Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T05:12:12.056Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2011

Andrew Reisner
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal
Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen
Affiliation:
Aarhus Universitet, Denmark
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Reasons for Belief , pp. 260 - 270
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, J. 2002. Belief's Own Ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Alston, W. 1988. The Deontological Conception of Epistemic Justification. Philosophical Perspectives 2: 257–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, W. 2005. Beyond Justification: Dimensions of Epistemic Evaluation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. 1973. Belief, Truth, and Knowledge. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audi, R. 1997. Moral Judgment and Reasons for Action. In Ethics and Practical Reason (ed. Cullity, G. and Gaut, B.). Cambridge University Press, 125–160.Google Scholar
Audi, R. 2001. An Internalist Theory of Normative Grounds. Philosophical Topics 29: 19–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bealer, G. 2000. A Theory of the A Priori. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 81: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, A. 2007. Justified Judging. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74: 81–110.CrossRef
Blackburn, S. 1998. Ruling Passions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boghossian, P. 2002. How Are Objective Epistemic Reasons Possible? In Reason and Nature: Essays in the Theory of Rationality (ed. Bermúdez, J. L. and Millar, A.). Oxford University Press, 15–48.Google Scholar
Boghossian, P.. 2003a. Blind Reasoning. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supp. Vol. 77: 225–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boghossian, P.. 2003b. The Normativity of Content. Philosophical Issues 13: 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BonJour, L. 1980. Externalist Theories of Empirical Knowledge. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5: 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BonJour, L.. 1985. The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brady, M. S. and Pritchard, D. H. (eds.) 2003. Moral and Epistemic Virtues. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bratman, M. 1999. Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason. Chicago: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Brewer, B. 1999. Perception and Reason. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brewer, B.. 2004. Realism and the Nature of Perceptual Experience. Philosophical Issues 14: 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, B.. 2006. Perception and Content. European Journal of Philosophy 14(2): 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, B.. 2008. How to Account for Illusion. In Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge (ed. Haddock, A. and Macpherson, F.). Oxford University Press, 168–180.Google Scholar
Brogaard, B. 2005. I Know. Therefore, I Understand (MS).
Brogaard, B.. 2006. Can Virtue Reliabilism Explain the Value of Knowledge? Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36: 335–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, J. 2000. Normative Requirements. Ratio 12: 398–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, J.. 2001. Normative Practical Reasoning. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supp. Vol. 75: 175–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, J.. 2004. Reasons. In Reason and Value: Themes from the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz (ed. Wallace, R. J., Pettit, P., Scheffler, S., and Smith, M.). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 28–55.Google Scholar
Broome, J.. 2005. Does Rationality Give Us Reasons? Philosophical Issues 15: 321–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, J.. 2007a. Does Rationality Consist in Correctly Responding to Reasons? Journal of Moral Philosophy 4: 349–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, J. 2007b. Is Rationality Normative? Disputatio 27: 161–178.Google Scholar
Broome, J.. 2007c. Wide or Narrow Scope? Mind 116: 359–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, T. 1993. Content Preservation. Philosophical Review 102: 457–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, J. 2003. Perceptual Entitlement. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67: 503–548.Google Scholar
Bykvist, K. and Hattiangadi, A. 2007. Does Thought Imply Ought? Analysis 67: 277–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, A. 2005. Perception and Conceptual Content. In Contemporary Debates in Epistemology (ed. Steup, M. and Sosa, E.). Oxford: Blackwell, 231–250.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. 2002. Reference and Consciousness. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassam, Q. 2007. Ways of Knowing. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 107: 339–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, C. 2006. Empirical Content and Rational Constraint. Inquiry 49(3): 242–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child, W. 1994. Causality, Interpretation and the Mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Chisholm, R. 1957. Perceiving: A Philosophical Study. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Coady, C. A. J. 1992. Testimony: A Philosophical Study. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. 1984. Justification and Truth. Philosophical Studies 46: 279–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conee, E. and Feldman, R. 2001. Internalism Defended. American Philosophical Quarterly 38: 1–18.
