Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T17:13:17.385Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prevention of obesity in preschool children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2010

Julie Lanigan*
Affiliation:
The MRC Childhood Nutrition Research Centre, University College London, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, LondonWC1N 1EH, UK
Sally Barber
Affiliation:
The MRC Childhood Nutrition Research Centre, University College London, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, LondonWC1N 1EH, UK
Atul Singhal
Affiliation:
The MRC Childhood Nutrition Research Centre, University College London, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, LondonWC1N 1EH, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Julie Lanigan, fax +44 20 7831 9903, email j.lanigan@ich.ucl.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Obesity is a serious problem that affects children from diverse ethnic backgrounds in both industrialised and developing countries. Worldwide, an estimated twenty-two million children <5 years of age were overweight in 2007. In the UK if current trends continue an estimated one-quarter of all children <16 years of age will be obese by 2050. Recent evidence suggests that most obesity is established during the preschool years, and because one in five obese 4 year olds will become obese adults this situation has major implications for public health. The causes of obesity in preschool children are complex and multifactorial. Although 30–50% of the predisposition towards obesity in preschool children can be explained by genetic factors, environmental influences also play a crucial role. The preschool period in particular is a pivotal time during which long-term dietary and physical activity habits are established, with potential lifelong effects on health. However, research in this age-group is limited. Previous studies have aimed to improve diet, increase physical activity and achieve behavioural change. However, few of these studies have been successful and there is an urgent need, therefore, for the development of evidence-based interventions aimed at the prevention of preschool obesity.

Type
Symposium on ‘Dietary management of disease’
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2010

Obesity is a serious problem that affects children from both industrialised and developing countries. In recent years its prevalence has reached epidemic proportions and it is estimated that 10% of the world's children are currently overweight or obese(Reference Lobstein, Baur and Uauy1). The problem is not confined to school-age children; twenty-two million children <5 years of age are now estimated to be overweight or obese(2).

Recent evidence suggests that in obese children most of their excess weight is gained before the age of 5 years(Reference Gardner, Hosking and Metcalf3) and that adiposity tracks into later childhood(Reference Gardner, Hosking and Metcalf3, Reference Nader, O'Brien and Houts4). This situation is a major concern for public health because weight gained before puberty has a strong association with risk factors for CVD, which are typically seen in adulthood but are becoming apparent in children as young as 4 years of age(Reference Cali and Caprio5). These risk factors are also known to track to adulthood(Reference Berenson6) with major implications for long-term health. Early childhood is therefore a key period for the development of obesity and an important target for intervention(Reference Flynn, McNeil and Maloff7). The present review considers factors that influence the development of obesity during the preschool period, summarises the evidence to inform preventative strategies and considers the effectiveness of interventions aimed at its prevention.

Determinants of obesity

Evolution has favoured hunger over satiety signals, resulting in a preference towards energy-dense foods. Previously, this predisposition would be advantageous because energy can be stored during periods of abundant food availability and accessed during famine. Human subjects are therefore genetically predisposed to adiposity and in the current environment approximately half to one-third of an individual's risk of overweight can be explained by genetic factors(Reference O'Rahilly, Farooqi and Yeo8). However, the human gene pool has remained relatively static despite a massive increase in obesity prevalence, suggesting that environmental factors are the most influential for the current obesity epidemic. Human subjects are particularly susceptible to the ‘obesogenic’ environment in which energy-dense foods are freely available and sedentary behaviours are common.

At the individual level excessive weight gain results when energy intake exceeds energy expenditure over a prolonged period. Environmental factors, both within individuals and within societies, have a major role in producing this positive energy balance. Societal changes that predispose to excess energy consumption include increased availability of food and use of technology(Reference Law, Power and Graham9). Within individuals factors predisposing to obesity in young children include intrauterine exposures, size at birth and early growth patterns, parental obesity and sleep duration(Reference Reilly, Armstrong and Dorosty10). However, the two lifestyle factors that have the greatest impact on the risk of obesity are likely to be diet and physical activity(Reference Parsons, Power and Logan11Reference Kipping, Jago and Lawlor13).

Role of diet

Surprisingly, the relationship between diet and obesity in preschool children is poorly researched but is likely to involve interaction between appetite, dietary composition, feeding or meal patterns and parental feeding influences(Reference Newby14). Research into the dietary determinants of preschool obesity has focused either on the role of total energy intake or the contribution of individual macronutrients(Reference Gunther, Buyken and Kroke15Reference Welsh, Cogswell and Rogers18).

