Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:55:12.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part IV - Lear on the Loose: Migrations and Appropriations of Lear

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2019

Edited by
Victoria Bladen ,
Sarah Hatchuel  and
Nathalie Vienne-Guerrin
Victoria Bladen
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Sarah Hatchuel
Affiliation:
Université Paul Valéry, Montpellier
Nathalie Vienne-Guerrin
Affiliation:
Université Paul Valéry, Montpellier
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

Yiddish King LearadaptationappropriationPolandHarry TomashefskyJacob GordinKing LearracismideologyspinoffDonald TrumpgenderviolenceThe Eye of the StormfilmAustraliagenderpostcolonialityLearnesssufferingBossEmpireKing LearTV seriesappropriationfamilypowerracegenderJean-Luc GodardKing LearScreenfilmcommentmetafilmic
Type
Chapter
Information
Shakespeare on Screen: King Lear , pp. 155 - 247
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Alter, I., ‘Jacob Gordin’s Mirele Elfros: King Lear as Jewish Mother’, in Shakespeare Survey 55: ‘King Lear’ and its Afterlife (2002): 114–27.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, J., Shakespeare on the American Yiddish Stage (Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Bruhn, J., Gjelsvik, A. and Haussen, E. F., ‘“There and back Again”: New Challenges and New Directions in Adaptations Studies’, in Bruhn, J., Gjelsvik, A. and Haussen, E. F. (eds.), Adaptation Studies: New Challenges, New Directions (London: Bloomsbury, 2013), 1–16.Google Scholar
Desmet, C., Loper, N. and Casey, J., ‘Introduction’, in Desmet, C., Loper, N. and Casey, J. (eds.), Shakespeare/Not Shakespeare (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017), 1–22.Google Scholar
Genette, G., Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation, trans. J. E. Lewin (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Goldman, E. A., Visions, Images and Dreams: Yiddish Film – Past & Present (Teaneck: Holmes & Meier, 2011).Google Scholar
Gordin, J., The Jewish King Lear: a Comedy in America, ed. Gay, R. and Glazer, S.(New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Gross, N., Film żydowski w Polsce [Yiddish film in Poland], trans. from Hebrew by A. Ćwiakowska (Kraków: Rabid, 2002).Google Scholar
Henry, B., Rewriting Russia: Jacob Gordin’s Yiddish Drama (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Henderson, D. E., Collaborations with the Past: Reshaping Shakespeare across Time and Media (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Hoberman, J., Bridge of Light: Yiddish Film between Two Worlds (Hanover and London: University Press of New England, 2010).Google Scholar
Hutcheon, L. with O’Flynn, S., A Theory of Adaptation, 2nd edition (New York and London: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Kahan, J. (ed.), ‘King Lear’: New Critical Essays (New York and London: Routledge, 2008).Google Scholar
Lanier, D. M., Shakespeare and Modern Popular Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Lanier, D. M. ‘Film Spin-offs and Citations’, in Burt, R. (ed.), Shakespeares after Shakespeare: an Encyclopedia of the Bard in Mass Media and Popular Culture (Westport: Greenwood Press, 2007), 186–7.Google Scholar
Lanier, D. M. ‘Shakespeare/Not Shakespeare: Afterword’, in Desmet, C., Loper, N. and Casey, J. (eds.) Shakespeare/Not Shakespeare (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017), 293–306.Google Scholar
Lubelski, T., ‘Historia Kina Polskiego. Twórcy, Filmy, Konteksty [History of Polish Film. Artists, Films, Contexts]’, Videograf II (2009), 105–8. www.akademiapolskiegofilmu.pl/pl/historia-polskiego-filmu/artykuly/film-zydowski-w-polsce-1930–1939/266 (accessed 15 January 2016).Google Scholar
Manchel, F., Film Study: an Analytical Bibliography, volume 1 (London and Toronto: Associated University Presses, 1990).Google Scholar
Moon, M., ‘Tragedy and Trash: Yiddish Theater and Queer Theater, Henry James, Charles Ludlam, Ethyl Eichelberger’, in Boyarin, D., Itzkovitz, D. and Pellegrini, A. (eds.), Queer Theory and the Jewish Question (New York: Columbia University Press, 2003), 266–84.Google Scholar
Pfister, M., The Theory and Analysis of Drama, trans. J. Halliday (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Rothwell, K. S., A History of Shakespeare on Screen: a Century of Film and Television, 2nd edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Sanders, J., Adaptation and Appropriation (London and New York: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar
Schechter, J., ‘Yiddish King Lear on the Relief Roll’, Forward, 8 December 2009, http://forward.com/culture/120500/yiddish-king-lear-on-the-relief-roll/ (accessed 20 January 2016).Google Scholar

Works Cited

Agamben, G., Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, trans. D. Heller-Roazen (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Bronfen, E., Over Her Dead Body: Death, Femininity, and the Aesthetic (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Butler, J., Precarious Life: the Power of Mourning and Violence (London and New York: Verso, 2004).Google Scholar
Hardt, M. and Negri, A., Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire (New York: Penguin, 2004).Google Scholar
Hartman, S. Scenes of Subjection: Terror, Slavery, and Self-Making in Nineteenth-Century America (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Jefferson, T., Notes on the State of Virginia (New York: Penguin, 1999 [1785]).Google Scholar
True, J., The Political Economy of Violence against Women (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Weheliye, A., Habeas Viscus: Racializing Assemblages, Biopolitics, and Black Feminist Theories of the Human (Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Žižek, S., Welcome to the Desert of the Real (London and New York: Verso, 2003).Google Scholar

Works Cited

Allen, G., Intertextuality, 2nd edition (London and New York: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G. and Tiffin, H., The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Post-Colonial Literatures, 2nd edition (London and New York: Routledge, 2002).Google Scholar
Beatson, P. R., ‘The Skiapod and the Eye: Patrick White’s The Eye of the Storm’, Southerly 34.3 (1974): 219–32.Google Scholar
Bladen, V., ‘Antipodean Shakespeares: Quoting Shakespeare in Australian Film’, in Joubin, A. A. (ed.), Cinematic Allusions to Shakespeare: International Appropriations (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Bulman, J. C. (ed.), Shakespeare Re-Dressed: Cross-Gender Casting in Contemporary Performance (Madison and Teaneck: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Calbi, M., Spectral Shakespeares: Media Adaptations in the Twenty-First Century (New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).Google Scholar
Cartelli, T. and Rowe, K., New Wave Shakespeare on Screen (Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Desmet, C., Loper, N. and Casey, J. (eds.), Shakespeare/Not Shakespeare (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017).Google Scholar
Flaherty, K., Ours as We Play It: Australia Plays Shakespeare (Crawley, W.A.: UWA Publishing, 2011).Google Scholar
Golder, J. and Madelaine, R. (eds.), O Brave New World: Two Centuries of Shakespeare on the Australian Stage (Sydney: Currency Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Griggs, Y., Shakespeare’s ‘King Lear’: the Relationship between Text and Film (London: Methuen Drama, 2009).Google Scholar
Hatchuel, S., Shakespeare, from Stage to Screen (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Helff, S., ‘Patrick White-Lite: Fred Schepisi’s Filmic Adaptation of The Eye of the Storm’, in Vanden Driesen, C. and Ashcroft, B. (eds.), Patrick White Centenary: the Legacy of a Prodigal Son (Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars, 2014), 181–95.Google Scholar
Hoover, C., ‘Women, Centaurs, and Devils in King Lear’, Women’s Studies 16 (1989): 349–59.Google Scholar
