol/l. During a median follow-up period of 11 years, 196 patients (7 %) developed cancer, excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer (forty-one cases of colorectal cancer). Patients with vitamin D deficiency had an increased risk of cancer (adjusted OR, 1·82; 95 % CI 1·25, 2·65) compared with those with sufficient levels. Each 1–2·5 nmol/l increase in plasma 25(OH)D was associated with an 8 % reduction in risk of colorectal cancer (OR, 0·92; 95 % CI 0·88, 0·96). The mean plasma 25(OH)D in patients who subsequently developed cancer was 12·5 nmol/l lower than in those who did not develop cancer (57 v. 69 nmol/l; P < 0·0001). They also reported a statistically significant inverse association for lung cancer (OR, 0·95; 95 % CI 0·90, 0·99). However, the study has its limitations; for example, the confounding impact of inflammation and low BMI on low 25(OH)D status was not reported and there was a lack of information on screening practices and on smoking.

Conclusion

Vitamin D insufficiency in IBD remains common. Consensus expert opinion has suggested 25(OH)D levels of 75–100 nmol/l may provide optimal benefits for musculoskeletal and cancer outcomes( Reference Souberbielle, Body and Lappe 20 ) and levels of 100–175 nmol/l for optimal immune effects( Reference Cannell and Hollis 113 ). The data reviewed here show evidence of positive associations with levels ≥75 nmol/l in Crohn's disease, and further possible associations with levels ≥100 nmol/l but such associations need validation with well-designed randomised controlled trials. These include associations with CDAI, muscle function, fatigue, QoL, maintenance of epithelial barrier function, decreased hospitalisations, reduced risk of surgery and cancer. In terms of dosage required to achieve these levels 20–25μg (800–1000 IU)/d vitamin D3 appears sufficient to achieve a serum level of 50 nmol/l, and between 25 and 100μg (1000 and 4000 IU)/d to bring levels beyond 75 nmol/l (on average 50μg (2000 IU)/d is required for this purpose( Reference Heaney, Davies and Chen 114 Reference Holick 123 )). In the present study of Crohn's disease patients, we found that 50μg (2000 IU)/d increased mean 25(OH)D levels to 91·6 (95% CI 75·5, 107·6) nmol/l over winter months, which was significantly higher than levels in the placebo group 40·4 (95% CI 30·4, 50·4) nmol/l (P < 0·001)( Reference Raftery, Lee and Cox 34 ). To obtain 25(OH)D status ≥100 nmol/l in Crohn's disease, 125μg (5000 IU)/d may be required( Reference Yang, Weaver and Smith 26 ). This is the lower end of what is considered the ‘physiological’ zone of 75–200 nmol/l, the range which corresponds to the serum levels observed in outdoor workers( Reference Haddock, Corcino and Vazques 25 , Reference Barger-Lux and Heaney 124 , Reference Azizi, Pavlotsky and Kudish 125 ) as well as in traditionally living populations in East Africa( Reference Luxwolda, Kuipers and Kema 126 ). This zone is far below the toxic zone, which appears to be located above the 400 nmol/l serum level( Reference Hathcock, Shao and Vieth 127 ). To conclude there are many unanswered clinical questions regarding the role of vitamin D in Crohn's disease such as: (1) what is the optimal role of vitamin D supplementation as a therapeutic modality in Crohn's disease; (2) what is the effect of disease activity and resection on circulating 25(OH)D concentrations; (3) what is the level with which a plateau effect is observed in terms of relapse prevention/immune augmentation, if any. Additional well-designed and executed randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trials which investigate 25(OH)D levels are required to address these questions.

Financial Support

T. R. is supported by a fellowship from the Irish Research Council (IRC) and the Sarah Purser research award from Trinity College, Dublin.

Conflict of Interest

None.