Reports from studies investigating associations between energy intake and obesity in preschool children are conflicting. Two studies have found that high energy intake is associated with increased obesity risk(Reference Stunkard, Berkowitz and Schoeller19, Reference Cowin and Emmett20), whilst surprisingly a randomised controlled trial has found that a lower energy intake during the preschool years is associated with increased risk of later obesity(Reference Niinikoski, Viikari and Ronnemaa21, Reference Hakanen, Lagstrom and Kaitosaari22). This discrepancy may be a consequence of difficulties in assessing energy intake, which can be confounded by factors such as body weight, metabolism and physical activity level. For example, when assessing energy intake studies do not always adjust for body size and physical activity level and few measure metabolisable energy intake using the ‘gold standard’ doubly-labelled-water method. Evidence from the USA suggests that increased energy intake rather than reduced energy expenditure is the major driver of obesity(Reference Swinburn, Sacks and Ravussin23). A meta-analysis of data from seven studies including 963 children aged 4–18 years has found that total energy intake is the greatest contributor to increases in body weight(Reference Swinburn, Jolley and Kremer24). More data from preschool children using the doubly-labelled-water technique to assess energy expenditure are needed before firm conclusions can be made.

Several studies have investigated the influence of macronutrient intake and the development of obesity in preschool children. The evidence is most consistent for an association between higher protein intake and increased obesity risk(Reference Gunther, Buyken and Kroke15Reference Rolland-Cachera, Deheeger and Akrout17, Reference Stunkard, Berkowitz and Schoeller19, Reference Verduci, Radaelli and Stival25, Reference Scaglioni, Agostoni and Notaris26). For instance, one study has shown that higher protein intake in the preschool years (14–15% total energy intake v. 11–12% total energy intake) more than doubles the risk of being overweight (OR 2·34 (95% CI 1·1, 5·0))(Reference Gunther, Buyken and Kroke16). Higher protein intake (16·6% energy intake v. 14·9% energy intake) is also associated with earlier age at adiposity rebound (<4 years of age, P<0·01), the point at which BMI begins to increase after reaching its childhood nadir (usually between 4 and 8 years of age)(Reference Rolland-Cachera, Deheeger and Akrout17), which itself is associated with an increased risk of later obesity(Reference Cole27, Reference Rolland-Cachera28).

Evidence for an influence of fat and carbohydrate intake on obesity risk is less convincing. Two studies suggest that higher fat intake increases the risk of obesity(Reference Hakanen, Lagstrom and Kaitosaari22, Reference Magarey, Daniels and Boulton29) whilst another study has found no such association(Reference Stunkard, Berkowitz and Schoeller19). Most studies investigating carbohydrate intake have focused on sweetened beverages as the source of carbohydrate and have reported conflicting results. For instance, in a recent study of >10 000 US preschool children consumption of more than one sweetened drink daily has been shown to double the risk of becoming overweight(Reference Welsh, Cogswell and Rogers18). In contrast, other studies have not found an association between sweetened beverage consumption and risk of overweight(Reference Scaglioni, Agostoni and Notaris26, Reference Magarey, Daniels and Boulton29Reference Skinner, Bounds and Carruth31). Thus, although approximately half 18-month-old children consume sweetened drinks daily in the UK, it is not known whether this factor increases the risk of obesity(Reference Northstone, Rogers and Emmett32).

Overall, there is limited evidence to support the role of diet alone in the development of preschool obesity, although there are data to support the hypothesis that a high protein intake during infancy and early childhood increases the tendency to obesity.

Role of physical activity

Evidence suggests that increased physical activity reduces the risk of obesity in preschool children(Reference Mo-suwan, Pongprapai and Junjana33Reference Berkowitz, Agras and Korner37). One cross-sectional study has shown that children with lower physical activity are approximately four times (3·8 (95% CI 1·4, 10·6) times) more likely to have increased body fat(Reference Moore, Nguyen and Rothman38). The effect size of physical activity on obesity may be considerable. For example, in Thailand preschool children reported to have low exercise levels have been shown to have >2-fold risk of obesity compared with children with a normal exercise level(Reference Mo-suwan and Geater39).

The intensity of physical activity may be particularly important in influencing obesity risk. For example, one study has shown that overweight children spend approximately 9 min less time (22·9 min v. 32·1 min, P<0·05) in vigorous physical activity daily compared with normal-weight children(Reference Metallinos-Katsaras, Freedson and Fulton34). Another study has found that children in the highest quartile for vigorous activity at 4–6 years of age are in the lowest quartile for body fat percentage at 3 year follow-up. No differences in body fat percentage were seen in association with low or moderate physical activity(Reference Janz, Burns and Levy40). Thus, even small differences in vigorous physical activity could contribute to the development of obesity.

There are only two studies of physical activity interventions in preschool children, neither of which report a positive effect. An intervention to increase physical activity and reduce BMI in Scottish nursery school children was unsuccessful(Reference Reilly, Kelly and Montgomery12), whilst an intervention in Thailand has shown a trend (P=0·06) towards reduced obesity prevalence in the intervention group(Reference Mo-suwan, Pongprapai and Junjana33).

Although the extent of the contribution of physical activity to preschool obesity is unclear, adopting a physically-active lifestyle is crucial for long-term health promotion. However, despite increasing awareness, most preschool children do not achieve the recommended 60 min moderate–vigorous physical activity daily(Reference Finn, Johannsen and Specker41Reference Cardon and De Bourdeaudhuij43).