Hutcheon, L. with O’Flynn, S., A Theory of Adaptation, 2nd edition (London and New York: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Kelly, P., ‘Performing Australian Identity: Gendering King Lear’, Theatre Journal 57.2 (2005): 205–27.Google Scholar
Klett, E., Cross-Gender Shakespeare and English National Identity: Wearing the Codpiece (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009).Google Scholar
Lanier, D. M., Shakespeare and Modern Popular Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Lanier, D. M. ‘Shakespeare/Not Shakespeare: Afterword’, in Desmet, C., Loper, N. and Casey, J. (eds.), Shakespeare/Not Shakespeare (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017), 293–306.Google Scholar
Lanier, D. M. ‘Shakespearean Rhizomatics: Adaptation, Ethics, Value’, in Huang, A. and Rivlin, E. (eds.), Shakespeare and the Ethics of Appropriation (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014), 21–40.Google Scholar
Maack, A., ‘Shakespearean Reference as Structural Principle in Patrick White’s The Tree of Man and The Eye of the Storm’, Southerly 38.2 (1978): 123–40.Google Scholar
McFarlane, B., ‘The Filmmaker as Adaptor: Fred Schepisi Takes on Patrick White in The Eye of the Storm’, Senses of Cinema 60 (2011): http://sensesofcinema.com/2011/60/the-filmmaker-as-adaptor-fred-schepisi-takes-on-patrick-white-in-the-eye-of-the-storm/ (accessed 23 November 2017).Google Scholar
Miller, G., ‘Cross-Gender Casting as Feminist Interventions in the Staging of Early Modern Plays’, Journal of International Women’s Studies 16.1 (2014): 4–17.Google Scholar
Pascal, J., The Yiddish Queen Lear/Woman in the Moon (London: Oberon Books, 2001).Google Scholar
Rothwell, K. S., A History of Shakespeare on Screen: a Century of Film and Television, 2nd edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Sanders, J., Adaptation and Appropriation (London and New York: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar
Sharrock, G., ‘Patrick White and Iris Murdoch – Death as a Moral Summons in The Eye of the Storm and Bruno’s Dream’, Antipodes 11.1 (1997): 41–4.Google Scholar
Stenning Edgecombe, R., ‘Hugo, Goethe, and Patrick White: Sources for The Eye of the Storm and The Vivisector’, Antipodes 28.2 (2014): 513–17.Google Scholar
White, P., The Eye of the Storm (Sydney: Vintage Books, 1995 [1973]).Google Scholar

Works Cited

Boose, L. E., ‘The Father and the Bride in Shakespeare’, PMLA 97.3 (May 1982): 325–47.Google Scholar
Chaiken, I., interview by B. Bogaev, ‘Shakespeare Unlimited: How King Lear Inspired Empire’, Folger Shakespeare Library, 22 March 2017: www.folger.edu/sites/default/files/Empire-Podcast-Transcript.pdf (accessed 30 July 2017).Google Scholar
Esteves, O. and Lefait, S., La Question raciale dans les séries américaines: The Wire, Homeland, Oz, The Sopranos, OITNB, Boss, Mad Men, Nip/Tuck (Paris: Presses de Sciences Po, 2014).Google Scholar
Hobson, D., Soap Opera (Oxford: Polity Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Kahn, C., ‘The Absent Mother in King Lear’ in Ferguson, M., Quilligan, M. and Vickers, N. (eds.), Rewriting the Renaissance: the Discourses of Sexual Difference (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985), 33–49.Google Scholar
Lanier, D., ‘Minstrelsy, Jazz, Rap: Shakespeare, African American Music, and Cultural Legitimation’, Borrowers and Lenders 1.1 (Spring/Summer 2005): www.borrowers.uga.edu/782016/show (accessed 30 July 2017).Google Scholar
Leverette, M., Ott, B. L. and Buckley, C. L. (eds.), It’s Not TV: Watching HBO in the Post-Television Era (New York: Routledge, 2008).Google Scholar
McCabe, J. and Akass, K., ‘Sex, Swearing and Respectability’, in McCabe, J. and Akass, K. (eds.), Quality TV: Contemporary American Television and Beyond (London and New York: I. B. Tauris, 2007), 62–76.Google Scholar
Sargent, A., ‘Empire: TV’s Contemporary-Art Gallery’, The New Yorker, 15 October 2015: www.newyorker.com/culture/culture-desk/empire-tvs-contemporary-art-gallery (accessed 30 July 2017).Google Scholar
Thompson, A. Passing Strange: Shakespeare, Race, and Contemporary America (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Trotta, J., ‘Dealers and Discourse: Sociolinguistic Variation in The Wire’, in Beers, K. Fägersten, (ed.), Watching TV with a Linguist (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2006), 40–65.Google Scholar

Works Cited

Aebischer, P., Greenhalgh, S. and Osborne, L. E. (eds.), Shakespeare and the ‘Live’ Theatre Broadcast Experience (London: Bloomsbury, 2018).Google Scholar
Cartelli, T. and Rowe, K., ‘Surviving Shakespeare: Kristian Levring’s The King Is Alive’ in their New Wave Shakespeare on Screen (Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press, 2007), 142–64.Google Scholar
Habinek, L., ‘Getting to Page Four of King Lear with Jean-Luc Godard’, Shakespeare (British Shakespeare Association) 9 (2013): 76–90.Google Scholar
Holland, P., ‘On the Gravy Train: Shakespeare, Memory and Forgetting’, in Holland, P. (ed.), Shakespeare, Memory and Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 207–34.Google Scholar
Ball, Robert Hamilton, ‘What, All in Motion? Shakespeare by Vitagraph (1908–1911)’, in his Shakespeare on Silent Film: a Strange Eventful History. New York: Theatre Arts Books, 1968, 38–60.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Judith, ‘“An Excellent Dumb Discourse”: British and American Shakespeare Films, 1899–1916’, in her Shakespeare on Film. Harlow: Pearson Longman, 2005, 21–48.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Judith, ‘Corporate Authorship: the Shakespeare Films of the Vitagraph Company of America’, in her Shakespeare on Silent Film: an Excellent Dumb Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009, 105–46.Google Scholar
Babiak, Peter E. S., ‘Silent Shakespeare’, in his Shakespeare Films: a Re-evaluation of 100 Years of Adaptations. Jefferson: McFarland, 2016, 25–38.Google Scholar
Ball, Robert Hamilton, ‘Strange Motions: the Continent (1908–1911)’, in his Shakespeare on Silent Film: a Strange Eventful History. New York: Theatre Arts Books, 1968, 90–134.Google Scholar
Coursen, H. R., ‘Silents’, in his Shakespeare in Space: Recent Shakespeare Productions on Screen. New York: Peter Lang, 2002, 95–111.Google Scholar
Rothwell, Kenneth S., ‘In Search of Nothing: Mapping King Lear’, in Shakespeare, the Movie: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV, and Video, ed. Boose, Lynda E. and Burt, Richard. London and New York: Routledge, 1997, 135–47.Google Scholar
Ball, Robert Hamilton, ‘These Visions Did Appear: During the War’, in his Shakespeare on Silent Film: a Strange Eventful History. New York: Theatre Arts Books, 1968, 216–62.Google Scholar
Guneratne, Anthony R., ‘Featuring the Bard: Frederick Warde’s Shakespeare and the Transformation of American Cinema’, in his Shakespeare, Film Studies, and the Visual Cultures of Modernity. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008, 95–113.Google Scholar
Rothwell, Kenneth S., ‘Representing King Lear on Screen: from Metatheatre to “Meta-Cinema”’, in Shakespeare and the Moving Image: the Plays on Film and Television, ed. Davies, Anthony and Wells, Stanley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, 211–33.Google Scholar
Aebischer, Pascale, ‘En-gendering Violence and Suffering in King Lear’, in her Shakespeare’s Violated Bodies: Stage and Screen Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, 151–89.Google Scholar
Ashby, Richard, ‘Crowding out Dover “Cliff” in Korol Lir’. Adaptation 10 (2017): 210–29.Google Scholar
Babiak, Peter E. S., ‘Kozintsev’, in his Shakespeare Films: a Re-evaluation of 100 Years of Adaptations. Jefferson: McFarland, 2016, 84–98.Google Scholar
Baker, Christopher, ‘Religion in Performance’, in his Religion in the Age of Shakespeare. Westport and London: Greenwood, 2007, 95–126.Google Scholar
Buchman, Lorne M., ‘Spatial Multiplicity: Patterns of Viewing in Cinematic Space’, in his Still in Movement: Shakespeare on Screen. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991, 12–32.Google Scholar
Buchman, Lorne M., ‘Inside-Out: Dynamics of Mise-en-scène’, in his Still in Movement: Shakespeare on Screen. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991, 33–51.Google Scholar