Authorship

T. R. and M. O'S. wrote the manuscript and approved the final draft of the submitted manuscript.

References

1. Xavier, RJ & Podolsky, DK (2007) Unravelling the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature 448, 427434.Google Scholar
2. Abraham, C & Cho, JH (2009) Inflammatory bowel disease. N Engl J Med 361, 20662078.Google Scholar
3. Khor, B, Gardet, A & Xavier, RJ (2011) Genetics and pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature 474, 307317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Jostins, L, Ripke, S, Weersma, RK et al. (2012) Host-microbe interactions have shaped the genetic architecture of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature 491, 119124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Ananthakrishnan, AN (2013) Environmental triggers for inflammatory bowel disease. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 15, 302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Holick, MF (2007) Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med 357, 266281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Holick, MF (2004) Sunlight and vitamin D for bone health and prevention of autoimmune diseases, cancers, and cardiovascular disease. Am J Clin Nutr 80, 6 Suppl., 1678S1688S.Google Scholar
8. Rosen, CJ (2011) Clinical practice. Vitamin D insufficiency. N Engl J Med 364, 248254.Google Scholar
9. Leslie, WD, Miller, N, Rogala, L et al. (2008) Vitamin D status and bone density in recently diagnosed inflammatory bowel disease: the Manitoba IBD Cohort Study. Am J Gastroenterol 103, 14511459.Google Scholar
10. Laakso, S, Valta, H, Verkasalo, M et al. (2012) Impaired bone health in inflammatory bowel disease: a case-control study in 80 pediatric patients. Calcif Tissue Int 91, 121130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Mowat, C, Cole, A, Windsor, A et al. (2011) Guidelines for the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults. Gut 60, 571607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Ananthakrishnan, AN, Khalili, H, Higuchi, LM et al. (2012) Higher predicted vitamin D status is associated with reduced risk of Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 142, 482489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Cantorna, MT & Mahon, BD (2004) Mounting evidence for vitamin D as an environmental factor affecting autoimmune disease prevalence. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 229, 11361142.Google Scholar
14. Cantorna, MT, Zhu, Y, Froicu, M et al. (2004) Vitamin D status, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, and the immune system. Am J Clin Nutr 80, 6 Suppl., 1717S1720S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Jørgensen, SP, Agnholt, J, Glerup, H et al. (2010) Clinical trial: vitamin D3 treatment in Crohn's disease – a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 32, 377383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Raftery, T, O'Morain, CA & O'Sullivan, M (2012) Vitamin D: new roles and therapeutic potential in inflammatory bowel disease. Curr Drug Metab 13, 12941302.Google Scholar
17. Institute of Medicine (2010) Report Brief: Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D.Google Scholar
18. Alkhouri, RH, Hashmi, H, Baker, RD et al. (2013) Vitamin and mineral status in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 56, 8992.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Blank, S, Scanlon, KS, Sinks, TH et al. (1995). An outbreak of hypervitaminosis D associated with the overfortification of milk from a home-delivery dairy. Am J Public Health 85, 656659.Google Scholar
20. Souberbielle, JC, Body, JJ, Lappe, JM et al. (2010) Vitamin D and musculoskeletal health, cardiovascular disease, autoimmunity and cancer: recommendations for clinical practice. Autoimmun Rev 9, 709715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Vieth, R (1999). Vitamin D supplementation, 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations, and safety. Am J Clin Nutr 69, 842856.Google Scholar