Conee, E., Feldman, R. 2004. Evidentialism. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottingham, J. 2002. Descartes and the Voluntariness of Belief. The Monist 85(3): 343–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullity, G. and Gaut, B. (eds.) 1997. Ethics and Practical Reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cuneo, T. 2007. The Normative Web. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancy, J. 1993. Moral Reasons. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dancy, J.. 2000. Practical Reality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dancy, J.. 2004. Enticing Reasons. In Reason and Value: Themes from the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz (ed. Wallace, R. J., Pettit, P., Scheffler, S., and Smith, M.). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 91–118.Google Scholar
Danielsson, S. and Olson, J. 2007. Brentano and the Buck-Passers. Mind 116: 511–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, M. 2001. Truth as the Epistemic Goal. In Knowledge, Truth, and Duty: Essays on Epistemic Justification, Virtue, and Responsibility (ed. Steup, M.). Oxford University Press, 151–169.Google Scholar
David, M.. 2005. Truth as the Primary Epistemic Goal: A Working Hypothesis. In Contemporary Debates in Epistemology (ed. M. Steup and E. Sosa). Oxford: Blackwell, 296–312.
Davidson, D. 1983. A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge. In Kant oder Hegel (ed. Henrich, D.). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta. Reprinted in Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson (ed. E. LePore). Oxford: Blackwell, 307–319.Google Scholar
Dreier, J. 2002. The Expressivist Circle: Invoking Norms in the Explanation of Normative Judgement. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65: 136–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dretske, F. 1969. Seeing and Knowing. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Dretske, F.. 1970. Epistemic Operators. Journal of Philosophy 67: 1007–1023. Reprinted in Dretske, 2000: 30–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dretske, F.. 1971. Conclusive Reasons. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 49: 1–22. Reprinted in Dretske, 2000: 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dretske, F.. 2000. Perception, Knowledge and Belief: Selected Essays. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgin, C. 2009. Is Understanding Factive? In Epistemic Value (ed. Haddock, A., Millar, A., and Pritchard, D. H.). Oxford University Press, 322–330.Google Scholar
Evans, G. 1982. The Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fantl, J. and McGrath, M. 2002. Evidence, Pragmatics, and Justification. Philosophical Review 111: 67–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, R. 1988a. Epistemic Obligations. Philosophical Perspectives 2: 235–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, R. 1988b. Having Evidence. Reprinted in Evidentialism (E. Conee and R. Feldman). Oxford University Press, 2004, 219–241.
Feldman, R.. 1988c. Subjective and Objective Justification in Ethics and Epistemology. The Monist 71: 405–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finlay, S. 2008. The Error in the Error Theory. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86: 347–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, G. 2009. Uneasy Companions. Ratio 22: 359–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, R. 1987. The Theory of Epistemic Rationality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, P. 1972. Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives. Philosophical Review 91: 305–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricker, M. 2003. Epistemic Justice and a Role for Virtue in the Politics of Knowing. Metaphilosophy 34: 154–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fumerton, R. 1995. Metaepistemology and Skepticism. Lanham, MA: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Fumerton, R.. 2006. The Epistemic Role of Testimony: Internalist and Externalist Perspectives. In The Epistemology of Testimony (ed. Lackey, J. and Sosa, E.). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, J. 2005. Wrongs and Faults. The Review of Metaphysics 59: 95–132.Google Scholar
Gardner, J.. 2007. Offences and Defences. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gettier, E. 1963. Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Analysis 23: 121–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, A. 1990. Wise Choices, Apt Feelings. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gibbons, J. Forthcoming. Things That Make Things Reasonable. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Ginsborg, H. 2006a. Aesthetic Judgment and Perceptual Normativity. Inquiry 49(5): 403–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, H.. 2006b. Empirical Concepts and the Content of Experience. European Journal of Philosophy 14(3): 349–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, H. 2006c. Reasons for Belief. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72(2): 286–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, H.. Forthcoming. Primitive Normativity and Skepticism about Rules. Journal of Philosophy.
