We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Suicide is a major problem around the globe. Among various psychiatric diagnoses, schizophrenia confers the greatest risk to an individual, while depression confers the greatest risk to populations due to higher prevalence. Predicting suicide attempts with specificity is a major challenge for clinicians. Evidence-based screening and assessment tools exist, which can help standardize the evaluation process, but these tools have limited specificity, sensitivity, and negative predictive value. Best practice is to use these tools in the context of a full clinical assessment that includes a medical and psychiatric history, a mental status exam, obtaining collateral, and eliciting risk and protective factors. The stress-diathesis model posits that suicidal behavior is the result of complex interactions between an acute stressor and underlying neurobiological vulnerability. Evidence supports treating suicide risk through lethal means restriction, outreach after discharge, psychiatric medication where appropriate (antidepressants, lithium, clozapine, ketamine), psychotherapy (cognitive behavior therapy, dialectical behavior therapy), and safety planning. When clinicians identify suicide risk factors and provide appropriate interventions, lives are saved.
Edited by
David Kingdon, University of Southampton,Paul Rowlands, Derbyshire Healthcare NHS foundation Trust,George Stein, Emeritus of the Princess Royal University Hospital
The suicides of important kings are recorded in the Bible, and the chapter starts with an overview of the history of suicide. It then covers suicide verdicts, international suicide rates and methods, then the epidemiology of suicide is reviewed. This includes the effect of marital status, the elderly and the young, mental illness, the emotions of hopelessness and shame, as well as suicide in major mental disorders such as depression, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and alcoholism. Economic influences such as poverty, occupation and unemployment, as well as worldwide financial crashes are covered. Can anything reduce the rates? Does religion help prevent suicide? Does suicide prevention and risk assessment help, or is this still just ’a work in progress’? Self harm has reached almost epidemic numbers in most parts of the world. The aetiology and why this should be is covered as well as what the later risk of completed suicides is.
Case management skills are critical to the effective, efficient and ethical delivery of clinical psychological services. The chapter will outline how case management involves the combination of practice-based evidence with management and documentation tasks.We outline the key management and documentation tasks associated with specific phases of the treatment process, framing them in a context of generating practice-based evidence. We illustrate good record keeping, maintainance of confidentiality, treatment planning, treatment implementation (including suicide risk assessment) and treatment termination.
Body attitudes may serve as both vulnerability and protective factors for various forms of emotional and behavioral disorders, including suicidal and self-harm behaviors in adolescent and youth populations. Body Investment Scale (BIS, Orbach & Mikulincer, 1998) is an instrument specially designed to account for body attitudes in suicide assessment.
Objectives
The study was aimed to provide a preliminary evidence for using the BIS translation in the assessment of suicide risk factors in Russian-speaking student population in Azerbaijan.
Methods
The common recommendations for test translation were used. The factor structure, inter-item consistency of scales, and retest reliability were assessed. The participants were 100 students (18-23 years, 40 females, 60 males), 50 of them completed the retest.
Results
The exploratory factor analysis with fixed number of factors reveals a homologous structure to the original BIS scales, explaining 48.2% of variance (in comparison to 55% of original measure). Inter-item reliability coefficients were lower: .989 for Body attitude, .696 for comfort with touch, .65 for Care and .61 for Protection scales. Pearson’s r for retest reliability (in a month) were above 0.9. Three items that could be excluded for enhancing the consistency of scales address physical contact and self-harm issues and might be culturally inappropriate.
Conclusions
BIS is a promising instrument due to its grounded factor structure, but refinement of some items of the Russian translation is desired, as well as further study of applicability for adolescent population. BIS could fill the gap in scarcity of instruments for suicide assessment for Russian speaking population.
Disclosure
No significant relationships.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.