22. Vieth, R (2006) Critique of the considerations for establishing the tolerable upper intake level for vitamin D: critical need for revision upwards. J Nutr 136, 11171122.Google Scholar
23. Jones, G (2008) Pharmacokinetics of vitamin D toxicity. Am J Clin Nutr 88, 582S586S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Maalouf, J, Nabulsi, M, Vieth, R et al. (2008) Short- and long-term safety of weekly high-dose vitamin D3 supplementation in school children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93, 26932701.Google Scholar
25. Haddock, L & Corcino, J, Vazques, MD (1982) V. 25(OH)D serum levels in the normal Puerto Rican population and in subjects with tropical sprue and parathyroid disease. Puerto Rico Health Sci J 1, 8591.Google Scholar
26. Yang, L, Weaver, V, Smith, JP et al. (2013) Therapeutic effect of vitamin d supplementation in a pilot study of Crohn's patients. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 4, e33.Google Scholar
27. Hanley, DA, Cranney, A, Jones, G et al. (2010) Vitamin D in adult health and disease: a review and guideline statement from Osteoporosis Canada. CMAJ 182, E610E618.Google Scholar
28. Siffledeen, JS, Siminoski, K, Steinhart, H et al. (2003) The frequency of vitamin D deficiency in adults with Crohn's disease. Can J Gastroenterol 17, 473478.Google Scholar
29. McCarthy, D, Duggan, P, O'Brien, M et al. (2005) Seasonality of vitamin D status and bone turnover in patients with Crohn's disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 21, 10731083.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30. Harries, AD, Brown, R, Heatley, RV et al. (1985) Vitamin D status in Crohn's disease: association with nutrition and disease activity. Gut 26, 11971203.Google Scholar
31. Gilman, J, Shanahan, F & Cashman, KD (2006) Determinants of vitamin D status in adult Crohn's disease patients, with particular emphasis on supplemental vitamin D use. Eur J Clin Nutr 60, 889896.Google Scholar
32. Driscoll, RH, Meredith, SC, Sitrin, M et al. (1982) Vitamin D deficiency and bone disease in patients with Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 83, 12521258.Google Scholar
33. de Bruyn, JR, van Heeckeren, R, Ponsioen, CY et al. (2014) Vitamin D deficiency in Crohn's disease and healthy controls: a prospective case-control study in the Netherlands. J Crohns Colitis 8, 1287–1273.Google Scholar
34. Raftery, T, Lee, C, Cox, G et al. (2013) Supplemental vitamin D in quiescent Crohn's disease – effects on quality of life, fatigue and muscle strength: results from a double blind placebo controlled study. Proc Nutr Soc 72, OCE3, E177.Google Scholar
35. Suibhne, TN, Cox, G, Healy, M et al. (2012) Vitamin D deficiency in Crohn's disease: prevalence, risk factors and supplement use in an outpatient setting. J Crohns Colitis 6, 182188.Google Scholar
36. Vogelsang, H, Klamert, M, Resch, H et al. (1995) Dietary vitamin D intake in patients with Crohn's disease. Wien Klin Wochenschr 107, 578581.Google Scholar
37. Filippi, J, Al-Jaouni, R, Wiroth, JB et al. (2006) Nutritional deficiencies in patients with Crohn's disease in remission. Inflamm Bowel Dis 12, 185191.Google Scholar
38. Bin, CM, Flores, C, Alvares-da-Silva, MR et al. (2010) Comparison between handgrip strength, subjective global assessment, anthropometry, and biochemical markers in assessing nutritional status of patients with Crohn's disease in clinical remission. Dig Dis Sci 55, 137144.Google Scholar
39. Hollander, D & Truscott, TC (1976) Mechanism and site of small intestinal uptake of vitamin D3 in pharmacological concentrations. Am J Clin Nutr 29, 970975.Google Scholar
40. Leichtmann, GA, Bengoa, JM, Bolt, MJ et al. (1991) Intestinal absorption of cholecalciferol and 25-hydroxycholecalciferol in patients with both Crohn's disease and intestinal resection. Am J Clin Nutr 54, 548552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41. Ulitsky, A, Ananthakrishnan, AN, Naik, A et al. (2011) Vitamin D deficiency in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: association with disease activity and quality of life. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 35, 308316.Google Scholar