Gluer, K. and Wikforss, Å. 2009. Against Content Normativity. Mind 118: 31–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. 1976. Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge. Journal of Philosophy 73: 771–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. 1979. What is Justified Belief? In Justification and Knowledge (ed. Pappas, George). Dordrecht: Reidel, 1–23.Google Scholar
Goldman, A.. 1999a. Internalism Exposed. Journal of Philosophy 96: 271–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. 1999b. Knowledge in a Social World. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greco, J. 2002. Knowledge as Credit for True Belief. In Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives from Ethics and Epistemology (ed. DePaul, M. and Zagzebski, L.). Oxford University Press, 111–134.Google Scholar
Greco, J.. 2007. The Nature of Ability and the Purpose of Knowledge. Philosophical Issues 17: 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greco, J.. 2008. What's Wrong With Contextualism? Philosophical Quarterly 58: 416–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greco, J.. 2009. The Value Problem. In Epistemic Value (ed. Haddock, A., Millar, A., and Pritchard, D. H.). Oxford University Press, 313–321.Google Scholar
Grimm, S. 2006. Is Understanding a Species of Knowledge? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57: 515–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, S.. 2009. Epistemic Normativity. In Epistemic Value (ed. Haddock, A., Millar, A., and Pritchard, D. H.). Oxford University Press, 243–264.Google Scholar
Gupta, A. 2006. Experience and Knowledge. In Perceptual Experience (ed. Gendler, T. S. and Hawthorne, J.). Oxford University Press, 181–204.Google Scholar
Haddock, A., Millar, A., and Pritchard, D. H. 2010. The Nature and Value of Knowledge: Three Investigations. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hampton, J. 1998. The Authority of Reason. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, G. 1990. The Intrinsic Quality of Experience. Philosophical Perspectives 4: 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, G. 1999. Reasoning, Meaning, and Mind. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hattiangadi, A. 2007. Oughts and Thoughts. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawthorne, J. and Stanley, J. 2008. Knowledge and Action. Journal of Philosophy, 105: 571–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heathwood, C. 2009. Moral and Epistemic Open Question Arguments. Philosophical Books 50: 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heck, R. 2000. Nonconceptual Content and the “Space of Reasons.” Philosophical Review 109(4): 483–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, B. 1994. The Practice of Moral Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hieronymi, P. 2005. The Wrong Kind of Reasons. Journal of Philosophy 102: 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hieronymi, P.. 2009. Two Kinds of Agency. In Mental Actions (ed. L. O'Brien, and M. Soteriou, ). Oxford University Press, 138–162.Google Scholar
Horder, J. 2004. Excusing Crime. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huemer, M. 2007. Moore's Paradox and the Norm of Belief. In Themes from G. E. Moore: New Essays in Epistemology and Ethics (ed. Nuccetelli, S. and Seay, G.). New York: Oxford University Press, 142–157.Google Scholar
Husak, D. 1999. Conflicts of Justification. Law and Philosophy 18: 41–68.Google Scholar
Jackson, F. 1999. Non-Cognitivism, Normativity, Belief. Ratio 12(4): 420–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, M. 2006. Better than Mere Knowledge? The Function of Sensory Awareness. In Perceptual Experience (ed. Gendler, T. S. and Hawthorne, J.). Oxford University Press, 260–290.Google Scholar
Jones, W. 1997. Why Do We Value Knowledge? American Philosophical Quarterly 34: 423–440.Google Scholar
Joyce, R. 2001. The Myth of Morality. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, R.. Forthcoming. The Error in “The Error in the Error Theory.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy.
