Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T23:57:44.032Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are groups more or less than the sum of their members? The moderating role of individual identification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2015

Roy F. Baumeister ,
Sarah E. Ainsworth  and
Kathleen D. Vohs
Roy F. Baumeister
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4301baumeister@psy.fsu.edu
Sarah E. Ainsworth
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224s.ainsworth@unf.edu
Kathleen D. Vohs
Affiliation:
Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455vohsx005@umn.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper seeks to make a theoretical and empirical case for the importance of differentiated identities for group function. Research on groups has found that groups sometimes perform better and other times perform worse than the sum of their individual members. Differentiation of selves is a crucial moderator. We propose a heuristic framework that divides formation of work or task groups into two steps. One step emphasizes shared common identity and promotes emotional bonds. In the other step, which we emphasize, group members take increasingly differentiated roles that improve performance through specialization, moral responsibility, and efficiency. Pathologies of groups (e.g., social loafing, depletion of shared resources/commons dilemmas, failure to pool information, groupthink) are linked to submerging the individual self in the group. These pathologies are decreased when selves are differentiated, such as by individual rewards, individual competition, accountability, responsibility, and public identification. Differentiating individual selves contributes to many of the best outcomes of groups, such as with social facilitation, wisdom-of-crowds effects, and division of labor. Anonymous confidentiality may hamper differentiation by allowing people to blend into the group (so that selfish or lazy efforts are not punished), but it may also facilitate differentiation by enabling people to think and judge without pressure to conform. Acquiring a unique role within the group can promote belongingness by making oneself irreplaceable.

Keywords

accountabilitybrainstorminggroupsgroup processidentityselfsocial facilitationsocial loafing
Type
Target Article
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 39 , 2016 , e137
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, D., Wetherell, M., Cochrane, S., Hogg, M. A. & Turner, J. C. (1990) Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology 29:97–119.Google Scholar
Allport, F. H. (1924) Social psychology. Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Asch, S. (1952) Social psychology. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Babbage, C. (1832) On the economy of machinery and manufactures. Philosophical Magazine Series 3:208–13. doi: 10.1080/14786443208647876.Google Scholar
Basu, S., Dickhaut, J., Hecht, G., Towry, K. & Waymire, G. (2009) Recordkeeping alters economic history by promoting reciprocity. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106:1009–14. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811967106.Google Scholar
Beaman, A. L., Klentz, B., Diener, E. & Svanum, S. (1979) Self-awareness and transgressions in children: Two field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37:1835–46. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beath, A., Christia, F. & Enikolopov, R. (2012) Direct democracy and resource allocation: Experimental evidence from Afghanistan (June 1, 2012) MIT Political Science Department Research Paper No. 2011–16. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1935055.Google Scholar
Bechtoldt, M. N., De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad, B. A. & Choi, H. (2010) Motivated information processing, social tuning, and group creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 99:622–37. doi: 10.1037/a0019386.Google Scholar
Bond, C. F. (1982) Social facilitation: A self-presentational view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42:1042–50. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.42.6.1042.Google Scholar
Bond, C. F. & Titus, L. J. (1983) Social facilitation: A meta-analysis of 241 studies. Psychological Bulletin 94:265–92. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.94.2.265.Google Scholar
Bond, R. & Smith, P. B. (1996) Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch's (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin 119:111–37. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.111.Google Scholar
Bray, R. M. & Sugarman, R. (1980) Social facilitation among interacting groups: Evidence for the evaluation-apprehension hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 6:137–42. doi: 10.1177/014616728061021.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B. (1991) The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17:475–82. doi: 10.1177/0146167291175001.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B. (2012) Optimal distinctiveness theory: Its history and development. In: Handbook of theories of social psychology, vol. 2, ed. Van Lange, P. A. M., Kruglanski, A. W. & Higgins, E. T., pp. 81–98. Sage.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B. & Kramer, R. M. (1986) Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50:543–49. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.543.Google Scholar
Brodbeck, F. C., Kerschreiter, R., Mojzisch, A., Frey, D. & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2002) The dissemination of critical, unshared information in decision-making groups: The effects of pre-discussion dissent. European Journal of Social Psychology 32:35–56. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.74.Google Scholar
