Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:26:55.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of 1 year combined flavan-3-ol and isoflavone intake, on biomarkers of vascular health in statin treated postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes: a double-blind randomised controlled trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2013

P. J. Curtis
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia
P. A. Kroon
Affiliation:
Institute of Food Research
P. Wilson
Affiliation:
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
K. Dhatariya
Affiliation:
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
M. Sampson
Affiliation:
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
A. Cassidy
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013 

Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) increases cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, adversely increasing common carotid artery intima-media thickness (CCA-IMT)( Reference Gomez-Marcos, Recio-Rodriguez and Patino-Alonso 1 ) and endothelial dysfunction( Reference Avogaro, Albiero and Menegazzo 2 ). Previously, higher intakes of some flavonoid sub-classes (specifically flavan-3-ols) have been associated with reduced atherosclerosis progression( Reference Mursu, Nurmi and Tuomainen 3 ), with animal and in vitro studies supporting benefits of this sub-class on Nitric Oxide (NO)( Reference Schewe, Steffen and Sies 4 ) and NADPH oxidase activity( Reference Gomez-Guzman, Jimenez and Sanchez 5 ) and of another sub-class, isoflavones, on vascular inflammation( Reference Babu, Si and Fu 6 ). The ability to metabolise the isoflavone equol, from its precursor, daidzein, has also been associated with improved vascular function( Reference Clerici, Setchell and Battezzati 7 ). Despite these previous findings, the longer-term vascular effects of combined flavan-3-ol and isoflavone intakes remain under-studied and few studies have examined if these flavonoids augment standard therapies in controlling CVD risk in ‘at-risk’ populations, such as T2DM patients.

In a randomised double-blind, parallel-design, placebo controlled study which was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki guidelines, postmenopausal women with T2DM consumed 27 g/d (split-dose) flavonoid-enriched chocolate (850 mg flavan-3-ols (90 mg epicatechin)+100 mg isoflavones (aglycone equivalents)/d), or matched placebo for 1-year. CCA-IMT, vascular biomarkers and measures of arterial stiffness (pulse wave velocity (PWV), augmentation Index (AIx)) and blood pressure (BP) were assessed. Changes from baseline (0 M) to 1–year (12M) were assessed with univariate ANCOVA.

SBP, systolic BP; DBP, diastolic BP; MAP, mean arterial pressure.1, PWV data, n=18 flavonoid, n=17 placebo.

Overall, intervention did not significantly change CCA-IMT, AIx or BP. However, in a sub-group arterial stiffness (PWV) improved (p=0.01) equating to a 10% CVD risk reduction. Although central aortic SBP, DBP and MAP were reduced, this did not reach statistical significance. Equol producer phenotype was associated with greater reductions in DBP, MAP and PWV (−2.24±1.31 mmHg, −1.24±1.30 mmHg, −0.68±0.40 m/s; p<0.01.

Although 1-year intervention did not change CCA-IMT or BP, clinically relevant improvements in arterial stiffness were observed; the equol producer phenotype was particularly responsive to vascular improvements. In postmenopausal T2DM patients receiving standard UK medication, the combined intake of several flavonoid sub-classes (flavan-3-ols and isoflavones) improved some measures of vascular health and these data may be of clinical relevance to support the care strategy of this ‘at-risk’ population group.

References

1. Gomez-Marcos, MA, Recio-Rodriguez, JI, Patino-Alonso, MC et al. (2011) Cardiovasc Diabetol 10, 3.Google Scholar
2. Avogaro, A, Albiero, M, Menegazzo, L et al. (2011) Diabetes Care 34, 285S–90S.Google Scholar
3. Mursu, J, Nurmi, T, Tuomainen, TP et al. (2007) Br J Nutr 98, 814–8.Google Scholar
4. Schewe, T, Steffen, Y, Sies, H (2008) Arch Biochem Biophys 476, 102–6.Google Scholar
5. Gomez-Guzman, M, Jimenez, R, Sanchez, M et al. (2012) Free Radic Biol Med 52, 70–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Babu, PV, Si, H, Fu, Z et al. (2012) J Nutr 142, 724–30.Google Scholar
7. Clerici, C, Setchell, KD, Battezzati, PM et al. (2007) J Nutr 137, 2270–8.Google Scholar