Buchman, Lorne M., ‘Houseless Heads: the Storm of King Lear in the Films of Peter Brook and Grigory Kozintsev’, in his Still in Movement: Shakespeare on Screen. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991, 52–63.Google Scholar
Buchman, Lorne M., ‘Temporal Multiplicity: Patterns of Viewing in Cinematic Time’, in his Still in Movement: Shakespeare on Screen. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991, 107–25.Google Scholar
Buhler, Stephen M., ‘Gaining in Translation’, in his Shakespeare in the Cinema: Ocular Proof. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002, 157–78.Google Scholar
Catania, Saviour, ‘“Darkness Rumbling”: Kozintsev’s Karòl Lier and the Visual Acoustics of Nothing’. Literature/Film Quarterly 36 (2008): 85–93.Google Scholar
Collick, John, ‘Kozintsev’s Hamlet and Korol Ler’, in his Shakespeare, Cinema and Society. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 1989, 128–48.Google Scholar
Coursen, H. R., ‘Lear and Cordelia’, in his Shakespearean Performance as Interpretation. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1992, 129–39.Google Scholar
Davies, Anthony, ‘King Lear on Film’, in ‘Lear’ from Study to Stage: Essays in Criticism, ed. Ogden, James and Scouten, Arthur H.. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1997, 247–66.Google Scholar
Dombrovskaia, Olga, ‘Hamlet, King Lear and Their Companions: the Other Side of Film Music’, in Contemplating Shostakovich: Life, Music and Film, ed. Ivashkin, Alexander and Kirkman, Andrew. Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate, 2012, 141–64.Google Scholar
Etkind, Alexander, ‘Mourning the Soviet Victims in a Cosmopolitan Way: Hamlet from Kozintsev to Riazanov’. Studies in Russian & Soviet Cinema 5 (2011): 389–409.Google Scholar
Gillespie, David, ‘Adapting Foreign Classics: Kozintsev’s Shakespeare’, in Russian and Soviet Film Adaptations of Literature, 1900–2001: Screening the Word, ed. Hutchings, Stephen and Vernitski, Anat. London and New York: RoutledgeCurzon-Taylor and Francis, 2005, 75–88.Google Scholar
Griggs, Yvonne, ‘On the Road: Reclaiming Grigori Kozinstev’s Korol Lir (1970)’, in her Shakespeare’s ‘King Lear’: the Relationship between Text and Film. London: Methuen Drama, 2009, 62–79.Google Scholar
Gronsky, Daniel, ‘Shakespeare in Translation’. Film International 11 (2004): 44–51.Google Scholar
Guntner, J. Lawrence, ‘Hamlet, Macbeth and King Lear on Film’, in The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film, ed. Jackson, Russell. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, 120–40.Google Scholar
Halio, Jay L., ‘The Play in Performance’, in his ‘King Lear’: a Guide to the Play. Westport and London: Greenwood Press, 2001, 95–115.Google Scholar
Hodgdon, Barbara, ‘Kozintsev’s King Lear: Filming a Tragic Poem’. Literature/Film Quarterly 5 (1977): 291–8.Google Scholar
Hodgdon, Barbara, ‘Two King Lears: Uncovering the Filmtext’. Literature/Film Quarterly 11 (1983): 143–51.Google Scholar
Holland, Peter, ‘Two-Dimensional Shakespeare: King Lear on Film’, in Shakespeare and the Moving Image: the Plays on Film and Television, ed. Davies, Anthony and Wells, Stanley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, 50–68.Google Scholar
Jackson, MacDonald P., ‘Screening the Tragedies: King Lear’, in The Oxford Handbook of Shakespearean Tragedy, ed. Neill, Michael and Schalkwyk, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, 607–23.Google Scholar
Jorgens, Jack J., ‘King Lear: Peter Brook and Grigori Kozintsev’, in his Shakespeare on Film. 1977, rpt. Lanham and London: University Press of America, 1991, 235–51.Google Scholar
Keyishian, Harry, ‘Performing Violence in King Lear: Edgar’s Encounters in 4.6 and 5.3’. Shakespeare Bulletin 14.3 (Summer 1996): 36–8.Google Scholar
Kozintsev, Grigori, ‘Hamlet and King Lear: Stage and Film’, in Shakespeare 1971: Proceedings of the World Shakespeare Congress, ed. Leech, Clifford and Margeson, J. M. R.. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press, 1972, 190–9.Google Scholar
Kozintsev, Grigori, ‘King Lear’: the Space of Tragedy: the Diary of a Film Director. Trans. Mary Mackintosh. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Leaming, Barbara, ‘King Lear’, in her Grigori Kozintsev. Boston: Twayne, 1980, 119–35.Google Scholar
Leggatt, Alexander, ‘Grigori Kozintsev’, in his King Lear. 2nd edn. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 2004, 88–104.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Courtney, ‘Grigori Kozintsev’, in Welles, Kurosawa, Kozintsev, Zeffirelli, by Thornton Burnett, Mark, Lehmann, Courtney, Rippy, Marguerite H. and Wray, Ramona. London and New York: Bloomsbury, 2013, 92–140.Google Scholar
Leonard, Kendra Preston, ‘King Lear’, in her Shakespeare, Madness, and Music: Scoring Insanity in Cinematic Adaptations. Lanham: Scarecrow Press, 2009, 97–115.Google Scholar
Leonard, Kendra Preston, ‘Edgar’, in her Shakespeare, Madness, and Music: Scoring Insanity in Cinematic Adaptations. Lanham: Scarecrow Press, 2009, 117–26.Google Scholar
Margolies, David, ‘King Lear: Kozinstev’s Social Translation’, in Shifting the Scene: Shakespeare in European Culture, ed. Bezzola Lambert, Ladina and Engler, Balz. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2004, 230–8.Google Scholar
Moore, Tiffany Conroy, Ann, ‘King Lear Revisited in the Brezhnev Era: Kozintsev’s 1970 Film Adaptation’, in her Kozintsev’s Shakespeare Films: Russian Political Protest in ‘Hamlet’ and ‘King Lear’. Jefferson and London: McFarland, 2012, 136–77.Google Scholar
Parker, R. B., ‘The Use of Mise-en-Scène in Three Films of King Lear’. Shakespeare Quarterly 42 (1991): 75–90.Google Scholar
Radcliff-Umstead, Douglas, ‘Order and Disorder in Kozintsev’s King Lear’. Literature/Film Quarterly 11 (1983): 266–73.Google Scholar
Riley, John, ‘Endgame (1964–1975): Hamlet to King Lear’, in his Dmitri Shostakovich: a Life in Film. London and New York: I. B. Tauris, 2005, 94–107.Google Scholar
Rothwell, Kenneth S., ‘Other Shakespeares: Translation and Expropriation’, in his A History of Shakespeare on Screen: a Century of Film and Television. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, 160–91.Google Scholar
Rothwell, Kenneth S., ‘King Lear’. Cineaste 32.3 (Summer 2007): 80–2.Google Scholar
Ryle, Simon, ‘Something from Nothing: King Lear and Film Space’, in his Shakespeare, Cinema and Desire: Adaptation and Other Futures of Shakespeare’s Language. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014, 36–84.Google Scholar
Sanders, Julie, ‘Symphonic Film Scores’, in her Shakespeare and Music: Afterlives and Borrowings. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press, 2007, 135–58.Google Scholar
Schmalz, Wayne, ‘Pictorial Imagery in Kozintsev’s King Lear’. Literature/Film Quarterly 13 (1985): 85–94.Google Scholar
Sokolyansky, Mark, ‘Grigori Kozintsev’s Hamlet and King Lear’, in The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film, ed. Jackson, Russell. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, 203–15.Google Scholar
Thomas, Alfred, ‘“A Dog’s Obeyed in Office”: Subverting Authority in Shakespeare’s King Lear and Grigori Kozintsev’s Korol’ Lir’, in his Shakespeare, Dissent, and the Cold War. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014, 97–140.Google Scholar
Troncale, Joseph, ‘The War and Kozintsev’s Films Hamlet and King Lear’, in The Red Screen: Politics, Society, Art in Soviet Cinema, ed. Lawton, Anna. London and New York: Routledge, 1992, 193–210.Google Scholar
Welsh, James M., ‘To See It Feelingly: King Lear through Russian Eyes’. Literature/Film Quarterly 4 (1976): 153–8.Google Scholar
Willson, Robert F., Jr, ‘Lear and Dispossession: the Peopled Space of Kozintsev’s King Lear’. Shakespeare Bulletin 6.3 (May/June 1988): 20–2.Google Scholar
Willson, Robert F., Jr, ‘Yuri Yarvet’s Lear: the Face of Tragedy’, in Images of Shakespeare: Proceedings of the Third Congress of the International Shakespeare Association, 1986, ed. Habicht, Werner, Palmer, D. J. and Pringle, Roger. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1988, 251–7.Google Scholar