Cable, D. M., Gino, F. & Staats, B. R. (2013) Breaking them in or eliciting their best? Reframing socialization around newcomers' authentic self-expression. Administrative Science Quarterly 58:1–36. doi: 10.1177/0001839213477098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabrera, Á. & Cabrera, E. F. (2002) Knowledge-sharing dilemmas. Organization Studies 23:687–710. doi: 10.1177/0170840602235001.Google Scholar
Camacho, L. M. & Paulus, P. B. (1995) The role of social anxiousness in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68:1071–80. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.68.6.1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatman, J. A., Boisnier, A. D., Spataro, S. E., Anderson, C. & Berdahl, J. L. (2008) Being distinctive versus being conspicuous: The effects of numeric status and sex-stereotyped tasks on individual performance in groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 107:141–60. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.02.006.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. L. & Davis, J. H. (1973) Effects of audience status, evaluation, and time of action on performance with hidden-word problems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 27:74–85. doi: 10.1037/h0034447.Google Scholar
Darley, J. M. & Latané, B. (1968) Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 8:377–83. doi: 10.1037/h0025589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawes, R. M., Van de Kragt, A. J. C. & Orbell, J. (1988) Not me or thee but we: The importance of group identity in eliciting cooperation in dilemma situations. Acta Psychologica 68:83–97. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(88)90047-9.Google Scholar
De Cremer, D. & Van Dijk, E. (2002) Reactions to group success and failure as a function of identification level: A test of the goal-transformation hypothesis in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 38:435–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cremer, D. & Van Dijk, E. (2009) Paying for sanctions in social dilemmas: The effects of endowment asymmetry and accountability. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 109:45–55. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.01.004.Google Scholar
De Cremer, D. & van Vugt, M. (1999) Social identification effects in social dilemmas: A transformation of motives. European Journal of Social Psychology 29:871–93. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199911)29:7.Google Scholar
De Cremer, D., Hoogervorst, N. & Desmet, P. (2012) Procedural justice and sanctions in social dilemmas: The moderating effects of group feedback and identification. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 42:1675–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00914.x.Google Scholar
De Cremer, D., Snyder, M. & Dewitte, S. (2001) The less I trust, the less I contribute (or not)? The effects of trust, accountability and self-monitoring in social dilemmas. European Journal of Social Psychology 31:93–107. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.34.Google Scholar
De Cremer, D., Van Knippenberg, D., Van Dijk, E. & Van Leeuwen, E. (2008) Cooperating if one's goals are collective-based: Social identification effects in social dilemmas as a function of goal transformation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 38:1562–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00359.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad, B. A. & van Knippenberg, D. (2008) Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Review 12(1):22–49. doi: 10.1177/1088868307304092.Google Scholar
De Dreu, C. K. W. & van Knippenberg, D. (2005) The possessive self as a barrier to conflict resolution: Effects of mere ownership, process accountability, and self-concept clarity on competitive cognitions and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89:345–57. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.345.Google Scholar
de Kwaadsteniet, E. W., van Dijk, E., Wit, A., De Cremer, D. & de Rooij, M. (2007) Justifying decisions in social dilemmas: Justification pressures and tacit coordination under environmental uncertainty. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 33:1648–60. doi: 10.1177/0146167207307490.Google Scholar
DeChurch, L. A. & Mesmer-Magnus, J. R. (2010) The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 95:32. doi: 10.1037/a0017328.Google Scholar
Deutsch, M. & Gerard, H. B. (1955) A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 51:629–36. doi: 10.1037/h0046408.Google Scholar
Diener, E., Fraser, S. C., Beaman, A. L. & Kelem, R. T. (1976) Effects of deindividuation variables on stealing among Halloween trick-or-treaters. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 33:178–83. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.33.2.178.Google Scholar
Esser, J. K. (1998) Alive and well after 25 years: A review of groupthink research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 73:116–41. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E. & Gächter, S. (2002) Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415:137–40. doi: 10.1038/415137a.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feinberg, J. M. & Aiello, J. R. (2006) Social facilitation: A test of competing theories. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 36:1087–109. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00032.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, L. M. (2002) Law in America: A short history. Random House.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (2011) The origins of political order: From prehuman times to the French Revolution. Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
Geen, R. G. & Gange, J. J. (1977) Drive theory of social facilitation: Twelve years of theory and research. Psychological Bulletin 84:1267–88. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.84.6.1267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D. & Dowling, C. M. (2013) Is there a secret ballot? Ballot secrecy perceptions and their implications for voting behaviour. British Journal of Political Science 43:77–102. doi: 10.1017/S000712341200021X.Google Scholar
Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B. & Griskevicius, V. (2008) A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research 35:472–82. doi: 10.1086/586910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, K. J. (1973) Social facilitation: Effects of performance anticipation, evaluation, and response competition on free associations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 28:270–75. doi: 10.1037/h0035790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, M. C., Visser, P. S. & Tetlock, P. E. (2000) Coping with accountability cross-pressures: Low-effort evasive tactics and high-effort quests for complex compromises. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26:1380–91. doi: 10.1177/0146167200263006.Google Scholar
Greene, R. G. (1979) Effects of being observed on learning following success and failure experiments. Motivation and Emotion 3:355–71. doi: 10.1007/BF00994050.Google Scholar
Guerin, B. (1986) Mere presence effects in humans: A review. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 22:38–77. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(86)90040-5.Google Scholar
Hardin, G. (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–48. doi: 10.1080/19390450903037302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hazelwood, D. L. & Brigham, J. C. (1998) The effects of juror anonymity on jury verdicts. Law and Human Behavior 22:695–713. doi: 10.1023/A:1025711024462.Google Scholar
Henchy, T. & Glass, D. C. (1968) Evaluation apprehension and the social facilitation of dominant and subordinate responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 10:446–54. doi: 10.1037/h0026814.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S. & Vollrath, D. A. (1997) The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin 121:43–64. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.43.Google Scholar
Hogg, M. A., Abrams, D., Otten, S. & Hinkle, S. (2004) The social identity perspective intergroup relations, self-conception, and small groups. Small Group Research 35:246–76. doi: 10.1177/1046496404263424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horan, R. D., Bulte, E. & Shogren, J. F. (2005) How trade saved humanity from biological exclusion: An economic theory of Neanderthal extinction. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 58:1–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2004.03.009.Google Scholar
Hubbard, G. & Kane, T. (2013) Balance: The economics of great powers from ancient Rome to modern America. Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Hüffmeier, J. & Hertel, G. (2011) When the whole is more than the sum of its parts: Group motivation gains in the wild. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47:455–59. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N. & Salgado, J. F. (2009) Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology 94:1128. doi: 10.1037/a0015978.Google Scholar
Janis, I. L. (1972) Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign policy decisions and fiascoes. Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Janssen, O. & Huang, X. (2008) Us and me: Team identification and individual differentiation as complementary drivers of team members' citizenship and creative behaviors. Journal of Management 34:69–88. doi: 10.1177/0149206307309263.Google Scholar
Karau, S. J. & Williams, K. D. (1993) Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65(4):681–706.Google Scholar
Karau, S. J. & Williams, K. D. (1995) Social loafing: Research findings, implications, and future directions. Current Directions in Psychological Science 4:134–40. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772570.Google Scholar
Kerr, N. L. & Bruun, S. E. (1983) Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44:78–94. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkman, B. L. & Shapiro, D. L. (2001) The impact of cultural values on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in self-managing work teams: The mediating role of employee resistance. Academy of Management Journal 44:557–69. doi: 10.2307/3069370.Google Scholar
Köhler, O. (1926) Kraftleistungen bei Einzel- und Gruppenarbeit [Physical performance in individual and group work]. Industrielle Psychotechnik 3:274–82.Google Scholar
Kramer, R. M. & Brewer, M. B. (1984) Effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated commons dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46:1044–57. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.46.5.1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kravitz, D. A. & Martin, B. (1986) Ringelmann rediscovered: The original article. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50:936–41. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamm, H. & Trommsdorff, G. (1973) Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming): A review. European Journal of Social Psychology 3:361–88. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420030402.Google Scholar
Latané, B. & Nida, S. (1981) Ten years of research on group size and helping. Psychological Bulletin 89:308–24. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.89.2.308.Google Scholar
Latané, B., Williams, K. & Harkins, S. (1979) Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37:822–32. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.822.Google Scholar
Le Bon, G. (1896/1960) The crowd: A study of the popular mind [La psychologie des foules]. Viking Press. (Original work published in 1896.)Google Scholar
Leary, M. R. & Forsyth, D. R. (1987) Attributions of responsibility for collective endeavors. In: Group processes, ed. Hendrick, C., pp. 167–88. Sage.Google Scholar
Lerner, J. S. & Tetlock, P. E. (1999) Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin 125:255–75. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.255.Google Scholar