42. Hassan, V, Hassan, S, Seyed-Javad, P et al. (2013) Association between serum 25 (OH) vitamin D concentrations and inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) activity. Med J Malaysia 68, 3438.Google Scholar
43. Jørgensen, SP, Hvas, CL, Agnholt, J et al. (2013) Active Crohn's disease is associated with low vitamin D levels. J Crohns Colitis 7, e407e413.Google Scholar
44. Ham, M, Longhi, MS, Lahiff, C et al. (2014) Vitamin d levels in adults with Crohn's disease are responsive to disease activity and treatment. Inflamm Bowel Dis 20, 856860.Google Scholar
45. Farraye, FA, Nimitphong, H, Stucchi, A et al. (2011) Use of a novel vitamin D bioavailability test demonstrates that vitamin D absorption is decreased in patients with quiescent Crohn's disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 17, 21162121.Google Scholar
46. Mouli, VP & Ananthakrishnan, AN (2014) Review article: vitamin D and inflammatory bowel diseases. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 39, 125136.Google Scholar
47. Wang, TJ, Zhang, F, Richards, JB et al. (2010) Common genetic determinants of vitamin D insufficiency: a genome-wide association study. Lancet 376, 180188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48. Simpson, S, Blizzard, L, Otahal, P et al. (2011) Latitude is significantly associated with the prevalence of multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 82, 11321141.Google Scholar
49. Peyrin-Biroulet, L, Oussalah, A & Bigard, MA (2009) Crohn's disease: the hot hypothesis. Med Hypotheses 73, 9496.Google Scholar
50. Frolkis, A, Dieleman, LA, Barkema, H et al. (2013) Environment and the inflammatory bowel diseases. Can J Gastroenterol 27, e18e24.Google Scholar
51. Spehlmann, ME, Begun, AZ, Burghardt, J et al. (2008) Epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease in a German twin cohort: results of a nationwide study. Inflamm Bowel Dis 14, 968976.Google Scholar
52. Khalili, H, Huang, ES, Ananthakrishnan, AN et al. (2012) Geographical variation and incidence of inflammatory bowel disease among US women. Gut 61, 16861692.Google Scholar
53. Shivananda, S, Lennard-Jones, J, Logan, R et al. (1996) Incidence of inflammatory bowel disease across Europe: is there a difference between north and south? Results of the European Collaborative Study on Inflammatory Bowel Disease (EC-IBD). Gut 39, 690697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54. Loftus, EV & Sandborn, WJ (2002) Epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 31, 120.Google Scholar
55. Schultz, M & Butt, AG (2012) Is the north to south gradient in inflammatory bowel disease a global phenomenon?. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 6, 445447.Google Scholar
56. Burisch, J, Pedersen, N, Cukovic-Cavka, S et al. (2013) Environmental factors in a population-based inception cohort of inflammatory bowel disease patients in Europe – An ECCO-EpiCom study. J Crohns Colitis 8, 607616 Google Scholar
57. Pinsk, V, Lemberg, DA, Grewal, K et al. (2007) Inflammatory bowel disease in the South Asian pediatric population of British Columbia. Am J Gastroenterol 102, 10771083.Google Scholar
58. Sewell, JL, Yee, HF & Inadomi, JM (2010) Hospitalizations are increasing among minority patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 16, 204207.Google Scholar
59. Limketkai, BN, Bayless, TM, Brant, SR et al. (2014) Lower regional and temporal ultraviolet exposure is associated with increased rates and severity of inflammatory bowel disease hospitalisation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 40, 508517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
60. Cantorna, MT & Mahon, BD (2005). D-hormone and the immune system. J Rheumatol Suppl 76, 1120.Google Scholar
61. Jäger, S, Stange, EF & Wehkamp, J (2013) Inflammatory bowel disease: an impaired barrier disease. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398, 112.Google Scholar
62. Tollin, M, Bergman, P, Svenberg, T et al. (2003) Antimicrobial peptides in the first line defence of human colon mucosa. Peptides 24, 523530.Google Scholar
