This chapter traces how the concept of ethnicity emerged as a depoliticised alternative to nationality. By the end of the nineteenth century, the triumph of nationalism as the hegemonic source of state legitimacy had resulted in the politicisation of the nation concept. This conceptual linkage of ‘nation’ with ‘state’ opened up a terminological vacuum: If nationhood implied statehood, what label should be given to those stateless nations and national minorities that had neither a state of their own nor the political capacity to acquire one? Against this backdrop, the chapter traces how an embryonic concept of ethnicity was articulated to fill in the terminological void. The chapter’s empirical focus is on the early twentieth-century academic literature on nationalism and the establishment of the world’s first international minority rights regime after the First World War. The argument also has significant implications for debates surrounding the conceptual distinction between ‘civic’ and ‘ethnic’ nationalism.

Models for the growth of interacting bacteria, structured populations, game theory and pattern formation.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US) of nerves and muscles are increasingly used as complementary tools in the diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders. Ultrasound has superior image resolution over MRI, a flexible field of view, and relatively low cost. US is also the preferred imaging modality when evaluating superficial structures. In contrast, MRI has the advantage of dedicated sequences with unique tissue-discriminating properties, and coverage of more deeply located structures. However, MRI requires dedicated protocols and visual assessment is limited by a high interobserver variability. US is device- and operator-dependent, and less suitable for evaluating much deeper structures. Visual assessment is, like MRI, subject to interobserver variability. Qualitative US has the ability to obtain more objective and repeatable measures.

Note that these listings are not exhaustive. Abbreviations: AD: autosomal dominant; AR: Autosomal recessive; genes in italic.

Dietterlin’s Architectura prints and the processes he used to form them engaged with sixteenth-century Central Europe’s robust culture of alchemy to transform the architectural image into a context of scientific inquiry. Formal and iconographic analyses of architectural etchings by Dietterlin, Wenzel Jamnitzer, and Hans Vredeman de Vries, in conversation with texts by alchemists Agrippa of Nettesheim and Paracelsus, reveal how architectural image-makers used etching’s mercurial, shapeshifting forms and the protean materiality of ornament not only to picture but also to activate alchemical theories and principles of empirical investigation. Dietterlin’s Architectura prints channelled etching’s alchemical dimensions, comparing the material and chemical transformations involved in architectural etching with the processes of transmutation studied in contemporary alchemical research. As is evident from the alchemical imagery that Dietterlin’s Architectura contributed to the court art of Holy Roman Emperor Rudolf II, the Architectura established architectural images as contexts of alchemical thinking in the years around 1600. In sum, the transformative structures of Dietterlin’s architectural etchings allowed architectural prints to become fora for natural philosophical inquiry.

As people migrate to digital environments they produce an enormous amount of data, such as images, videos, data from mobile sensors, text, and usage logs. These digital footprints documenting people’s spontaneous behaviors in natural environments are a gold mine for social scientists, offering novel insights; more diversity; and more reliable, replicable, and ecologically valid results.

How can groups best coordinate to solve problems? The answer touches on cultural innovation, including the trajectory of science, technology, and art. If everyone acts independently, different people will explore different solutions, but there is no way to leverage good solutions across the community. If everyone acts in consort, early successes can lead the group down dead ends and stifle exploration. The challenge is one of maintaining innovation but also communicating effective solutions once they are found. When solutions spaces are smooth – that is, easy – communication is good. But when solution spaces are rugged – that is, hard – the balance should tilt toward exploration. How can we best achieve this? One answer is to place people in social structures that reduce communication, but maintain connectivity. But there are other solutions that might work better. Algorithms, like simulated annealing, are designed to deal with such problems by adjusting collective focus over time, allowing systems to “cool off” slowly as they home in on solutions. Network science allows us to explore the performance of such solutions on smooth and rugged landscapes, and provides numerous avenues for innovation of its own.

The main aim of a first consultation will concentrate on establishing a diagnosis. However, there are two other major aims: capturing the expectations of the patient and appreciating the impact of the complaints on daily life.

Adolescents’ ability to access health care depends on sharing accurate information about concerns, needs, and conditions. Parents and other adults serve as both resources and gatekeepers in adolescents’ ability to access and manage care. Understanding information sharing between adolescents and parents, adolescents and providers, and parents and providers is thus critical. This chapter distinguishes between adolescents’ routine and self-disclosure of information. The former refers to sharing information required for the partner to perform their role. The latter refers to voluntarily sharing more information than required. Because the roles of parent and provider are distinct relative to the adolescent, disclosure decisions can conflict. These differences are discussed in the context of communication privacy management theory and the literature on legitimacy of authority. A framework for understanding information sharing processes is developed that considers stage of care, type of care, stigma/privacy associated with the condition, and the age of the adolescent.