Womack, Kenneth, ‘Assessing the Rhetoric of Performance Criticism in Three Variant Soviet Texts of King Lear’. Yearbook of Comparative and General Literature 41 (1993): 149–59.Google Scholar
Wood, Michael, ‘The Languages of Cinema’, in Nation, Language, and the Ethics of Translation, ed. Bermann, Sandra and Wood, Michael. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2005, 79–88.Google Scholar
Yutkevitch, Sergei, ‘The Conscience of the King: Kozintsev’s King Lear’. Sight and Sound 40 (1970–1971): 192–6.Google Scholar
Acker, Paul, ‘Conventions for Dialogue in Peter Brook’s King Lear’. Literature/Film Quarterly 8 (1980): 219–24.Google Scholar
Babiak, Peter E. S., ‘Or Image of That Horror: the Apocalyptic Visions of Peter Brook and Akira Kurosawa’, in The Silk Road of Adaptation: Transformations across Disciplines and Cultures, ed. Raw, Laurence. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2013, 122–31.Google Scholar
Babiak, Peter E. S., ‘Kott, Brook, Richardson and Polanski’, in his Shakespeare Films: a Re-evaluation of 100 Years of Adaptations. Jefferson: McFarland, 2016, 114–23.Google Scholar
Berlin, Normand, ‘Peter Brook’s Interpretation of King Lear: “Nothing Will Come of Nothing”’. Literature/Film Quarterly 5 (1977): 299–303.Google Scholar
Brook, Peter, ‘Filming King Lear’, in his The Shifting Point: Theatre, Film, Opera 1946–1987. New York: Harper & Row, 1987, 203–6.Google Scholar
Buchman, Lorne M., ‘Local Habitations: the Dialectics of Filmic and Theatrical Space’, in his Still in Movement: Shakespeare on Screen. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991, 84–106.Google Scholar
Buhler, Stephen, ‘Transgressive, in Theory’, in his Shakespeare in the Cinema: Ocular Proof. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002, 125–56.Google Scholar
Cartmell, Deborah, ‘Shakespeare, Film and Violence: Doing Violence to Shakespeare’, in her Interpreting Shakespeare on Screen. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000, 1–20.Google Scholar
Chaplin, William, ‘Our Darker Purpose: Peter Brook’s King Lear’. Arion ns 1 (1973): 168–87.Google Scholar
Davies, Anthony, ‘Peter Brook’s King Lear and Akira Kurosawa’s Throne of Blood’, in his Filming Shakespeare’s Plays: the Adaptations of Laurence Olivier, Orson Welles, Peter Brook and Akira Kurosawa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988, 143–66.Google Scholar
Egan, Gabriel, ‘Showing versus Telling: Shakespeare’s Ekphraseis, Visual Absences, and the Cinema’, in Talking Shakespeare: Shakespeare into the Millennium, ed. Cartmell, Deborah and Scott, Michael. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave, 2001, 168–86.Google Scholar
Eidsvik, Charles, ‘King Lear and the Theater of Cruelty’, in his Cineliteracy: Film among the Arts. New York: Random House, 1978, 257–62.Google Scholar
Gilman, Todd S., ‘The Textual Fabric of Peter Brook’s King Lear: “Holes” in Cinema, Screenplay, and Playtext’. Literature/Film Quarterly 20 (1992): 294–300.Google Scholar
Griggs, Yvonne, ‘Peter Brook’s King Lear (1971): “A Hollywood Showman’s Nightmare?”’, in her Shakespeare’s ‘King Lear’: the Relationship between Text and Film. London: Methuen Drama, 2009, 41–62.Google Scholar
Harris, Laurilyn J., ‘Peter Brook’s King Lear: Aesthetic Achievement or Far Side of the Moon?’ Theatre Research International 11 (1986): 223–39.Google Scholar
Holland, Peter, ‘Peter Brook’, in Brook, Hall, Ninagawa, Lepage, ed. Peter, Holland. London and New York: Bloomsbury, 2013, 7–46.Google Scholar
Jackson, Russell, ‘People’, in his Shakespeare and the English-speaking Cinema. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, 36–63.Google Scholar
Johnson, William, [Untitled.] Film Quarterly 25.3 (Spring 1972): 41–8.Google Scholar
Leggatt, Alexander, ‘Peter Brook’, in his King Lear. 2nd edn. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 2004, 105–17.Google Scholar
Mullin, Michael, ‘Peter Brook’s King Lear: Stage and Screen’. Literature/Film Quarterly 11 (1983): 190–6.Google Scholar
Mullin, Michael, ‘Peter Brook’s King Lear: a Reassessment’, in Screen Shakespeare, ed. Skovmand, Michael. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, 1994, 54–63.Google Scholar
Reddington, John, ‘Film, Play and Idea’. Literature/Film Quarterly 1 (1973): 367–71.Google Scholar
Rothwell, Kenneth S., ‘Classic Film Versions of Shakespeare’s Tragedies: a Mirror for the Times’, in A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works, vol. 1: The Tragedies, ed. Dutton, Richard and Howard, Jean E.. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell, 2003, 241–61.Google Scholar
Rothwell, Kenneth S., ‘Shakespeare Movies in the Age of Angst’, in his A History of Shakespeare on Screen: a Century of Film and Television. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, 136–59.Google Scholar
Rozett, Martha Tuck, ‘The Peter Brook-Paul Scofield King Lear: Revisiting the Film Version’. Shakespeare Bulletin 19.1 (Winter 2001): 40–2.Google Scholar
Rutter, Carol Chillington, ‘Body Parts or Parts for Bodies: Speculating on Cordelia’, in her Enter the Body: Women and Representation on Shakespeare’s Stage. London and New York: Routledge, 2001, 1–26.Google Scholar
Saunders, John, ‘“The promis’d end? or image of that horror?”: Two Different Ways of Looking at the Ending of King Lear’, in Critical Essays on ‘King Lear’, ed. Linda, Cookson. Harlow: Longman, 1988, 120–9.Google Scholar
Saunders, J. G., ‘“Apparent Perversities”: Text and Subtext in the Construction of the Role of Edgar in Brook’s Film of King Lear’. Review of English Studies ns 47.187 (1996): 317–30.Google Scholar
‘Shakespeare in the Cinema: a Film Directors’ Symposium with Peter Brook, Sir Peter Hall, Richard Loncraine, Baz Luhrmann, [Trevor Nunn,] Oliver Parker, Roman Polanski and Franco Zeffirelli’. Cineaste 24.1 (1998): 48–55.Google Scholar
Shaw, William P., ‘Violence and Vision in Polanski’s Macbeth and Brook’s Lear’. Literature/Film Quarterly 14 (1986): 211–13.Google Scholar
Teller, Joseph R., ‘The (Dis)possession of Lear’s Two Bodies: Madness, Demystification, and Domestic Space in Peter Brook’s King Lear’. Borrowers and Lenders: the Journal of Shakespeare and Appropriation 5.1 (Spring/Summer 2010): www.borrowers.uga.edu/782421/show (accessed 17 May 2019).Google Scholar
Viguers, Susan, ‘Costuming as Interpretation: the Elliott/Olivier and the Brook/Scofield King Lear’. Shakespeare Bulletin 12.2 (Spring 1994): 44–6.Google Scholar
Wilds, Lillian, ‘One King Lear for Our Time: a Bleak Film Version by Peter Brook’. Literature/Film Quarterly 4 (1976): 159–64.Google Scholar
Babiak, Peter E. S., ‘Kurosawa’, in his Shakespeare Films: a Re-evaluation of 100 Years of Adaptations. Jefferson: McFarland, 2016, 69–83.Google Scholar
Baker, Rob, ‘Fools on a Precipice’. Parabola: The Magazine of Myth and Tradition 11.4 (Nov. 1986): 90–5, 98.Google Scholar
Bannon, Christopher J., ‘Man and Nature in Ran and King Lear’. New Orleans Review 18.4 (Winter 1991): 5–11.Google Scholar
Brown, Eric C., ‘Akira Kurosawa’. Shakespeare Bulletin 34 (2016): 496–9.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Judith, ‘Cross-cultural Narrative Rhymes: the Shakespeare Films of Akira Kurosawa’, in her Shakespeare on Film. Harlow: Pearson Longman, 2005, 71–89.Google Scholar
Burnett, Mark Thornton, ‘Akira Kurosawa’, in Welles, Kurosawa, Kozintsev, Zeffirelli, by Thornton Burnett, Mark, Lehmann, Courtney, Rippy, Marguerite H. and Wray, Ramona. London and New York: Bloomsbury, 2013, 54–91.Google Scholar
Catania, Saviour, ‘Wailing Woodwind Wild: the Noh Transcription of Shakespeare’s Silent Sounds in Kurosawa’s Ran’. Literature/Film Quarterly 34 (2006): 85–92.Google Scholar
Collick, John, ‘Kurosawa’s Kumonosu jo and Ran’, in his Shakespeare, Cinema and Society. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 1989, 166–87.Google Scholar
Conrad, Peter, ‘Expatriating Lear’, in his To Be Continued: Four Stories and Their Survival. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995, 95–152.Google Scholar
Cowie, Peter, ‘The Literary Connection’, in his Akira Kurosawa: Master of Cinema. New York: Rizzoli, 2010, 186–231.Google Scholar