Developmental factors

Recently, developmental factors in early life such as nutrition and the pattern of early growth have been shown to influence the later risk of obesity. For instance, rapid growth during infancy is strongly related to obesity risk(Reference Baird, Fisher and Lucas44Reference Ong and Loos46), an effect largely attributed to nutrition. Indeed, four systematic reviews now provide strong evidence for a protective effect of breast-feeding on risk of obesity(Reference Arenz, Ruckerl and Koletzko47Reference Harder, Bergmann and Kallischnigg50), possibly as a result of differences in nutritional composition between human and formula milk. For example, early protein intake has been reported to be 70% greater in formula-fed infants than in breast-fed infants, which could increase the rate of infant growth and hence the risk of later obesity. Evidence to support this notion has emerged from a large trial of >1000 infants in which infants randomised to a higher protein diet during the first year of life were found to have greater weight gain in infancy and greater BMI at 2 years of age(Reference Koletzko, von Kries and Monasterolo51). Overfeeding in early postnatal life may therefore programme obesity development later in life.

The mechanisms for the effect of nutrition and growth in infancy on the development of obesity are poorly understood. Evidence suggests that programming of energy balance is central to energy regulation and hence the development of obesity, although there are few data in human subjects to support this hypothesis. However, animal studies suggest that neuro-endocrine systems controlling energy balance develop during the perinatal period, probably controlled by the action of hormones such as insulin and leptin on the central nervous system. Environmental factors in perinatal life, including nutrition, could therefore affect the development of appetite and hence obesity risk. For example, in mice growth restriction as a result of undernutrition in utero followed by postnatal overfeeding leads to increased body weight and adiposity in adult life(Reference Vickers, Krechowec and Breier52, Reference Yura, Itoh and Sagawa53).

The role of developmental nutritional factors beyond infancy, when diet is no longer predominantly milk based, is largely unexplored(Reference Parsons, Power and Logan11). However, the preschool period is a pivotal time during which long-term dietary habits are established, with potential lifelong effects on obesity(Reference Nicklas, Farris and Smoak54). For instance, appetite in preschool children strongly influences later adiposity(Reference Wardle, Carnell and Haworth55). Development of particular food preferences and consumption of a greater diversity of energy-dense foods could therefore influence the development of obesity(Reference Nicklaus56).

Food preference is a strong determinant of dietary diversity. Both food preference and diversity track from the first year of life(Reference Skinner, Carruth and Houck57) and therefore dietary behaviours adopted in early childhood are likely to persist throughout life(Reference Nicklaus56). A greater variety of food choice is associated with increased energy intake and a greater risk of obesity in several(Reference Hetherington, Foster and Newman58, Reference Rolls, Rowe and Rolls59) but not all studies(Reference Nicklaus, Boggio and Chabanet60), possibly as a consequence of more energy-dense foods being consumed in individuals who have a diverse diet.

Secular changes affecting diet and physical activity

Societal changes

Whilst individual behaviours are influential in the development of obesity, these behaviours are strongly influenced by societal factors. The recent dramatic increase in obesity is partly attributable to societal changes that encompass educational, financial and recreational aspects(Reference Law, Power and Graham9). For example, improvements in food manufacturing and marketing have resulted in increased availability of energy-dense foods(Reference Hawkins and Law61). Eating habits have also changed markedly. More food is now eaten outside the home, with energy-dense ‘convenience foods’ more commonly consumed(Reference Nielsen and Popkin62). At the same time, increased use of technology such as lifts, moving walkways and cars has reduced the time spent in physical activity. Schoolchildren are less likely to walk to school(Reference Sturm63), while televisions and personal computers may encourage sedentary behaviours(Reference Sturm64). However, the role of these behaviours is controversial and despite the obesity epidemic it has been suggested that there has been no increase in television viewing in the USA(Reference Sturm64).

Changes in diet

Dietary patterns among children have changed considerably over the past 30 years(Reference Hawkins and Law61). National surveys from the USA and UK suggest that preschool children's diets do not comply with recommendations for fruit and vegetable intake but exceed the recommended intake for fat and refined carbohydrate(Reference Cowin and Emmett65Reference Gregory, Collins and Davies67). Reports on energy intake of preschool children from national surveys are conflicting. In the UK energy intake has remained static or declined during the course of the obesity epidemic(Reference Prynne, Paul and Price68). For instance, the energy intake of 4-year-old children in the UK has been reported to have declined from 6046 kJ (1445 kcal)/d in 1950 to 5138 kJ (1228 kcal)/d in 1992(Reference Prynne, Paul and Price68). However, in the USA energy intakes of preschool children appear to have significantly increased from 5812 kJ (1389 kcal)/d in 1977 to 6519 kJ (1558 kcal)/d in 1994, possibly because of increases in portion size and increased consumption of food outside the home(Reference Kranz, Siega-Riz and Herring69). This discrepancy may be a result of difficulties in assessing dietary intake in this age-group, which is particularly problematic for foods consumed outside the home. In the USA, for instance, a decrease has been reported in food consumed at home, from 76% total energy during the 1970s to 69% total energy in the 1990s, together with large increases in the consumption of energy-dense foods including salty snacks, pizza and soft drinks(Reference Nielsen, Siega-Riz and Popkin70).