63. Otte, JM, Zdebik, AE, Brand, S et al. (2009) Effects of the cathelicidin LL-37 on intestinal epithelial barrier integrity. Regul Pept 156, 104117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
64. Gombart, AF, Borregaard, N & Koeffler, HP (2005) Human cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide (CAMP) gene is a direct target of the vitamin D receptor and is strongly up-regulated in myeloid cells by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 . FASEB J 19, 10671077.Google Scholar
65. Daniel, C, Sartory, NA, Zahn, N et al. (2008) Immune modulatory treatment of trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid colitis with calcitriol is associated with a change of a T helper (Th) 1/Th17 to a Th2 and regulatory T cell profile. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 324, 2333.Google Scholar
66. Tang, J, Zhou, R, Luger, D et al. (2009) Calcitriol suppresses antiretinal autoimmunity through inhibitory effects on the Th17 effector response. J Immunol 182, 46244632.Google Scholar
67. Jeffery, LE, Burke, F, Mura, M et al. (2009) 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 and IL-2 combine to inhibit T cell production of inflammatory cytokines and promote development of regulatory T cells expressing CTLA-4 and FoxP3. J Immunol 183, 54585467.Google Scholar
68. Cantorna, MT (2012) Vitamin D, multiple sclerosis and inflammatory bowel disease. Arch Biochem Biophys 523, 103106.Google Scholar
69. Froicu, M & Cantorna, MT (2007) Vitamin D and the vitamin D receptor are critical for control of the innate immune response to colonic injury. BMC Immunol 8, 5.Google Scholar
70. Froicu, M, Weaver, V, Wynn, TA et al. (2003) A crucial role for the vitamin D receptor in experimental inflammatory bowel diseases. Mol Endocrinol 17, 23862392.Google Scholar
71. Cantorna, MT, Munsick, C, Bemiss, C et al. (2000) 1,25-Dihydroxycholecalciferol prevents and ameliorates symptoms of experimental murine inflammatory bowel disease. J Nutr 130, 26482652.Google Scholar
72. Henderson, P, van Limbergen, JE et al. (2011) Function of the intestinal epithelium and its dysregulation in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 17, 382395.Google Scholar
73. Marchiando, AM, Graham, WV & Turner, JR (2010) Epithelial barriers in homeostasis and disease. Annu Rev Pathol 5, 119144.Google Scholar
74. Cantorna, MT, McDaniel, K, Bora, S et al. (2014) Vitamin D, immune regulation, the microbiota, and inflammatory bowel disease. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 239, 15241530.Google Scholar
75. D'Incà, R, Di Leo, V, Corrao, G et al. (1999) Intestinal permeability test as a predictor of clinical course in Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol 94, 29562960.Google Scholar
76. Wyatt, J, Vogelsang, H, Hübl, W et al. (1993) Intestinal permeability and the prediction of relapse in Crohn's disease. Lancet 341, 14371439.Google Scholar
77. Kong, J, Zhang, Z, Musch, MW et al. (2008) Novel role of the vitamin D receptor in maintaining the integrity of the intestinal mucosal barrier. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 294, G208G216.Google Scholar
78. Ooi, JH, Li, Y, Rogers, CJ et al. (2013) Vitamin D regulates the gut microbiome and protects mice from dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis. J Nutr 143, 16791686.Google Scholar
79. Zhang, Y, Leung, DY, Richers, BN et al. (2012) Vitamin D inhibits monocyte/macrophage proinflammatory cytokine production by targeting MAPK phosphatase-1. J Immunol 188, 21272135.Google Scholar
80. Hewison, M (2010) Vitamin D and the immune system: new perspectives on an old theme. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 39, 365379; table of contents.Google Scholar
81. El-Matary, W, Sikora, S & Spady, D (2011) Bone mineral density, vitamin D, and disease activity in children newly diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Dis Sci 56, 825829.Google Scholar