Crowl, Samuel, ‘The Bow Is Bent and Drawn: Kurosawa’s Ran and the Shakespearean Arrow of Desire’. Literature/Film Quarterly 22 (1994): 109–16.Google Scholar
Davis, Darrell William, ‘Other Manifestations of the Monumental Style’, in his Picturing Japaneseness: Monumental Style, National Identity, Japanese Film. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996, 219–49.Google Scholar
Dawson, Anthony, ‘Reading Kurosawa Reading Shakespeare’, in A Concise Companion to Shakespeare on Screen, ed. Diana, E. Henderson. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell, 2006, 155–75.Google Scholar
Diniz, Thaïs Nogueira, Flores, ‘King Lear’s Filmic Adaptation: a Chaos?’ Canadian Review of Comparative Literature/Revue Canadienne de Littérature Comparée 23 (1996): 775–80.Google Scholar
Dodson-Robinson, Eric, ‘Karma, Revenge, Apocalypse: Ran’s Violent Victim-Agent through Japanese and Western Contexts’. Shakespeare Bulletin 31 (2013): 233–55.Google Scholar
Geist, Kathe, ‘Late Kurosawa: Kagemusha and Ran’. Post Script: Essays in Film and the Humanities 12.1 (Fall 1992): 26–36.Google Scholar
Goodwin, James, ‘Tragedy without Heroes’, in his Akira Kurosawa and Intertextual Cinema. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994, 165–216.Google Scholar
Griggs, Yvonne, ‘Chaos on the Western Frontier: Akira Kurosawa’s Ran (1985)’, in her Shakespeare’s ‘King Lear’: the Relationship between Text and Film. London: Methuen Drama, 2009, 79–99.Google Scholar
Grilli, Peter, ‘Kurosawa Directs a Cinematic Lear’, in Akira Kurosawa: Interviews, ed. Cardullo, Bert. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 2008, 125–30.Google Scholar
Hapgood, Robert, ‘Ran from Screenplay to Film’. Shakespeare Bulletin 10.3 (Summer 1992): 37–8.Google Scholar
Hapgood, Robert, ‘Kurosawa’s Shakespeare Films: Throne of Blood, The Bad Sleep Well, and Ran’, in Shakespeare and the Moving Image: the Plays on Film and Television, ed. Davies, Anthony and Wells, Stanley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, 234–49.Google Scholar
Hirano, Kyoko, ‘The Director, Kurosawa: the Emperor of Japanese Cinema on Designing Ran’. Theatre Crafts 20.2 (Feb. 1986): 88–93.Google Scholar
Hirano, Kyoko, ‘Making Films for All the People: an Interview with Akira Kurosawa’, in Akira Kurosawa: Interviews, ed. Cardullo, Bert. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 2008, 139–44.Google Scholar
Hoile, Christopher, ‘King Lear and Kurosawa’s Ran: Splitting, Doubling, Distancing’. Pacific Coast Philology 22 (1987): 29–34.Google Scholar
Howlett, Kathy, ‘Breaking the Frame: Akira Kurosawa’s Ran’, in her Framing Shakespeare on Film. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2000, 115–27.Google Scholar
Johansen, Ib, ‘Visible Darkness: Shakespeare’s King Lear and Kurosawa’s Ran’, in Screen Shakespeare, ed. Skovmand, Michael. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, 1994, 64–86.Google Scholar
Jortner, David, ‘The Stability of the Heart amidst Fields of Green: an Ecocritical Reading of Kurosawa Akira’s Ran’. Post Script: Essays in Film and the Humanities 20.1 (Fall 2000): 82–91.Google Scholar
Kane, Julie, ‘From the Baroque to Wabi: Translating Animal Imagery from Shakespeare’s King Lear to Kurosawa’s Ran’. Literature/Film Quarterly 25 (1997): 146–51.Google Scholar
Kehr, Dave, ‘Samurai Lear’. American Film 10.10 (Sept. 1985): 20–6.Google Scholar
Keller, Jocelyn and Keller, Wolfram R., ‘“Now is the time”: Shakespeare’s Medieval Temporalities in Akira Kurosawa’s Ran’, in The Medieval Motion Picture: the Politics of Adaptation, ed. Johnston, Andrew James, Rouse, Margitta and Hinz, Philipp. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014, 19–40.Google Scholar
Kishi, Tetsuo and Bradshaw, Graham, ‘Shakespeare and Japanese Film: Kurosawa Akira’, in their Shakespeare in Japan. London and New York: Continuum, 2005, 126–45.Google Scholar
Kott, Jan, ‘Ran, or the End of the World’, in his The Bottom Translation: Marlowe and Shakespeare and the Carnival Tradition. Trans. Daniela Miedzyrzecka and Lillian Vallee. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1987, 143–51.Google Scholar
Kurosawa, Akira, Oguni, Hideo and Masato, Ide, Ran. Trans. Tadashi Shishido. Boston and London: Shambhala, 1986.Google Scholar
Leggatt, Alexander, ‘Cross-cultural Dialogue: Akira Kurosawa’s Ran’, in his King Lear. 2nd edn. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 2004, 169–99.Google Scholar
Linton, Joan Pong, ‘Kurosawa’s Ran (1985) and King Lear: Towards a Conversation on Historical Responsibility’. Quarterly Review of Film and Video 23 (2006): 341–51.Google Scholar
Manheim, Michael, ‘The Function of Battle Imagery in Kurosawa’s Histories and the Henry V Films’. Literature/Film Quarterly 22 (1994): 129–35.Google Scholar
McDonald, Keiko, ‘The Noh Convention in The Throne of Blood and Ran’, in her Japanese Classical Theater in Films. Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1994, 125–44.Google Scholar
Nardo, Anna K., ‘Dialogue in Shakespearean Offshoots’. Literature/Film Quarterly 34 (2006): 104–12.Google Scholar
Nordin, Kenneth D., ‘Buddhist Symbolism in Akira Kurosawa’s Ran: a Counterpoint to Human Chaos’. Asian Cinema 16 (2005): 242–54.Google Scholar
Parker, Brian, ‘Ran and the Tragedy of History’. University of Toronto Quarterly 55 (1986): 412–23.Google Scholar
Perret, Marion D., ‘Caveat Lector: the Screenplay of Ran’. Shakespeare on Film Newsletter 13.1 (Dec. 1988): 1, 6.Google Scholar
Phillips, Stephen J., ‘Akira Kurosawa’s Ran’, in ‘Lear’ from Study to Stage: Essays in Criticism, ed. Ogden, James and Scouten, Arthur H.. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1997, 267–77.Google Scholar
Powers, John, ‘Kurosawa: an Audience with the Emperor’, in Akira Kurosawa: Interviews, ed. Cardullo, Bert. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 2008, 131–8.Google Scholar
Prince, Stephen, ‘Years of Transition’, in his The Warrior’s Camera: the Cinema of Akira Kurosawa. Revised and expanded edn. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999, 250–91.Google Scholar
Richie, Donald, ‘Ran’, in his The Films of Akira Kurosawa. 3rd expanded edn. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1996, 214–19.Google Scholar
Ryan, Bartholomew, ‘Deception, Nature and Nihilism in Politics: King Lear and Kurosawa’s Ran’, in Politics Otherwise: Shakespeare as Social and Political Critique, ed. Donskis, Leonidas and Mininger, J. D.. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi, 2012, 69–84.Google Scholar
Serper, Zvika, ‘Blood Visibility/Invisibility in Kurosawa’s Ran’. Literature/Film Quarterly 28 (2000): 149–54.Google Scholar
Serper, Zvika, ‘The Bloodied Sacred Pine Tree: a Dialectical Depiction of Death in Kurosawa’s Throne of Blood and Ran’. Journal of Film and Video 52.2 (Summer 2000): 13–27.Google Scholar
Serper, Zvika, ‘Lady Kaede in Kurosawa’s Ran: Verbal and Visual Characterization through Animal Traditions’. Japan Forum 13 (2001): 145–58.Google Scholar
Sheplock, Sarah, ‘“Contending with fretful elements”: Shakespeare, Kurosawa and the Benshi. On Film Adaptation’. Anglistica 15.2 (2011): 1–14.Google Scholar
Takakuwa, Yoko, ‘(En)Gendering Desire in Performance: King Lear, Akira Kurosawa’s Ran, Tadashi Suzuki’s The Tale of Lear’, in Shakespeare and His Contemporaries in Performance, ed. Esche, Edward J.. Aldershot and Burlington: Ashgate, 2000, 35–49.Google Scholar
Thompson, Ann, ‘Kurosawa’s Ran: Reception and Interpretation’. East-West Film Journal 3.2 (June 1989): 1–13.Google Scholar
Willson, Robert F., Jr, ‘Ran and King Lear: Adaptation as Interpretation’. Deutsche Shakespeare-Gesellschaft West: Jahrbuch (1987): 114–16.Google Scholar
Wing, Susan L., ‘King Lear “Translated”: a Cross-Cultural Psychoanalytic Reading of Kurosawa’s Ran’, in Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Psychology and Literature. Lisbon: Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, 1991, 169–75.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, Hiroshi, ‘On Kurosawa’s King Lear’. Renaissance Bulletin 12 (1985): 41–5.Google Scholar