Changes in physical activity

Societal changes mean that many children spend more time in childcare facilities, where structured activities have displaced time spent in free play. For example, American preschool children spend less time playing, approximately 8·5 h per week less in 1997 compared with 1981(Reference Sturm64). American preschool children also spend insufficient time in recreational activity(Reference Datar and Sturm71). One survey (in 1998) has reported that only 16% of children take part in daily physical education sessions, with 13% participating less than once per week, often for <30 min each day(Reference Sturm63).

Increased time spent in sedentary activities may contribute to positive energy balance and the development of obesity. In the USA many children exceed recommendations for a maximum of 2 h television viewing per d(Reference Taveras, Rifas-Shiman and Belfort72, Reference Vandewater, Rideout and Wartella73). Recent increases in the use of media sources such as videos and computer games are likely to have increased the time spent in sedentary activity and ⩽30–40% of American children aged <6 years watch videos and play computer games daily(Reference Vandewater, Rideout and Wartella73). Time spent reading or being read to has also doubled in preschool children between 1981 and 1997, probably as a result of increased pressure to excel academically(Reference Sturm64).

In summary, secular trends at the societal and individual level have led to changes in dietary and physical activity behaviours in preschool children that have increased the risk of obesity. Interventions to redress these changes are therefore urgently sought.

Planning an intervention for preschool obesity prevention

The main causes of the current obesity epidemic are large changes in diet and physical activity as a result of individual behaviours and societal changes. Whilst it is difficult for healthcare professionals to intervene at a societal level, there is a critical need for interventions that can help individuals to modify their behaviours.

In its recently-issued guidelines for prevention, management and treatment of obesity in the UK the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence recommends that interventions for childhood obesity should include advice on achieving a healthy diet, address lifestyle risk factors within the family and social settings and incorporate strategies for behavioural change(74). Importantly, interventions should include at least one other family member. Specific guidance for preschool children suggests that nurseries and childcare facilities should minimise sedentary activities and provide regular opportunities for active play and structured physical activity. However, despite these recommendations there are currently no published data from successful interventions for the prevention of preschool obesity in the UK.

Previous interventions for the prevention of obesity in children have reported limited success, especially in the critical preschool years. A Cochrane systematic review has found little evidence that interventions prevent weight gain or obesity(Reference Summerbell, Waters and Edmunds75) and a further review has reported that only nine of 150 childhood obesity interventions have targeted the 0–5 years age-group(Reference Flynn, McNeil and Maloff7). Data from controlled trials of interventions to prevent obesity in preschool children are available for only five trials (all of which were of <12 months duration). Two of these five trials intervened to increase physical activity only(Reference Reilly, Kelly and Montgomery12, Reference Mo-suwan, Pongprapai and Junjana33) and three had interventions combining diet and physical activity(Reference Harvey-Berino and Rourke76Reference Fitzgibbon, Stolley and Schiffer78). The following is a review of the results.

Physical activity interventions

A study from Thailand in 292 preschool children randomised to either an exercise or control group has found a trend towards lower obesity prevalence in the intervention group (8·8% v. 9·4% in controls, P=0·06)(Reference Mo-suwan, Pongprapai and Junjana33). The second study of 545 Scottish nursery-school children has reported no significant effect on BMI at either 6 or 12 months after the intervention(Reference Reilly, Kelly and Montgomery12).

Combined dietary and physical activity interventions

Three controlled trials of interventions in preschool children have combined dietary advice and physical activity(Reference Harvey-Berino and Rourke76Reference Fitzgibbon, Stolley and Schiffer78). Only one of these trials has reported success, with lower BMI z-score 2 years after intervention (difference −0·54 (95% CI –0·98, −0·10) kg/m2, P=0·02)(Reference Fitzgibbon, Stolley and Schiffer78).

Behavioural therapy

Previous interventions have all highlighted the importance of behavioural therapies that include theoretical frameworks to address eating behaviours and the factors that influence them(Reference Glanz, Basil and Maibach79Reference Baranowski81). Assessment of carers' and children's motivation to change adverse behaviours in general(Reference Prochaska and Velicer82) (and eating behaviours in particular(Reference Van Strien, Frijters and Bergers83)) is important. Although family involvement is critical to the success and sustainability of obesity prevention programmes in children, only 3% of such programmes have included a family or home-based component(Reference Flynn, McNeil and Maloff7).