82. Joseph, AJ, George, B, Pulimood, AB et al. (2009) 25 (OH) vitamin D level in Crohn's disease: association with sun exposure & disease activity. Indian J Med Res 130, 133137.Google Scholar
83. Ananthakrishnan, AN, Cagan, A, Gainer, VS et al. (2013) Normalization of plasma 25-hydroxy vitamin D is associated with reduced risk of surgery in Crohn's disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 19, 19211927.Google Scholar
84. Boyd, CA & Limdi, JK (2013) Vitamin D deficiency and disease outcomes in South Asian patients with IBD. Dig Dis Sci 58, 21242125.Google Scholar
85. Miheller, P, Muzes, G, Hritz, I et al. (2009) Comparison of the effects of 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D and 25 hydroxyvitamin D on bone pathology and disease activity in Crohn's disease patients. Inflamm Bowel Dis 15, 16561662.Google Scholar
86. Raftery, T, Martineau, A, Greiller, C et al. (2013) Does vitamin D supplementation impact plasma cathelicidin, human beta defensin 2 and intestinal permeability in stable Crohn's disease? – Results from a randomised, double blind placebo controlled study. Proc Nutr Soc 72, OCE3, E176.Google Scholar
87. Schneider, SM, Al-Jaouni, R, Filippi, J et al. (2008) Sarcopenia is prevalent in patients with Crohn's disease in clinical remission. Inflamm Bowel Dis 14, 15621568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
88. Wiroth, JB, Filippi, J, Schneider, SM et al. (2005) Muscle performance in patients with Crohn's disease in clinical remission. Inflamm Bowel Dis 11, 296303.Google Scholar
89. Geerling, BJ, Badart-Smook, A, Stockbrügger, RW et al. (1998) Comprehensive nutritional status in patients with long-standing Crohn disease currently in remission. Am J Clin Nutr 67, 919926.Google Scholar
90. van Langenberg, DR, Della Gatta, P, Warmington, SA et al. (2014) Objectively measured muscle fatigue in Crohn's disease: correlation with self-reported fatigue and associated factors for clinical application. J Crohns Colitis 8, 137146.Google Scholar
91. Jelsness-Jorgensen, LP, Bernklev, T, Henriksen, M et al. (2012) Chronic fatigue is associated with increased disease-related worries and concerns in inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 18, 445452.Google Scholar
92. Casati, J, Toner, BB, de Rooy, EC, Drossman, DA et al. (2000) Concerns of patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a review of emerging themes. Dig Dis Sci 45, 2631.Google Scholar
93. Drossman, DA, Patrick, DL, Mitchell, CM et al. (1989) Health-related quality of life in inflammatory bowel disease. Functional status and patient worries and concerns. Dig Dis Sci 34, 13791386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
94. Maunder, RG, de Rooy, EC, Toner, BB et al. (1997) Health-related concerns of people who receive psychological support for inflammatory bowel disease. Can J Gastroenterol 11, 681685.Google Scholar
95. Minderhoud, IM, Oldenburg, B, van Dam, PS et al. (2003) High prevalence of fatigue in quiescent inflammatory bowel disease is not related to adrenocortical insufficiency. Am J Gastroenterol 98, 10881093.Google Scholar
96. Reimund, JM, Wittersheim, C, Dumont, S et al. (1996) Mucosal inflammatory cytokine production by intestinal biopsies in patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. J Clin Immunol 16, 144150.Google Scholar
97. Cominelli, F (2004) Cytokine-based therapies for Crohn's disease–new paradigms. N Engl J Med 351, 20452048.Google Scholar
98. Visser, M, Pahor, M, Taaffe, DR et al. (2002) Relationship of interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha with muscle mass and muscle strength in elderly men and women: the Health ABC Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 57, M326M332.Google Scholar
99. Schaap, LA, Pluijm, SM, Deeg, DJ et al. (2006) Inflammatory markers and loss of muscle mass (sarcopenia) and strength. Am J Med 119, e9e17.Google Scholar
100. Al-Shoha, A, Qiu, S, Palnitkar, S et al. (2009) Osteomalacia with bone marrow fibrosis due to severe vitamin D deficiency after a gastrointestinal bypass operation for severe obesity. Endocr Pract 15, 528533.Google Scholar