Kant, I. 1787. Kritik der reinen Vernunft, 2nd (B) edition. Riga: Hartknoch.Google Scholar
Karlander, K. 2008. The Normativity of Thought and Meaning. Doctoral dissertation. Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Kasser, J. and Shah, N. 2006. The Metaethics of Belief: An Expressivist Reading of “The Will to Believe.” Social Epistemology 20(1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kavka, G. 1983. The Toxin Puzzle. Analysis 43: 33–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, T. 2003. Epistemic Rationality as Instrumental Rationality: A Critique. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66: 612–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, T.. 2006. Evidence. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (ed. Zalta, E. N.). http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/evidence/#EviGuiTruEviSigSymMarGoogle Scholar
Kelly, T. 2007. Evidence and Normativity: Reply to Leite. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75: 465–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. 1988. What is Naturalized Epistemology? Philosophical Perspectives 2: 381–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolodny, N. 2005. Why Be Rational? Mind 114(455): 509–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolodny, N.. 2007. State or Process Requirements? Mind 116(462): 371–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornblith, H. 1993. Epistemic Normativity. Synthese 94: 357–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kvanvig, J. 2003. The Value of Knowledge and the Pursuit of Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kvanvig, J.. 2005. Truth is Not the Primary Epistemic Goal. In Contemporary Debates in Epistemology (ed. Steup, M. and Sosa, E.). Oxford: Blackwell, 285–296.Google Scholar
Kvanvig, J.. 2009a. Responses to Critics. In Epistemic Value (ed. Haddock, A., Millar, A., and Pritchard, D. H.). Oxford University Press, 339–351.Google Scholar
Kvanvig, J.. 2009b. The Value of Understanding. In Epistemic Value (ed. A. Haddock, A. Millar, and D. H. Pritchard). Oxford University Press, 95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lackey, J. 2007. The Norms of Assertion. Noûs 41: 594–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lackey, J. and Sosa, E. (eds.) 2006. The Epistemology of Testimony. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langsam, H. 2008. Rationality, Justification, and the Internalism/Externalism Debate. Erkenntnis 68: 79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, K. 1990. Theory of Knowledge. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Lehrer, K. and Paxson, T. 1969. Knowledge: Undefeated Justified True Belief. Journal of Philosophy 66(4): 225–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leite, A. 2005. A Localist Solution to the Regress of Epistemic Justification. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83: 395–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leite, A. 2007. Epistemic Instrumentalism and Reasons for Belief: A Reply to Tom Kelly's “Epistemic Rationality as Instrumental Rationality: A Critique.”Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75: 456–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leite, A.. 2008. Believing One's Reasons Are Good. Synthese 161(3): 419–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, C. I. 1946. An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Lillehammer, H. 2007. Companions in Guilt. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlejohn, C. The Myth of the False, Justified Belief (MS).
Littlejohn, C. 2009a. The Externalist's Demon. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39: 399–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlejohn, C.. 2009b. Must We Act Only On What We Know? Journal of Philosophy 106: 463–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlejohn, C. 2010. Moore's Paradox and Epistemic Norms. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88: 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlejohn, C. Forthcoming. Evidence and Armchair Access. Synthese.
Lynch, M. 2004. True to Life: Why Truth Matters. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L. 1977. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Martin, M. G. F. 2002. The Transparency of Experience. Mind and Language 17(4): 376–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, M. G. F. 2004. The Limits of Self-Awareness. Philosophical Studies 120(1–3): 37–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J. 1982. Criteria, Defeasibility, and Knowledge. Proceedings of the British Academy 68: 455–479. Reprinted in McDowell, 1998.Google Scholar
McDowell, J.. 1994a. Knowledge by Hearsay. In Knowing from Words: Western and Indian Philosophical Analyses of Understanding and Testimony (ed. Matilal, B. K. and Chakrabarti, A.). Dordrecht: Kluwer, 195–224. Reprinted in McDowell, 1998.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. 1994b. Mind and World. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. 1998. Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Millar, A. 1991. Reasons and Experience. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millar, A. 2004. Understanding People: Normativity and Rationalizing Explanation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millar, A.. 2007. What the Disjunctivist is Right About. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74: 176–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millar, A.. 2008a. Disjunctivism and Skepticism. In The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism (ed. Greco, J.). New York: Oxford University Press, 581–604.Google Scholar