Overall, only one intervention to prevent obesity in early childhood (age 1–5 years) has shown long-term benefits(Reference Fitzgibbon, Stolley and Schiffer78). This US-based programme combined dietary and physical activity intervention and included a behavioural theoretical framework. However, the validity and generalisability of this study to a UK population is unknown, and there appear to be no interventions in the UK designed to prevent obesity in preschool children that meet all the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence recommendations(74).

Recently, a new method has been described for building and evaluating internet-based health interventions(Reference Collins, Murphy and Strecher84) that could equally be applied to the development of obesity interventions. This strategy employs a multiphase optimisation design that requires: a screening phase in which candidate components for inclusion in an intervention are identified; a refining phase in which selected components are developed and their optimal proportion within the intervention is assessed; a confirming phase in which the optimised intervention is evaluated in a randomised controlled trial. This strategy may help in the design of successful interventions for childhood obesity and has been used in the Trim Tots obesity intervention.

Trim Tots preschool obesity prevention programme

As a consequence of the lack of effective interventions a programme for the prevention of obesity specifically in preschool children has been developed and piloted. The Trim Tots healthy lifestyle programme (designed by a multidisciplinary team of health professionals including dietitians, paediatricians, exercise instructors and clinical psychologists) from the Institute of Child Health, University College, London, UK aims to educate parents and carers of preschool children in nutrition and physical activity. Behavioural change strategies are used to encourage the adoption of healthier dietary and physical activity habits. Importantly, the programme meets all current National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence recommendations for interventions to help prevent childhood obesity(74).

Trim Tots is currently being piloted within a Sure Start Children's Centre. Such centres are central to the UK Government's strategy to deliver better outcomes for children and families(85) and have the advantage of being placed within easy access for families living in areas of medium to high social deprivation. This programme is a community- and home-based intervention that aims to help parents or carers of young children develop the knowledge and skills needed to establish healthy dietary and activity patterns. It aims to increase children's understanding of foods and nutrients using nutrition workshops incorporating music, art and craft.

The active intervention period spans 6 months during which adults and children attend twice weekly sessions in the first 12 weeks. A 2 h nutrition and activity session teaches the basics of nutrition and physical activity through interactive teaching and workshops and a 1 h physical activity session gives parents a chance to exercise while their children take part in play-based activity. Each week a ‘themed’ approach based on a specific nutritional topic, e.g. dairy foods and the importance of Ca in the diet, is used and included in each aspect of the intervention. Adults are encouraged to take part in interactive nutrition education that develops their understanding of how to make the best food choices, to shop for a family, plan menus and prepare healthy meals. After the intensive period the intervention continues for a further 12 weeks in which education from the initial 12-week intensive period is consolidated through a weekly session that includes music and movement, practical nutrition workshops and physical activity classes for both adults and children.

Feasibility of the Trim Tots intervention is currently being tested in a randomised controlled trial with BMI z-score as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include measures of body composition, dietary exposures, physical activity and cardiovascular health and fitness. If successful, it is hoped that the study will be extended to a large-scale randomised controlled trial to test the feasibility of the intervention in a national setting and evaluate cost effectiveness.

Conclusions

Clearly, the prevention of obesity in young children is a major public health priority both for societal benefit and long-term health consequences in individuals. The UK Government's strategy is to reduce numbers of obese children by 2020 to levels reported in 2000(86). However, the Foresight Report argues that a paradigm shift at societal and government will be required to achieve this outcome(Reference McPherson, Marsh and Brown87). Substantial societal changes, e.g. large increases in food or fuel prices, might be the only scenario in which a reversal of obesity would occur. In the absence of such change it is predicted that by 2050 the prevalence of obesity in individuals <20 years of age will be 25% in the UK. It is unlikely that social change of this magnitude can be achieved. Thus, because of the serious long-term consequences of obesity there is now an urgent need for interventions to modify behaviour at the individual level, particular in young children.

Acknowledgements

All authors contributed to the first manuscript. J. L. and A. S. reviewed and J. L. edited all subsequent manuscripts. J. L. and A. S. are funded by a programme grant from the UK Medical Research Council (grant ref G0700349, ID 81585). S. B. is funded by the EU in the EARNEST project, ‘EARly Nutrition programming long-term follow-up of Efficacy and Safety Trials and integrated epidemiological, genetic, animal, consumer and economic research’, as part of Sixth Framework Programme, FP6-FOOD-CT-2005-007036. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The Trim Tots intervention programme was funded in part by a charitable donation from Nutricia Plc, Trowbridge, Wilts., UK.