Lerner, J. S. & Tetlock, P. E. (2003) Bridging individual, interpersonal, and institutional approaches to judgment and decision making: The impact of accountability on cognitive bias. In: Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision research, ed. Lerner, J. S. & Tetlock, P. E., pp. 431–57. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levine, J. M. & Moreland, R. L. (1990) Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology 41:585–634. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.003101.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1952) Group decision and social change. In: Readings in Social Psychology, Revised edition, ed. Swanson, G. E., Newcomb, T. N. & Hartley, E. L., pp. 459–73. Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
Lorinkova, N. M., Pearsall, M. J. & Sims, H. P. (2013) Examining the differential longitudinal performance of directive versus empowering leadership in teams. Academy of Management Journal 56:573–96. doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.0132.Google Scholar
Lu, L., Yuan, Y. C. & McLeod, P. L. (2012) Twenty-five years of hidden profiles in group decision making: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review 16:54–75. doi: 10.1177/1088868311417243.Google Scholar
Lynn, M. & Oldenquist, A. (1986) Egoistic and nonegoistic motives in social dilemmas. American Psychologist 41:529–34. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.41.5.529.Google Scholar
Madirolas, G. & de Polavieja, G. G. (2014) Wisdom of the confident: Using social interactions to eliminate the bias in wisdom of the crowds. Proceedings of the Collective Intelligence Conference at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, June 10–12, 2014, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Mann, L., Newton, J. W. & Innes, J. M. (1982) A test between deindividuation and emergent norm theories of crowd aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42:260–72. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.42.2.260.Google Scholar
Mannix, E. & Neale, M. A. (2005) What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 6:31–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00022.x.Google Scholar
Martens, R. & Landers, D. M. (1972) Evaluation potential as a determinant of coaction effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 8:347–59. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(72)90024-8.Google Scholar
McNeill, W. H. (1982) The pursuit of power. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1934) Mind, self and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Messick, D. M. & Brewer, M. B. (1983) Solving social dilemmas: A review. In: Review of personality and social psychology, vol. 4, ed. Wheeler, L. & Shaver, P., pp. 11–44. Sage.Google Scholar
Metzinger, T. (2009) The ego tunnel: The science of the mind and the myth of the self. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Moffett, M. W. (2013) Human identity and the evolution of societies. Human Nature 24:219–67. doi: 10.1007/s12110-013-9170-3.Google Scholar
Moorman, R. H. & Blakely, G. L. (1995) Individualism-collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior 16:127–42. doi: 10.1002/job.4030160204.Google Scholar
Morris, D. R. (1965) The washing of the spears: The rise and fall of the Zulu nation. Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Mueller, J. S. (2012) Why individuals in larger teams perform worse. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 117:111–24. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.08.004.Google Scholar
Mullen, B. (1986) Atrocity as a function of lynch mob composition: A self-attention perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 12:187–97. doi: 10.1177/0146167286122005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullen, B. & Copper, C. (1994) The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin 115:210–27. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.210.Google Scholar
Mullen, B., Johnson, C. & Salas, E. (1991) Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 12:3–23. doi: 10.1207/s15324834basp1201_1.Google Scholar
Nadler, A., Goldberg, M. & Jaffe, Y. (1982) Effect of self-differentiation and anonymity in group on deindividuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42:1127–36. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.42.6.1127.Google Scholar
Nemeth, C. J. (1986) Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review 93:23–32. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.93.1.23.Google Scholar
Nemeth, C. J., Personnaz, B., Personnaz, M. & Goncalo, J. A. (2004) The liberating role of conflict in group creativity: A study in two countries. European Journal of Social Psychology 34:365–74. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.210.Google Scholar
Olken, B. (2010) Direct democracy and local public goods: Evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. American Political Science Review 104:243–67. doi: 10.1017/S0003055410000079.Google Scholar
Orbell, J. M. & Dawes, R. M. (1981) Social dilemmas. In: Progress in applied social psychology, vol. 1, ed. Stephenson, G. & Davis, J. H., pp. 37–66. Wiley.Google Scholar
Osborn, A. F. (1953) Applied imagination. Scribner's.Google Scholar
Osborn, K. A., Irwin, B. C., Skogsberg, N. J. & Feltz, D. L. (2012) The Köhler effect: Motivation gains and losses in real sports groups. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology 1:242–53. doi: 10.1037/a0026887.Google Scholar
Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A. & Schroeder, D. A. (2005) Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology 56:365–92. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070141.Google Scholar
Petty, R. E., Harkins, S. G. & Williams, K. D. (1980) The effects of group diffusion of cognitive effort on attitudes: An information-processing view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38:81–92. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.38.1.81.Google Scholar