Lan, Yong Li, ‘Spectacle and Shakespeare on Film’, in Shakespeare’s World/World Shakespeares: the Selected Proceedings of the International Shakespeare Association World Congress, Brisbane, 2006, ed. Fotheringham, Richard, Jansohn, Christa and White, R. S.. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2008, 182–92.Google Scholar
Yoshimoto, Mitsuhiro, ‘Ran’, in his Kurosawa: Film Studies and Japanese Cinema. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2000, 355–8.Google Scholar
Coursen, H. R., ‘Editing the Script’, in his Watching Shakespeare on Television. Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1993, 93–104.Google Scholar
Griffin, Alice, ‘Shakespeare through the Camera’s Eye 1953–1954’. Shakespeare Quarterly 6 (1955): 63–6.Google Scholar
Howard, Tony, ‘When Peter Met Orson: the 1953 CBS King Lear’, in Shakespeare, the Movie: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV, and Video, ed. Boose, Lynda E. and Burt, Richard. London and New York: Routledge, 1997, 121–34.Google Scholar
Rippy, Marguerite H., ‘Orson Welles’, in Welles, Kurosawa, Kozintsev, Zeffirelli, by Thornton Burnett, Mark, Lehmann, Courtney, Rippy, Marguerite H. and Wray, Ramona. London and New York: Bloomsbury, 2013, 7–53.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Marvin, ‘Shakespeare on TV: an Optimistic Survey’, in Shakespeare on Television: an Anthology of Essays and Reviews, ed. Bulman, J. C. and Coursen, H. R.. Hanover and London: University Press of New England, 1988, 85–91.Google Scholar
Wadsworth, Frank W., ‘“Sound and Fury”–King Lear on Television’. Quarterly of Film, Radio, and Television 8 (1954): 254–68.Google Scholar
Miller, Jonathan, ‘Subsequent Performances II: iv’, in his Subsequent Performances. London and Boston: Faber and Faber, 1986, 119–53.Google Scholar
Cook, Hardy M., ‘Two Lears for Television: an Exploration of Televisual Strategies’. Literature/Film Quarterly 14 (1986): 179–86.Google Scholar
Coursen, H. R., ‘Edmund’s Nature’, in his Shakespearean Performance as Interpretation. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1992, 122–8.Google Scholar
Fenwick, Henry, ‘The Production’, in ‘King Lear’: the BBC TV Shakespeare, ed. Alexander, Peter et al. London: British Broadcasting Corporation, 1983, 19–34.Google Scholar
Leggatt, Alexander, ‘Jonathan Miller and Michael Hordern’, in his King Lear. 2nd edn. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 2004, 118–31.Google Scholar
Lusardi, James P. and Schlueter, June, Reading Shakespeare in Performance: ‘King Lear’. Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Schlueter, June, ‘Staging the Promised End’, in her Dramatic Closure: Reading the End. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1995, 115–23.Google Scholar
Willis, Susan, ‘Jonathan Miller: Producer and Director’, in her The BBC Shakespeare Plays: Making the Televised Canon. Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press, 1991, 107–34.Google Scholar
Worthen, William B., ‘The Player’s Eye: Shakespeare on Television’. Comparative Drama 18 (1984): 193–202.Google Scholar
Davies, Anthony, ‘Revisiting the Olivier King Lear on Television’, in Shakespeare on Screen: Television Shakespeare: Essays in Honour of Michèle Willems, ed. Hatchuel, Sarah and Vienne-Guerrin, Nathalie. Mont-Saint-Aignan: Publications des Universités de Rouen et du Havre, 2008, 79–90.Google Scholar
Gibińska, Marta, ‘Olivier’s King Lear and the Problem of Naturalistic Mimesis in Modern Media’, in Reception of the Classics in Modern Theatre: Proceedings of Kraków-Bochum Symposium in Theatre Studies, Kraków, 21–23 May 1991, ed. Gibińska, Marta. Cracow: Towarzystwo Autorów i Wydawców Prac Naukowych Universitas, 1991, 57–72.Google Scholar
Kimbrough, R. Alan, ‘Olivier’s Lear and the Limits of Video’, in Shakespeare on Television: an Anthology of Essays and Reviews, ed. Bulman, J. C. and Coursen, H. R.. Hanover and London: University Press of New England, 1988, 115–22.Google Scholar
Leggatt, Alexander, ‘Laurence Olivier’, in his King Lear. 2nd edn. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 2004, 132–43.Google Scholar
Mebane, John S., ‘Olivier’s King Lear and the “Feminine” Virtues in Shakespearean Tragedy’. Shakespeare Yearbook 3 (1992): 143–66.Google Scholar
Millard, Barbara, ‘Husbanded with Modesty: Shakespeare on TV’. Shakespeare Bulletin 4.3 (May/June 1986): 19–22.Google Scholar
Occhiogrosso, Frank, ‘“Give Me Thy Hand”: Manual Gesture in the Elliott-Olivier King Lear’. Shakespeare Bulletin 2.9 (May/June 1984): 16–19.Google Scholar
Orbison, Tucker, ‘The Stone and the Oak: Olivier’s TV Film of King Lear’. CEA Critic  47.1–2 (Fall and Winter 1984): 67–77.Google Scholar
Rothwell, Kenneth S., ‘Laurence Olivier Directs Shakespeare’, in his A History of Shakespeare on Screen: a Century of Film and Television. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, 47–68.Google Scholar
Coursen, H. R., ‘Shakespeare on Television: Four Recent Productions’, in his Shakespeare in Space: Recent Shakespeare Productions on Screen. New York: Peter Lang, 2002, 53–70.Google Scholar
Leggatt, Alexander, ‘Ian Holm and Richard Eyre’, in his King Lear. 2nd edn. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 2004, 144–68.Google Scholar
Rothwell, Kenneth S., ‘Shakespeare in Love, in Love with Shakespeare: the Adoration after the Millennium’, in his A History of Shakespeare on Screen: a Century of Film and Television. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, 248–74.Google Scholar
Coursen, H. R., ‘Three Recent Productions’, in his Contemporary Shakespeare Production. New York: Peter Lang, 2010, 160–72.Google Scholar
Rowe, Katherine, ‘Medium-Specificity and Other Critical Scripts for Screen Shakespeare’, in Alternative Shakespeares 3, ed. Henderson, Diana E.. London and New York: Routledge, 2008, 34–53.Google Scholar
Coursen, H. R., ‘King Lear’, in his Shakespeare Translated: Derivatives on Film and TV. New York: Peter Lang, 2005, 115–31.Google Scholar
Griggs, Yvonne, ‘Displacing the Patriarchal Family: Joseph Mankiewicz’s House of Strangers (1949)’, in her Shakespeare’s ‘King Lear’: the Relationship between Text and Film. London: Methuen Drama, 2009, 121–6.Google Scholar
Oya, Reiko, ‘Filming “The Weight of This Sad Time”: Yasujiro Ozu’s Rereading of King Lear in Tokyo Story (1953)’. Shakespeare Survey 66 (2013): 55–66.Google Scholar
Griggs, Yvonne, ‘King Lear as Western Elegy: Edward Dmytryk’s Broken Lance (1954)’, in her Shakespeare’s ‘King Lear’: the Relationship between Text and Film. London: Methuen Drama, 2009, 100–10.Google Scholar
Kliman, Bernice W., ‘Broken Lance Is Not Lear’. Shakespeare on Film Newsletter 2.1 (Dec. 1977): 3.Google Scholar
Pendleton, Thomas A., ‘The Return of The Broken Lance’. Shakespeare on Film Newsletter 3.1 (Dec. 1978): 3.Google Scholar
Willson, Robert F., Jr, ‘Selected Offshoots: Shakespeare at War, on Broadway, in the Mob, in Space, and on the Range’, in his Shakespeare in Hollywood, 1929–1956. Madison and Teaneck: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2000, 74–129.Google Scholar
Ardolino, Frank, ‘Metadramatic Grand Guignol in Theater of Blood’. Shakespeare on Film Newsletter 15.2 (Apr. 1991): 9.Google Scholar
Gearhart, Stephannie S., ‘“Only he would have the temerity to rewrite Shakespeare”: Douglas Hickox’s Theatre of Blood as Adaptation’. Literature/Film Quarterly 39 (2011): 116–27.Google Scholar
Holdefer, Charles, ‘Bad Shakespeare: Adapting a Tradition’, in Screening Text: Critical Perspectives on Film Adaptation, ed. Wells-Lassagne, Shannon and Hudelet, Ariane. Jefferson and London: McFarland, 2013, 197–206.Google Scholar
Hutchings, Peter, ‘Theatres of Blood: Shakespeare and the Horror Film’, in Gothic Shakespeares, ed. Drakakis, John and Townshend, Dale. London and New York: Routledge, 2008, 153–66.Google Scholar
Loiselle, André, ‘Cinéma du Grand Guignol: Theatricality in the Horror Film’, in Stages of Reality: Theatricality in Cinema, ed. Loiselle, André and Maron, Jeremy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2012, 55–80.Google Scholar
Lowe, Victoria, ‘“Stages of Performance”: Adaptation and Intermediality in Theatre of Blood (1973)’. Adaptation 3 (2010): 99–111.Google Scholar
Pendleton, Thomas A., ‘What [?] Price [?] Shakespeare [?]’ Literature/Film Quarterly 29 (2001): 135–46.Google Scholar