References

1.Lobstein, T, Baur, L & Uauy, R (2004) Obesity in children and young people: a crisis in public health. Obes Rev 5, Suppl. 1, 4–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.World Health Organization (2004) Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health. Geneva: WHO; available at http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/strategy/eb11344/strategy_english_web.pdfGoogle Scholar
3.Gardner, DS, Hosking, J, Metcalf, BS et al. (2009) Contribution of early weight gain to childhood overweight and metabolic health: a longitudinal study (EarlyBird 36). Pediatrics 123, e67e73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Nader, PR, O'Brien, M, Houts, R et al. (2006) Identifying risk for obesity in early childhood. Pediatrics 118, e594e601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Cali, AM & Caprio, S (2006) Obesity in children and adolescents. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93, S31S36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Berenson, GS (2002) Childhood risk factors predict adult risk associated with subclinical cardiovascular disease. The Bogalusa Heart Study. Am J Cardiol 21, 3L7L.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Flynn, MA, McNeil, DA, Maloff, B et al. (2006) Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with ‘best practice’ recommendations. Obes Rev 7, 7–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.O'Rahilly, S, Farooqi, IS, Yeo, GS et al. (2003) Minireview: human obesity – lessons from monogenic disorders. Endocrinology 44, 37573764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Law, C, Power, C, Graham, H et al. (2007) Obesity and health inequalities. Obes Rev 8, S19S22.Google ScholarPubMed
10.Reilly, JJ, Armstrong, J, Dorosty, AR et al. (2005) Early life risk factors for obesity in childhood: cohort study. Br Med J 330, 1357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Parsons, TJ, Power, C, Logan, S et al. (1999) Childhood predictors of adult obesity: a systematic review. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 23, S1S107.Google ScholarPubMed
12.Reilly, JJ, Kelly, L, Montgomery, C et al. (2006) Physical activity to prevent obesity in young children: cluster randomised controlled trial. Br Med J 333, 1041.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Kipping, RR, Jago, R & Lawlor, DA (2008) Obesity in children. Part 1: Epidemiology, measurement, risk factors, and screening. Br Med J 337, a1824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Newby, PK (2007) Are dietary intakes and eating behaviors related to childhood obesity? A comprehensive review of the evidence. J Law Med Ethics 35, 3560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Gunther, ALB, Buyken, AE & Kroke, A (2006). The influence of habitual protein intake in early childhood on BMI and age at adiposity rebound: results from the DONALD Study. Int J Obes 30, 10721079.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Gunther, AL, Buyken, AE & Kroke, A (2007) Protein intake during the period of complementary feeding and early childhood and the association with body mass index and percentage body fat at 7 y of age. Am J Clin Nutr 85, 16261633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Rolland-Cachera, MF, Deheeger, M, Akrout, M et al. (1995) Influence of macronutrients on adiposity development: a follow up study of nutrition and growth from 10 months to 8 years of age. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 8, 573578.Google Scholar
18.Welsh, JA, Cogswell, ME, Rogers, S et al. (2005) Overweight among low-income preschool children associated with the consumption of sweet drinks: Missouri, 1999–2002. Pediatrics 115, e223e229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Stunkard, AJ, Berkowitz, RI, Schoeller, D et al. (2004) Predictors of body size in the first 2 y of life: a high-risk study of human obesity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 28, 503513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Cowin, IS & Emmett, PM (2001) Associations between dietary intakes and blood cholesterol concentrations at 31 months. Eur J Clin Nutr 55, 3949.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Niinikoski, H, Viikari, J, Ronnemaa, T et al. (1997) Regulation of growth of 7- to 36-month-old children by energy and fat intake in the prospective, randomized STRIP baby trial. Pediatrics 100, 810816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Hakanen, M, Lagstrom, H, Kaitosaari, T et al. (2006) Development of overweight in an atherosclerosis prevention trial starting in early childhood. The STRIP study. Int J Obes (Lond) 30, 618626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Swinburn, B, Sacks, G & Ravussin, E (2009) Increased food energy supply is more than sufficient to explain the US epidemic of obesity. Am J Clin Nutr 90, 14531456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Swinburn, BA, Jolley, D, Kremer, PJ et al. (2006) Estimating the effects of energy imbalance on changes in body weight in children. Am J Clin Nutr 83, 859863.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Verduci, E, Radaelli, G, Stival, G et al. (2007) Dietary macronutrient intake during the first 10 years of life in a cohort of Italian children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 45, 9095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Scaglioni, S, Agostoni, C, Notaris, RD et al. (2000) Early macronutrient intake and overweight at five years of age. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 24, 777781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Cole, TJ (2004) Children grow and horses race: is the adiposity rebound a critical period for later obesity? BMC Pediatr 4, 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Rolland-Cachera, MF (2005) Rate of growth in early life: a predictor of later health? Adv Exp Med Biol 569, 3539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Magarey, AM, Daniels, LA, Boulton, TJ et al. (2001) Does fat intake predict adiposity in healthy children and adolescents aged 2–15 y? A longitudinal analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr 55, 471481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Skinner, JD & Carruth, BR (2001) A longitudinal study of children's juice intake and growth: the juice controversy revisited. J Am Diet Assoc 101, 432437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.Skinner, JD, Bounds, W, Carruth, BR et al. (2004) Predictors of children's body mass index: a longitudinal study of diet and growth in children aged 2–8 y. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 28, 476482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32.Northstone, K, Rogers, I & Emmett, P (2002) Drinks consumed by 18-month-old children: are current recommendations being followed? Eur J Clin Nutr 56, 236244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33.Mo-suwan, L, Pongprapai, S, Junjana, C et al. (1998). Effects of a controlled trial of a school-based exercise program on the obesity indexes of preschool children. Am J Clin Nutr 68, 10061011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.Metallinos-Katsaras, ES, Freedson, PS, Fulton, JE et al. (2007) The association between an objective measure of physical activity and weight status in preschoolers. Obesity 15, 686694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35.Klesges, RC, Klesges, LM, Eck, LH et al. (1995) A longitudinal analysis of accelerated weight gain in preschool children. Pediatrics 95, 126130.Google ScholarPubMed
36.Jago, R, Baranowski, T, Baranowski, JC et al. (2005) BMI from 3–6 y of age is predicted by TV viewing and physical activity, not diet. Int J Obes 29, 557564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37.Berkowitz, RI, Agras, WS, Korner, AF et al. (1985) Physical activity and adiposity: a longitudinal study from birth to childhood. J Pediatr 106, 734738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38.Moore, LL, Nguyen, US, Rothman, KJ et al. (1995) Preschool physical activity level and change in body fatness in young children. The Framingham Children's Study. Am J Epidemiol 142, 982988.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39.Mo-suwan, L & Geater, AF (1996). Risk factors for childhood obesity in a transitional society in Thailand. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 20, 697703.Google Scholar
40.Janz, KF, Burns, TL & Levy, SM (2005) Tracking of activity and sedentary behaviors in childhood: the Iowa Bone Development Study. Am J Prev Med 29, 171178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41.Finn, K, Johannsen, N & Specker, B (2002) Factors associated with physical activity in preschool children. J Pediatr 140, 8185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42.Reilly, JJ, Jackson, DM, Montgomery, C et al. (2004) Total energy expenditure and physical activity in young Scottish children: mixed longitudinal study. Lancet 363, 211212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43.Cardon, G & De Bourdeaudhuij, I (2007) Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer measures of physical activity in preschool children. Pediatr Exerc Sci 19, 205214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44.Baird, J, Fisher, D, Lucas, P et al. (2005) Being big or growing fast: systematic review of size and growth in infancy and later obesity. Br Med J 331, 929.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45.Monteiro, PO & Victora, CG (2005) Rapid growth in infancy and childhood and obesity in later life – a systematic review. Obes Rev 6, 143154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46.Ong, KK & Loos, RJ (2006) Rapid infancy weight gain and subsequent obesity: systematic reviews and hopeful suggestions. Acta Paediatr 95, 904908.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47.Arenz, S, Ruckerl, R, Koletzko, B et al. (2004) Breast-feeding and childhood obesity – a systematic review. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 28, 12471256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48.Owen, CG, Martin, RM, Whincup, PH et al. (2005) Effect of infant feeding on the risk of obesity across the life course: a quantitative review of published evidence. Pediatrics 115, 13671377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49.Owen, CG, Martin, RM, Whincup, PH et al. (2005) The effect of breastfeeding on mean body mass index throughout life: a quantitative review of published and unpublished observational evidence. Am J Clin Nutr 82, 12981307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50.Harder, T, Bergmann, R, Kallischnigg, G et al. (2005) Duration of breastfeeding and risk of overweight: a meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol 162, 397403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
51.Koletzko, B, von Kries, R, Monasterolo, RC et al. (2009) Infant feeding and later obesity risk. Adv Exp Med Biol 646, 1529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
52.Vickers, MH, Krechowec, SO & Breier, BH (2007) Is later obesity programmed in utero? Curr Drug Targets 8, 923934.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
53.Yura, S, Itoh, H, Sagawa, N et al. (2005) Role of premature leptin surge in obesity resulting from intrauterine undernutrition. Cell Metab 1, 371378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
54.Nicklas, TA, Farris, RP, Smoak, CG et al. (1988) Dietary factors relate to cardiovascular risk factors in early life. Bogalusa Heart Study. Arteriosclerosis 8, 193199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
55.Wardle, J, Carnell, S, Haworth, CM et al. (2008) Obesity associated genetic variation in FTO is associated with diminished satiety. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93, 36403643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
56.Nicklaus, S (2009) Development of food variety in children. Appetite 52, 253255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
57.Skinner, JD, Carruth, BR, Houck, K et al. (1997) Transitions in infant feeding during the first year of life. J Am Coll Nutr 16, 209215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
58.Hetherington, MM, Foster, R, Newman, T et al. (2006) Understanding variety: tasting different foods delays satiation. Physiol Behav 87, 263271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
59.Rolls, BJ, Rowe, EA, Rolls, ET et al. (1981) Variety in a meal enhances food intake in man. Physiol Behav 26, 215221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
60.Nicklaus, S, Boggio, V, Chabanet, C et al. (2005) A prospective study of food variety seeking in childhood, adolescence and early adult life. Appetite 44, 289297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