Millar, A.. 2008b. Perceptual-Recognitional Abilities and Perceptual Knowledge. In Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge (ed. Haddock, A. and Macpherson, F. E.). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 330–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millar, A. 2009. What is it that Cognitive Abilities are Abilities to Do? Acta Analytica 24: 223–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millar, A. 2010. Knowing from Being Told. In Social Epistemology (ed. Haddock, A., Millar, A., and Pritchard, D.). Oxford University Press, 175–193.Google Scholar
Mitova, V. 2009. A Quasi-Pragmatist Explanation of Our Ethics of Belief. Teorema 28(3): 113–130.Google Scholar
Moran, R. 2006. Getting Told and Being Believed. In The Epistemology of Testimony (ed. J. Lackey, and E. Sosa, ). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 272–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, P. 1989. Knowledge and Evidence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. 1979. Mortal Questions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Oddie, G. 2005. Value, Reality, and Desire. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, J. 2009. Reasons and the New Non-Naturalism. In Spheres of Reason (ed. Robertson, S.). Oxford University Press, 164–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, J.. 2010. In Defence of Moral Error Theory. In New Waves in Metaethics (ed. Brady, M.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 62–84.Google Scholar
Owens, D. 2000. Reason Without Freedom. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfit, D. 2001. Reasons and Rationality. In Exploring Practical Rationality (ed. Egonsson, D., Josefsson, J., Petersson, B., and Rønnow-Rasmussen, T.). Aldershot: Ashgate, 17–39.Google Scholar
Peacocke, C. 2001. Does Perception Have a Nonconceptual Content? Journal of Philosophy 98: 239–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacocke, C.. 2004. The Realm of Reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Percival, P. 2003. The Pursuit of Epistemic Good. Metaphilosophy 34: 29–47. Reprinted in Moral and Epistemic Virtues (ed. M. S. Brady and D. H. Pritchard). Oxford: Blackwell, 2003, 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, J. 1974. Knowledge and Justification. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pollock, J.. 1986. Contemporary Theories of Knowledge. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Pollock, J. and Cruz, J. 1999. Contemporary Theories of Knowledge, 2nd edition. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Price, H. H. 1932. Perception. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. 2007a. Knowledge, the Value of. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (ed. Zalta, E.). http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/knowledge-value/
Pritchard, D. H.. 2007b. Recent Work on Epistemic Value. American Philosophical Quarterly, 44: 85–110.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H.. 2008. Greco on Knowledge: Virtues, Contexts, Achievements. Philosophical Quarterly 58: 437–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. H.. 2009a. Knowledge, Understanding and Epistemic Value. In Epistemology (Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures) (ed. O'Hear, A.). Cambridge University Press, 19–44.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H.. 2009b. The Value of Knowledge. Harvard Review of Philosophy 16: 2–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D., Millar, A., and Haddock, A. 2010. The Nature and Value of Knowledge: Three Investigations. OxfordUniversity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryor, J. 2000. The Skeptic and the Dogmatist. Noûs 34: 517–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryor, J. 2004. What's Wrong with Moore's Argument? Philosophical Issues 14: 349–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryor, J.. 2005. There is Immediate Justification. In Contemporary Debates in Epistemology (ed. M. Steup, and E. Sosa, ). Oxford: Blackwell, 181–202.Google Scholar
Pryor, J.Forthcoming. When Warrant Transmits. In Wittgenstein, Epistemology and Mind: Themes from the Philosophy of Crispin Wright (ed. Coliva, A.). Oxford University Press.
Putnam, H. 1990. Beyond the Fact/Value Dichotomy. In Putnam, Realism with a Human Face (ed. Conant, J.). Cambridge University Press, 135–141.Google Scholar
Rabinowicz, W. and Rønnow-Rasmussen, T. 2004. The Strike of the Demon: On Fitting Pro-Attitudes and Value. Ethics 114: 391–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Railton, P. 1997. On the Hypothetical and Non-Hypothetical in Reasoning about Belief and Action. In Ethics and Practical Reason (ed. Cullity, G. and Gaut, B.). Cambridge University Press, 53–80.Google Scholar
Raz, J. 1975. Practical Reason and Norms. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Raz, J.. 1986. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, J.. 1990. Practical Reason and Norms. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, J.. 1999. Engaging Reason. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, J.. 2005. The Myth of Instrumental Rationality. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 1(1): 2–28.