Tibbetts, John C., ‘Backstage with the Bard: Or, Building a Better Mousetrap’, in The Encyclopedia of Stage Plays into Film, ed. Tibbetts, John C. and Welsh, James M.. New York: Facts on File, 2001, 541–70.Google Scholar
Schoenbaum, S., ‘Looking for Shakespeare’, in Shakespeare’s Craft: Eight Lectures, ed. Highfill, Philip H.. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press for George Washington University, 1982, 156–77.Google Scholar
Wasson, Sam, ‘Harry and Tonto’, in his Paul on Mazursky. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press, 2011, 77–88.Google Scholar
Wasson, Sam, ‘Josh on Mazursky’, in his Paul on Mazursky. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press, 2011, 89–92.Google Scholar
Burt, Richard, ‘All That Remains of Shakespeare in Indian Film’, in Shakespeare in Asia: Contemporary Performance, ed. Kennedy, Dennis and Lan, Yong Li. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010, 73–108.Google Scholar
Cassity, Kathleen J., ‘Emerging from Shadows: the “Unhomed” Anglo-Indian of 36 Chowringhee Lane’. International Journal of Anglo-Indian Studies 6 (2001): home.alphalink.com.au/~agilbert/chowri~1.html (accessed 17 May 2019).Google Scholar
García-Periago, Rosa M., ‘English Shakespeares in Indian Cinema: 36 Chowringhee Lane and The Last Lear’. Borrowers and Lenders: the Journal of Shakespeare and Appropriation 9.2 (Fall/Winter 2015): www.borrowers.uga.edu/1634/show (accessed 17 May 2019).Google Scholar
Greenberg, Harvey R., ‘The Dresser: Played to Death’. Psychoanalytic Review 72 (1985): 347–52.Google Scholar
Meyer-Dinkgräfe, Daniel, ‘From Theatre to Film: Ronald Harwood’s The Dresser’. Shakespeare Bulletin 8.3 (Summer 1990): 37–8.Google Scholar
Bennett, Susan, ‘Production and Proliferation: Seventeen Lears’, in her Performing Nostalgia: Shifting Shakespeare and the Contemporary Past. London and New York: Routledge, 1996, 39–78.Google Scholar
Kershaw, Baz, ‘King Real’s King Lear: Radical Shakespeare for the Nuclear Age’. Critical Survey 3 (1991): 249–59.Google Scholar
Bennett, Susan, ‘Godard and Lear: Trashing the Can(n)on’. Theatre Survey 39 (1998): 7–19.Google Scholar
Diniz, Thaís Nogueira, Flores, ‘Godard: a Contemporary King Lear’, in Foreign Accents: Brazilian Readings of Shakespeare, ed. Cunha Resende, Aimara da. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2002, 198–206.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Peter S., ‘Disseminating Shakespeare: Paternity and Text in Jean-Luc Godard’s King Lear’, in his Shakespearean Films/Shakespearean Directors. Boston and London: Unwin Hyman, 1990, 189–225.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Peter S., ‘Shakespeare and Media Allegory’, in Shakespeare and Genre: from Early Modern Inheritances to Postmodern Legacies, ed. Guneratne, Anthony R.. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011, 223–37.Google Scholar
Griggs, Yvonne, ‘“Meantime we shall express our darker purpose”: Jean-Luc Godard’s King Lear (1987)’, in her Shakespeare’s ‘King Lear’: the Relationship between Text and Film. London: Methuen Drama, 2009, 156–70.Google Scholar
Guneratne, Anthony R., ‘Six Authors in Search of a Text: the Shakespeares of Van Sant, Branagh, Godard, Pasolini, Greenaway, and Luhrmann’, in his Shakespeare, Film Studies, and the Visual Cultures of Modernity. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008, 211–49.Google Scholar
Guneratne, Anthony R., ‘Four Funerals and a Bedding: Freud and the Post-Apocalyptic Apocalypse of Jean-Luc Godard’s King Lear’, in Apocalyptic Shakespeare: Essays on Visions of Chaos and Revelation in Recent Film Adaptations, ed. Croteau, Melissa and Jess-Cooke, Carolyn. Jefferson and London: McFarland, 2009, 197–215.Google Scholar
Guneratne, Anthony, ‘A Certain Tendency in Post-New Wave French Shakespearean Cinema: from Early Truffaut to Late Godard via Orson Welles’, in Shakespeare on Screen in Francophonia, special issue, ed. Croteau, Melissa, gen. ed. Dorval, Patricia and Vienne-Guerrin, Nathalie. Université Montpellier III, Institut de Recherche sur la Renaissance, l’Âge Classique et les Lumières (IRCL), 2016. shakscreen.org/post-new_wave_french_cinema/ (accessed 17 May 2019).Google Scholar
Habinek, Lianne, ‘Getting to Page Four of King Lear with Jean-Luc Godard’. Shakespeare (British Shakespeare Association) 9 (2013): 76–90.Google Scholar
Harrison, Keith, ‘Bakhtinian Polyphony in Godard’s King Lear’, in his Shakespeare, Bakhtin, and Film: a Dialogic Lens. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017, 141–62.Google Scholar
Impastato, David, ‘Godard’s Lear … Why Is It so Bad?’ Shakespeare Bulletin 12.3 (Summer 1994): 38–41.Google Scholar
Maerz, Jessica M., ‘Godard’s King Lear: Referents Provided upon Request’. Literature/Film Quarterly 32 (2004): 108–14.Google Scholar
Morrey, Douglas, ‘Smiling with Regret: 1984–90’, in his Jean-Luc Godard. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 2005, 165–95.Google Scholar
Murray, Timothy, ‘The Crisis of Cinema in the Age of New World Memory: the Baroque Legacy of Jean-Luc Godard’, in his Digital Baroque: New Media Art and Cinematic Folds. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press, 2008, 85–110.Google Scholar
Petříková, Linda, ‘Against Adaptation: Jean-Luc Godard’s King Lear’. Litteraria Pragensia 20.39 (July 2010): 41–54.Google Scholar
Robinson, Marc, ‘Resurrected Images: Godard’s King Lear’. Performing Arts Journal 11.1 (31) (Jan. 1988): 20–5.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, Jonathan, ‘The Importance of Being Perverse: Godard’s King Lear’, in his Placing Movies: the Practice of Film Criticism. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995, 184–9.Google Scholar
Walworth, Alan, ‘Cinema Hysterica Passio: Voice and Gaze in Jean-Luc Godard’s King Lear’, in The Reel Shakespeare: Alternative Cinema and Theory, ed. Starks, Lisa S. and Lehmann, Courtney. Madison and Teaneck: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2002, 59–94.Google Scholar
Griggs, Yvonne, ‘Mafia Father Figures: Francis Ford Coppola’s The Godfather Trilogy (1972, 1974, 1990)’, in her Shakespeare’s ‘King Lear’: the Relationship between Text and Film. London: Methuen Drama, 2009, 126–33.Google Scholar
Burnett, Mark Thornton, ‘Capital, Commodities, Cinema: Shakespeare and the Eastern European “Gypsy” Aesthetic’. Shakespeare Jahrbuch 150 (2014): 146–60.Google Scholar
Ezell, Pamela, ‘A Thousand Acres: King Lear for the Heartland’. Creative Screenwriting 5.2 (1998): 16–19.Google Scholar
Griggs, Yvonne, ‘King Lear as Melodrama: Jocelyn Moorhouse’s A Thousand Acres (1997)’, in her Shakespeare’s ‘King Lear’: the Relationship between Text and Film. London: Methuen Drama, 2009, 143–54.Google Scholar
Keller, James R., ‘Dreaming of the Pure Vegetable Kingdom: Ecofeminism and Agriculture in A Thousand Acres and Antonia’s Line’, in his Food, Film and Culture: a Genre Study. Jefferson and London: McFarland, 2006, 94–108.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Courtney, ‘A Thousand Shakespeares: from Cinematic Saga to Feminist Geography or, The Escape from Iceland’, in A Companion to Shakespeare and Performance, ed. Hodgdon, Barbara and Worthen, W. B.. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell, 2005, 588–609.Google Scholar
Marquardt, Anne-Kathrin, ‘Unlearning Tradition: William Shakespeare’s King Lear, Jane Smiley’s and Jocelyn Moorhouse’s A Thousand Acres’, in Rewriting Shakespeare’s Plays for and by the Contemporary Stage, ed. Dobson, Michael and Rivier-Arnaud, Estelle. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2017, 11–29.Google Scholar
Bottinelli, Jennifer J., ‘Watching Lear: Resituating the Gaze at the Intersection of Film and Drama in Kristian Levring’s The King Is Alive’. Literature/Film Quarterly 33 (2005): 101–9.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Judith, ‘Leaves of Brass and Gads of Steel: Cinema as Subject in Shakespeare Films, 1991–2000’, in her Shakespeare on Film. Harlow: Pearson Longman, 2005, 220–60.Google Scholar