61.Hawkins, SS & Law, C (2006) A review of risk factors for overweight in preschool children: a policy perspective. Int J Pediatr Obes 1, 195209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
62.Nielsen, SJ & Popkin, BM (2003) Patterns and trends in food portion sizes, 1977–1998. JAMA 289, 450453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
63.Sturm, R (2005) Childhood obesity – what we can learn from existing data on societal trends, part 2. Prev Chronic Dis 2, A20.Google ScholarPubMed
64.Sturm, R (2005) Childhood obesity – what we can learn from existing data on societal trends, part 1. Prev Chronic Dis 2, A12.Google ScholarPubMed
65.Cowin, I & Emmett, P (2000) Cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations, birthweight and central obesity in pre-school children ALSPAC Study Team. Avon Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 24, 330339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
66.Krebs-Smith, SM, Cook, A, Subar, AF et al. (1996). Fruit and vegetable intakes of children and adolescents in the United States. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 150, 8186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
67.Gregory, J, Collins, D, Davies, P et al. (1995) National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Children Aged 1½ to 4½ Years. London: H. M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
68.Prynne, CJ, Paul, AA, Price, GM et al. (1999) Food and nutrient intake of a national sample of 4-year-old children in 1950: comparison with the 1990s. Public Health Nutr 2, 537547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
69.Kranz, S, Siega-Riz, AM & Herring, AH (2004) Changes in diet quality of American preschoolers between 1977 and 1998. Am J Public Health 94, 15251530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
70.Nielsen, SJ, Siega-Riz, AM & Popkin, BM (2002) Trends in energy intake in U.S. between 1977 and 1996: similar shifts seen across age groups. Obes Res 10, 370378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
71.Datar, A & Sturm, R (2004) Physical education in elementary school and body mass index: evidence from the early childhood longitudinal study. Am J Public Health 94, 15011506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
72.Taveras, EM, Rifas-Shiman, SL, Belfort, MB et al. (2009) Weight status in the first 6 months of life and obesity at 3 years of age. Pediatrics 123, 11771183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
73.Vandewater, EA, Rideout, VJ, Wartella, EA et al. (2007) Digital childhood: electronic media and technology use among infants, toddlers, and preschoolers. Pediatrics 119, e1006e1015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
74.National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2006) Obesity Guidance on the Prevention, Identification, Assessment and Management of Overweight and Obesity in Adults and Children. Clinical Guidelines CG43. London: NICE.Google Scholar
75.Summerbell, CD, Waters, E, Edmunds, LD et al. (2005) Interventions for preventing obesity in children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, issue 3, CD001871. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
76.Harvey-Berino, J & Rourke, J (2003) Obesity prevention in preschool native-American children: a pilot study using home visiting. Obes Res 11, 606611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
77.Dennison, BA, Russo, TJ, Burdick, PA et al. (2004) An intervention to reduce television viewing by preschool children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 158, 170176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
78.Fitzgibbon, ML, Stolley, MR, Schiffer, L et al. (2005) Two-year follow-up results for Hip-Hop to Health Jr.: a randomized controlled trial for overweight prevention in preschool minority children. J Pediatr 146, 618625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
79.Glanz, K, Basil, M, Maibach, E et al. (1998) Why Americans eat what they do: taste, nutrition, cost, convenience, and weight control concerns as influences on food consumption. J Am Diet Assoc 98, 11181126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
80.Epstein, LH, Gordy, CC, Raynor, HA et al. (2001). Increasing fruit and vegetable intake and decreasing fat and sugar intake in families at risk for childhood obesity. Obes Res 9, 171178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
81.Baranowski, T (2006) Advances in basic behavioral research will make the most important contributions to effective dietary change programs at this time. J Am Diet Assoc 106, 808811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
82.Prochaska, JO & Velicer, WF (1997) The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot 12, 3848.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
83.Van Strien, T, Frijters, JER, Bergers, GPA et al. (1986) The Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (DEBQ) for assessment of restrained, emotional and external eating behaviour. Int J Eat Disord 5, 295315.3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
84.Collins, LM, Murphy, SA & Strecher, V (2007) The multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) and the sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART): new methods for more potent eHealth interventions. Am J Prev Med 32, S112S118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
85.HM Treasury, Department for Education and Skills, Department for Work and Pensions, Department of Trade and Industry (2005) Choice for Parents, the Best Start for Children: A Ten Year Strategy for Childcare. London: The Stationery Office; available at http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/bud05_choice_for_parents_210.pdfGoogle Scholar
86.Cross-Government Obesity Unit, Department of Health and Department of Children, Schools and Families (2008) Healthy Weight, Healthy Lives: A Cross Government Strategy for England. London: Department of Health; available at http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/documents/digitalasset/dh_084024.pdfGoogle Scholar
87.McPherson, K, Marsh, T & Brown, M (2007) Foresight. Tackling obesities: future choices – modelling future trends in obesity and the impact on health, 2nd ed. www.foresight.gov.uk/Obesity/14.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar