Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T00:00:40.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Solved paradoxes and old hats? The research needed on differentiated selves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2016

Ilan Dar-Nimrod  and
Karen Gonsalkorale
Ilan Dar-Nimrod
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia. ilan.dar-nimrod@sydney.edu.aukaren.gonsalkorale@sydney.edu.auhttp://sydney.edu.au/science/people/ilan.dar-nimrod.phphttp://sydney.edu.au/science/people/karen.gonsalkorale.php
Karen Gonsalkorale
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia. ilan.dar-nimrod@sydney.edu.aukaren.gonsalkorale@sydney.edu.auhttp://sydney.edu.au/science/people/ilan.dar-nimrod.phphttp://sydney.edu.au/science/people/karen.gonsalkorale.php
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The idea that differentiated selves almost always improve group outcomes is overly simplistic. We argue that it is essential to distinguish between two distinct elements of differentiated selves – identifiability and specialization – and to identify conditions under which they influence group outcomes. Adopting a group-by-situation perspective, in which group and situation variables are considered jointly, is recommended to generate novel hypotheses.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 39 , 2016 , e146
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

D'Innocenzo, L., Mathieu, J. E. & Kukenberger, M. R. (2014) A meta-analysis of different forms of shared leadership–team performance relations. Journal of Management. doi: 10.1177/0149206314525205.Google Scholar
De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad, B. A. & van Knippenberg, D. (2008) Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Review 12(1):22–49. doi: 10.1177/1088868307304092.Google Scholar
De Dreu, C. K. W. & Weingart, L. R. (2003) Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 88(4):741–49.Google Scholar
George, J. M. (1990) Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology 75:107–16.Google Scholar
Hackman, J. R. & Morris, C. G. (1975) Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In: Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 8, ed. Berkowitz, L., pp. 45–99. Academic press.Google Scholar
Harkins, S. G. (1987) Social loafing and social facilitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 23(1):1–18.Google Scholar
Janis, I. L. & Mann, L. (1977) Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. Free Press.Google Scholar
Karau, S. J. & Williams, K. D. (1993) Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65(4):681–706.Google Scholar
LePine, J. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R. & Hedlund, J. (1997) Effects of individual differences on the performance of hierarchical decision-making teams: Much more than g . Journal of Applied Psychology 82:803–11.Google Scholar
McGuire, W. J. (2013) An additional future for psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science 8(4):414–23.Google Scholar
Pondy, L. R. (1967) Organizational conflict: Concepts and models. Administrative Science Quarterly 12(2):296–20.Google Scholar
Smaldino, P. E. (2014a) Group-level traits emerge. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37(3):281–95.Google Scholar
Stasser, G., Stewart, D. D. & Wittenbaum, G. M. (1995) Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 31:244–65. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1995.1012.Google Scholar
West, M. A. & Anderson, N. (1996) Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology 81:680–93.Google Scholar