Burnett, Mark Thornton, ‘Spirituality/Meaning/Shakespeare’, in his Filming Shakespeare in the Global Marketplace. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007, 107–28.Google Scholar
Burt, Richard, ‘Alluding to Shakespeare in L’Appartement, The King Is Alive, Wicker Park, a Time to Love, and University of Laughs: Digital Film, Asianization, and the Transnational Film Remake’. Shakespeare Yearbook 17 (2010): 45–78.Google Scholar
Calbi, Maurizio, ‘Shakespearean Retreats: Spectrality, Survival, and Autoimmunity in Kristian Levring’s The King Is Alive’, in his Spectral Shakespeares: Media Adaptations in the Twenty-First Century. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013, 39–61.Google Scholar
Cartelli, Thomas and Rowe, Katherine, ‘Surviving Shakespeare: Kristian Levring’s The King Is Alive’, in their New Wave Shakespeare on Screen. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press, 2007, 142–64.Google Scholar
Chumo, II, Peter, N., ‘The King Is Alive: Screenplay by Kristian Levring’. Creative Screenwriting 8.4 (July/Aug. 2001): 20–2.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Ailsa Grant, ‘The Dance of Death: Dogme#4: The King Is Alive and King Lear’, in her Shakespeare, Cinema, Counter-Culture: Appropriation and Inversion. New York and London: Routledge, 2016, 58–86.Google Scholar
Griggs, Yvonne, ‘“Radical art phalanx” versus “a clever flag of PR convenience”: Kristian Levring’s The King Is Alive (2000)’, in her Shakespeare’s ‘King Lear’: the Relationship between Text and Film. London: Methuen Drama, 2009, 171–85.Google Scholar
Harrison, Keith, ‘Shakespeare Shaping in Dogme95 Films, and Bakhtin’s Theory of Tragedy’, in his Shakespeare, Bakhtin, and Film: a Dialogic Lens. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017, 163–86.Google Scholar
Holland, Peter, ‘On the Gravy Train: Shakespeare, Memory and Forgetting’, in Shakespeare, Memory and Performance, ed. Peter, Holland. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006, 207–34.Google Scholar
Jess, Carolyn, ‘“The Barbarous Cronos”: (Post)Colonialism, Sequelization, and Regenerative Authority in Kristian Levring’s The King Is Alive (2000)’. Shakespeare in Southern Africa 15 (2003): 11–20.Google Scholar
Jess, Carolyn, ‘New-ness, Sequelization, and Dogme Logic in Kristian Levring’s The King Is Alive’. New Cinemas: Journal of Contemporary Film 3 (2005): 3–16.Google Scholar
Jess-Cooke, Carolyn, ‘“The Promised End” of Cinema: Portraits of Apocalypse in Post-Millennial Shakespearean Film’, in Apocalyptic Shakespeare: Essays on Visions of Chaos and Revelation in Recent Film Adaptations, ed. Croteau, Melissa and Jess-Cooke, Carolyn. Jefferson and London: McFarland, 2009, 216–27.Google Scholar
Kelly, Richard, ‘“Is this the promised end?”: Kristian Levring & The King Is Alive’, in his The Name of This Book Is Dogme95. London and New York: Faber and Faber, 2000, 209–17.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Courtney, ‘The Passion of the W: Localizing Shakespeare, Globalizing Manifest Density from King Lear to Kingdom Come’. Upstart Crow 25 (2005): 16–32.Google Scholar
Livingston, Paisley, ‘Artistic Self-Reflexivity in The King Is Alive and Strass’, in Purity and Provocation: Dogma 95, ed. Hjort, Mette and MacKenzie, Scott. London: British Film Institute, 2003, 102–10.Google Scholar
Nochimson, Martha P., ‘The King Is Alive’. Film Quarterly 55.2 (Winter 2001): 48–54.Google Scholar
Roman, Shari, ‘Dogme 95 and the New Guard: Original Dogme: Kristian Levring’, in her Digital Babylon: Hollywood, Indiewood & Dogme 95. Hollywood: ifilm Publishing, 2001, 71–8.Google Scholar
Scott-Douglass, Amy, ‘Dogme Shakespeare 95: European Cinema, Anti-Hollywood Sentiment, and the Bard’, in Shakespeare, the Movie, II: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV, Video, and DVD, ed. Burt, Richard and Boose, Lynda E.. London and New York: Routledge, 2003, 252–64.Google Scholar
Griggs, Yvonne, ‘Gangster Lear as Morality Tale: Don Boyd’s My Kingdom (2001)’, in her Shakespeare’s ‘King Lear’: the Relationship between Text and Film. London: Methuen Drama, 2009, 133–43.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Courtney, ‘The Postnostalgic Renaissance: the “Place” of Liverpool in Don Boyd’s My Kingdom’, in Screening Shakespeare in the Twenty-First Century, ed. Burnett, Mark Thornton and Wray, Ramona. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006, 72–89.Google Scholar
Aldama, Frederick Luis, ‘Race, Cognition, and Emotion: Shakespeare on Film’. College Literature 33.1 (Winter 2006): 197–213.Google Scholar
Coursen, H. R., ‘Shakespeare on Television’, in Sh@kespeare in the Media: from the Globe Theatre to the World Wide Web, ed. Brusberg-Kiermeier, Stefani and Helbig, Jörg. 2nd, revised edn. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 2010, 169–78.Google Scholar
Osborne, Laurie E., ‘A Local Habitation and a Name: Television and Shakespeare’. Shakespeare Survey 61 (2008): 213–26.Google Scholar
Dengel-Janic, Ellen and Roering, Johanna, ‘Re-Imaging Shakespeare in Second Generation – A British-Asian Perspective on Shakespeare’s King Lear’, in Drama and Cultural Change: Turning around Shakespeare, ed. Bauer, Matthias and Zirker, Angelika. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier, 2009, 211–19.Google Scholar
Marino, Alessandra, ‘Multicultural Shakespeare: Italian and British TV Series of the 9–11 pm Slot. “Brand” Shakespeare and TV Adaptations’. Anglistica 15.2 (2011): 15–26.Google Scholar
Marino, Alessandra, ‘Cut’n’mix King Lear: Second Generation and Asian-British Identities’, in Shakespeare and Conflict: a European Perspective, ed. Dente, Carla and Soncini, Sara. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013, 170–83.Google Scholar
Fedderson, Kim and Michael Richardson, J., ‘Slings & Arrows: an Intermediated Shakespearean Adaptation’, in OuterSpeares: Shakespeare, Intermedia, and the Limits of Adaptation, ed. Fischlin, Daniel. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2014, 205–29.Google Scholar
Osborne, Laurie E., ‘Serial Shakespeare: Intermedial Performance and the Outrageous Fortunes of Slings & Arrows’. Borrowers and Lenders: the Journal of Shakespeare and Appropriation 6.2 (Fall/Winter 2011): www.borrowers.uga.edu/783090/show (accessed 17 May 2019).Google Scholar
Pittman, L. Monique, ‘Tracing Hamlet in Slings and Arrows: Fathers Haunt the Theater’, in her Authorizing Shakespeare on Film and Television: Gender, Class, and Ethnicity in Adaptation. New York: Peter Lang, 2011, 177–206.Google Scholar
Royster, Francesca T., ‘Comic Terror and Masculine Vulnerability in Slings and Arrows: Season Three’. Journal of Narrative Theory 41 (2011): 343–61.Google Scholar
Chakravarti, Paromita, ‘Reading Intertextualities in Rituporno [sic] Ghosh’s The Last Lear: the Politics of Recanonization’. Shakespearean International Yearbook 12 (2012): 115–29.Google Scholar
Chakravarti, Paromita, ‘Interrogating “Bollywood Shakespeare”: Reading Rituparno Ghosh’s The Last Lear’, in Bollywood Shakespeares, ed. Dionne, Craig and Kapadia, Parmita. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014, 127–45.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Ankhi, ‘hamarashakespeare.com: Shakespeare in India’, in her What Is a Classic?: Postcolonial Rewriting and Invention of the Canon. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2014, 182–213.Google Scholar
Földváry, Kinga, ‘Postcolonial Hybridity: the Making of a Bollywood Lear in London’. Shakespeare (British Shakespeare Association) 9 (2013): 304–12.Google Scholar
Rayner, Jonathan, ‘Meditative Tangents: Fred Schepisi’s The Eye of the Storm (2011)’. Australian Studies 4 (2012): https://www.austlit.edu.au/austlit/page/6130749 (accessed 17 May 2019).Google Scholar
Walker, Elsie, ‘Adaptation as Re-reading, Line by Line’. Literature/Film Quarterly 41 (2013): 86–91.Google Scholar
Ibraheem, Noha Mohamad, Mohamad, ‘Ἁbd al-Raḥīm Kamāl’s Dahsha: an Upper Egyptian Lear’. Critical Survey 28.3 (Winter 2016): 67–85.Google Scholar
Winckler, Reto, ‘This Great Stage of Androids: Westworld, Shakespeare and the World as Stage’. Journal of Adaptation in Film & Performance 10 (2017): 169–88.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×