Postmes, T. & Spears, R. (1998) Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 123:238–59. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.123.3.238.Google Scholar
Prentice-Dunn, S. & Rogers, R. W. (1982) Effects of public and private self-awareness on deindividuation and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43:503. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.503.Google Scholar
Rajecki, D. W., Ickes, W., Corcoran, C. & Lenerz, K. (1977) Social facilitation of human performance: Mere presence effects. The Journal of Social Psychology 102:297–310. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1977.9713277.Google Scholar
Rapoport, A., Bornstein, G. & Erev, I. (1989) Intergroup competition for public goods: Effects of unequal resources and relative group size. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56:748–56. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.748.Google Scholar
Ringelmann, M. (1913b) Research on animate sources of power: The work of man. Annales de l'Institut National Agronomique, 2e serie-tome XII:1–40.Google Scholar
Rogers, R. W. & Ketchen, C. M. (1979) Effects of anonymity and arousal on aggression. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied 102:13–19. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1979.9915089.Google Scholar
Satow, K. (1975) Social approval and helping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 11:501–509. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(75)90001-3.Google Scholar
Schachter, S. (1951) Deviation, rejection, and communication. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 46:190–207. doi: 10.1037/h0062326.Google Scholar
Schachter, S. (1954) Interpretative and methodological problems of replicated research. Journal of Social Issues 10:52–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1954.tb01654.x.Google Scholar
Scholten, L., van Knippenberg, D., Nijstad, B. A. & de Dreu, C. K. W. (2007) Motivated information processing and group decision-making: Effects of process accountability on information processing and decision quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43:539–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.010.Google Scholar
Schopler, J., Insko, C. A., Drigotas, S. M. & Wieselquist, J. (1995) The role of identifiability in the reduction of interindividual–intergroup discontinuity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 31:553–74. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1995.1025.Google Scholar
Schulz-Hardt, S., Brodbeck, F. C., Mojzisch, A., Kerschreiter, R. & Frey, D. (2006) Group decision making in hidden profile situations: Dissent as a facilitator for decision quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91:1080–93. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1080.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. & Gottlieb, A. (1976) Bystander reactions to a violent theft: Crime in Jerusalem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 34:1188–99. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.34.6.1188.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. & Gottlieb, A. (1980) Bystander anonymity and reactions to emergencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39:418–30. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.418.Google Scholar
Scott, M. B. & Lyman, S. M. (1968) Paranoia, homosexuality and game theory. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 9:179–87. doi: 10.2307/2948402.Google Scholar
Semin, G. R. & Manstead, A. S. R. (1983) The accountability of conduct: A social psychological analysis. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sherif, M. (1936) The psychology of social norms. Harper.Google Scholar
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., Galak, J. & Frederick, S. (2011) Intuitive biases in choice versus estimation: Implications for the wisdom of crowds. Journal of Consumer Research 38:1–15. doi: 10.1086/658070.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1776/1991) The wealth of nations. Knopf. (Original work published in 1776.)Google Scholar
Spencer-Rodgers, J., Hamilton, D. L. & Sherman, S. J. (2007) The central role of entitativity in stereotypes of social categories and task groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92:369. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.369.Google Scholar
Staats, B. R. & Gino, F. (2012) Specialization and variety in repetitive tasks: Evidence from a Japanese bank. Management Science 58:1141–59. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1110.1482.Google Scholar
Stasser, G. (1999) The uncertain role of unshared information in collective choice. In: Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge, ed. Levine, J. M., Thompson, L. L. & Messick, D. M., pp. 49–69. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Stasser, G., Stewart, D. D. & Wittenbaum, G. M. (1995) Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 31:244–65. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1995.1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stasser, G. & Titus, W. (1985) Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48:1467–78. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467.Google Scholar
Stasser, G. & Titus, W. (1987) Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53:81–93. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.81.Google Scholar
Stroebe, W. & Frey, B. S. (1982) Self-interest and collective action: The economics and psychology of public goods. British Journal of Social Psychology 21:121–37. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1982.tb00521.x.Google Scholar
Surowiecki, J. (2004) The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations. Anchor.Google Scholar
Swann, W. B. & Buhrmester, M. D. (2012) Self as functional fiction. Social Cognition 30:415–30. doi: 10.1521/soco.2012.30.4.415.Google Scholar
