Following the appearance of my note on this subject in the July 1967 JOURNAL, Professor Hemp kindly pointed out a mistake in one of the basic assumptions. This has led to a recalculation of the results, and the correct results are given below.
a width of beam
b lower bound on height of beam
d upper bound on height of beam
E Modulus of elasticity
h (x) height of beam at position x
H the Pontryagin Hamiltonian
i second moment of area=ah3/12
i length of beam
M (x) bending moment = ![](//static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20230327091752032-0021:S0001924000084402:S0001924000084402_inline01.gif?pub-status=live)
rl, r2non-dimensional length parameters
p density al lengthparam
t non-dimensional length parameter=x/l
u non-dimensional length parameter=h/l
x horizontal distance from base of beam
y (x) vertical displacement of the centre-line of beam
Y error function in hill climbing sequence
Vectors
f phase space velocity vector =dX/dt
P adjoint vector
X non-dimensional state vector