Reisner, A. 2004. Conflicts of Normativity. thesis, D. Phil, Oxford University.Google Scholar
Reisner, A. 2008. Weighing Pragmatic and Evidential Reasons for Belief. Philosophical Studies 138: 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisner, A.. 2009a. The Possibility of Pragmatic Reasons for Belief and the Wrong Kind of Reason Problem. Philosophical Studies 145(2): 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisner, A. 2009b. Unifying the Requirements of Rationality. Philosophical Explorations 12(3): 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggs, W. 2002a. Beyond Truth and Falsehood: The Real Value of Knowing that p. Philosophical Studies 107: 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggs, W.. 2002b. Reliability and the Value of Knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64: 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggs, W.. 2003. Understanding “Virtue” and the Virtue of Understanding. In Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives from Ethics and Epistemology (ed. Zagzebski, L. and DePaul, M.). Oxford University Press, 203–226.Google Scholar
Riggs, W.. 2007. The Value Turn in Epistemology. In New Waves in Epistemology (ed. Hendricks, V. and Pritchard, D. H.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 300–323.Google Scholar
Riggs, W. 2009. Understanding, Knowledge, and the Meno Requirement. In Epistemic Value (ed. Haddock, A., Millar, A., and Pritchard, D. H.). Oxford University Press, 331–338.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. 1996. Competing Theories of Justification: Deeds v. Reasons. In Harm and Culpability (ed. Simester, A. and Smith, A.). New York: Oxford University Press, 45–70.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T.M. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schroeder, M. 2004. The Scope of Instrumental Reason. Philosophical Perspectives 18: 337–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, M.. 2007. Slaves of the Passions. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, M. 2008. Having Reasons. Philosophical Studies 139(1): 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, M.. Forthcoming. Stakes, , Withholding, and the Subject-Sensitivity of Knowledge. Philosophical Studies.
Shah, N. 2003. How Truth Governs Belief. Philosophical Review 112: 447–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, N.. 2006. A New Argument for Evidentialism. Philosophical Quarterly 56: 481–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, N.. 2008. How Action Governs Intention. Philosophers' Imprint 8: 1–19.Google Scholar
Shah, N. and Velleman, D. 2005. Doxastic Deliberation. Philosophical Review 114: 497–534.CrossRef
Smith, M. 1994. The Moral Problem. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smith, M.. 2001. Some Not-Much-Discussed Problems for Non-Cognitivism in Ethics. Ratio 14(2): 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobel, D. and Wall, S. (eds.) 2009. Reasons for Action. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Sobel, J. H. Good and Gold: A Judgmental History of Metaethics from G. E. Moore through J. L. Mackie (MS). www.utsc.utoronto.ca/∼sobel/Gd_Gld/
Sosa, E. 1988. Beyond Skepticism, to the Best of Our Knowledge. Mind 97: 153–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, E.. 1991. Knowledge in Perspective: Selected Essays in Epistemology. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, E. 2007. A Virtue Epistemology: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge, Volume I. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speaks, J. 2005. Is There a Problem about Nonconceptual Content? Philosophical Review 114(3): 359–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steglich-Petersen, A. 2006a. No Norm Needed: On the Aim of Belief. Philosophical Quarterly 56: 499–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steglich-Petersen, A.. 2006b. Voluntarism and Transparent Deliberation. South African Journal of Philosophy 25: 171–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steglich-Petersen, A.. 2008a. Against Essential Normativity of the Mental. Philosophical Studies 140: 263–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steglich-Petersen, A.. 2008b. Does Doxastic Transparency Support Evidentialism? Dialectica 62: 541–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steglich-Petersen, A.. 2009. Weighing the Aim of Belief. Philosophical Studies 145: 395–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steup, M. 1999. A Defense of Internalism. In The Theory of Knowledge: Classical and Contemporary Readings (ed. Pojman, L.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 373–384.Google Scholar
