There is limited evidence on the association between cognitive function, psychotic symptoms and doses of antipsychotics in adults under compulsory psychiatric care.

We assessed (a) the degree of cognitive impairment in adults involuntarily hospitalised for compulsory psychiatric care and (b) correlation of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score with psychotic symptoms, polypharmacy and prescription of high-dose antipsychotics.

This was a nationwide, cross-sectional study, conducted at the only referral state hospital for compulsory psychiatric care in Cyprus (December 2016–February 2018). Τhe MoCA was applied for the assessment of cognitive functioning. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) was applied for the assessment of psychotic symptoms.

The sample comprised 187 men and 116 women. The mean MoCA score was 22.09 (reported scale range (RSR): 3–30); the mean PANSS general symptoms subscale score was 49.60 (RSR = 41–162). The participants who reported positive psychiatric history (mean 21.71, s.d. 5.37), non-adherence to pharmacotherapy (mean 21.32, s.d. 5.56) and prescription of high-dose antipsychotics (with medication prescribed as needed: mean 21.31, s.d. 5.70; without medication prescribed as needed: mean 20.71, s.d. 5.78) had lower mean MoCA scores compared with those who reported negative psychiatric history (mean 23.42, s.d. 4.51; P = 0.017), adherence to pharmacotherapy (mean 23.10, s.d. 6.61; P = 0.003) and no prescription of high-dose antipsychotics (with medication prescribed as needed: mean 22.56, s.d. 4.90; without medication prescribed as needed: mean 22.60 s.d. 4.94; P = 0.045–0.005), respectively. Mean MoCA score was mildly and inversely associated with total PANSS score (r = −0.15, P = 0.03), PANSS general (r = −0.18, P = 0.002) and PANSS negative (r = −0.16, P = 0.005) symptoms subscales, respectively.

Our findings support the evaluation of cognitive functioning in adults under compulsory psychiatric care via the MoCA tool, with focus on those prescribed high-dose antipsychotics, with positive mental health history and non-adherence to pharmacotherapy.

Studies show ethnic inequalities in rates of involuntary admission and types of clinical care (such as psychological therapies). However, few studies have investigated if there is a relationship between clinical care practices and ethnic inequalities in involuntary admission.

This study investigated the impact of ethnicity and clinical care on involuntary admission and the potential mediation effects of prior clinical care.

In this retrospective cohort study, we used data from the electronic records of the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and identified patients with a first hospital admission between January 2008 and May 2021. Logistic regression and mediation analyses were used to investigate the association between ethnicity and involuntary admission, and whether clinical care, in the 12 months preceding admission, mediates the association.

Compared with White British people, higher odds of involuntary admission were observed among 10 of 14 minority ethnic groups; with more than twice the odds observed among people of Asian Chinese, of Asian Bangladeshi and of any Black background. There were some ethnic differences in clinical care prior to admission, but these had a minimal impact on the inequalities in involuntary admission. More out-patient appointments and home treatment were associated with higher odds of involuntary admission, whereas psychological therapies and having a care plan were associated with reduced odds of involuntary admission.

Ethnic inequalities in involuntary admission persist after accounting for potential mediating effects of several types and frequencies of clinical care. Promoting access to psychological therapies and ensuring that care plans are in place may reduce involuntary admissions.