101. Schott, GD & Wills, MR (1976) Muscle weakness in osteomalacia. Lancet 1, 626629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
102. Mawer, EB, Backhouse, J, Holman, CA et al. (1972). The distribution and storage of vitamin D and its metabolites in human tissues. Clin Sci 43, 413431.Google Scholar
103. Boillon, R, Gielen, E & Vanderschueren, D (2014) Vitamin D receptor and vitamin D action in muscle. Endocrinology 155, 32103213.Google Scholar
104. Pfeifer, M, Begerow, B, Minne, HW et al. (2009) Effects of a long-term vitamin D and calcium supplementation on falls and parameters of muscle function in community-dwelling older individuals. Osteoporos Int 20, 315322.Google Scholar
105. van Langenberg, DR, Gatta, PD, Hill, B et al. (2013) Delving into disability in Crohn's disease: dysregulation of molecular pathways may explain skeletal muscle loss in Crohn's disease. J Crohns Colitis 8, 626634.Google Scholar
106. Salacinski, AJ, Regueiro, MD, Broeder, CE et al. (2013) Decreased neuromuscular function in Crohn's disease patients is not associated with low serum vitamin D levels. Dig Dis Sci 58, 526533.Google Scholar
107. Wacker, M & Holick, MF (2013) Vitamin D – effects on skeletal and extraskeletal health and the need for supplementation. Nutrients 5, 111148.Google Scholar
108. Feskanich, D, Ma, J, Fuchs, CS et al. (2004) Plasma vitamin D metabolites and risk of colorectal cancer in women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13, 15021508.Google Scholar
109. Giovannucci, E (2007) Strengths and limitations of current epidemiologic studies: vitamin D as a modifier of colon and prostate cancer risk. Nutr Rev 65,Pt 2, S77S79.Google Scholar
110. Giovannucci, E (2009) Vitamin D and cancer incidence in the Harvard cohorts. Ann Epidemiol 19, 8488.Google Scholar
111. Giovannucci, E, Liu, Y, Rimm, EB et al. (2006) Prospective study of predictors of vitamin D status and cancer incidence and mortality in men. J Natl Cancer Inst 98, 451459.Google Scholar
112. Lappe, JM, Travers-Gustafson, D, Davies, KM et al. (2007) Vitamin D and calcium supplementation reduces cancer risk: results of a randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr 85, 15861591.Google Scholar
113. Cannell, JJ & Hollis, BW (2008) Use of vitamin D in clinical practice. Altern Med Rev 13, 620.Google Scholar
114. Heaney, RP, Davies, KM, Chen, TC et al. (2003) Human serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol response to extended oral dosing with cholecalciferol. Am J Clin Nutr 77, 204210.Google Scholar
115. Heaney, RP, Horst, RL, Cullen, DM et al. (2009) Vitamin D3 distribution and status in the body. J Am Coll Nutr 28, 252256.Google Scholar
116. Grant, WB & Holick, MF (2005) Benefits and requirements of vitamin D for optimal health: a review. Altern Med Rev 10, 94111.Google Scholar
117. Hollis, BW (2005) Circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels indicative of vitamin D sufficiency: implications for establishing a new effective dietary intake recommendation for vitamin D. J Nutr 135, 317322.Google Scholar
118. Bischoff-Ferrari, HA, Willett, WC, Orav, EJ et al. (2012) A pooled analysis of vitamin D dose requirements for fracture prevention. N Engl J Med 367, 4049.Google Scholar
119. Hall, LM, Kimlin, MG, Aronov, PA et al. (2010) Vitamin D intake needed to maintain target serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations in participants with low sun exposure and dark skin pigmentation is substantially higher than current recommendations. J Nutr 140, 542550.Google Scholar
120. Vieth, R (2006) What is the optimal vitamin D status for health? Prog Biophys Mol Biol 92, 2632.Google Scholar
121. Whiting, SJ & Calvo, MS (2010) Correcting poor vitamin D status: do older adults need higher repletion doses of vitamin D3 than younger adults? Mol Nutr Food Res 54, 10771084.Google Scholar
122. Garrett-Mayer, E, Wagner, CL, Hollis, BW et al. (2012) Vitamin D3 supplementation (4000 IU/d for 1 y) eliminates differences in circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D between African American and white men. Am J Clin Nutr 96, 332336.Google Scholar
123. Holick, MF (2012) Vitamin D: extraskeletal health. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 38, 141160.Google Scholar
124. Barger-Lux, MJ & Heaney, RP (2002) Effects of above average summer sun exposure on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and calcium absorption. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87, 49524956.Google Scholar
125. Azizi, E, Pavlotsky, F, Kudish, A et al. (2012) Serum levels of 25-hydroxy-vitamin D3 among sun-protected outdoor workers in Israel. Photochem Photobiol 88, 15071512.Google Scholar
126. Luxwolda, MF, Kuipers, RS, Kema, IP et al. (2012) Traditionally living populations in East Africa have a mean serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration of 115 nmol/l. Br J Nutr 108, 15571561.Google Scholar
127. Hathcock, JN, Shao, A, Vieth, R et al. (2007) Risk assessment for vitamin D. Am J Clin Nutr 85, 618.Google Scholar
128. Tajika, M, Matsuura, A, Nakamura, T et al. (2004) Risk factors for vitamin D deficiency in patients with Crohn's disease. J Gastroenterol 39, 527533.Google Scholar
129. Jahnsen, J, Falch, JA, Mowinckel, P et al. (2002) Vitamin D status, parathyroid hormone and bone mineral density in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 37, 192199.Google Scholar
130. Wingate, KE, Jacobson, K, Issenman, R et al. (2014) 25-Hydroxyvitamin D concentrations in children with Crohn's disease supplemented with either 2000 or 400 IU daily for 6 months: a randomized controlled study. J Pediatr 164, 860865.Google Scholar
131. Sentongo, TA, Semaeo, EJ, Stettler, N et al. (2002) Vitamin D status in children, adolescents, and young adults with Crohn disease. Am J Clin Nutr 76, 10771081.Google Scholar
132. Pappa, HM, Gordon, CM, Saslowsky, TM et al. (2006) Vitamin D status in children and young adults with inflammatory bowel disease. Pediatrics 118, 19501961.Google Scholar
133. Vagianos, K, Bector, S, McConnell, J et al. (2007) Nutrition assessment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 31, 311319.Google Scholar
134. Fu, YT, Chatur, N, Cheong-Lee, C et al. (2012) Hypovitaminosis D in adults with inflammatory bowel disease: potential role of ethnicity. Dig Dis Sci 57, 21442148.Google Scholar
135. Ananthakrishnan, AN, Cheng, SC, Cai, T et al. (2013) Association between reduced plasma 25-hydroxy vitamin D and increased risk of cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 12, 821827.Google Scholar
136. Garg, M, Rosella, O, Lubel, JS et al. (2013) Association of circulating vitamin D concentrations with intestinal but not systemic inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 19, 26342643.Google Scholar
137. Grunbaum, A, Holcroft, C, Heilpern, D et al. (2013) Dynamics of vitamin D in patients with mild or inactive inflammatory bowel disease and their families. Nutr J 12, 145.Google Scholar
138. Abraham, BP, Prasad, P & Malaty, HM (2014) Vitamin D deficiency and corticosteroid use are risk factors for low bone mineral density in inflammatory bowel disease patients. Dig Dis Sci. 59, 18781884.Google Scholar
139. Dumitrescu, G, Mihai, C, Dranga, M et al. (2014) Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration and inflammatory bowel disease characteristics in Romania. World J Gastroenterol 20, 23922396.Google Scholar
140. Ananthakrishnan, AN, Cheng, SC, Cai, T et al. (2014) Association between reduced plasma 25-hydroxy vitamin d and increased risk of cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 12, 821827.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Prevalence of suboptimal vitamin D status in inflammatory bowel disease in patients with active and quiescent disease

Figure 1

Table 2. Observational studies of the association between 25-hyroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) status and disease related outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)

Figure 2

Table 3. Intervention studies; relationship between 25-hyroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) and outcomes in Crohn's disease