Steup, M.. 2001. Epistemic Duty, Evidence, and Internality. In Knowledge, Truth, and Duty (ed. Steup, M.). New York: Oxford University Press, 134–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steup, M.. 2008. Doxastic Freedom. Synthese 161: 375–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stich, S. 1990. The Fragmentation of Reason: Preface to a Pragmatic Theory of Cognitive Evaluation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stratton-Lake, P. 2002. Introduction. In D. Ross, The Right and the Good (ed. Stratton-Lake, P.). Oxford: Clarendon Press, ix–xlix.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1962. Freedom and Resentment. Proceedings of the British Academy 48: 1–25.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1979. Perception and Its Objects. In Perception and Identity: Essays presented to A. J. Ayer with His Replies to Them (ed. Macdonald, G. F.). London: Macmillan, 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroud, B. 2004. Perceptual Knowledge and Epistemological Satisfaction. In Ernest Sosa and His Critics (ed. Greco, J.). Oxford: Blackwell, 164–173.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. 2005. Stick to What You Know. Noûs 39: 359–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, J.. 2007. Without Justification. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sverdlik, S. 1996. Motive and Rightness. Ethics 106: 327–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinburne, R. 1999. Providence and the Problem of Evil. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swinburne, R.. 2000. Epistemic Justification. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Textor, M. 2009. Are Particulars or States of Affairs Given in Perception? In States of Affairs (ed. Reicher, M.). Frankfurt/Main: Ontos, 129–150.Google Scholar
Travis, C. 2004. The Silence of the Senses. Mind 113: 57–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travis, C. 2005. A Sense of Occasion. Philosophical Quarterly 55: 286–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vahid, H. 2006. Aiming at Truth: Doxastic vs. Epistemic Goals. Philosophical Studies 131: 303–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velleman, D. 2000. The Possibility of Practical Reason. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, J. 2001. Normativity, Commitment, and Instrumental Reason. Philosophers' Imprint 1: 1–26.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. J., Pettit, P., Scheffler, S., and Smith, M. (eds.) 2004. Reason and Value: Themes from the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wedgwood, R. 1999. The A Priori Rules of Rationality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59: 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedgwood, R. 2002a. The Aim of Belief. Philosophical Perspectives 16: 267–297.Google Scholar
Wedgwood, R.. 2002b. Internalism Explained. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65: 349–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedgwood, R.. 2003. Choosing Rationally and Choosing Correctly. In Weakness of Will and Practical Irrationality (ed. Stroud, S. and Tappolet, C.). Oxford University Press, 201–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedgwood, R.. 2007a. The Nature of Normativity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedgwood, R.. 2007b. Normativism Defended. In Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Mind (ed. McLaughlin, B. and Cohen, J.). Oxford: Blackwell, 85–101.Google Scholar
Williams, B. 1973. Problems of the Self. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, B.. 1980. Internal and External Reasons. Reprinted in Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers, 1973–1980. Cambridge University Press, 1981, 101–113.Google Scholar
Williams, B.. 1995. Internal Reasons and the Obscurity of Blame. In Making Sense of Humanity. Cambridge University Press, 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, T. 1995. Is Knowledge a State of Mind? Mind 104: 533–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, T.. 2000. Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, T.. 2007. The Philosophy of Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, C. 2001. On Basic Logical Knowledge. Philosophical Studies 106: 41–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, C.. 2002. (Anti-)Sceptics Simple and Subtle: Moore and McDowell. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65: 330–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, C.. 2003. Some Reflections on the Acquisition of Warrant by Inference. In New Essays on Semantic Externalism and Self-Knowledge (ed. Nuccetelli, S.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 57–77.Google Scholar
Wright, C.. 2004. Warrant for Nothing (and Foundations for Free)?Aristotelian Society Supplement 78: 167–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, C.. 2007. The Perils of Dogmatism. In Themes from G. E. Moore: New Essays in Epistemology and Ethics (ed. Nuccetelli, S. and Seay, G.). Oxford University Press, 25–48.Google Scholar
Zagzebski, L. 1996. Virtues of the Mind: An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagzebski, L.. 1999. What is Knowledge? In The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology (ed. Greco, J. and Sosa, E.). Oxford: Blackwell, 92–116.Google Scholar
Zagzebski, L. 2001. Recovering Understanding. In Knowledge, Truth, and Duty: Essays on Epistemic Justification, Virtue, and Responsibility (ed. Steup, M.). Oxford University Press, 235–252.Google Scholar
Zagzebski, L.. 2003. The Search for the Source of Epistemic Good. Metaphilosophy 34: 12–28. Reprinted in Moral and Epistemic Virtues (ed. M. S. Brady and D. H. Pritchard). Oxford: Blackwell, 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, M. 2002. Taking Luck Seriously. Journal of Philosophy 99: 553–576.CrossRef

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×