Szymanski, K., Garczynski, J. & Harkins, S. (2000) The contribution of the potential for evaluation to coaction effects. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 3:269–83. doi: 10.1177/1368430200033003.Google Scholar
Tata, J., Anthony, T., Lin, H., Newman, B., Tang, S., Millson, M. & Sivakumar, K. (1996) Proportionate group size and rejection of the deviate: Meta-analytic integration. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 11:739–52.Google Scholar
Tetlock, P. E. (1983) Accountability and the perseverance of first impressions. Social Psychology Quarterly 46:285–92. doi: 10.2307/3033716.Google Scholar
Tetlock, P. E. (1992) The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: Toward a social contingency model. In: Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 25, ed. Zanna, M. P., pp. 331–76. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tetlock, P. E., Skitka, L. & Boettger, R. (1989) Social and cognitive strategies for coping with accountability: Conformity, complexity, and bolstering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57:632–40. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.632.Google Scholar
Triplett, N. (1898) The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. The American Journal of Psychology 9:507–33. doi: 10.2307/1412188.Google Scholar
Tuckman, B. (1965) Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin 63:384–99. doi: 10.1037/h0022100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, J. & Tajfel, H. (1982) Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Twenge, J. M. & Campbell, W. K. (2003) “Isn't it fun to get the respect that we're going to deserve?” Narcissism, social rejection, and aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29:261–72. doi: 10.1177/0146167202239051.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R. & Degoey, P. (1995) Collective restraint in social dilemmas: Procedural justice and social identification effects on support for authorities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69:482–97. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.3.482.Google Scholar
Van de Kragt, A., Orbell, J. & Dawes, R., Braver, S. & Wilson, L. (1986) Doing well and doing good as ways of resolving social dilemmas. In: Experimental social dilemmas, ed. Wilkc, H., Messick, D. & Rutte, C., pp. 177–203. Verlag Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Van Lange, P. A. M., Liebrand, W. B. G., Messick, D. M. & Wilke, H. A. M. (1992) Introduction and literature review. In: Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings, ed. Liebrand, W. B. G., Messick, D. M. & Wilke, H. A. M., pp. 3–28. Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Van Vugt, M. & De Cremer, D. (1999) Leadership in social dilemmas: The effects of group identification on collective actions to provide public goods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76:587. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Vugt, M. & Hart, C. M. (2004) Social identity as social glue: The origins of group loyalty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86:585. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.4.585.Google Scholar
VanTuinen, M. & McNeel, S. P. (1975) A test of the social facilitation theories of Cottrell and Zajonc in a coaction situation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1:604–607. doi: 10.1177/014616727500100412.Google Scholar
Watson, R. I. (1973) Investigation into deindividuation using a cross-cultural survey technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 25:342–45. doi: 10.1037/h0034218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wegner, D. M. (1986) Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In: Theories of group behavior, ed. Mullen, B. & Goethals, G. R., pp. 185–208. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Weldon, E. & Gargano, G. M. (1988) Cognitive loafing: The effects of accountability and shared responsibility on cognitive effort. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 14:159–71. doi: 10.1177/0146167288141016.Google Scholar
Weldon, E. & Mustari, E. L. (1988) Felt dispensability in groups of coactors: The effects of shared responsibility and explicit anonymity on cognitive effort. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 41:330–51. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(88)90033-7.Google Scholar
West, A. (1999) The flute factory: An empirical measurement of the effect of division of labor on productivity and production. American Economist 43:82–87. 10.1177/056943459904300109.Google Scholar
Wildschut, T., Pinter, B., Vevea, J. L., Insko, C. A. & Schopler, J. (2003) Beyond the group mind: A quantitative review of the interindividual-intergroup discontinuity effect. Psychological Bulletin 129:698–722. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.698.Google Scholar
Williams, K., Harkins, S. G. & Latané, B. (1981) Identifiability as a deterrent to social loafing: Two cheering experiments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40:303–11. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.40.2.303.Google Scholar
Wittenbaum, G. M. & Park, E. S. (2001) The collective preference for shared information. Current Directions in Psychological Science 10:70–73. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00118.Google Scholar
Wittenbaum, G. M. & Stasser, G. (1996) Management of information in small groups. In: What's social about social cognition?: Research on socially shared cognition in small groups, ed. Nye, J. L. & Brower, A. M., pp. 3–28. Sage.Google Scholar
Zajonc, R. B. (1965) Social facilitation. Science 149:269–74. doi: 10.1126/science.149.3681.269.Google Scholar
Zdaniuk, B. & Levine, J. M. (2001) Group loyalty: Impact of members' identification and contributions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 37:502–509. doi: 10.1006/jesp.2000.1474.Google Scholar
Zimbardo, P. G. (1969) The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 17:237–307.Google Scholar